Greek lawmaker attacks paintings in Athens' National Gallery, claiming they are offensive
Police detained Nikolaos Papadopoulos — of the small right-wing, ultra-religious Niki party — for several hours before releasing him. The National Gallery - Alexandros Soutsos Museum shut down after the attack, with visitors turned away.
The museum issued a statement saying Papadopoulos and one other person attacked the paintings that were part of an exhibition of Greek artists titled 'The Allure of the Bizarre,' throwing them to the floor and shattering glass in the frames.
The exhibition includes works that caricature religious icons and themes, and runs as an accompaniment to a display of 80 engravings by the Spanish master Francisco Goya.
Papadopoulos previously said in parliament that one of the Greek paintings was offensive to Orthodox Christianity, the predominant religion in Greece, asserting that it insulted the Virgin Mary and Christ.
The Culture Ministry responded that it acts 'with the aim of protecting the country's cultural and artistic heritage in general' and that it 'never engages in acts of censorship.'
'I took down four icons, four blasphemous icons, and in two of those ... the glass pane broke, nothing else,' Papadopoulos told reporters after he was released. He said works at the exhibition 'insult the Virgin Mary, St George ... the archangels that we in our homes were taught to worship and respect.'
In a statement issued Monday evening, the gallery's board of directors said it 'unreservedly condemn(s) every act of vandalism, violence and censorship which violate the constitutionally guaranteed freedom of expression.'
Formed in 2019, Niki, Greek for Victory, first entered parliament in 2023 elections, offering a mix of Orthodox Christian traditionalism and nationalism. It holds 10 of parliament's 300 seats.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
16 hours ago
- Spectator
The joy of Giorgia Meloni
There are not, as far as I know, any Italian top-flight poker players. Italians are hardly renowned for their ability to suppress their facial expressions or conceal what they're really thinking, they are unusually well-represented in this regard by their Premier, Giorgia Meloni. Upon becoming Italy's prime minister in 2022, Ms Meloni was written off by the bien-pensant Anglophone press as a far-right extremist, destined for her rag tag coalition to crash like so many Italian governments before. Contra this narrative, she took her seat beside president Trump at the leaders' round table in Washington DC yesterday. He even complimented her longevity in a famously unstable political climate: 'You've been there for a long period of time relative to others. They don't last very long; you've lasted a long time. You're going to be there a long time.' Such prominence for an Italian leader would have been unthinkable a little while ago. Italy's schizophrenic political culture and its resolute failure to commit to Nato defence spending goals had made it easy for tho France-German alliance to usher the Italians into a side room alongside the Spanish, Greeks and other 'full partners' in the European enterprise. Not so now. Meloni is not only making positive moves on defence, standing firm on the issue of Ukraine (earning her the ire of the actual Italian far right) but is also overseeing one of Europe's only successful economies. She is seen by many as a Trump whisperer, able to wrap the notoriously erratic and bizarre American president around her finger. Ms Meloni's facial expressions at the Washington summit were a delight. Whether it was the eye roll during the pompous, drawn-out remarks of the German chancellor or her perma-scowl and crossed arms in the Oval Office, she has a remarkable ability to steal the show – and make her feelings abundantly clear – even in a room that contains more than its fair share of divas. Her visible hatred of Emmanuel Macron is often conveyed through withering stares; she looks at the French president as if he's something that she has just stepped in on the notoriously unclean pavements of Rome. One person, by contrast, who can't even make his words convey meaning, is our own dear leader. Sir Keir's turn came on the round table and he duly filled his designated two minutes with waffle. The observation that 'this conflict has gone on for three and a bit years' was one of his more profound contributions. During his speech, Ms Meloni flicked her hair, pursed her lips and explained considerably more than Sir Keir ever could.
