Call for Julie Bishop to resign from top university role after concerning allegations were made about the former foreign minister by a colleague
On Tuesday, Dr Liz Allen, a former member of the Australian National University (ANU) Council, told a Senate committee investigating higher education governance that she resigned in April after losing confidence in the university's leadership.
Dr Allen alleged senior figures had issued 'misleading public statements' and dismissed community concerns.
She claimed that since 2024 she had endured 'threats, intimidation, and bullying' for pushing for greater transparency, an ordeal she says drove her 'to near suicide' and caused lasting trauma.
She alleged Ms Bishop had falsely accused her and an undergraduate student representative of leaking confidential council information, allegations Dr Allen 'strongly denies.'
According to Dr Allen, during a February meeting Ms Bishop delivered a 'near two-hour disciplinary-like lecture' before later confronting her in a private room with another council member present.
'The Chancellor further berated me, suggested commencing a legal investigation, and calling a journalist to confirm I wasn't leaking,' Dr Allen said. She told the hearing she felt 'threatened' and feared for her job.
Senator Mehreen Faruqi said during the committee hearing that she could see no way forward other than for Ms Bishop and ANU vice-chancellor Genevieve Bell to resign following Dr Allen's testimony.
The academic also claimed she had received a legal letter from ANU after she was accused of leaking information.
'ANU media (also) delayed publication of a piece I worked on (and) I was excluded from coordinated media during the election, something I would usually participate in.'
Dr Allen said the situation also damaged her working relationships.
'Colleagues are afraid to collaborate with me, fearing the leadership,' she said.
'My online and work activities are monitored and I recently received numerous emails from the Vice-Chancellor's head of public affairs and the senior adviser noting they were 'watching my public comments'.'
She further alleged Ms Bishop laughed at her emotional response, blocked her from leaving the room, and left her feeling 'violated and deeply humiliated.'
'The trauma caused by the most senior people at the nation's university continues to affect me and my family,' she said.
'I haven't leaked. I haven't breached the ANU code of conduct. I've merely tried to hold leadership accountable.'
Dr Allen said the emotional toll was too much, leaving her to consider taking her own life.
'It affected me so deeply that on the drive home, I decided to kill myself.,' she said.
'I pulled over to write final goodbyes to my children and partner. I emailed my supervisors because I knew I hadn't done anything wrong.
'A call from my husband stopped me taking my life.'
Dr Allen also said that she suffered a miscarriage just two weeks after the alleged incident with Bishop occurred.
Later in the day, ANU Chief Operating Officer Jonathan Churchill appeared before the committee, and addressed Dr Allen's allegations.
'We take what has been said very seriously,' Mr Churchill said.
'On a preliminary view, a number of the statements don't appear to be correct,' he said.
'We will examine all of the statements made and will respond with particularity, in writing, to those assertions.'
Mr Churchill noted that Dr Allen's case was an ongoing internal matter.
'In relation to Dr Allen, I draw the committee's attention to the fact there is a current grievance procedure against the university… that has been initiated by Dr Allen,' he said.
'That makes it impossible for me to comment whilst the grievance procedure is on foot without compromising those current proceedings.'
Mr Churchill also told the committee that Vice-Chancellor Genevieve Bell was absent from the inquiry due to illness.
He added that Chancellor Julie Bishop was engaged on other duties, in her role as UN Secretary General and Special Representative on Myanmar.
Another member of the Australian National University Council, Francis Markham, has also resigned, with his departure confirmed overnight.
Appearing before the Senate committee earlier on Tuesday, Dr Markham said his decision was driven by 'concerns about governance practices within the council.'
He had been due to serve on the council until September 2026.
The claims against Bishop follow sharp criticism against her and the ANU Vice Chancellor Genevieve Bell, who have been slammed over their running of the university.
Bishop came under fire for holidaying in Dubai, at the five-star Atlantis Hotel, where rooms go for upwards of $1,000 a night, just weeks after ANU announced $250million in budget cuts
Lucy Chapman-Kelly, co-convener of the 'No Cuts at ANU' campaign, slammed Bishop.
'Julie Bishop and Genevieve Bell deserve to be sacked for putting profit over our education. ANU students and staff won't stop fighting until we achieve a reversal of [the cuts],' she told Daily Mail.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
23 minutes ago
- The Independent
UK university tuition fees could rise again
Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson is considering allowing universities to raise tuition fees annually in line with inflation to improve their financial stability. This follows a previous announcement that tuition fees, frozen at £9,250 since 2017, would increase in September 2025 based on the Retail Price Index. The proposal addresses concerns about the financial health of universities, with a report indicating 40 per cent of English institutions may face budget deficits this year. A significant factor contributing to universities' financial struggles is a decline in the number of international students. Labour's position on tuition fees has evolved, with Keir Starmer retracting his pledge to abolish them, now seeking a "fairer solution" due to affordability concerns.
