&w=3840&q=100)
O-1 and 'Einstein visas': How Indians are trying to get the fastest entry into US
Since the Donald Trump administration is making it harder to get H1-B and other types of visas, Indians are now trying to gain entry to the US via the O-1 visas and 'Einstein visas'. What do we know about these visas? read more
Since the Donald Trump administration is making it harder to get H1-B visas and other type of visas, Indians are now trying to admitted to the US via the O-1 visas and 'Einstein visas'. Reuters
The United States may be cracking down on immigration, but Indians aren't ready to give up just yet.
Since the Trump administration is making it harder to get H1-B visas and other type of visas, Indians are now trying to admitted to the US via two new routes – the O-1 visas and 'Einstein visas'.
But what do we know about these visas?
Let's take a closer look:
O-1 visa
Like the H1-B visa, the O-1 is a non-immigrant visa.
However, this visa is earmarked for those who display 'extraordinary abilities' in science, technology engineering, mathematics, arts, education, business or athletics.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
This visa was founded under the Immigration Act of 1990.
Unlike the H1-B visa, there is no cap to the O-1 visa.
The O-1 visa, which is initially granted for a three-year period, also has a 93 per cent approval rate.
It also can be extended indefinitely.
The H1-B visa, on the other hand, has an approval rate of just 37 per cent.
The O-1 visahas a 93 per cent approval rate compared to the H1-B visa, which is at just 37 per cent. Reuters
However, the O-1 visa application costs between $10,000 (Rs 8.55 lakh) and $30,000 (Rs 25.6 lakh) – which is 10 times more expensive than the H1-B visa.
In 2024, 22,669 visas were granted.
In 2023, 18,894 such visas were granted. This is over double the visas – 8,838 – granted in 2020.
Indians were allotted 1,418 such visas in 2023 – nearly triple the visas received, 487, in 2020.
Only citizens of the United Kingdom in Brazil received more such visas.
The visa does not require the applicant to have a minimum salary or a degree.
It can be processed in under two weeks.
All this explains why the O-1 visa, despite the exorbitant cost – is gaining popularity as an alternative to the H1-B visa.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
US firms such as Tesla, Microsoft and McKinsey are using the O-1 visa to recruit Indian talent.
As are prestigious schools such as Yale and Harvard to bring in faculty.
However, there are still far more H1-B visas (225,957) allotted.
'Einstein' visa
This visa is officially called the EB-1 visa.
Despite it being nicknamed the 'Einstein visa', the famed scientist Albert Einstein was not responsible for the creation of the visa.
The visa is given to individuals with 'extraordinary ability' who have received 'sustained national and international acclaim'.
This includes Pulitzer Prize winners, Oscar winners, those who have won Olympic medals, academic researchers and professors of international repute.
Extraordinary ability can be demonstrated by showing that one has
Nationally or internationally recognised prizes
Evidence of membership in associations that demand outstanding achievement of their members
Articles about them in major media
Asked to be on a panel to judge others
Proof of original contribution to the field
Proof of success in arts
Proof of your articles in media
Proof that your work has been put on display at artistic exhibitions or showcases
Proof of a leading or critical role in distinguished organisations
Proof of high salary in your field.
This is among the most difficult visas to obtain.
Incidentally, First Lady Melania Trump came to America on an 'Einstein visa'
First Lady Melania Trump received an 'Einstein visa' in 2001. File Image/AP
At the time, back in 2001, she was Melania Knauss, a model from Slovenia working in New York.
She also happened to be dating Donald Trump.
Melania was one of just five people in Slovenia who was approved for the EB-1 visa.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Indians broker and agents are now promising to get these visas for researchers and professors – for a price.
Such advertisements have even been put up on LinkedIn, which is raising the hackles of many within the field of academics.
Experts are worried that such incidents could tarnish India's hard won reputation in the field of science.
