Govt. notifies rules enabling greater jointness and command efficiency in armed forces
The government has notified the rules formulated under the Inter-Services Organisations (Command, Control and Discipline) Act 2023, which came into effect from May 27.
'This significant step aims to bolster effective command, control, and efficient functioning of Inter-Services Organisations (ISOs), thereby strengthening jointness among the armed forces,' said the Defence Ministry.
The Bill was passed by both Houses of Parliament during the Monsoon Session of 2023. It received the assent of the President on August 15, 2023, and the Act came into force with effect from May 10, 2024. Subsequently, the ISOs were notified through a gazette notification dated December 27, 2024.
The Act empowers the Commanders-in-Chief and Officers-in-Command of the ISOs to exercise command and control over the service personnel serving under them, ensuring effective maintenance of discipline and administration within the organisations.
'This is achieved without altering the unique service conditions applicable to each branch of the armed forces,' it said.
The newly notified subordinate rules, framed under Section 11 of the Act, will facilitate the effective implementation of the provisions laid down in the legislation. The rules are a critical enabler for the functioning of the ISOs and establish a comprehensive framework for discipline, administrative control, and operational synergy.
'With the notification of these Rules, the Act is now fully operational. This will empower the heads of the ISOs, enable the expeditious disposal of disciplinary cases, and help avoid the duplication of proceedings,' said the Ministry.
As part of the military reforms, the post of Chief of Defence Staff was created in 2019 with the mandate to ensure 'jointness' of the three services in operations, logistics, transport, training, support services, communications, repairs, and maintenance.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Asim Munir jailed my wife Bushra Bibi out of spite, claims Imran Khan
Former Pakistani prime minister Imran Khan has accused Army Chief General Asim Munir of jailing his wife, Bushra Bibi, out of personal vendetta after being removed as ISI chief. Speaking from prison, Khan alleged Bibi was targeted without evidence, denied basic rights, and subjected to inhumane conditions. He claimed the May 9, 2023 unrest was staged to dismantle his party and called the judiciary 'complicit.' Khan demanded a judicial probe into what he called state-sponsored repression of his political movement. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads 'Unjust incarceration and inhumane treatment' Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads 'London plan' allegations resurface Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads From behind bars, Imran Khan has launched some of his most scathing accusations yet against Pakistan's military leadership. In a public post on Monday, the former prime minister said Army Chief General Asim Munir was using his power to exact revenge on Khan's wife, Bushra Bibi, following a personal falling claimed the feud dates back to his tenure in office, when he removed Munir from the role of Director General of Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI). According to Khan, Munir then sought to contact Bibi through back channels.'As Prime Minister, when I removed General Asim Munir from the post of DG ISI, he sought to approach my wife Bushra Bibi through intermediaries to discuss the matter. Bushra Bibi categorically declined, saying that she had no involvement with such affairs and would not meet him,' Khan wrote on alleged that Munir's 'vindictive nature' led directly to his wife's who has been in Adiala Jail since mid-2023, said Bushra Bibi had been wrongfully jailed for 14 months and described the conditions of her detention as appalling.'It is General Asim Munir's vindictive nature that is behind Bushra Bibi's unjust 14-month incarceration and deplorable inhumane treatment in prison,' he added that she had been charged repeatedly without proof.'She was accused of aiding and abetting, an allegation for which no proof has ever been presented, and she is arrested in one false case after another. She is a private citizen, a homemaker with no political involvement.'Khan also said he had been denied contact with her for over four weeks, including a court-approved visit scheduled for June 1.'According to jail regulations, I was scheduled to meet her on June 1 but even that meeting was denied, in complete violation of court orders,' he did not stop with accusations against the army. He repeated claims that the violent protests on May 9, 2023, were part of a wider scheme to eliminate his political party, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI).'The way my wife has been targeted for personal vengeance is unprecedented. Even during Pakistan's darkest periods of dictatorship such a thing never happened,' Khan asserted that the unrest and subsequent crackdown were part of the so-called 'London Plan.''Under this premeditated plan, I and several of my party leaders and workers were unlawfully imprisoned. Our democratic mandate was brazenly stolen, and corrupt individuals — Sharifs and Zardaris — were imposed upon the nation,' he accused