French accused of making a mockery of ‘one-in, one-out' migrant deal after letting unsafe dinghy reach UK
A search-and-rescue ship was deployed near Calais on Thursday after a small boat was detected to be in distress.
French rescuers recovered 15 migrants but let the rest carry on toward Britain.
The RNLI picked up the others.
It came two days after the new migrant swaps deal with Paris began.
Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp said: 'The French should not be allowing a badly damaged boat to continue on its journey - this is incredibly dangerous.
'It is incredibly irresponsible for French authorities to allow these dangerous boats to cross.
'This makes a mockery of the migrant deal announced last week.
'If the French were serious about ending this dangerous and illegal route they would be stopping these boats at sea.'
France's maritime prefect of the Channel insists their authorities cannot force migrants to be rescued due to the risk of them falling overboard if their dinghy capsizes.
Chris Philp added: 'Labour's deal with France will allow 94 per cent of illegal arrivals to stay in the UK. Earlier this week, I went to the Channel to see for myself if the deal was deterring any crossings. It wasn't.
'We found two boats full of illegal immigrants in half an hour and they were escorted to UK waters by the French.'
Loophole in PM's swap plan means the more bogus an asylum seeker is, the less chance we have of kicking them out
1
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
28 minutes ago
- The Independent
Minister can't guarantee that murderers or rapists will spend any time in prison under ‘deport now, appeal later' scheme
The government cannot guarantee murderers or rapists would spend a single day in prison in their country of origin if they are removed from the UK under its 'deport now, appeal later' scheme. The scheme, which sees foreign criminals deported before their appeals have been heard, has been expanded to include offenders from another 15 countries including India, Bulgaria and Australia, bringing the total to 23 countries. The scheme allows the UK to deport offenders who have had a human rights claim against their removal rejected, with any appeals heard from abroad over a video link. But asked whether it is guaranteed that offenders will be deported into a prison in their home country, rather than just released, victims minister Alex Davies-Jones told Sky News: 'All of the information will be given to their country of origin. But ultimately, it is up to that country of origin what they do with that individual.' She added: 'What is important is that they will not be costing the taxpayer £54,000, which is what it costs to house a prisoner here in England and Wales. And they will not be taking up space in our prisons, which we desperately need.' Asked what her message to victims would be, Ms Davies-Jones said: 'They will be deported to their country of origin, with no right to ever return to this country, keeping that victim safe and secure in the knowledge that they can never return. 'And also they're not costing that victim through their hard earned taxpayers money, the cost of staying in a prison in England.' Announcing plans to expand the scheme over the weekend, home secretary Yvette Cooper said foreign criminals had been 'exploiting' the immigration system by 'remaining in the UK for months or even years while their appeals drag on'. She said: 'That has to end. Those who commit crimes in our country cannot be allowed to manipulate the system, which is why we are restoring control and sending a clear message that our laws must be respected and will be enforced.' The other countries now in the scheme are Angola, Botswana, Brunei, Canada, Guyana, Indonesia, Kenya, Latvia, Lebanon, Malaysia, Uganda and Zambia. The Home Office said the expansion of 'deport now, appeal later' would help 'scale up' the country's ability to remove foreign criminals, alongside measures announced on Sunday to deport offenders as soon as they are sentenced. Justice secretary Shabana Mahmood said the move, which requires parliamentary approval, would save £54,000 a year per prison place. It comes as the government ramps up its efforts to bring down migration amid growing public anger over the issue. Last week it was announced that the government's new 'one in, one out' returns deal was up and running, with the first migrants who arrived in the UK after crossing the English Channel being detained on Thursday. The agreement, announced by the prime minister in a joint press conference with Emmanuel Macron last month, means that any adult migrant who crosses the Channel will now be at risk of return if their claim for asylum is considered inadmissible. The government is hoping the new scheme will turn the tide on the numbers of people arriving in the UK after crossing the Channel, amid mounting tensions over the issue in recent days and protests across the UK. Since Labour came to power last year, almost 5,200 foreign offenders have been deported, representing a 14 per cent increase on the previous 12 months. Officials have said increasing deportations will help ease pressure on overcrowded prisons. But figures from the Ministry of Justice from the end of June suggest there are currently just 772 prisoners from the 15 new countries covered by 'deport now, appeal later'. Of the new countries, only Indians are in the top nationalities among current prisoners, while there are no offenders from Botswana or Brunei currently behind bars. The 'deport now, appeal later' scheme for human rights claims was introduced in 2014 but was ruled unlawful by the Supreme Court three years later in cases where deportation would prevent the offender from giving live evidence in their appeal. But the court noted that giving evidence over a video link could be sufficient, provided it was financially and logistically possible, in effect limiting the policy to countries where video appeal facilities were realistically available. The UK currently has arrangements for video appeals with eight countries, including Tanzania, Belize, Finland and Estonia. While the Tories said the scheme is a 'step in the right direction', shadow home secretary Chris Philp said it is only a 'drop in the ocean' compared to 'record numbers of illegal arrivals'. 'Until Keir Starmer either commits to deporting all foreign criminals or stops rolling out the red carpet for migrants the world over, this problem is not going away', he added.
