Strategic legislative revisions aid renewed Indiana drive for tolling
Indiana Gov. Mike Braun's administration is getting serious about tolling to make up for falling fuel tax revenue and upgrade aging highways — eight years after former Gov. Eric Holcomb's administration backed away from the prospect.
The Indiana Department of Transportation (INDOT) 'is working closely with the governor's office, looking at different options: routes, the tolling process, the application, all of it as a whole, to see what makes the most sense (and) where need is greatest,' the agency said.
The governor's office confirmed its interest.
'No decisions have been made,' Chief of Staff Josh Kelley cautioned.
'But tolling has to be considered to maintain our current and future infrastructure and we are exploring all potential options,' he added.
Strategic changes housed in recently approved legislation could give those efforts a boost.
But the loosened restrictions have sparked opposition from cash-strapped Hoosiers — and those already paying tolls along borders with Illinois and Kentucky.
And it's not as easy as simply adding tolls to existing interstates.
U.S. law generally bans user fees on federal-aid highways, including those that make up the Interstate Highway System.
There are exceptions, of course.
One program allows tolling on new highways, bridges and tunnels, plus on new lanes, as long as the number of toll-free lanes doesn't decrease. Reconstructed or replaced bridges and tunnels also qualify.
Another program lets states toll high occupancy vehicle lanes. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) also offers two limited-slot pilot programs.
Tolling-curious Indiana has been down this road before.
Fuel taxes produce more than 82% of Indiana's transportation infrastructure dollars. But Indiana is just 140 miles wide on average, so those who drive through without filling up don't pay in.
And uptake of fuel-efficient and electric vehicles is expected to cost the state millions, jeopardizing maintenance and expansion plans for vast stretches of crumbling asphalt and concrete.
Lawmakers in 2017 recognized that long-term challenge, advancing legislation that gave Holcomb the power to add tolls. The law also mandated detailed examinations of the concept.
One feasibility study, produced that year for INDOT, estimated that a statewide interstate highway tolling program would have an 85% chance of generating upwards of $39 billion between 2021 and 2050.
It further reported a 50% chance that revenue could exceed $53 billion over that timeframe. The estimates didn't include the likely significant costs to install and maintain tolling gantries, process payments, provide customer service, enforce collections and more.
Also that year, INDOT produced a strategic plan exploring how it could implement that tolling program.
One of the law's related requirements — that Holcomb's INDOT seek federal approval for the tolling initiative — wasn't fulfilled, the agency confirmed to the Capital Chronicle.
A 10-cent fuel tax hike, accompanied by six years worth of inflation-indexed increases capped to a penny each, did go into effect. In 2023, his last year in office, Holcomb authorized a three-year extension.
It's just a stop-gap.
'The public has made it very clear nobody wants to pay more for anything right now,' Build Indiana Council Executive Director Brian Gould said. But, he added, 'If we continue to look at the model that we operate under right now, we likely would have been talking about a 30-cent gas tax increase this year.'
'So, in order to keep that off the table and keep the plan solvent, you've got to look at other funding mechanisms that are out there,' continued Gould, whose industry group seeks sustained funding for Indiana roads and bridges.
That's why Braun is getting more serious about tolling.
'It's going to have to be considered because, otherwise, I don't think we can maintain our main arteries. Asking for the ability to do it doesn't mean you're going to do it comprehensively,' he said at a Munster luncheon this month, WTHR reported. 'You do it selectively, where the need is the greatest.'
Tucked among House Enrolled Act 1461's myriad local funding tweaks are detailed revisions to Indiana tolling laws.
Lawmakers, for example, nullified a ban on new tolls within 75 miles of interstate highways and bridges that already had tolls in 2017. INDOT said the change 'provides some more flexibility in terms of locations.'
But Hoosiers already living near tolled facilities object.
Driving the 70-year-old northern Indiana Toll Road's 157-mile span costs the typical passenger vehicle more than $15 and can approach $100 for the heaviest-duty, six-axle vehicles. Crossing any of three RiverLink bridges to the south — tolled since 2016 — costs between $2.61 and $15.61 a pop, depending on payment and vehicle type.
The prohibition previously shielded Rep. Wendy Dant Chesser's Kentucky border community from new additions as far up as Columbus, Indiana.
Now, the Jeffersonville Democrat said, 'We could be tolled at mile marker one.' She warned that more tolls in the area would prompt 'a lot of noise.'
In some instances, what was stripped out of law is 'about as important' as what was added, Gould said.