the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) of resorting to fascist tactics, including violence and fabricating criminal cases against PTI directed sharp criticism at the Pakistani judiciary, accusing it of being politically compromised and failing to act impartially. He said judges had refused to examine CCTV footage from the May 9 violence, which could potentially exonerate PTI workers.'Despite repeated demands, they refuse to summon or examine the stolen CCTV footage from May 9, 2023. Not a single judge has the courage to demand those tapes and deliver a verdict based on evidence. We are innocent. Our people are being sentenced without evidence and without the right to a fair trial,' Khan called for a judicial commission to investigate the deaths of unarmed protesters during the May 9 and November 26 his post, Khan linked the current judiciary's performance with past controversial figures in Pakistan's legal history.'The judiciary in Pakistan has never been more disgraceful than it is today. In the past, there was Justice Munir, whose unjust decisions earned him global notoriety. Today, Justice Qazi Faez Isa is following in the same footsteps,' he wrote.'The entire judicial system seems complicit, driven not by justice but by a desire to protect their own jobs and privileges.'The backdrop to Khan's remarks is a year-long crackdown on PTI. On May 9, 2023, protests erupted following Khan's arrest. Demonstrators damaged military installations and government property. Authorities responded with mass arrests and week, a Pakistani court sentenced 11 PTI supporters—including a sitting lawmaker—for their involvement in the Islamabad protests. They were charged with inciting violence and post, which coincides with growing international attention on Pakistan's human rights record, is the latest in a series of public appeals as he continues to face multiple legal battles. Despite his incarceration, Khan maintains that the charges are politically motivated.(With inputs from PTI)
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
HC rules 37 private schools in Chandigarh to get full reimbursement for EWS admissions
The Punjab and Haryana high court has ruled that 37 private unaided schools, which have been operational before 1996, are liable to be reimbursed fully by the Chandigarh administration for Economically Weaker Section (EWS) category admissions under the Right to Education (RTE) Act, 2009. The court also held that unaided private schools, opened after a 1996 scheme, can charge a 'nominal fee' from students who were admitted against 15% seats kept reserved under the scheme, which has to be paid by the administration. These schools would also get full reimbursement for the remaining 10% admissions, as applicable under the RTE Act. The court also quashed UT administration's order to derecognise St Kabir Public School and Vivek High School. The single judge bench of justice HS Sethi was hearing petitions from schools which challenged the UT's decision of bringing schools, which have been functioning prior to 1996, under the ambit of a land allotment scheme whereby they had to reserve 15% seats for the EWS category and further get reimbursement for only 10% of students under the RTE Act. There were other several issues raised by these schools in the petitions filed in 2020 through senior advocate Ashish Chopra, Pash Pal Sharma and Swati Dayalan. There are 83 schools operating within Chandigarh. Among these, 50 (37 private unaided non-minority schools and 13 unaided minority schools) were allotted land before 1996, and the remaining 33 schools, inclusive of both unaided minority and private non-minority schools, were allotted land after 1996. 'The scheme 1996 does not operate retrospectively or expressly include the institutions which were already allotted land prior to January 31, 1996. The endeavour of the UT administration to bring all operational schools under the ambit of Clause 18 of the 1996 scheme is not sustainable under law and is incorrect,' the bench observed. The friction between schools and the administration began after the implementation of the RTE Act, which mandated reservation of up to 25% to students in unaided private schools. Thirteen schools had opted for the minority status after 2012 as they were not bound to admit EWS category students. Subsequently, UT challenged the minority status of various schools. Major takeaways All private non-minority schools will be bound to give admission to students belonging to the EWS category to the extent of 25% of total seats. UT will prepare the list of children belonging to the EWS category and send it to schools. Any objection raised by a school regarding the eligibility of any student will be referred back to the administration. UT, after looking into the objection, would make the recommendation. If replacement would be required, a new name would be sent to the school. After this, the school would be bound by such recommendation. Private unaided schools opened prior to 1996 would get reimbursement for 25% admissions. Minority and non-minority schools opened after 1996 are allowed to charge a 'nominal fee' from students admitted against 15% seats reserved under the 1996 scheme in consultation with the government. Within a period of three months of finishing a particular session, the schools will be reimbursed by UT.
