Hong Kong aims to safeguard key facilities with new cybersecurity law
Hong Kong passed a cybersecurity law on Wednesday to regulate operators of critical infrastructure, forcing them to strengthen computer systems and report cybersecurity incidents or risk penalties of up to 5 million Hong Kong dollars ($640,000).
The law, set to take effect in 2026, aims to safeguard the security of computer systems vital to the functioning of critical infrastructure, said Chris Tang, the security chief of the Asian financial hub.
"It's definitely not to target personal information or commercial secrets," he added.
The law was necessary because disruption or sabotage of the computer systems at the heart of critical infrastructure posed a risk to society and the economy in the former British colony, the Security Bureau told the legislative council.
Such incidents could have "a rippling effect affecting the entire society, seriously jeopardizing the economy, people's livelihood, public safety and even national security," it added.
The bill covers infrastructure in eight industries from banking and financial services to information technology, energy transport, health care and communications.
Authorities would notify the concerned operators, but would not identify them individually to keep them from becoming targets, Tang had said earlier.
The bill, which also covers major sports and performance venues and research and development parks, mandates annual security risk assessments and an independent security audit every two years.
It sets a deadline of two hours to report serious security incidents.
Noncompliance could lead to fines ranging from HK$500,000 to HK$5 million ($64,000 to $640,000), along with additional daily fines for persistent non-compliance in some cases.
Since the new bill may swell compliance costs for the data center business, the government needs to consider if it could deter foreign investors, said George Chen, Co-Chair of Digital Practice at consulting firm the Asia Group based in Washington.
"Some investors may feel Hong Kong is now entering a busy cycle of legislation," Chen said, referring to tougher national security laws the China-ruled city adopted in 2020 and 2024.
Investors' desire for a more stable regulatory environment is a factor the Hong Kong government must weigh in its effort to retain, or attract, foreign investment, he added.
"Economic recovery remains a top priority for Hong Kong."
China passed a sweeping cybersecurity law in 2016, but Hong Kong did not have one until now.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Japan Times
an hour ago
- Japan Times
U.S. military drills in Philippines end — but anti-ship missile system stays
The U.S. military has kept another advanced weapons system in the Philippines following recent joint drills, suggesting the Pentagon is using exercises to de facto deploy key weapons to the region amid growing tensions with China. The U.S. Navy-Marine Expeditionary Ship Interdiction System (NMESIS), an advanced mobile anti-ship missile platform, 'is still within the country, and it will continue to be used by the Philippine Marine Corps for training purposes,' local media quoted Philippine Navy spokesperson Capt. John Percie Alcos as saying Tuesday after the NMESIS was used in this year's Balikatan and Kamandag joint exercises. The Balikatan drills ran from April 21 to May 9, while the Kamandag exercises took place from May 26 to June 6. The spokesperson declined to disclose the weapon's current location, citing operational security reasons, but the remarks are the first to suggest that the NMESIS, which was last spotted on the island of Batanes — located between the Philippines' Luzon island and Taiwan — could remain in the Southeast Asian country indefinitely. Leaving it with the U.S. ally would replicate a similar decision with the Typhon midrange missile system, which the Pentagon originally deployed for drills back in April 2024. Composed of an uncrewed vehicle mounting two launchers for the Naval Strike Missile, which has a range of up to 185 kilometers, the NMESIS is a coastal defense system that could be used to keep Chinese warships at bay in the event of not only conflict with the Philippines, but also with nearby Taiwan. Alcos said the NMESIS deployment should not be viewed as a threat to China, which is embroiled in increasingly heated maritime and territorial disputes in parts of the South China Sea with the Philippines. 'The presence of the NMESIS in our country is only a deterrent to anybody who intends to conduct illegal, coercive, aggressive and deceptive actions against the Philippines,' the spokesman said. 'Otherwise, it's just military equipment that we use for training.' A Typhon midrange capability launcher arrives on northern Luzon island, in the Philippines, on April 8, 2024, in the capability's first deployment into the theater. | U.S. ARMY Still, confirmation that the weapon will remain in the Philippines is likely to anger Beijing, which has already been calling for the removal of the Typhon, arguing that this weapon, in particular, is a 'strategic' and 'offensive' system. Should the Typhon and NMESIS remain on Philippine soil, China's state-owned Global Times newspaper warned in April, they would become 'a constant source of tension in the region.' According to Philippine Army chief Lt. Gen. Roy Galido, the country's armed forces have been using the Typhon to familiarize themselves with such a capability, with Defense Secretary Gilberto Teodoro recently telling The Japan Times that Manila has already secured funding to acquire either this or another type of midrange capability. 'We are still learning, we are still training. Just like any equipment you have, you just don't learn it one time. You have to be well-versed with the equipment,' local media quoted Galido as saying Tuesday. 'It's still our desire to have one, and we have proposed to have similar, if not that platform, within the inventory of the army,' he added. The U.S. has also deployed other advanced military systems for joint exercises with the Philippines this year. These include the HIMARS multiple rocket launchers, maritime and aerial drones such as uncrewed solar-powered surveillance vehicles and a microwave-based directed energy weapon system designed to counter drone swarms. It's unclear how many of these systems will also remain in the country, but the Philippine Navy is already known to field a unit dedicated to operating uncrewed surface vehicles after receiving a handful of U.S.-made Mantas T12 and Devil Ray T38 maritime drones. It is likely that Washington will provide additional advanced systems to Manila as it seeks to reassure its oldest ally in Asia of its 'ironclad' commitment amid tensions with China. The U.S. is also looking at greater defense-industrial cooperation with the Philippines, saying earlier this year that the allies have identified a number of areas, including uncrewed systems, ammunition components and logistical support, as well as ship and aircraft maintenance and repair. The U.S. Navy even revealed recently that one of its destroyers had participated in a simulated wartime repair activity at the Philippines' Subic Bay in January.