With inputs from agencies
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
Who will Be denaturalised — and who won't: Trump administration draws the line in Justice Department memo
In a major policy signal with lasting implications for the future of US citizenship, the Trump administration has laid out clear parameters for who qualifies for naturalisation, and who may face denaturalization . A newly published memo from the Department of Justice, dated June 11, outlines a shift towards heightened scrutiny and enforcement against naturalized citizens suspected of having obtained citizenship through fraud, concealment, or criminal acts, as mentioned in a report by The Guardian. The move effectively sharpens the government's criteria for who will be naturalised in the future and who may be at risk of losing their US citizenship—part of a broader immigration realignment under President Trump's second-term agenda. Who Is Eligible for Naturalisation? While the basic eligibility for naturalisation remains unchanged—requiring lawful permanent residency, continuous residence, good moral character, and knowledge of English and US civics—the memo signals stricter enforcement post-naturalisation. Immigration attorneys believe this reflects a shift toward not just assessing qualifications at the time of application, but retrospectively reviewing them years later. 'The concern now is not just whether someone can be naturalised, but whether they can remain naturalised,' said Sameera Hafiz, policy director of the Immigration Legal Resource Center. Categories at Risk: The 10 Denaturalisation Priorities The memo lists ten priority categories of naturalized citizens for potential denaturalization, as per the report by The Guardian. These include: Live Events Individuals who obtained citizenship through false statements or document fraud; Persons convicted of war crimes, genocide, or other human rights violations; Naturalized individuals with ties to terrorism or organised crime; Those convicted of serious financial fraud, including medical fraud or immigration scams; Individuals who concealed prior deportation orders or failed to disclose critical criminal history. The memo also empowers Justice Department attorneys to initiate civil denaturalization proceedings—which, unlike criminal trials, do not guarantee the right to an attorney and require a lower burden of proof. Lighter Burden of Proof in Civil Cases One of the most significant procedural changes is the reliance on civil litigation to revoke citizenship. 'This is a quiet but significant shift,' said a senior immigration litigator. 'Civil cases move faster, require less evidence, and don't give people the right to court-appointed lawyers. That's a dangerous mix for naturalized citizens.' Notably, naturalized citizens—unlike birthright citizens—can face denaturalization if authorities find that their original application omitted crucial facts or contained false statements, even unintentionally. First Casualty: Military Veteran Loses Citizenship On June 13, a US judge revoked the citizenship of Elliott Duke, a military veteran originally from the UK, after it was revealed that Duke had concealed a past conviction involving child sexual abuse materials. Though his military service was not disputed, the Department of Justice argued that Duke's failure to disclose this history during his application rendered his naturalization fraudulent. Observers believe this case sets a precedent for broader enforcement in years to come. 25 Million Naturalized Citizens in Focus According to government data, over 25 million Americans are naturalized citizens—immigrants who obtained US citizenship after being born abroad. The Justice Department's memo has raised alarms among this demographic, as even decades-old infractions could now be reviewed under this expanding denaturalisation policy. Broader Civil Rights Concerns The memo is part of a larger transformation of the Department of Justice's Civil Rights Division, which is now being used to advance Trump administration goals such as ending diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs and challenging race-based policies in education and hiring. In one instance, the department recently initiated legal action against 15 US district attorneys in Maryland for delaying deportations. Meanwhile, the resignation of the University of Virginia President Jim Ryan has been linked to an ongoing investigation by the Civil Rights Division over race-conscious scholarship policies. Amid these upheavals, nearly 70% of lawyers in the division—approximately 250 attorneys—have reportedly exited the department since January. Naturalisation Going Forward: A More Cautious Path While the pathway to US naturalization remains open, the post-citizenship landscape is clearly shifting. Immigration lawyers now advise applicants to be meticulous in documentation, transparent in disclosures, and proactive in legal counsel—especially given the growing emphasis on post-facto investigations. 'This memo is not just about removing bad actors,' Hafiz cautioned. 'It sets the tone for how we define belonging in America.' FAQs What does the new DOJ memo on naturalisation signify? The memo, dated June 11, outlines a tougher stance on both granting and retaining U.S. citizenship. It emphasizes post-naturalisation enforcement, allowing the government to pursue denaturalization of individuals suspected of fraud, criminal activity, or concealment during the naturalisation process. Who remains eligible for U.S. naturalisation? The basic eligibility criteria—lawful permanent residency, continuous U.S. residence, good moral character, and English/civics knowledge—remain the same. However, the new policy introduces tighter scrutiny both before and after citizenship is granted.