Careful deletions in House Enrolled Act 1461 also allow the Indiana Finance Authority to take on debt to pay for transportation infrastructure projects, effective July 1.
That is 'something that's not been an option for INDOT for almost two decades,' Gould said. The changes, he added, will let the state leverage its AAA credit rating to finance projects upfront, then use tolling revenue to pay the debt — 'easing the burden on Hoosiers.'
'We were almost working in reverse order, because so much of what the state was trying to get to was actually in existing law (as) a prohibition,' he said.
Other tweaks removed requirements that lawmakers specifically authorize certain tolling-related activities.
INDOT said it hadn't yet narrowed down which exceptions or facilities it was considering.
The agency is 'still … casting a wide net, looking at all options, as we move forward,' it said.
Implementing tolling would be a 'multi-year process,' per INDOT.
Gould said that in between now and then, 'Hoosiers can expect to see major reconstruction of those interstates and expanded capacity. So I think people should likely be pretty pleased with what they see, not happy about paying for it.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Miami Herald
18 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Veteran analyst drops 6-word verdict on Apple's $100 billion investment
An eye-popping $100 billion U.S. investment sounds like good press, but Wedbush's Dan Ives says there's a lot more than meets the eye. Apple (AAPL) CEO Tim Cook stood beside President Donald Trump in announcing a massive $100 billion boost in U.S. spending as part of the "America First" strategy. Is this just Apple looking to play politics, or was the move more calculated? Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Ives' note effectively answers those questions, as he looks to delve deeper into the timing, the politics, and what it signals about Cook's strategy. Image source: McNamee/Getty Images Apple shook things up with a whopping $100 billion investment in expanding its U.S. manufacturing footprint. Announced on Aug. 6 during a White House event with President Trump, the huge bet takes Apple's total U.S. investment to $600 billion over the next four years. Also, it builds on an earlier $500 billion promise made this year, which involves hiring 20,000 American workers. Related: Nvidia tops list of veteran analyst's best stocks for rest of 2025 The move's timing seems very intentional. Tariffs are once again on the table, and Apple is making sure it's not in the crosshairs. Through partnerships with Corning (for Kentucky-made iPhone glass) and MP Materials (for rare-earth magnets), CEO Cook is doubling down on key components that could prove economically viable to produce domestically. The positive press doesn't hurt, either. Some might deem the move as more about optics, considering how Biden-era chip controls and President Trump's tariff threats have boxed Apple into a corner. Still, don't expect full iPhone assembly to be coming home anytime soon. Analysts feel that replicating Foxconn-style production in the U.S. would lead to a sharp increase in prices and weigh down margins, while eroding Apple's tight grip on operational efficiency. Instead, the focus stays on high-impact investments in states like Arizona, Texas, and North Carolina, areas that effectively deliver political wins and component-level gains. Apple's latest move to shell out $100 billion into U.S. operations is earning cautious praise from Wall Street's finest. Wedbush analyst Dan Ives hails the announcement as a "good step in the right direction," signaling that Apple is finally aligning itself more closely with the shifting political climate. The bet brings Apple's total U.S. investment to $600 billion over the next four years, sending Apple shares higher in the process. Related: ChatGPT maker quietly shakes the AI landscape and Elon Musk's xAI "This isn't just about manufacturing," Ives said. "It's a strategic chess move that helps Apple get on Trump's good side and avoid becoming the next trade-war headline." It seems like a clear nod to the Trump administration's America First policy as the pressure continues to mount on Big Tech to reinvest at home. However, not everyone is convinced it's a game-changer; some analysts believe the pledge is more about optics than overhaul. A big part of that is the logistical hurdles, which effectively make iPhone development in the U.S. mostly impractical. More News: Veteran analyst spots unexpected star in Apple's earnings reportBank of America drops shocking price target on hot weight-loss stock post-earningsJPMorgan drops 3-word verdict on Amazon stock post-earnings Still, Cook has bought Apple considerable breathing room as he looks to tweak the tech giant's complex supply chain. Whether it's enough to shift the tide or consumer perception remains to be seen. Apple leverages federal funding to power domestic and sustainable growth Apple's $100 billion pledge isn't just a political hedge - it's a savvy financial move. It appears to be a broader play into tapping federal incentives from the CHIPS and Science Act and the Inflation Reduction Act. That effectively positions Apple to qualify for U.S. investments in the billions for subsidies, grants, and tax breaks. Under CHIPS, a massive $39 billion is earmarked for onshore chip manufacturing, along with a 25% tax credit for qualifying chip equipment. The Inflation Reduction Act adds another layer to that, which also offers roughly 30% in credits for clean-energy manufacturing, along with bonuses for domestically sourced materials, including green steel and iron. So Apple's partnerships with Corning in Kentucky and MP Materials in Texas are no accident. These supply-chain tweaks, in line with federally funded chip-packaging and testing hubs in Phoenix and New York, could potentially lead to overlapping incentives. As Washington leans into clean tech, Apple's early alignment with these priorities could give it a major edge. Related: Jim Cramer drops jaw-dropping price target on Palantir stock post-earnings The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.


