logo
RNC chair Michael Whatley defends Trump tariffs in NC, arguing that market chaos is ‘overreaction'

RNC chair Michael Whatley defends Trump tariffs in NC, arguing that market chaos is ‘overreaction'

Yahoo08-04-2025

Michael Whatley (right), chair of the Republican National Committee, speaks to reporters as North Carolina GOP chairman Jason Simmons looks on at the NC GOP headquarters in Raleigh on Sept. 14, 2024. (Galen Bacharier/NC Newsline)
The chair of the Republican National Committee said Monday evening he believes recent chaos in global stock markets was an 'overreaction' to President Donald Trump's new tariffs.
'I think there's a lot of false equivocation that the market equals the economy,' argued Michael Whatley, who was elevated to the national post by Trump after previously serving as head of the North Carolina GOP. 'It doesn't.'
Whatley's comments Monday came during an event at NC State University, held by the conservative campus group Turning Point USA — which grew contentious at times as he defended the administration's policies in front of a student crowd that included multiple vocal protesters.
Stock futures bounced Tuesday morning after news of Trump's wide-ranging tariffs caused days of steep losses and volatility across global markets. Multiple questions from students addressed costs and the economy; one was spotted looking at the S&P 500's daily chart on his laptop as the state GOP chairman, Jason Simmons, addressed the room.
'I am not panicking' about the markets, Whatley told the crowd of around 50 at Talley Student Union. He said he believed they 'will rebound' as the world adjusts to the new policy (multiple prominent trade partners, including the E.U. and China, have vowed to retaliate with additional tariffs of their own). And he urged students to take a longer, and wider, view of the administration's trade policies.
'You probably want to look at that not just in a vacuum,' Whatley said, but rather as an 'overall strategy to bring manufacturing back to the U.S.'
Attendees at Monday's Turning Point event, most of whom were students, quizzed Whatley on a range of topics — including the GOP's approach to housing, the administration's mass deportation policy and concerns about free speech.
And throughout the event, a group of students there to protest the event frequently set off noisemakers and ended the event shouting at Whatley.
One student, who said he led a campus group focused on real estate, asked how the party could focus on making housing affordable. (Whatley said reducing the cost of materials and taking down building regulations were key.) Another asked about potential shortages of people on visas, concerned about the impact on agricultural workforce. (Whatley said people should view the current phase of immigration enforcement as 'phase one.')
Multiple protesters urged Whatley to answer for reports of migrants who are in the U.S. legally and do not have criminal charges also being caught up in deportation operations. And they asked him to comment on two NC State students' visas being revoked last week.
'I don't know anything about the students here,' Whatley said. But he defended the administration's immigration enforcement broadly, and said that 'folks who are over here on visas are not citizens.'
The Q&A ended on a tense note, as protesters grew increasingly agitated with Whatley's answers and shouted criticisms of the administration and GOP's actions toward pro-Palestinian protesters. Those protesters, many of whom are students, have reportedly been under scrutiny by immigration authorities and private groups for possible deportation.
'You don't care, and that's the problem,' one shouted, as another held up a sign reading 'free speech unless it's free Palestine.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

This investment turned $50,000 into $23 million in 10 years. It's still a buy.
This investment turned $50,000 into $23 million in 10 years. It's still a buy.

Yahoo

time37 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

This investment turned $50,000 into $23 million in 10 years. It's still a buy.