Nikkei Asia
2 hours ago
- Nikkei Asia
China is 'different kettle of fish' from 'rash' Russia: Finland president
TOKYO -- The biggest national security threat facing Finnish President Alexander Stubb is indisputably Russia, which shares a 1,340-kilometer land border with his country. Many Asian governments would point to China as their top challenge. But the Nordic leader this week warned against drawing easy parallels between the two Eurasian powers, stressing each is a "different kettle of fish." Stubb, who is on a five-day visit to Japan until Thursday, spoke at the University of Tokyo on Tuesday, laying out his perspective on geopolitics and a shifting global order. He described Russia -- whose 2022 invasion of Ukraine spurred Finland's move to join NATO in 2023 -- as "imperialist" and "rash."
Yomiuri Shimbun
3 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Britain and Allies Impose Sanctions on Israeli Far-Right Ministers for ‘Inciting Violence'
Maya Alleruzzo/Pool via REUTERS Far-right Israeli lawmakers Itamar Ben Gvir, center, and Bezalel Smotrich, right, attend the swearing-in ceremony for the new Israeli parliament, at the Knesset, or parliament, in Jerusalem, November 15, 2022. LONDON, June 10 (Reuters) – Britain and four other nations imposed sanctions on Tuesday on two far-right Israeli cabinet ministers, Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich, accusing them of repeatedly inciting violence against Palestinians in the West Bank. Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Norway joined Britain in freezing the assets and imposing travel bans on Israel's national security minister Ben-Gvir and finance minister Smotrich, both West Bank settlers. Signalling a rare split with its close British ally, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio wrote on X that the U.S. condemned the move. He said it would not advance U.S.-led efforts to achieve a ceasefire in Gaza, end the war there and bring home hostages Palestinian Hamas militants abducted from Israel 20 months ago. 'We reject any notion of equivalence: Hamas is a terrorist organisation… We remind our partners not to forget who the real enemy is,' Rubio said, demanding a withdrawal of the sanctions. British foreign minister David Lammy, in a joint statement with the foreign ministers of the other four nations, said Ben-Gvir and Smotrich had 'incited extremist violence and serious abuses of Palestinian human rights. These actions are not acceptable. 'This is why we have taken action now to hold those responsible to account,' the statement said. Two sources with direct knowledge of the matter said the sanctions included targeted financial restrictions and travel bans. Israel's foreign minister, Gideon Saar, said the action by the five countries was 'outrageous' and the Israeli government would hold a special meeting early next week to decide how to respond. Smotrich, speaking at the inauguration of a new West Bank Jewish settlement in the Hebron Hills, spoke of 'contempt' for Britain's move. 'We are determined, God willing, to continue building,' he said. As the five nations announced action against the Israeli ministers, the United States imposed sanctions on a leading Palestinian human rights organization as well as five charity groups in the Middle East and Europe, accusing them of supporting Palestinian militants including Hamas. 'EGREGIOUS' Last month, the leaders of Britain, France and Canada put pressure on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government to end a blockade on aid into Gaza, where international experts have said famine is imminent, promising 'concrete action' if a new military offensive did not stop. London also suspended free trade talks with Israel for pursuing 'egregious policies' in the occupied West Bank and Gaza, and announced further sanctions against West Bank settlers. In response, Netanyahu accused them of wanting to help Hamas and 'being on the wrong side of history'. Tuesday's joint statement said their action was focused on curbing violence by Israeli settlers in the West Bank and was aimed solely at individuals who 'undermine Israel's own security'. But it added the measures could not be seen in isolation of events in Gaza. 'We continue to be appalled by the immense suffering of civilians, including the denial of essential aid,' it said. 'There must be no unlawful transfer of Palestinians from Gaza or within the West Bank, nor any reduction in the territory of the Gaza Strip.' The foreign ministers said they still wanted 'a strong friendship with the people of Israel based on shared ties, values and commitment to (its) security and future'. 'We will strive to achieve an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, the immediate release of the remaining hostages by Hamas, which can have no future role in the governance of Gaza, a surge in aid and a path to a two-state solution,' the statement said. Ben-Gvir and Smotrich have previously clashed with Netanyahu, both calling for the permanent conquest of Gaza and re-establishment of the Jewish settlements there that Israel abandoned in 2005, notions that the Israeli leader has rejected. Israel began its offensive in Gaza in response to the Hamas-led attack on southern Israel in October 2023 in which 1,200 people, mostly civilians, were killed, according to Israeli tallies, and 251 people were taken to Gaza and held hostage. Israel's campaign has devastated much of Gaza and killed more than 54,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza health authorities.
