
‘Digital blitz': Misinformation on social media casts shadow on US-China trade truce
From false claims of Americans panic-buying Chinese goods to bot-driven attacks on US brands, a tide of misinformation is casting a shadow over a temporary trade truce between Washington and Beijing.
The world's two biggest economies agreed earlier this month to pause reciprocal tariffs for 90 days, a surprise de-escalation in their bitter trade war following high-level talks in Geneva.
But an alternate reality is unfolding across social media platforms, including China's Douyin and Weibo, where a surge of falsehoods is fueling anti-American sentiment that could undermine the fragile truce.
One online video, which garnered millions of views across those platforms and TikTok, claims to show panicked American shoppers snapping up Chinese-branded television sets in the aftermath of trade tensions.
But in reality, that was old footage from 2018 showing Black Friday shopping frenzy at a US supermarket.
The falsehood was further amplified by Chinese state media outlets, including China Daily, which ran headlines such as: 'Americans are starting to stock up like crazy amid tariffs and snapping up Chinese-branded TVs.'
A news clip on its website — more recycled footage from 2018 — bears a 'file footage' watermark in the upper left corner, apparently to shield the outlet from legal liability.
Other unfounded claims emerged on Chinese platforms about Americans flying to China to shop for Chinese goods, and that US citizens — reeling from the economic fallout of the trade war — were queuing up to purchase supplies in bulk.
'These narratives are almost certainly curated by the state, which has become increasingly fluent in harnessing social media,' Andrew Mertha, director of the SAIS China Global Research Center at Johns Hopkins University, told AFP.
'(They) help align Chinese public opinion with governmental strategy, in this case demonstrating — albeit inaccurately, certainly prematurely — that 'the US is already feeling the pain, so China must stay the course.''
Economic jitters
US President Donald Trump's on-again, off-again tariffs have sent jitters through the world economy, unnerving investors and roiling financial markets.
Under the May 12 truce, the United States agreed to temporarily reduce the tariff on Chinese imports to 30 percent from 145 percent, while China said it would lower its import duty on American goods to 10 percent from 125 percent.
Some of the false narratives emerged before the agreement but have continued to spread online, fueling confusion and a broader wave of information chaos.
'A lot of friends in China asked me: Are there no eggs in the United States? Is it very unsafe? Are people rushing to buy things? Have you stockpiled anything?' Vivian Wei, a Chicago-based content creator, told AFP.
'Some people even (suggested) not to come to the United States for tourism or study.'
The rumors prompted Wei to tour several supermarkets across Chicago, only to find shelves stocked.
While American shoppers seemed unfazed by the swirl of online misinformation, Wei observed that the 'Chinese were getting very excited.'
'Digital blitz'
Last month, disinformation security firm Cyabra uncovered an anti-US influence campaign on the Elon Musk-owned X involving thousands of fake or bot-operated accounts.
They targeted global brands such as Gucci, Chanel and Amazon, amplifying the unfounded narrative that they produced goods in China while branding them as 'Made in France' or 'Made in Italy.'
The accounts blamed Trump's trade policies for enabling such deceptive marketing practices, while urging consumers to ditch those brands and purchase products directly from China.
'This was a digital blitz. A third of the accounts weren't real, but the backlash they triggered was,' Dan Brahmy, chief executive of Cyabra, told AFP.
'Fake profiles hijacked luxury brands, pushed anti-US narratives, and steered buyers away without raising suspicion. That's what makes it effective.'
Last month, AFP also uncovered viral TikTok videos by Chinese content creators promoting the spurious claim that international luxury brands were secretly manufacturing their products in China.
The targeted brands did not respond to the claim, which appeared to be part of a sprawling campaign exploiting US-China trade tensions to market counterfeit luxury goods.
The false narratives are unlikely to fade as trade negotiations continue, experts say.