In life, you make things happen, watch things happen or wonder what happened. Don't let your cash slip away unnoticed. Throughout history, moments come when our basic assumptions shift quietly beneath our feet. Most people don't notice until it's too late. I bought my mother-in-law a condo — and she took out a $30,000 car loan. Now she refuses to get a roommate. 'I prepaid our mom's rent for a year': My sister is a millionaire and never helps our mother. How do I cut her out of her will? Circle's stock is having another big day. What the blockbuster IPO has meant for other cryptocurrency plays. I help my elderly mother every day and drive her to appointments. Can I recoup my costs from her estate? S&P 500 changes are imminent. Robinhood and these other stocks could join the index. Imagine two young fish swimming together. An older fish passes by, greeting them, 'Good morning, boys. How's the water?' One fish looks puzzled, leans toward the other, and mutters, 'What the hell's water?' This analogy perfectly illustrates our relationship with our money. You've been floating cluelessly in a fish tank of government funny money for so long you've forgotten you're all wet. Every year, central banks crank the printing presses into overdrive, flooding the economy with more paper currency. Politicians treat debt as endlessly available, with no consequences. This is not capitalism. This is economic waterboarding. And yet we accept it as normal, just as residents of a town that floods every spring casually accept disaster. They move their sofas upstairs, prop up their televisions and shrug: Flooding, to them, is inevitable. When a fresh-faced optimist asks, 'Why don't we just drain the swamp?' he's laughed out of town — until someone suddenly realizes, 'Wait, we actually can drain the swamp.' That's our money system. Instead of sandbags, politicians toss trillions of newly printed dollars at us, hoping we'll float a bit longer. But each fresh flood of cash makes the problem worse. MarketWatch Live: Home to the world's top-performing currency this year, Russia cuts interest rates for the first time since 2022 Bitcoin BTCUSD is the grown-up choice in a world run by toddlers with credit cards. It's not a Band-Aid or a 'patch' or one more empty promise from a politician who'd lose money running a lemonade stand. Instead, bitcoin is stable precisely because no central banker can muck it up. Every minute you hesitate is another moment your wealth gets eaten by money-printing machines run by bureaucrats who think math is an inconvenience. Bitcoin isn't just another investment; it's financial Kevlar for the inevitable gunfight between your wallet and the world's central planners. Protect your savings, or don't — but don't say you weren't warned. But first, understand clearly why you're facing this situation. We live with a profound economic paradox: Technological advances continually lower the cost of living, yet prices keep climbing. Your money buys far less today than 10 or 20 years ago, despite incredible progress. Why? Inflation. It's baked into a monetary system engineered to steadily devalue currency. Most accept this erosion as natural — it isn't. Bitcoin provides an alternative, yet few truly grasp it. Labels like 'digital gold,' 'investment' and 'bubble' confuse rather than clarify, causing bitcoin to remain vastly underutilized. Bitcoin isn't digital gold, although it shares gold's GC00 scarcity. It is not merely a speculative asset you buy hoping prices rise. Instead, understanding bitcoin requires adopting a new mindset. Bitcoin is an open, decentralized system built specifically to securely store and freely exchange value — without banks or bureaucrats getting in the way. Nobody controls bitcoin. Yet everybody can benefit. Consider how the internet transformed information. Before, gatekeepers— newspapers, TV networks — controlled what you saw. The internet removed those gatekeepers, allowing free and instant access to information. Bitcoin applies the same principle to money. It removes financial gatekeepers, eliminates fees and prevents inflationary manipulation, putting control of your finances permanently into your hands. Bitcoin's core innovation is decentralization. Its security isn't backed by banks or governments; it's rooted in mathematics, cryptography and a global network of independent participants. There is no CEO, no headquarters and, crucially, no way to print more currency. This revolutionary design ensures no one can seize your bitcoin, freeze your accounts or dilute your savings. It's money designed intentionally to be fair, neutral, secure and universally accessible. Grasping bitcoin demands a fundamental rethinking — not just about technology but about money itself. It challenges deeply held beliefs about