logo
Alleged buyer of stolen transformer denied bail, case postponed

Alleged buyer of stolen transformer denied bail, case postponed

The Citizen16-07-2025
A case involving four suspects accused of stealing a transformer from Laudium valued at R7-million, has been postponed to August 5.
This after the fourth suspect, Katlego Molepo (32), from Middelburg appeared in the Atteridgeville Magistrates' Court for his bail application on July 11.
Molepo is alleged to be the buyer of the transformer stolen from the Claudius Substation in Laudium.
National Prosecuting Authority spokesperson, Lumka Mahanjana, said, 'The matter was postponed to August 5, 2025, for a regional court transfer.'
'The court ruled that it would not be in the interest of justice to grant Molepo bail,' she said, adding that his co-accused, three city officials, were granted bail.
Molepo had handed himself over to police at the Atteridgeville Police Station on July 6.
'The city officials, Kleinbooy Mahlangu (45) from Soshanguve, Thomas Baloi (41) from Pretoria North, and Daniel Kubayi (50) from Hammanskraal were granted bail [on July 8],' said Mahanjana.
The three were arrested on July 1 after a nearly year-long thorough investigation into the transformer theft.
'The four accused are facing charges related to the theft of essential infrastructure,' she said.
She said SAPS and TMPD allegedly responded to a tip-off about a theft in progress at the Claudius Substation on November 7, 2024.
'Upon arrival, they found cranes, trucks, and a City of Tshwane-branded vehicle on site. As no proof of work authorisation could be provided, 11 people were arrested at the scene.'
Mahanjana said 10 individuals were later released from custody.
'Another City of Tshwane official, Madimetja Jacob Malebane (38), who was also arrested at the scene, appeared in court on 28 November 2024 and was released on bail,' she said.
She said during the police investigation, it was discovered that Mahlangu, Baloi, and Kubayi had fled the scene before law enforcement arrived.
'Warrants of arrest were issued, and the three were arrested at their respective workplaces,' she said.
Mahanjana added that during his bail application, Molepo, through his legal representative, argued that the State had a weak case against him.
'He further claimed he should be released because he is a father of four, has a wife to support, and suffers from a chronic illness,' she said.
She said, however, Prosecutor Grace Komane opposed the application.
She said Komane cited the seriousness of the offence and Molepo's previous conviction for defrauding the Unemployment Insurance Fund.
'That conviction resulted in a sentence of five years' direct imprisonment or a fine of R40 000,' she said.
Komane added that Molepo allegedly committed the current offence just ten months after that conviction, showing that he could commit more crimes.
Mahanjana also said the magistrate agreed with the State, adding, 'The accused is facing a serious charge. His medical condition can be managed while in custody.'
She said Molepo failed to provide evidence that his children would suffer undue hardship if he were not granted bail.
'There are no substantial or compelling circumstances warranting his release,' she said.
WATCH PREVIOUS VIDEO OF THE SYNDICATES BEING NABBED:
Do you have more information about the story?
Please send us an email to [email protected] or phone us on 083 625 4114.
For free breaking and community news, visit Rekord's websites: Rekord East
For more news and interesting articles, like Rekord on Facebook, follow us on Twitter or Instagram or TikTok.
At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ex-husband of Faith Nketsi fights R1. 5 million fraud charges
Ex-husband of Faith Nketsi fights R1. 5 million fraud charges