Daily Mail
23 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Former Trump national security advisor warns Australia on China
Donald Trump 's former national security adviser has warned Australia needs to clarify its position on China, which had grown ambiguous under Anthony Albanese. John Bolton this week said the Albanese government was 'less vocal about what the problem is' in comparison to its predecessors. 'It is a little hard to get used to,' Bolton said in an interview. Just a few weeks ago, while Albanese was on Chinese soil, the Pentagon demanded to know if Australia would support the US if China attacked Taiwan. Bolton warned that the US could treat its quieter allies with suspicion as tensions in the Pacific persist. The Trump administration is already reconsidering the AUKUS deal, which would provide Australia with nuclear submarines. The ex-national security advisor, who was fired in a tweet by Trump during his first term in 2019 after repeated clashes, said that 'back in the Cold War days, Labour governments in Great Britain were just as anti-communist' as the right wing. 'When you see a leftist government that's not willing to talk as openly about what the real threat is, it does make some people nervous,' Bolton told The Sydney Morning Herald. 'Why the hell are we worried about talking about what the threat is? The struggle is on, and we ought to be candid about it,' he said. Tensions between China and the West have significantly grown since the communist superpower began ramping up efforts to grow influence over the Indo-Pacific in the 2010s. Chinese President Xi Jinping claimed in a recent speech that: 'No one can stop China's 'reunification' with Taiwan'. The continued pressure from Washington for Australia to make its stance on China public comes in spite of the US growing guarded over its own position. While former president Joe Biden repeatedly said the US would defend Taiwan from Chinese invasion, the Trump administration's style has been described as 'purposeful strategic ambiguity' to keep both friends and foes guessing. So why should Australia, which sits much closer to the disputed region, be the first to stick its neck out? Naval operations expert Bryan Clark, a senior fellow at the conservative Hudson Institute, believes it boils down to AUKUS. In 2023, Australia announced it would buy three American-made nuclear submarines. Those subs are set to be delivered in the early 2030s. From there, the US and UK will share knowledge with Australia to help it be able to build its own nuclear submarines, SSN AUKUS subs. That submarine construction yard will be built in Adelaide's Osborne Naval Shipyard, which South Australian Premier Peter Malinauskas toured alongside US congressmen on Wednesday. Mr Clark explained the US wanted clarification on whether the submarines it sells to Australia would be used to back America, should it find itself in conflict with China. He said Australia had been 'reticent' to explicitly say they would be used against China, which had raised some questions in Washington about why the government was not more straightforward about the reason for purchasing the submarines. Australia is spending billions to procure the submarines, but there is not a guarantee they will arrive. The AUKUS deal contains a clause that the US can only supply Australia excess submarines not needed by its own navy. Australia has so far paid the US two installments of $800 million twice this year, in February and July. By the end of 2025, Australia will have paid USD$2 billion to help expand America's nuclear submarine production, which is already worryingly behind schedule. All up, Australia plans to spend $368 billion over 30 years on the AUKUS submarine pact. The pact is currently being reviewed by US defence under Secretary Elbridge Colby, a vocal AUKUS skeptic. While it's widely believed AUKUS will remain intact when the review concludes in the coming months, it has only served to further strain relations between the US and Australia following Trump's trade tariff spree. Bolton conceded it was detrimental for America to expect Australia to publicly call out China while it remained tight-lipped. However, he supported Washington's calls for Australia to lift its defence budget to three per cent of GDP. Labor's existing policies promise just 2.33 per cent of GDP by 2033. 'Everybody is going to have to go up, I just think that's inevitable. It's not because of Trump's pressure, it's because of what's going on in the real world,' Bolton said. In response to the US' earlier demands for an official stance on Taiwan, Albanese said he would not bow to pressure to make 'private' discussions public. 'The sole power to commit Australia to war, or to allow our territory to be used for conflict, is the elected government of the day,' he told the ABC. 'That is our position. Sovereignty will always be prioritized and that will continue to be our position.' Albanese has still not had a sit-down meeting with President Trump since his January inauguration. The pair were due to meet in June but the Trump left Canada's G7 summit early citing urgent developments in the Middle East, preceding the bombing of Iran.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Australia is issued with a grim warning as Trump's former national security advisor slams Anthony Albanese about the nation's biggest threat