freedom and control. Read: Here's how much higher gold prices can still go — even after doubling the past two years Right now, governments and banks decide how much money to print. Imagine playing the board game Monopoly, but one player secretly prints extra bills. Suddenly, everyone's cash is worth less, and prices rise uncontrollably. This is inflation. It shrinks your savings and paycheck, making everyday life more expensive. Asset owners — those with stocks and real estate — benefit, while regular earners suffer dwindling purchasing power. Bitcoin completely flips this scenario. Its supply is capped at 21 million coins. No government or bank can ever create more. Rather than losing value over time, bitcoin protects — and potentially enhances — your purchasing power. Think of bitcoin like rare baseball cards or limited-edition sneakers. Finite supply plus growing demand equals increased value. Instead of your savings eroding each year through inflation, bitcoin rewards you by maintaining or growing your buying power. Secured by mathematics and powerful computing, it's unforgeable digital gold: safe, scarce and impossible to manipulate. Bitcoin isn't just new money — it forces us to reconsider money's role in our lives entirely. Consider this 10-year investing lesson: On June 2, 2015, imagine you faced a crucial choice. You had $50,000 saved for your child's education. Two investment paths appeared clearly. One, a familiar S&P 500 SPX fund — the SPDR S&P 500 ETF SPY —promising stable, reliable growth. The other, bitcoin: experimental, misunderstood, yet uniquely resistant to inflation. Ten years later, the outcomes diverged dramatically: Bitcoin: Your $50,000 bought roughly 220 coins at about $227 each. Now, with the cryptocurrency recently at about $102,000 per coin, your investment is worth around $23.2 million. S&P 500 ETF: Your $50,000 purchased roughly 236 shares at about $212 each. Now, with the ETF recently at $593 per share, your investment totals roughly $140,000. After adjusting for inflation averaging 3% annually, each 2025 dollar equals 74 cents in 2015 purchasing power. In real, after-inflation terms, your bitcoin investment maintains $17.1 million in buying power, while your S&P 500 ETF preserves about $104,000 — still a gain, but dwarfed by bitcoin's inflation-adjusted returns. This 10-year lesson teaches us something profound about our assumptions. Ultimately, the question isn't just about returns; it's about sovereignty. The real lesson isn't about luck or risk. It's about whom you trust with your money. Do you want your financial destiny dictated by institutions that profit from quietly eroding your wealth, or do you want to become your own banker, operating under principles that respect your financial independence? Read: Trump administration rescinds Biden-era caution about crypto in 401(k) plans — here's what that means for you Here's what keeps me up at night: Right now, somewhere, a couple is arguing over money. A parent is calculating whether they can afford their kid's college tuition. A retiree is watching their savings evaporate, one grocery trip at a time. They're all making the same mistake. See, there are only two kinds of people in this story. Those who act. And those who become cautionary tales their grandchildren whisper about: 'If only Grandpa had bought bitcoin when it was just six figures … ' The math doesn't lie. The 10-year proof is staring you in the face. Your choice isn't between safe and risky anymore. It's between two futures: In one, you're explaining to your family why you ignored the biggest wealth transfer in human history when the evidence was screaming at you. In the other, you're the one who saw what was coming and acted. Twenty years from now, only one question will matter: Were you the smart money or the scared money? Garcia holds positions in bitcoin and gold. . More: America's biggest lender is closing its wallet — and investors and home buyers will feel it. Here's what to watch. Also read: The 'mother of all credit squeezes' is coming — hang on to your wallet 'I'm not wildly wealthy, but I've done well': I'm 79 and have $3 million in assets. Should I set up 529 plans for my grandkids? What's at stake if world's most powerful market finally buckles after decades-long U.S. debt splurge My daughter's boyfriend, a guest in my home, offered to powerwash part of my house — then demanded money How do I make sure my son-in-law doesn't get his hands on my daughter's inheritance? Never mind the tariffs and tantrums. The 'dual equity pain trade' means new highs for stocks. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Veteran fund manager resets stock market forecast amid Musk, Trump fallout
Veteran fund manager resets stock market forecast amid Musk, Trump fallout

