Hong Kong aims to safeguard key facilities with new cybersecurity law
Hong Kong passed a cybersecurity law on Wednesday to regulate operators of critical infrastructure, forcing them to strengthen computer systems and report cybersecurity incidents or risk penalties of up to 5 million Hong Kong dollars ($640,000).
The law, set to take effect in 2026, aims to safeguard the security of computer systems vital to the functioning of critical infrastructure, said Chris Tang, the security chief of the Asian financial hub.
"It's definitely not to target personal information or commercial secrets," he added.
The law was necessary because disruption or sabotage of the computer systems at the heart of critical infrastructure posed a risk to society and the economy in the former British colony, the Security Bureau told the legislative council.
Such incidents could have "a rippling effect affecting the entire society, seriously jeopardizing the economy, people's livelihood, public safety and even national security," it added.
The bill covers infrastructure in eight industries from banking and financial services to information technology, energy transport, health care and communications.
Authorities would notify the concerned operators, but would not identify them individually to keep them from becoming targets, Tang had said earlier.
The bill, which also covers major sports and performance venues and research and development parks, mandates annual security risk assessments and an independent security audit every two years.
It sets a deadline of two hours to report serious security incidents.
Noncompliance could lead to fines ranging from HK$500,000 to HK$5 million ($64,000 to $640,000), along with additional daily fines for persistent non-compliance in some cases.
Since the new bill may swell compliance costs for the data center business, the government needs to consider if it could deter foreign investors, said George Chen, Co-Chair of Digital Practice at consulting firm the Asia Group based in Washington.
"Some investors may feel Hong Kong is now entering a busy cycle of legislation," Chen said, referring to tougher national security laws the China-ruled city adopted in 2020 and 2024.
Investors' desire for a more stable regulatory environment is a factor the Hong Kong government must weigh in its effort to retain, or attract, foreign investment, he added.
"Economic recovery remains a top priority for Hong Kong."
China passed a sweeping cybersecurity law in 2016, but Hong Kong did not have one until now.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NHK
27 minutes ago
- NHK
Japan's defense minister: Govt. contacts China over aircraft carriers' activity
Japan's Defense Minister Nakatani Gen says the government has asked China for consideration following the dispatch of both of its aircraft carriers to the Pacific Ocean. The Japanese Defense Ministry announced on Monday that the Liaoning and the Shandong, which are China's only two active aircraft carriers, were spotted near Japan between Saturday and Monday. The ministry said it was the first time the two carriers have simultaneously entered the Pacific. Speaking to reporters after a Cabinet meeting on Tuesday, Nakatani said the ministry suspects that China's navy is trying to improve the operational capabilities of the warships, including their long-range functions. He added that the government has used a diplomatic channel to convey to China a request not to make its naval activities a threat to Japan's security. The defense minister also said the government will continue its caution and surveillance of the situation and will disclose relevant information appropriately. He added that the government also continues to demonstrate its will and capacity to prevent any attempt to change the status quo unilaterally and by force. Nakatani indicated that the government is planning to deploy a mobile surveillance radar system on remote islands in the Pacific.
Japan Times
36 minutes ago
- Japan Times
Catastrophe on the roof of the world
The Tibetan Plateau is home to vast glacial reserves, which amount to the largest store of fresh water outside the Arctic and the Antarctic. It is also the source of 10 major Asian river systems — including the Yellow and Yangtze rivers of mainland China, the Mekong, Salween and Irrawaddy rivers of Southeast Asia and the Indus and Brahmaputra of South Asia — which supply water to nearly 20% of the global population. And, now, it is the site of a slow-burning environmental calamity that is threatening the water security, ecological balance and geopolitical stability of the entire Asian continent. For over two decades, China has been engaged in an aggressive and opaque dam-building spree, centered on — though not limited to — the Tibetan Plateau. Yet China's government has refused to negotiate a water-sharing treaty with any of the downriver countries, which must suffer the consequences of their upstream neighbor's whims. Already, Chinese-built megadams near the Plateau's border have brought water levels in the Mekong River to unprecedentedly low levels, with devastating effects on fisheries and livelihoods across Cambodia, Laos, Thailand and Vietnam. As the Mekong Delta in southern Vietnam retreats — driven partly by Chinese dams — rice farmers are being forced to abandon their traditional livelihoods, instead farming shrimp or growing reeds. Yet China's dam ambitions continue to grow. The Three Gorges Dam, which runs along the Yangtze River, is the largest in the world. But it will be dwarfed by the dam China is now building on the Yarlung Zangbo river, also known as the Brahmaputra, in a seismically active region of the Tibetan Plateau. If completed, this project would drastically alter water flows into India and Bangladesh, threaten the region's food security and ecological balance and increase China's geopolitical leverage over downstream countries. The specter of water weaponization looms large. In fact, water is fast becoming the new oil — a strategic resource with the potential to trigger conflicts. Already, water disputes within and between countries are intensifying. But China's assault on the Tibetan Plateau extends beyond water. Its avaricious mining of Tibet's mineral-rich lands — which boast critical resources like lithium, gold and copper — is contributing to deforestation and producing toxic-waste discharge, while providing cover for China's militarization of the Plateau. It is impossible to know the full extent of China's destruction. The area is off limits to international observers and efforts by members of indigenous Tibetan communities — whose cultural reverence for nature has underpinned a long history of sound environmental