IOL News

time36 minutes ago

  • IOL News

Ex-husband of Faith Nketsi fights R1. 5 million fraud charges

Fraud-accused businessman and former husband of Faith Nketsi, Nzuzo Njilo. Image: Supplied Nzuzo Njilo, the ex-husband of influencer and media personality Faith Nketsi, has been dismissed by the State in his attempt to have his R1.5 million fraud case withdrawn, as he claims the State has a weak case against him. Njilo, the son of former Pietermaritzburg mayor and businessman Themba Njilo, made a brief appearance in the Durban Commercial Crimes Court on Wednesday morning to hear about the outcome of the representations he had made. State prosecutor Quentin Quarsingh said the representations have been declined by a senior public prosecutor (SPP) at the Durban Regional Court. The State is alleging that between February 2023, Njilo pretended to Khumbulani Cele that he was going to supply him with 1,000 tons of chrome. Cele then deposited R1.5 million into Njilo's Absa business account. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading 'He (Nzuzo) knew that he would not supply the product required. He would use the money for his benefit,' read the charge sheet. Before the representations were made, there was a pre-trial conference in the matter, and the State had said it would take three days to finalise the matter. The defence said it would bring two witnesses, and the State said it would bring three. On behalf of his client, the former acting director of public prosecutions in KwaZulu-Natal, now defence counsel advocate Simphiwe Mlotshwa, told the court that they would now make the representations to the Director of Public Prosecutions in Pietermaritzburg. Although it was not detailed in court why Njilo wanted the charges against him dismissed, according to the representations that were urgently filed by Mlotshwa to the SPP, he stated that the investigation was unlawful. 'The entire investigation, including but not limited to the involvement of the 'alleged' private investigator in this matter, was unconstitutional,' he said. Moreover, Mlotshwa said, should the matter proceed to trial, it would be put into dispute the admissibility of the evidence of all State witnesses for a trial-within-a-trial to be held for the determination of admissibility. Additionally, in the representations, Mlotshwa said the transaction alleged by the State to be fraudulent was a pure commercial transaction with remedy in private law but not in public law generally, 'criminal law in particular,' he added. He further stated that the withdrawal of charges at this stage would save the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) and the police from an unnecessary civil claim. Mlotshwa asked for the matter to be postponed to September for the outcome of representations made to the DPP. The matter was adjourned to September for the hearing of the DPP's decision.

Sigh of relief as murder accused in Fose case is released
Sigh of relief as murder accused in Fose case is released

IOL News

time36 minutes ago

  • IOL News

Sigh of relief as murder accused in Fose case is released

Scores of community members of Durban Deep, Roodepoort and anti-GBV organisations came out in their numbers to support the grieving family of 14-year-old Likhona Fose, who was mutilated and killed in the area. Image: Itumeleng English / Independent Newspapers The National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) has announced that it has withdrawn charges against Mduduzi Trevor Mnisi in the murder case of 14-year-old Likhona Fose. The withdrawal of charges comes two weeks after Mnisi was released on bail of R5,000 after the Roodepoort Magistrates Court learned that the evidence of the State heavily relied on a report given by a community member, who had stated that Mnisi was the last person to be seen with the teenager. Mnisi, who was on parole at the time of the incident, was linked to the case through a single witness who later became uncooperative, as there was no forensic or additional evidence tying him to the crime, with the court finding the State's case too weak to proceed. On 2 July, Mnisi's girlfriend, Pinky Gantso, testified at his bail hearing to provide an alibi for the day Fose disappeared. Gantso detailed Mnisi's movements on 31 May 2025, painting a picture of a man following his normal routine, with Gantso saying Mnisi had visited her in Daveyton, Ekurhuleni, on the same day that Fose disappeared, and on his return, proceeded to travel to Dobsonville, Soweto. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad Loading The 39-year-old parolee, who faced several charges, including premeditated murder, appeared in the Roodepoort Magistrate's Court on Wednesday, where he was visibly relieved over the decision. Mnisi told members of the media outside court that he was relieved that the court had found in his favour. "I am so happy that the charges have been dropped against me, I was innocent all along because I was not involved in this," he said. The teen's mutilated body was discovered in an open field in Durban Deep, west of Johannesburg, on June 1, following her disappearance on May 31. Mnisi was charged with the murder and during his application to be released on bail, Mnisi raised an alibi that he did not know the deceased and that his phone records would prove that he was in Daveyton on 31 May 2025, the day Fose went missing. In a statement on Wednesday, NPA spokesperson Phindile Mjonondwane stated that subsequent to Mnisi's bail hearing, the NPA had given instructions to the investigating officer to probe his alibi, and indeed, his phone was linked to a tower in Daveyton. "Furthermore, there were more statements obtained from other witnesses that confirmed that Minisi could not have been the last person to be seen with the deceased. The decision to withdraw charges is therefore fair and responsible under these circumstances. "The investigation continues to unearth what transpired on the day Fose was brutally killed. At this stage, we urge community members to work with us in our attempts to find justice for the affected family.