Miami Herald

time39 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

Veteran fund manager resets stock market forecast amid Musk, Trump fallout

Put two mercurial personalities in the room, add competing goals and a hefty dose of media pressure, and what do you get? Let's just say that the high-profile friend-to-foe saga isn't overly surprising. Elon Musk and Donald Trump are polarizing figures with a penchant for dropping verbal bombshells, and that was particularly evident this week as the two sparred over the Big Beautiful bill, electric vehicle credits, and debt. The rift may shock some, however, given how closely Musk and Trump worked together over the past year. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Musk spent hundreds of millions helping elect Donald Trump as president, and Trump rewarded Musk with a high-profile role in his administration as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE. Trump even went so far as to host a Tesla showroom on the White House lawn to support Musk after Musk's political activism caused a drop in Tesla's sales. One person who wasn't the least bit surprised by the high-profile dust-up was veteran hedge fund manager Doug Kass. Back in December, Kass picked the break-up as one of his top 15 surprises for 2025. It was far from the only correct forecast for Kass. He also predicted a stock market reckoning could cause the S&P 500 to fall 15%, and in April, he accurately forecast that stocks would find their footing after the brutal sell-off. Kass recently revisited his take on Musk and Trump, and how stocks may react to their fallout. His S&P 500 outlook may disappoint many, while his take on Trump and Musk might surprise most. After back-to-back 20% gains in the S&P 500 in 2023 and 2024, including an impressive 24% return last year, investors may have complacently expected more good times in 2025. Then reality set in. The stock market has whipsawed amid a series of shocks, many delivered by President Trump and Elon Musk, via his high-profile and much-debated cost-cutting at DOGE. Related: Elon Musk latest message sends Tesla stock surging Stocks came into 2025 arguably priced to perfection. Optimism for a friendly Federal Reserve shift in monetary policy to dovish interest rate cuts and a flood of artificial intelligence spending fueled big returns last year, pushing the S&P 500's price-to-earnings ratio north of 22. Historically, returns following high P/E ratios have been largely lackluster. That point wasn't lost on Kass, who correctly said in December that the S&P 500 could drop 15% in 2025. "Surprise #9: In 2025, the S&P Index falls by about 15%. The technology-laden Nasdaq drops by over 20%," wrote Kass. Kass beat the bearish drum continuously through February, when the S&P 500 reversed after hitting all-time highs. From mid-February through early April, bombshells in the form of shockingly high tariff announcements from President Trump and job losses stemming from Musk's DOGE efforts caused the benchmark index to plummet. At its worst, the S&P 500 fell 19%, while the tech-heavy Nasdaq fell about 24%. The sharp drop was painful, and many hit the sell button, worried that an endless stream of uncertainty would cause even greater losses. Kass, however, correctly reversed course, making bargain-basement buys on the indexes and tech leaders, including Amazon, near the lows. Since then, Trump's pause on tariffs and potential for trade deals that ease the tariffs' bite have helped fuel a dramatic recovery, lifting the S&P 500 by 20%. More Economic Analysis: Hedge-fund manager sees U.S. becoming GreeceA critical industry is slamming the economyReports may show whether the economy is toughing out the tariffs The result has been a nausea-inspiring roller coaster ride for buy-and-hold investors. That's been particularly true for Tesla (TSLA) shareholders. The EV company rallied after Trump's election amid hope that Musk's White House connections would pave the way to sales growth. Instead, Musk's DOGE efforts, and arguably controversial political comments, caused a mass exodus of left-leaning Tesla buyers. Sales cratered in key markets, including Europe and California, the largest U.S. auto market. In Europe, Tesla sales dropped 49% year-over-year in April to 7,261 vehicles, according to the European Automobile Manufacturers' Association. In California, Tesla registrations fell 21.5% year-over-year in the first quarter, while non-Tesla electric vehicle (EV) registrations grew 14%. Tesla's stock price got hammered as a result, falling 54% from mid-December highs to early April lows. It's since recovered alongside the broad market, jumping 35%, largely on news Elon Musk would step away from DOGE. Doug Kass has seen a thing or two. His career stretches back into the 1970s at money manager Putnam, including a stint as research director for billionaire Leon Cooperman's Omega Advisors. His deep experience navigating markets professionally means he had a front-row seat to his share of political, economic, and stock market surprises. He witnessed Richard Nixon's Watergate implosion, the inflation-riddled 70s, the Savings & Loan crisis, the Internet boom and bust, hanging chads, the housing-bubble-driven Great Financial Recession, Trump presidency version 1.0, Covid, and the recent inflation shock and recovery. Related: Veteran strategist unveils updated gold price forecast Every December, he tests that experience with his "surprises" list for the coming year. This year, in addition to predicting the S&P 500 sell-off, he forecast the unfriendly end of the Trump-Musk relationship. "Surprise #2: The 'other' romance, between Trump/Musk, doesn't make it past spring 2025," wrote Kass. "National protests and demonstrations emerge and demands from a wide array of members of both the Republican and Democratic parties (including conservatives and liberals) call for 'ousting' Elon Musk, an unelected official, from playing such a dominant role in the U.S. government." Kass's Musk prediction is a longer read, but the gist is simple: Musk and Trump will suffer a fallout, which may have consequences for investors. He revisited his outlook, offering a new take on the Trump-Musk situation. "Right in front of us, it is obvious that political positions of influence can easily be bought-sold by both parties (and that certainly includes the presidency)," wrote Kass. "I am not even sure where the performance ends and reality begins. In the end (probably sooner than later) - just like the president's opening salvos of ridiculously high tariff proposals - the two actors will likely have a detente (and kiss and make up) because the downside is certain for both of them, as no one will win. When that make-up happens, no one knows. It could happen today, next week or next month, but the parties' 'interests' are now so enmeshed that Musk and Trump recognize where their bread is buttered." A potential "easing" of tensions would be welcome, given that a long-term tit-for-tat would fuel market volatility. Still, Kass's view of what happens to the stock market next isn't encouraging. "Never in my investing career has there been so many possible social, political, geopolitical, economic, interest rates and fiscal policy outcomes (many of which are adverse). That is why I don't understand the uber confidence expressed by the Perma Bull cabal (led by Fundstrat's Tom Lee) and manifested in a near-vertical move higher for equities over the last two months," continued Kass. "With a forward PE of 22x, equities remain overvalued and, after covering my Index shorts yesterday, I plan to reshort any rally." If Kass is correct that instability will force stocks lower, how low could it go, and when might things improve? "I see seven lean months ahead for our markets. We estimate downside risk to be roughly 3x the upside reward," concludes Kass. Related: Veteran fund manager who predicted April rally updates S&P 500 forecast The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

How Trump's big bill could affect your taxes
How Trump's big bill could affect your taxes