Mint
36 minutes ago
- Mint
Donald Trump's ‘Big, Beautiful Bill': 59% Americans fear it will hurt their families, poll finds
A majority of Americans oppose the sweeping federal budget bill championed by President Donald Trump, according to a new Fox News national poll, underscoring the uphill battle Republicans face as the legislation moves through the Senate. The survey, conducted June 13–16, found that 59% of voters oppose the tax and spending bill, compared with just 38% who support it—a 21-point margin of disapproval. About half of respondents (49%) said the legislation would personally hurt their families. Only 23% believed it would help, while 26% said it would make no difference. Even among those who reported having a good understanding of what is in the bill, skepticism remained high. While they were slightly more likely to support the measure, more still thought it would do harm rather than good (45% vs. 34%). The measure, formally called the One, Big, Beautiful Bill, revealed stark political divisions: 73% of Republicans favor the legislation. 89% of Democrats oppose it. 73% of independents also oppose it. The bill passed the House of Representatives last month by a single vote and is now facing a series of votes in the Senate. The sweeping package is stuffed with Trump's signature priorities, including: Extending the 2017 tax cuts and eliminating taxes on tips and overtime pay. Funding billions in border security and codifying stricter immigration policies. Restructuring Medicaid and cutting funding to food stamps to offset tax reductions. Imposing new work requirements for Medicaid coverage. Critics, particularly Democrats, have attacked the bill's impact on America's social safety net. Medicaid provides health coverage to about 71 million low-income Americans, and the proposed cuts go further than those passed in the House version. President Trump has been celebrating the measure online, calling it 'ONE GREAT BIG BEAUTIFUL BILL.' He has pressed lawmakers to send it to his desk by July 4, framing it as a fulfillment of his second-term promises. Meanwhile, Republicans argue that Democrats are opposing tax relief for working Americans and instead backing tax hikes. The Senate voted 51–49 late Saturday to clear the first hurdle toward final passage, setting up an intense week of debates and amendments. President Trump celebrated the advance on social media, calling it a 'great victory' and praising Republican senators Rick Scott, Mike Lee, Ron Johnson, and Cynthia Lummis for their 'fantastic work' in helping secure the vote. On Monday, June 30, senators will engage in a vote-a-rama, a procedural marathon in which lawmakers can propose an unlimited number of amendments to the massive bill. Democrats are expected to mount a series of efforts to reshape the legislation, which enshrines Trump's core domestic agenda. The measure combines tax cuts, new spending provisions, stricter immigration rules, and changes to entitlement programs such as Medicaid. The Senate resumed its final debate this morning after a weekend spent adjusting provisions to comply with parliamentarian rulings and satisfy holdout Republicans. If the Senate manages to pass the bill, it will head to the House of Representatives, where divisions among lawmakers remain sharp. Some members are alarmed by the legislation's price tag, while others are concerned about proposed cuts to Medicaid. With Democrats uniformly opposed, Republicans can afford to lose no more than three votes in either chamber if they hope to get the bill through. After this, the legislation would move to President Trump's desk before the July 4 deadline he has set for signing it into law.
Indian Express
39 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Trump blames AT&T for tech issues in a call with faith leaders
US President Donald Trump on Monday blamed AT&T for technical issues in a conference call he held with American faith leaders and urged the wireless carrier's boss to handle the situation. The president also said his administration may use another carrier's service in other calls. 'I'm doing a major Conference Call with Faith Leaders from all over the Country, and AT&T is totally unable to make their equipment work properly,' Trump wrote on social media about the call on Monday. 'This is the second time it's happened. If the Boss of AT&T, whoever that may be, could get involved — It would be good. There are tens of thousands of people on the line!' AT&T said on X it had reached out to the White House and was working to 'understand and assess the situation.' Trump did not elaborate on the specifics of the issue. In a subsequent post, Trump apologized to faith leaders for what he described as a long wait on the conference call. 'We may have to reschedule the call, but we'll use another carrier the next time,' Trump said. AT&T shares pared gains very briefly after Trump's post then recovered. During his first White House term, Trump criticized the company, which at the time owned CNN, about the news channel's coverage of his administration. Earlier this month, Trump's family business licensed its name to launch a US mobile service and a $499 smartphone, calling it Trump Mobile, in a deal brokered by the president's children.