Mistakes to avoid when applying for a protection order against alleged abusers
Mistakes to avoid when applying for a protection order against alleged abusers

The Citizen

time36 minutes ago

  • The Citizen

Mistakes to avoid when applying for a protection order against alleged abusers

The respondent must be served with the order within 24 hours. If it has not been served, then it is not yet active. The court can grant an order for an abusive spouse to continue maintaining their partner despite a protection order against them. This was shared by senior National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) advocates Buyisiwe Nkala and Mzoxolo Rusi, along with senior domestic violence court clerk Qaqamba Tshangela, in their Eastern Cape domestic violence webinar on Wednesday. The officers shared steps to take when applying for a protection order against an abusive close relative and also mistakes for victims to avoid to ensure their order remains in place. According to the South African Police Service (Saps), a protection order aims at preventing the recurrence of domestic violence or sexual harassment by stating what conduct the alleged offender must refrain from doing. ALSO READ: Protection orders and police 'failing victims of GBV' As long as the alleged offender complies with the protection order, the complainant will be safe. If the alleged offender contravenes any stipulation of the protection order, they may be arrested. Once a protection order is granted, it is enforceable throughout the country. What to know about protection orders According to the Saps, to apply for one, the complainant must make an affidavit and complete an application form at their nearest police station. Supporting affidavits by persons who have knowledge of the matter in question may accompany the application. These documents must be handed to the clerk of the nearest court. The court will consider the application immediately. Once the interim has been granted, it goes to the police station, where they will look for the respondent. The respondent must be served with the order within 24 hours. If it has not been served, then it is not yet active, according to Tshangela. Tshangela said the interim protection order will protect you for the period you wait until your trial date. While still waiting for your trial date, if anything happens to you, you can go back to the police with the interim order, and the respondent will be arrested. However, Tshangela cautioned applicants against the mistake of not going back for their trial date once the interim protection order has been granted. ALSO READ: Justice department's poor record-keeping delays protection orders for GBV victims – AG 'Until the magistrate grants you a final order, that's when your protection order application is valid for a lifetime,' she said. 'If you only have the interim and not the final order, it means once your trial date comes and you don't show up, your application will be set aside after two postponements, and you won't have the protection order.' Those who do return for trial are allowed to take no more than three people to accompany them to court. Domestic violence In a situation where your alleged perpetrator is a spouse whom you depend on, the NPA urged victims not to let this stop them from applying for a protection order, as there are systems in place to ensure their upkeep. 'In your application, in the interim order, there is a section that highlights that if this person was maintaining you and now you fear that if you open the case and he will not provide anymore, the magistrate will conduct an inquiry with you that clearly explains that this person was providing for you,' said Tshangela. ALSO READ: Public protector probe confirms inadequate GBV measures by justice department 'It will be a must that he must continue providing whatever he was providing for you. The court can oblige him to continue with the maintenance.' Monetary relief An applicant can also apply for emergency monetary relief – compensation for the things they lost due to their spouse's domestic violence conduct. 'If someone assaulted you to the point of getting admitted to the hospital and you lost your earnings, you can apply for that relief for the person to compensate you,' said Tshangela. 'If you have to relocate because you cannot be under one roof with your perpetrator, they must pay for the relocation. The presiding order decides on the duration of the payment. 'If you are married in community of property and you are being violated, the courts can grant an order that the perpetrator must move out, even if you're both owners of the property. The perpetrator must go.' For those who do not wish to return to their home, they can apply for a place of safety, where they are provided with accommodation. An applicant can also apply for a safety monetary notice, which forces the police to visit and monitor the applicant's safety. READ NEXT: Man sentenced to life after brutally murdering ex, despite protection order

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store