CNN
27 minutes ago
- CNN
Indiana's Republican leaders won't commit to redistricting after Vance visit
Indianapolis — Vice President JD Vance met Thursday with Gov. Mike Braun and state legislative leaders as the White House ramps up pressure on Republican-led states to redraw their congressional maps. But Indiana's GOP leaders didn't commit to giving President Donald Trump's administration what it wants: a mid-decade effort to turn the two Democratic-held House seats in the Hoosier State into right-leaning districts. Braun was noncommittal, telling reporters that 'we listened' and describing the conversation as 'pretty good.' Indiana House Speaker Todd Huston said in a statement they'd had a 'meaningful discussion' and will 'continue conversations.' Senate President Pro Tem Rodric Bray said he 'appreciated the opportunity to hear from the vice president on a variety of issues, which we will continue to talk through in the days ahead.' The Indiana Republican leaders are likely to face immense pressure from the White House and Trump allies. Still, many Republican operatives in Indiana said they are skeptical that a redistricting effort will take place. And former Gov. Mitch Daniels, who remains a hugely influential figure in Indiana Republican politics, told CNN he opposes a mid-decade redrawing of Indiana's maps. 'It's certainly not going to reduce the level of public cynicism or increase the level of confidence,' Daniels said. 'It may be appropriate in some places, but I don't understand that Indiana is one. I think we have pretty fairly drawn lines now, and I don't see any good reason that they should be tampered with out of cycle.' Vance ignored CNN's questions entering the Capitol Thursday about why Indiana should redraw its congressional districts and what he would tell Braun. Vance was brought in through tunnels to keep him away from public eyes as protesters rallied outside the governor's office. He left after about an hour and later attended a Republican National Committee fundraiser at the InterContinental Indianapolis hotel. Trump's push to find more Republican seats ahead of next year's midterms has launched a nationwide redistricting arms race. Republicans hold a slim majority in the US House, with Democrats currently needing to net just 3 seats next year to win back control. The meeting in Indianapolis comes as Texas Republicans seek to redraw the state's maps to add five GOP-leaning House seats — an effort Democrats are impeding by fleeing the state to deny the Texas House the two-thirds quorum necessary to do business. Republicans are also eyeing Ohio, where a quirk in state law requires the maps to be redrawn, and Missouri, for more potential seats. And Democratic governors in California, Illinois, New York and other states are vowing to retaliate with their own redistricting push. What could Republicans gain in Indiana? One, maybe two, House seats. The GOP already holds seven of Indiana's nine House seats, so they'd be targeting the seats of Democratic Reps. Frank Mrvan and, potentially, André Carson. Mrvan's 1st District includes what's known as 'the Region' — Indiana's cities and suburbs that stretch southeast of Chicago. Carson represents the 7th District, urban territory that includes most of Indianapolis. Those two seats have long been in Democratic hands. Carson, who won a special election to replace his late grandmother in 2008, has never faced a serious challenge. Mrvan, the son of a state senator who first won his House seat in 2020, coasted to a nearly 10-point victory last November despite some GOP efforts to target his seat. Political operatives in Indiana say Mrvan's district could be made more favorable to Republicans with nips and tucks from neighboring rural, deep-red districts. Carson's much more compact and heavily Democratic district, though, would likely have to be sliced into several different pieces, dispersed into multiple districts. Who are the key players? Indiana's filing deadline is in February, and the part-time legislature is out of session until January, so redrawing the congressional maps would likely require Braun to call a special session. From there, it'd be up to Huston, the House speaker, and Bray, the Senate president pro tem. Both first won their offices in 2012 — Bray succeeded his father Richard, a long-time state senator. They've both remained quiet amid questions about Indiana joining the redistricting arms race.. Both first won their offices in 2012 — Bray succeeded his father Richard, a long-time state senator. They've both remained quiet amid questions about Indiana joining the redistricting arms race. One consideration could be the costs of a potential special session in lawmaker per diems and travel expenses, as Indiana faces a budget crunch. How are Democrats responding? Democrats rallied steps away from the governor's office as Vance, Braun and legislative leaders met Thursday. However, they have no real power to stop a Republican redistricting push. The GOP has supermajorities in Indiana's House and Senate, which means Democrats couldn't slow things down by following the lead of Texas House Democrats and fleeing the state to deny the quorum necessary to do business. Carson, in a news conference after that rally, urged Braun to 'show the independent spirit — Indiana has always had an independent, libertarian streak' and 'demonstrate sovereignty.' Mrvan told the crowd outside the governor's office that he thought redistricting was a 'done deal.' 