The Independent
28 minutes ago
- The Independent
Police confirm 532 arrests at Palestine Action protest
More than 530 people have been arrested at a protest in central London with the majority of arrests relating to support for banned group Palestine Action, the Metropolitan Police said. The force confirmed on Sunday that 522 people were held for displaying an item in support of a proscribed organisation, out of 532 total arrests made during the policing operation. The Met said they were aware of online photos and footage suggesting some people returned to Parliament Square after being released on bail, adding it would be 'entirely unrealistic' for officers to recognise these individuals. This comes after hundreds of people attended the demonstration in Parliament Square on Saturday, organised by Defend Our Juries, with the Met warning it would arrest anyone expressing support for Palestine Action. 'Given the numbers of people arrested (on Saturday) it would have been entirely unrealistic for officers to recognise individuals who returned to the area,' a spokesperson for the Metropolitan Police said. 'Their focus was rightly on those continuing to commit offences who were still to be arrested. 'We are as confident as we can be that none of those who returned to Parliament Square re-joined the protesters who were holding placards.' The majority of those arrested, 348, were aged 50 or over, according to a breakdown published by the Met on Sunday. Detained protesters were taken to prisoner processing points in the Westminster area. Those whose details could be confirmed were released on bail to appear at a police station at a future date. They were given conditions not to attend future demonstrations related to Palestine Action, police said. There were a further 10 arrests, six for assaults on officers, two for breaching Public Order Act conditions, one arrest for obstructing a constable in the execution of their duty, and one for a racially aggravated public order offence, the force said. Over the coming weeks, officers from the Met's Counter Terrorism Command will work to put together case files and secure charges against those arrested for supporting Palestine Action. Justice minister Alex Davies-Jones said on Monday supporters of a 'terrorist organisation will feel the full force of the law'. She told BBC Breakfast: 'I want to thank the police for their bravery and their courage in carrying out their diligent duties in the line of public protection, and I want to state that the right to peacefully protest in this country is a cornerstone of our democracy, and of course, we respect that. 'But with regards to Palestine Action, they are a proscribed terrorist organisation and their actions have not been peaceful. 'They have violently carried out criminal damage to RAF aircraft. 'We have credible reports of them targeting Jewish-owned businesses here in the United Kingdom, and there are other reasons, which we can't disclose because of national security. 'But they are a prescribed terrorist organisation and anyone showing support for that terrorist organisation will feel the full force of the law.' Securing a charge for an offence under the Terrorism Act will in some instances require approval by both the Crown Prosecution Service and the Attorney General Lord Hermer, police said. Last week, the force confirmed the first three charges in England and Wales for offences against Section 13 of the Terrorism Act relating to Palestine Action. The three charged were arrested at a protest in Parliament Square on July 5. 'A further 26 case files relating to arrests on the same day are due to be submitted to the CPS imminently, with more to follow in relation to later protests,' a spokesperson for the Met added.
Telegraph
29 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Pull down Clive of India statue, says Labour peer
A Labour peer has called on the Government to pull down a statue of Clive of India outside the Foreign Office. Baroness Debbonaire claimed the bronze sculpture in Whitehall is historically inaccurate and 'not helpful' for British relations with India. Clive of India was a clerk with the East India Company who rose to become a wealthy military leader and lead British expansion on the subcontinent. He has been blamed for presiding over the Bengal Famine and in 2021 his name was stripped from a house at his former private school in the wake of the Black Lives Matter movement. Baroness Debonnaire, who was Sir Keir Starmer's shadow culture secretary before losing her seat at the last general election, told a panel event that the statue should be taken down. Speaking at the Edinburgh International Book Festival, the Labour peer said: 'I'm not sure that a statue of Clive should really have any place outside the Foreign Office. 'I walk past it and the frieze shows happy, smiling people really delighted to see him. And that's just not historically accurate. It's not helpful for our current relationship with India and it is deeply unhelpful to see India as a country that Britain civilised. 'India had a thriving engineering industry in the 17th century – it knew about mineral extraction, there had been incredible technological advances, it knew about free trade before free trade rules were ever written. That was closed down by an extractive colonising force. 'But what is pictured on that statue is tiny, tiny little Indians who are subservient and incidental to their own national story, and then a great big Clive.' Baroness Debonnaire also referred to the statue as 'a shocking piece of sculpture' in comments that were first reported by The Times. Clive the Great defeated Mughal forces with company troops at the Battle of Plassey, which prompted British expansion into Bengal, and went on to a huge amount of wealth. However, he would later be accused of causing starvation by mismanagement as the Bengal Famine killed as many as 10 million people. He purportedly took his own life aged 49. The Grade II-listed statue of the first British Governor of Bengal was first unveiled in 1912. It was then moved to its current location outside the Foreign Office four years later. The artwork on the side of the plinth that was criticised by Baroness Debonnaire includes a depiction of the Mughal emperor granting Clive the Great the right to collect revenue for the East India Company in 1865. The politics of the past Statues of historical figures with links to the empire came under threat after the Black Lives Matter protests that followed the murder of George Floyd in the United States in 2020. A 125-year-old statue of the slave trader Edward Colston was toppled by a mob in Bristol in June of that year, with activists going on to dump it in the city's harbour. Baroness Debonnaire was an MP in the city at the time and had called for the statue to be taken down two years earlier. Addressing a Black History Month event in 2018, she said: 'Having statues of people who oppressed us is not a good thing to be saying to black people in this city. 'Edward Colston did many things, but he was not completely defined by that, and it's an important part of saying to black people in the city 'you are welcome'.' Sir Keir said at the time that the statue of Colston should have been removed 'a long, long time ago' but also argued that the manner of its removal by protesters was 'completely wrong'. The now-Prime Minister said: 'That statue should have been brought down properly, with consent, and put, I would say, in a museum. 'This was a man who was responsible for 100,000 people being moved from Africa to the Caribbean as slaves, including women and children, who were branded on their chests with the name of the company that he ran. 'Of the 100,000, 20,000 died en route and they were chucked in the sea. He should not be on a statue in Bristol, or anywhere else.'
