Photos of Beijing's World Humanoid Robot Games show how a human touch is still needed
But they also toppled, crashed and collapsed, requiring humans' help and leading to questions about how far, after all, the robots can go on their own.
The games featured more than 500 humanoids on 280 teams from 16 countries, including the United States, Germany and Japan, that competed in sports such as soccer, running and boxing at the 12,000-seater National Speed Skating Oval, built for the 2022 Winter Olympics.
The event comes as China has stepped up efforts to develop humanoid robots powered by artificial intelligence.
Robots were often seen close to their operators, whether they were controlled remotely, held, lifted, sorted or separated. Batteries needed replacing and limbs tuned.
Although the robots showed off some impressive moves, some tripped and human intervention was never far from the field. One had to be carried out by two people, like an injured athlete, in a display of the limitations the machines are still facing.
Their effect on the audience, however, was not unlike that of real athletes. Cheers erupted when a robot landed a punch, scored a goal, or won a game, showing that viewers were genuinely invested in the machines' endeavors.
AI-powered robots are expected to be increasingly used in industrial settings.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
2 minutes ago
- The Independent
ChatGPT makes friendly change after user complaints
ChatGPT 's latest GPT-5 update has faced criticism from users who found the chatbot's tone too formal and less friendly. Users complained that the new system lacked the social and positive personality they had become accustomed to in previous versions. In response to feedback, OpenAI is implementing changes to make GPT-5 'warmer and friendlier,' incorporating subtle compliments. OpenAI previously aimed to reduce ChatGPT's tendency to be overly supportive, which had led to criticism regarding potentially dangerous interactions. The company is now attempting to strike a balance between a less sycophantic tone and a more approachable user experience.
Finextra
2 hours ago
- Finextra
Payoneer and Stripe team on cross-border checkouts for SMBs
Payoneer (NASDAQ: PAYO), the global financial technology company powering business growth across borders, today announced a strategic partnership with programmable financial services company Stripe. 0 This content is provided by an external author without editing by Finextra. It expresses the views and opinions of the author. The collaboration marks an expansion of Payoneer's Online Checkout offering for cross-border merchants looking to sell direct-to-consumer. Launching in key markets within the Asia Pacific (APAC) region first, including China and Hong Kong, the upgraded Payoneer Checkout capabilities — powered by Stripe's best-in-class technology — will empower Small and Medium-sized Businesses (SMBs) to accept a broader range of payments methods via online webstore checkout including Buy Now Pay Later (BNPL) options like Affirm and Klarna, and digital wallets such as Apple Pay and Google Pay. In the three years since launching Payoneer Checkout, the company has scaled from zero to nearly $1 billion in run-rate annual volume, demonstrating rapid market adoption and strong customer demand. Over the last twelve months through June 30, 2025, the business has generated $30 million in revenue, representing over 100 percent year-over-year growth. "We are committed to simplifying cross-border online trade for SMBs," said Adam Cohen, Chief Growth Officer, Payoneer. "This partnership with Stripe is a strategic step in our journey to expand our Checkout offering and deliver a best-in-class user experience at scale. By combining Payoneer's local market distribution and expertise with Stripe's exceptional checkout technology, we're combining the strengths of both companies to deliver unmatched value to our customers." Through this partnership, Payoneer and Stripe are enabling enhanced customer conversion rates, improving acceptance rates, helping to reduce fraud, and expanding payment acceptance options for SMBs selling direct-to-consumer via their own eCommerce webstores. This enhanced Checkout experience aligns with Payoneer's strategic vision to expand its SMB financial stack through high-impact partnerships. With Stripe's advanced capabilities and Payoneer's customer-first approach, the partnership delivers unmatched value for entrepreneurs and businesses across the globe.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
The Guardian view on Britain's AI strategy: the risk is that it is dependency dressed up in digital hype
There was a time when Britain aspired to be a leader in technology. These days, it seems content to be a willing supplicant – handing over its data, infrastructure and public services to US tech giants in exchange for the promise of a few percentage points of efficiency gains. Worryingly, the artificial intelligence strategy of Sir Keir Starmer's government appears long on rhetoric, short on sovereignty and built on techno-utopian assumptions. Last week Peter Kyle, the technology secretary, was promoting the use of AI-generated discharge letters in the NHS. The tech, he said, will process complex conversations between doctors and patients, slashing paperwork and streamlining services. Ministers say that by applying AI across the public sector, the government can save £45bn. But step back and a more familiar pattern emerges. As Cecilia Rikap, a researcher at University College London, told the Politics Theory Other podcast, Britain risks becoming a satellite of the US tech industry – a nation whose public infrastructure serves primarily as a testing ground and data source for American AI models hosted on US-owned cloud computing networks. She warned that the UK should not become a site of 'extractivism', in which value – whether in the form of knowledge, labour or electricity – is supplied by Britain but monetised in the US. It's not just that the UK lacks a domestic cloud ecosystem. It's that the government's strategy does nothing to build one. The concern is that public data, much of it drawn from the NHS and local authorities, will be shovelled into models built and trained abroad. The value captured from that data – whether in the form of model refinement or product development – will accrue not to the British public, but to US shareholders. Even the promise of job creation appears shaky. Datacentres, the physical backbone of AI, are capital-intensive, energy-hungry, and each one employs only about 50 people. Meanwhile, Daron Acemoglu, the MIT economist and Nobel laureate, offers a still more sobering view: far from ushering in a golden age of labour augmentation, today's AI rollout is geared almost entirely toward labour displacement. Prof Acemoglu sees a fork: AI can empower workers – or replace them. Right now, it is doing the latter. Ministerial pledges of productivity gains may just mean fewer jobs – not better services. The deeper problem is one of imagination. A government serious about digital sovereignty might build a public cloud, fund open-source AI models and create institutions capable of steering technological development toward social ends. Instead, we are offered efficiency-by-outsourcing – an AI strategy where Britain provides the inputs and America reaps the returns. In a 2024 paper, Prof Acemoglu challenged Goldman Sachs' 10-year forecast that AI would lead to global growth of 7% – about $7tn – and estimated instead under $1tn in gains. Much of this would be captured by US big tech. There's nothing wrong with harnessing new technologies. But their deployment must not be structured in a way that entrenches dependency and hollows out public capacity. The Online Safety Act shows digital sovereignty can enforce national rules on global platforms, notably on porn sites. But current turmoil at the Alan Turing Institute suggests a deeper truth: the UK government is dazzled by American AI and has no clear plan of its own. Britain risks becoming not a tech pioneer, but a well-governed client state in someone else's digital empire. Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.