'Historically, people have bent the knee to the Vance-Trump administration,' he told reporters afterward. Still, both Mrvan and Carson said they will run for reelection regardless. Mrvan said he expects new districts would face legal challenges. 'Everywhere I go, people say, 'Find middle ground, we're tired of the fighting,'' Mrvan said. 'And what they're about to do is they're going to elevate that to the whole state of Indiana because they're afraid of a checks-and-balances system.' State Rep. Matt Pierce, the Indiana House Democratic leader, urged Braun to resist pressure from Trump. 'I think they know that it's unusual to call special session for this purpose, but you know they've not been able to say no to Donald Trump yet, and so that's my concern,' Pierce said. 'The governor can single-handedly stop this by simply refusing to call the special session,' he said, 'and if he does, the leaders of the legislature need to say, 'No, we're not going to subvert democracy just to satisfy President Trump.'' This story has been updated with additional details. CNN's Ethan Cohen and David Wright contributed to this report.


New York Post
40 minutes ago
- New York Post
JD Vance's security detail requested the Ohio River's water level be raised for the VP's birthday kayaking trip
Vice President JD Vance's security detail had an Ohio river's water level raised last week to accommodate a kayaking trip he and his family took to celebrate his 41st birthday. The U.S. Secret Service said it requested the increased waterflow for the Little Miami River, first reported by The Guardian, to ensure motorized watercraft and emergency personnel 'could operate safely' while protecting the Republican vice president, whose home is in Cincinnati. But critics immediately blasted the action as a sign of the vice president's entitlement, particularly given the administration Trump administration's focus on slashing government spending. The U.S. Secret Service raised an Ohio river's water level last week to accommodate Vice President JD Vance's upcoming kayaking trip, where he will be celebrating his 41st birthday with his family. Getty Images Richard W. Painter, who served as chief White House ethics lawyer under President George W. Bush, said on X that 'it's outrageous for the Army corps of engineers to spend taxpayer money to increase water flow in a river so @VP can go canoeing when budget cuts to the National Park Service have severely impacted family vacations for everyone else.' The Corps of Engineers' Louisville District temporarily increased outflows from the Caesar Creek Lake in southwest Ohio into the Little Miami 'to support safe navigation of U.S. Secret Service personnel,' said spokesperson Gene Pawlik. He said the move met operational criteria and fell within normal practice. 'It was determined that the operations would not adversely affect downstream or upstream water levels,' the corps said in a statement. 'Downstream stakeholders were notified in advance of the slight outflow increase, which occurred August 1, 2025.' Vance's birthday was on Aug. 2. The sprawling 2,830-acre Caesar Creek Lake has an unlimited horsepower designation and five launch ramps, according to the Ohio Department of Natural Resources website. A marina, campground and lodge are also located on site. The department provided two natural resources officers to assist the Secret Service with the Vance event, spokesperson Karina Cheung said. The Vance family has already become accustomed to certain accommodations being made as they move about the world. During a recent trip to Italy, the Roman Colosseum was closed to the public so that his wife, Usha, and their children could take a tour, sparking anger among some tourists. Vance turned 41 on Aug. 2 and has already received criticism for the planned trip. Getty Images The Taj Mahal also was closed to visitors during the Vance family's visit to India. Such special treatment isn't reserved for one political party. When Democratic Vice President Al Gore, then a presidential candidate, paddled down the Connecticut River for a photo opportunity in 1999, utility officials had opened a dam and released 4 billion gallons of water to raise the river's level. That request, too, came after a review of the area by the Secret Service — and Gore also experienced political pushback. Gore's campaign said at the time that he did not ask for the water to be released. A spokesman for Vance's office declined immediate comment.