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

How Trump's big bill could affect your taxes

President Trump's bill to cut taxes and spending centers on an extension of his previous round of tax cuts, which Republicans slated for expiration at the end of this year back in 2017. As such, it will preserve the status quo on many big parts of the code so that taxpayers won't see any change in things like the amount of money the government takes out of their paychecks. Other tax cuts in the legislation now moving through Congress will be brand new, though most of the new additions are scheduled to end after a few years. Here's a look at some of the big-ticket items in the latest round of GOP tax cuts. Trump's 2017 tax law cut many individual income tax rates, and those would continue into the future through the current legislation. Under current law and moving up the income spectrum, marginal rates are 10 percent, 12 percent, 22 percent, 24 percent, 32 percent, 35 percent, and 37 percent. The new GOP law will lock those rates in place. The extension of those rates will reduce federal revenues by $2.2 trillion through 2034, according to the Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT). If they were allowed to lapse, rates would change to 10 percent, 15 percent, 25 percent, 28 percent, 33 percent, 35 percent, and 39.6 percent. Only the 10-percent and 35-percent rates were left alone by the 2017 tax cuts. Trump in recent weeks floated letting the top rate go back to 39.6 percent from 37 percent as a way to lower the $3.8 trillion cost of the bill's tax portion, but he has since backed away from that idea. The law preserves — and temporarily boosts — the higher standard deduction, which was nearly doubled back in 2017. The new boost is $1,000 for individuals and $2,000 for couples filing jointly and will last for four years. This is paired with getting rid of personal exemptions, making tax filing simpler for many taxpayers. In 2024, the standard deduction was $14,600 for individuals and $29,200 for married couples. The higher standard deduction is projected to reduce revenues by $1.3 trillion through 2034. The loss of personal exemptions will add $1.9 trillion to federal revenues, resulting in a net revenue gain between the two measures. The bill creates a temporary full deduction for tips and overtime pay, allowing taxpayers to avoid paying taxes on those types of compensation. Taken together, the tax breaks will reduce revenues by about $164 billion through 2028 when they expire. People who work in the restaurant industry say they're concerned that the tax break will motivate customers to pay fewer gratuities, since tipping is left to the discretion of individual shoppers and diners as opposed to being a component of the employer-paid wage. 'I'm afraid that people are going to want to tip less with that income not being taxed,' one New York City bartender, who asked not to be named, told The Hill. The person also expressed concern that the no-tips rule could add to tensions in his restaurant between the front-of-house staff, who work for tips, and the kitchen staff, who do not. 'In the industry, the bigger concern is, why would the front-of-house not pay taxes when the back-of-house will still be paying taxes because they don't get tips?' the person said. Tax experts told The Hill the measures could add to the amount of paperwork that tax filers — both employers and employees — need to fill out, depending on how the IRS interprets the law and modifies its regulations and forms. The law gives an additional $4,000 tax break to seniors below a certain income threshold, which would be added to the $15,000 standard deduction and an already existing $2,000 deduction for seniors. Trump promised while campaigning to remove taxes on Social Security, which is funded through a payroll tax and then taxed again, above an income threshold, upon disbursal to bolster the Social Security fund along with Medicare. The enhanced deduction for seniors is a close substitute for the Social Security tax cancellation promised by Trump but is technically a different tax. According to congressional rules, the Social Social program cannot be altered through budget reconciliation, which is the legislative workaround Republicans are using to allow a party-line vote on their bill and avoid a Democratic filibuster in the Senate. Republicans haven't agreed on the most controversial provision of their tax bill — the state and local tax (SALT) deduction cap — but they're getting close. The initial proposal from the Ways and Means Committee raised the cap to $30,000, but members of the SALT caucus shot it down. Another proposal floated late Tuesday would bump the SALT deduction cap up to $40,000 — four times the current $10,000 cap — for people making $500,000 or less in income, three sources told The Hill. That level would increase by 1 percent a year over 10 years, according to one of the sources. Whatever they agree to, it will be expensive. Various estimates from the JCT put the cost of canceling the cap — which is a top priority for many blue-state Republicans — at around $1 trillion over 10 years. The SALT cap interacts with different parts of the tax code, including the higher standard deduction and the extended effective repeal of the alternative minimum tax (AMT), which costs more than $1.4 trillion in revenues. 'Even if you live in a place like New York, the combination of repealing the AMT and the $10,000 SALT cap was actually still positive for you. You were better off with the SALT cap because you lost the AMT than you would have been if the law hadn't happened at all,' Tax Policy Center senior fellow Howard Gleckman told The Hill. 'It was actually a good deal for people,' Gleckman said. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store