Donald Trump 's former national security adviser has warned Australia needs to clarify its position on China, which had grown ambiguous under Anthony Albanese. John Bolton this week said the Albanese government was 'less vocal about what the problem is' in comparison to its predecessors. 'It is a little hard to get used to,' Bolton said in an interview. Just a few weeks ago, while Albanese was on Chinese soil, the Pentagon demanded to know if Australia would support the US if China attacked Taiwan. Bolton warned that the US could treat its quieter allies with suspicion as tensions in the Pacific persist. The Trump administration is already reconsidering the AUKUS deal, which would provide Australia with nuclear submarines. The ex-national security advisor, who was fired in a tweet by Trump during his first term in 2019 after repeated clashes, said that 'back in the Cold War days, Labour governments in Great Britain were just as anti-communist' as the right wing. 'When you see a leftist government that's not willing to talk as openly about what the real threat is, it does make some people nervous,' Bolton told The Sydney Morning Herald. 'Why the hell are we worried about talking about what the threat is? The struggle is on, and we ought to be candid about it,' he said. Tensions between China and the West have significantly grown since the communist superpower began ramping up efforts to grow influence over the Indo-Pacific in the 2010s. Chinese President Xi Jinping said in a recent speech that: 'No one can stop China's 'reunification' with Taiwan'. The continued pressure from Washington for Australia to make its stance on China public comes in spite of the US remaining vague over its own position. While former president Joe Biden repeatedly said the US would defend Taiwan from Chinese invasion, the Trump administration's style has been described as 'purposeful strategic ambiguity' to keep both friends and foes guessing. So why should Australia, which sits much closer to the disputed region, be the first to stick its neck out? Naval operations expert Bryan Clark, a senior fellow at the conservative Hudson Institute, believes it boils down to AUKUS. In 2023, Australia announced it would buy three American-made nuclear submarines. Those subs are set to be delivered in the early 2030s. From there, the US and UK will share knowledge with Australia to help it be able to build its own nuclear submarines, SSN AUKUS subs. That submarine construction yard will be built in Adelaide's Osborne Naval Shipyard, which South Australian Premier Peter Malinauskas toured alongside US congressmen on Wednesday. Mr Clark explained the US wanted clarification on whether the submarines it sells to Australia would be used to back America, should it go to war with China. 'The Australians have been a little reticent to explicitly call out that they might use them against China,' he told the Sydney Morning Herald. 'If you're not willing to say it in public, then you're not going to put the Chinese on notice. It has been privately conveyed in the past but the US would like Australia to make it more public. 'There's definitely some questions on their part about why isn't Australia being more straightforward about why they are buying these submarines.' But, it's not as though the US is giving Australia submarines. In fact, Australia plans to spend billions procuring them. Australia has so far paid the US two installments of $800million twice this year, in February and July. By the end of 2025, Australia will have paid USD$2billion to help expand America's nuclear submarine production, which is already worryingly behind schedule. All up, Australia plans to spend $368billion over 30 years on the AUKUS submarine pact. Another point to keep in mind, the AUKUS pact is currently being reviewed by US defence under secretary Elbridge Colby, a vocal AUKUS skeptic. While it's widely believed AUKUS will remain intact when the review concludes in the coming months, it only served to further strain relations between the US and Australia. Bolton conceded it was wrong for America to expect Australia to publicly defend Taiwan while it remained silent. 'To treat Australia as, 'Well, you put your situation on the line first before we do' is destructive to the relationship,' he said. However, he supported Washington's calls for Australia to lift its defence budget to three per cent of GDP. Labor's existing policies promise just 2.33 per cent of GDP by 2033. 'Everybody is going to have to go up, I just think that's inevitable. It's not because of Trump's pressure, it's because of what's going on in the real world,' Bolton said. In response to the US' earlier demands for an official stance on Taiwan, Albanese said he would not bow to pressure to make 'private' discussions public. 'The sole power to commit Australia to war, or to allow our territory to be used for conflict, is the elected government of the day,' he told the ABC. 'That is our position. Sovereignty will always be prioritised and that will continue to be our position.' Albanese has still not had a sit-down meeting with President Trump since his January inauguration. The pair were de to meet in June but the Trump left Canada's G7 summit early citing urgent developments in the Middle East, preceding the bombing of Iran. During the Australia America Leadership Dialogue in Adelaide this week, Democrat senator Chris Coons suggested Trump visit Australia soon. 'When you're sitting in the same room as someone you have a better conversation,' he told reporters. Mike Turner, former chair of the House Intelligence Committee, added an in-person dialogue would be 'helpful'.