'I believe these narratives will continue and will evolve in parallel with strengthening the Chinese government's negotiating position,' said Mertha from Johns Hopkins University.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Asia Times
an hour ago
- Asia Times
A US cavalier talks 'imminent' war in Singapore
In his recent speech in Singapore, US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth pledged to defend the region against Chinese aggression and encroachment. This should have reassured the audience presumed to be concerned about China's assertiveness. Yet, possibly, the room listening to him wasn't quite ready to believe what they were hearing. The past few months have been full of surprises for Asia. Technically, Japan is still at war with Russia, just as South Korea is with North Korea. And yet, both Russia and North Korea are fighting in Ukraine— a country that has been left hanging by the US because Washington is (was?) seeking to turn Russia (and maybe also North Korea?) against China. This situation is spreading anxiety in Asia. China may suddenly look more straightforward, reliable and easier to talk to. Plus, Chinese jet fighters look more formidable than French fighters because the French aircraft (adopted by the Indian Air Force) performed poorly compared to the Chinese ones (adopted by Pakistan) in the recent bilateral clash. Furthermore, everyone in the region— starting with the US's closest allies— is scrambling to understand what kind of trade deal they can make with America. It is all creating huge uncertainty in the region. So far, no one feels they have a clear picture, and no one has a deal. Then, America doesn't address these issues, but comes and lambasts China. Maybe Japanese, or Thai or South Korean, could say: 'Sure, China is my biggest concern in the long term. But geography doesn't change, and what if America doesn't have my back in one or two years? It dropped me about Russia and North Korea, it bugs me about my trade surplus, but it wants me to push harder on China. Sure, I'll do it, but I'll need to hedge my bets— at the very least.' These contradictory statements and actions are causing massive unease in Asia. Many (maybe all) American regional allies are getting cold feet about the US. Their feet are getting even colder because, despite many warnings, America doesn't seem to realize the gravity of the situation and that Asia can't be separated from what is happening in Europe. In the 1950s and 1960s, the Korean and Vietnam Wars had a massive impact on Europe. To cap it all, the Chinese—and thus true believers in conspiracy theories—could see this erratic US behavior as evidence that the US administration is caught in a loop of irrationality or is penetrated by Russia. Moscow could likely fuel those suspicions. And still, the pragmatic Chinese would be puzzled: if the Russians are so good at plotting in Washington, why didn't they get a peace deal in Ukraine already? Thus, short of certainty, Beijing would not sensibly talk to Washington without a clear picture of what was happening. It would realistically wait to see the developments with the US and the world. This also impacts Europe, now closely following Asian developments, and Russia. Moscow has fewer incentives to seek peace in Ukraine when the whole American fabric seems to be unraveling. America can decide to be cavalier about all of this, and the problems will certainly fester and rot transpacific and transatlantic trust, weakening US clout in the regions and the world. Or it can decide to address these concerns, which need profound rethinking. This article first appeared on Appia Institute and is republished with kind permission. Read the original here.


South China Morning Post
4 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
This moment in US-China rivalry is Asean's chance to remake the bloc
Asean is at a critical juncture. The Southeast Asian bloc, caught between the currents of the US-China trade war , is making a dive for strategic space between a new free-trade agreement with China and the possibility of a Trump tariff meeting. Last month, China and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations finalised negotiations to upgrade their 15-year-old free-trade agreement. Set to be signed by the end of the year, the deal aims to deepen China-Asean economic integration by incorporating digital trade, green economy initiatives and supply chain connectivity. Bilateral trade in goods exceeded US$980 billion last year – China and Asean are each other's biggest trading partner – underscoring the deal's strategic weight. At the same time, Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim of Malaysia, the current Asean chair, has written to US President Donald Trump to press for an Asean-US meeting to discuss tariffs. These include the 10 per cent baseline tariff and 'reciprocal' tariffs ranging from 17 per cent for the Philippines to 49 per cent for Cambodia. Anwar is seeking a unified response to ensure trade fairness for Asean's export-driven economies. In this moment of tension, Asean has a critical opportunity to rise above passivity, leveraging its diplomatic agility to assert itself as a linchpin in global trade and geopolitics – and become the architect of a new regional order. Rather than being a battleground for US-China rivalry, Asean can redefine its role by fostering a neutral, inclusive trade ecosystem that prioritises regional resilience and strategic autonomy. This opportunity hinges on Asean's ability to exploit the US-China rivalry. Asean's unique position of being geographically central, economically vibrant and diplomatically neutral allows it to shape trade rules rather than merely adapt to them. But this requires navigating internal divisions and external pressures with unprecedented cohesion.


RTHK
7 hours ago
- RTHK
Most countries prefer mediation to settle disputes: SJ
Most countries prefer mediation to settle disputes: SJ Paul Lam has stressed that non-member states can also use the services provided by the International Organization for Mediation. Photo: RTHK Secretary for Justice Paul Lam said the International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has the potential to show the world that disputes can be solved by "equal and peaceful means". Speaking days after the founding of the IOMed in the SAR last Friday, Lam stressed that there is always an urgency for mediation on a global level. For example, he noted that two years ago, Iran and the United Arab Emirates resumed diplomatic relations through the help of Chinese mediation. "I think there's major room for mediation. We shouldn't allow the rather dejecting small amount of countries that disrespect international laws hurt our confidence. Rather, this highlights the need for mediation," the minister said on Commercial Radio. "We need to change the whole atmosphere, and show that the vast majority of countries in the world insist on using equal and peaceful means to settle disputes. We can use this new platform to demonstrate our persistence on such principles." Lam said non-member states can also use the mediation service, and they are most welcome to join the organisation going forward. He noted that compared with arbitration or litigation, countries who take part in mediation are more likely to respect the results of the process, since both parties would have found common ground through direct negotiations. Speaking on a TVB programme later, the minister said the renovation of the organisation's base – at the Old Wan Chai Police Station – should be completed by the end of the year. When it will start taking on cases depends on member states, and the formation of the organisation's secretariat, he added. The minister also stressed that the organisation is located in Hong Kong not only because of China's backing, but it also reflects the reputation of the SAR's rule of law, the city's global status, safety and transport links.