The Hindu
3 hours ago
- The Hindu
The political deadlock in Taiwan
On May 20, Taiwanese President Lai Ching-te celebrated a year in office. And while Mr. Lai's celebratory speech presented a vision of cooperation with rival stakeholders, the second year of his presidency is off to a rocky start. If the recall campaign facing legislators of the two main parties — the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and the Kuomintang (KMT) — comes to fruition, it may be both a display of democratic vibrance, and indicative of volatility in the political corridors of Taipei. Yielding the Yuan Mr. Lai's biggest policymaking hurdle since the beginning of his tenure has been that his party, the DPP, had failed to achieve a majority in the Legislative Yuan. Of the 113 parliamentary seats, 52 were won by the main opposition party, the KMT, and 51 by the DPP. Eight seats were won by a third party closely aligned with the KMT — the Taiwan People's Party (TPP). The remaining two seats went to independent candidates who, again, are believed to be ideologically aligned with the KMT. Subsequently, the KMT has blocked vital steps to secure Taiwan's internal democratic and legal processes, as well as its defence preparedness. For example, in December 2024, the KMT pushed amendments to the 'Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures'. The Act was amended for the first time in 25 years, and its new text restricted the central government's budgetary decision-making powers, especially in the defence sector. Now, the central government is liable to disburse more funds to local governments, bringing the ratio of the central-to-local tax revenue share from 75:25 to 60:40, the pre-1999 amendment levels. KMT's controversial manoeuvres during Mr. Lai's tenure go back a year. In May 2024, one of the bills put forth jointly by the KMT and the TPP made the case that it should be compulsory for the president-elect to address the Yuan post-inauguration, and conduct an on-the-spot question-and-answer session with legislators. In the past, this had been optional for the President. Historically, no sitting Taiwanese president has been subject to it. Despite this, KMT and TPP lawmakers proposed that it be made mandatory for Mr. Lai which led to scuffles in the Yuan. DPP lawmakers have also alleged that the KMT introduced amendments to laws on the legislature's powers, without going through mandatory processes. These processes include first hashing out bills at a procedural committee meeting, and then forwarding them for a first and second reading to the legislative floor, before the eventual vote. However, KMT lawmakers have opposed the allegations. On the brink of dismantling? Today, the ideological and political rift is evident in something more serious — a series of recall campaigns (a mechanism through which voters can remove a sitting legislator and ask for re-election) targeting as many as 37 KMT legislators and 15 DPP ones. The initiators of the petitions for the KMT recall campaigns seem to all be citizen groups, including from constituencies through which KMT legislators won a seat in the Yuan. Many KMT lawmakers are in the second stage of the recall process, where 10% of the electorate in a constituency signs a petition to initiate a recall vote. In a face-saving move, KMT lawmakers, too, initiated a recall campaign against DPP parliamentarians, and have shot themselves in the foot by forging signatures on behalf of voters who were declared dead sometime in the past year. It now seems that by June, a huge batch of lawmakers (of which a greater majority belong to the KMT) may have to vacate their Yuan seats. It all depends on the validity of the signatures submitted to the Central Election Commission. Names of the first set of recalled legislators may even be available as early as late June-early July, when the third and final stage, the recall vote, comes to fruition. A rift beyond repair Under Mr. Lai, the rift between the KMT and the DPP is especially apparent, because the KMT previously never occupied a majority in the Yuan when a member of the DPP party (Tsai Ing-Wen or Chen Shui-Bian) was President. The transformation of this legislative deadlock into a mass recall campaign means that democracy is alive through the exercise of citizens' rights to re-election. But it also means that even KMT lawmakers who won a majority in the 2024 elections are losing hold of their electorate. Historically, the KMT has been a party that promotes dialogue over deterrence with China, while the DPP is relatively more vocal against reunification. With changing sentiments among the youth, the KMT's narrative and pitch were already unappealing, even though they won Yuan seats due to dissatisfaction with the DPP's economic and diplomatic performance during two tenures before Mr. Lai. As the ideological rift materialises into a deadlock, Mr. Lai has two options. He can either continue to emphasise deliberations with the KMT to avoid mass recall, including by inviting opposition parties to the table for a meeting on national security. His other option is to put the weight of the DPP behind KMT recall petitioners, and prepare a policy agenda so strong that by-elections yield majority seats for the DPP. Either way, this would be a historic moment in Taiwanese politics. Anushka Saxena is a staff research analyst at The Takshashila Institution.