Spectator
a day ago
- Spectator
The remarkable life of Peter Kemp, warrior and Spectator writer
Today is the 110th anniversary of the birth of a former Spectator correspondent who took part in and survived more wars than any other English writer in modern history. Yet he is practically forgotten today because he fought all his life for unfashionable conservative causes. Peter Kemp, the son of a judge in the Indian Raj, was born in Bombay on 19 August 1915. Educated at Wellington, and destined for the law like his father, he went up to Trinity College, Cambridge, the alma mater of the notorious Communist sympathising Soviet spies Kim Philby, Guy Burgess and Anthony Blunt. Kemp gravitated to the polar opposite of his leftist contemporaries and became a right-wing Tory. As such, he abandoned his studies and determined to fight for the Nationalist side in the Spanish civil war when it broke out in the summer of 1936. Pretending to be a journalist, he obtained a press pass as a correspondent for the Sunday Dispatch newspaper, and entered the war-torn country from Portugal. Disliking the Falange, the Spanish fascist party, Kemp preferred to enlist in the cavalry of the Carlists, a monarchist faction noted for their staunch Catholicism and bravery in battle. But however romantic, these horse soldiers weren't of much use in modern warfare, and Kemp was thirsting for action, so he transferred to the Spanish Legion – the Iberian version of the French Foreign Legion – a brutal and tough outfit whose motto was 'Viva la Muerte!' (Long live death!) The Legion gave Kemp invaluable experience in the savage realities of modern warfare. Fighting alongside the Moors who were the mainstays of General Franco's army in the battles for control of Madrid's university city, Kemp was kept awake all night by the screams of a captured Republican militiaman being tortured to death by his Moorish comrades in a neighbouring lecture hall. Another time, Kemp unsuccessfully pleaded for the life of a fellow Briton, a member of the International Brigades from Belfast, but was ordered to command the firing squad at his execution instead. Wounded on several occasions, and promoted to command a whole bandera (battalion) aged only 24 – an unusual honour for a foreigner – the Spanish war ended for Kemp when his jaw was shattered and his hands were crippled by an exploding mortar bomb. The outbreak of the second world war saved Kemp from the humdrum boredom of peace, and he lost no time in signing up for a special force, the precursor of the Special Operations Executive (SOE), specialising in cross-Channel raids on isolated Nazi outposts in France. On one such raid, Operation Dryad, Kemp took a group of Germans prisoner who were garrisoning a lighthouse off Alderney. His next SOE assignment was to parachute into Axis-occupied Albania in support of partisans supposedly struggling to liberate their homeland. But these guerilla bands were divided between nationalists and communists and Kemp's anti-communist convictions were reinforced when he realised they preferred to fight their rival compatriots rather than the Nazi and fascist enemy. Kemp collided once more against his lifelong communist foes on his next mission when he was dropped into Poland to help the anti-communist home army in the 1944 Warsaw uprising against the Nazis. After the rising was crushed – partly because Stalin refused to let the Red Army intervene – Kemp surrendered to the Russian 'allies' but found himself in Moscow, imprisoned and interrogated by the notorious NKVD, Stalin's murderous secret police. He was finally freed after several months and ended the war in Indochina helping France against the VietMinh communist revolutionaries. By now, Kemp was a hardened Cold Warrior, and as that global ideological struggle began, he found himself again and again battling his old Red enemies. He was in Budapest in 1956 when Russian tanks put down the anti-communist revolution there and he helped smuggle young Hungarian rebels to safety in Austria; and he was present in the Congo in 1960 as that vast country gained independence from Belgium while dissolving in chaotic civil strife. It was in Africa that Kemp became a special correspondent for The Spectator. In the 1970s, The Spectator's editor, Alexander Chancellor, was persuaded, despite his liberal tendencies, to employ the old warrior (who had passed his pensionable age) as a special correspondent in Rhodesia to report on the bitter bush war between the minority white regime of Ian Smith and Robert Mugabe's black guerilla army. As might be expected, Kemp's sympathies lay with the embattled Smith regime, but he continued to file insightful pieces sporadically until the Lancaster House agreement ended the conflict in 1979. In 1957 Kemp had discovered his gift for writing when he published Mine Were of Trouble – a vivid memoir of his time in Spain and the first in an autobiographical trilogy covering his eventful life. He remained utterly unashamed of having chosen the 'wrong' side in Spain and was proud of fighting for Franco. He continued to believe that it was the Basques themselves rather than the Nazi Condor Legion aircraft who had destroyed the ancient Basque capital of Guernica. Intrigued by an article by Kemp in a History magazine frankly titled 'Why I fought for Franco' I sought an interview with him in the 1980s. Given his amazing military record I was expecting a fire breathing volcano but was surprised and impressed by his gentleness of manner. For someone who had spent so long in situations of extreme violence, he exuded a calming sense of peace. Even in old age, Peter Kemp couldn't resist a final campaign and his last battle, when he was already in his 70s, was on the side of the anti-communist Contras in Nicaragua. He died in October 1993 – an unfashionable hero to the last.