stewardship — to sound the alarm are quickly quelled, often through imprisonment or exile. But there is no doubt that the Tibetan Plateau's ecosystem is becoming increasingly fragile, especially given its heightened vulnerability to climate change. The Plateau is warming at twice the global average rate and its ice is melting faster than at the poles — trends that are reducing its water-storage capacity and reshaping river flows. The implications are far-reaching. The Tibetan Plateau, which towers over the rest of Asia (rising into the troposphere), profoundly influences Asian climatic, weather and monsoonal patterns and even affects atmospheric general circulation — the system of winds that transports warm air from the equator toward higher latitudes — in the Northern Hemisphere. Its degradation will exacerbate droughts and floods, accelerate biodiversity loss, contribute to agricultural collapse and fuel mass migration across Asia and beyond. Despite these risks, the international community, from global climate forums to multilateral institutions like the United Nations and World Bank, has been deafeningly silent about Tibet. The reason is not ignorance, but fear: China has used its clout to suppress meaningful criticism of its actions on the 'roof of the world.' Given the stakes, the international community cannot afford to let itself be cowed by China. Countries must relentlessly press for transparency about China's activities on the Tibetan Plateau. Specifically, China must share real-time hydrological data and submit its projects for international environmental assessment. Independent environmental researchers and monitors must be granted unfettered access to the Plateau to gather vital data and conduct unbiased analyses. China must also be held accountable for its violations of the rights of indigenous communities — including the nearly 1 million Tibetans who have been forcibly relocated from their ancestral lands since 2000. Western governments and multilateral institutions have leverage here. By tying environmental transparency, respect for indigenous rights and equitable management of shared river systems to trade agreements and climate cooperation, they can compel China to change its behavior. Direct support for indigenous Tibetan voices and civil-society networks would also help boost transparency. Ignoring the unfolding crisis on the Tibetan Plateau might seem expedient; after all, China has plenty of economic and geopolitical clout — and it is not afraid to use it. But the costs of inaction would be staggering. Tibet is Asia's ecological lifeline. China must not be allowed to use it in ways that threaten to upend the lives of people throughout the continent and beyond. Brahma Chellaney, professor emeritus of strategic studies at the New Delhi-based Center for Policy Research and fellow at the Robert Bosch Academy in Berlin, is the author of "Water, Peace, and War: Confronting the Global Water Crisis" (Rowman & Littlefield, 2013). © Project Syndicate, 2025
Japan Times
37 minutes ago
- Japan Times
Taiwan moves thwart foreign defense firms: American Chamber of Commerce
Changes that Taiwan made to rules for defense cooperation with foreign companies might discourage them from working with the archipelago, an American business group says — a view that comes just as China's military shows off some key advances. A policy that was tweaked last year "presents several challenges that risk undermining Taiwan's attractiveness as a defense market,' the American Chamber of Commerce in Taiwan said in a paper on Tuesday. It added this could slow procurement and undercut the incentive for foreign firms to invest in Taiwan. AmCham said "the rules are unclear about what kind of investments or technology-sharing companies are expected to provide in return for defense contracts,' calling on Taipei to safeguard commercial viability to encourage long-term spending on its defense industrial base. The paper provides a glimpse of some of the difficulties Taipei faces as it tries to field a military that can deter China's much more powerful forces. Taiwan is keen to work with the U.S. on weapons production, hoping to ensure a more stable flow of advanced arms to the archipelago. Last year, Taiwan changed its Industrial Cooperation Policy, dropping a requirement that foreign defense firms invest 40% of a contract value into the domestic economy in favor of a discretionary, case-by-case model. Both versions of the policy are intended to ensure that overseas companies invest in areas the Taiwan government deems important while also providing for some tech transfers. Officials in Taipei have watched as the U.S. focused on arming Ukraine in its fight against Russia in recent years. That may change somewhat under U.S. President Donald Trump, who reportedly plans to ramp up weapons sales to Taiwan to a level exceeding the pace set during his first term. Beijing has escalated military pressure on Taiwan since President Lai Ching-te came to office last year, holding an unprecedented number of military exercises around the democracy of 23 million. Beijing says Taiwan is its territory and has threatened to use force to take control of the self-governing archipelago. Some experts have said those drills show China is capable of blockading Taiwan, shutting it off from key shipments of energy for an extended period. China's military appears to be getting more formidable in other ways. Over the weekend, one of its carriers operated deeper into the Pacific Ocean than ever before. Also, last month Pakistan said the use of its Chinese J-10C fighters helped shoot down Indian fighters during a confrontation — challenging the notion that China-made weapons are inferior to Western arms. India has downplayed Pakistan's claims about the effectiveness of weaponry deployed from China and other countries, saying that its military was able to conduct precision airstrikes deep in Pakistani territory. AmCham also said in its report that Lai's pledge to raise defense spending to more than 3% of gross domestic product was "pragmatic' given cross-strait tensions. While campaigning for president the second time, Trump suggested the archipelago should devote 10% of GDP to its armed forces — comments that align with his push for NATO members in Europe to bear more of the costs of collective defense. The chamber also called for clarifying regulations covering Chinese components used in the defense industry. It suggested classifying parts depending on where they were made and whether they contained Chinese subcomponents or raw materials. The recommendations come as Taiwan continues to seek a trade deal with the U.S., which has threatened a 32% tariff on its goods.