Spectator
a day ago
- Spectator
Childfree zealots are anti-humanity
Few things in life are more French than a dispute animée about holidays. While the Spanish enjoy an easy relationship with mañana and the Italians savour il dolce far niente (sweet idleness), the French will incite a riot over any threat to their leisure time faster than you can say faire une pause. It's therefore little surprise to witness the ardourof government officials in condemning childfree resorts, a rare but growing feature of French holidaymaking. Saint-Delis in Normandy is but one hotel offering an 'ever more exclusive and peaceful experience' with 'absolute relaxation' for only €334 a night. The existence of such facilities has prompted Laurence Rossignol, a former families minister, to propose that adult-only venues should be banned. The Socialist party senator claimed that they 'institutionalise and legitimise intolerance', adding for good measure that 'to not like children is to not like humanity itself'. With rates of childlessness only climbing worldwide, it's a debate that will only become more pertinent. France's fertility rate is a mere 1.66 births per woman, according to the World Bank, with birthrates at their lowest ebb since the second world war. In Britain (1.56 births per woman), the Office for National Statistics recently revealed that a slender majority of women turned 30 without having had their first child in 2020, for the first time in history. Such is the scale of the childlessness that even the bien pensants are spooked. Last year French president Emmanuel Macron called for 'demographic rearmament', offering six months parental leave for both parents, free fertility checks for 25-year-olds, and more funding for reproductive technology. The vogue for childfree hospitality indicates this is as much a cultural problem as a financial or even technological one. Earlier this year France's high commissioner for childhood, Sarah El Haïry, felt obliged to publicly rebuke anti-child attitudes, arguing that the country must resist the notion 'that children aren't welcome on a restaurant terrace'. To some degree the reaction is overwrought. One travel company group reckons that only 3 per cent of France's hotels and resorts qualify as childfree, and many of those visiting will be parents who have dropped Josephine and Gabriel off at the in-laws for a weekend of amour – or at least a few nights of unbroken sleep. Having the odd pub that bars patrons still in primary school is likewise no great crisis if there's a more family-friendly alternative nearby, nor should there be any objection to the curfews imposed in many British venues, ordering children home for bedtime. Even if we're allowing kids to vote, there's no need to have them hogging the barstools. But there is a darker side to these reasonable requests. While the decision not to have children is a legitimate exercise of personal agency, the emboldened childfree movement – who dislike the more exposing 'childless' description – are increasingly arguing that other people's children should be neither seen nor heard. I've visited cafes – a trade heavily reliant on mothers of young children – who will post signs declaring that dogs are allowed, but children merely tolerated. See also the growth in childfree weddings: as if a marriage without children isn't basically a tax avoidance scheme. Public transport is another battleground, with a viral TikTok clip from April 2023 showing a man throw a hissy fit over a baby crying on a plane stuck in a holding pattern. This June an American sports pundit called for parents to 'brain rot the baby on TikTok' if it starts crying in the sky, and only a few days ago the Standard reported that a fight broke out on a Ryanair flight in response to infant tears. This is all to say that childfree zealots are as prone to temper tantrums as the toddlers they despise. Much of this comes downstream of intellectual attempts to paint child-rearing as a quirky personal interest, rather than the only reason any of us are alive. No doubt all parents enjoy a slither of solipsism in replicating their genes. But this is rather undercut by the self-sacrifice of raising the pickles, as many childless people cite when justifying their decision not to have any. Still, the childless are happy to draw from the welfare state when they reach their autumn years, funded, naturally, by other people's children. All of that is anyway besides the point. At the risk of sounding like a heartbleeder, what matters is that children are people like any other. They can be loud, annoying and inconsiderate, much like adults. Both deserve a place in public, even if it upsets those with dual incomes and no kids.
