Analyst unveils surprising Microsoft stock price target after tariff slump
In an environment where recession warnings are growing louder, even Microsoft isn't untouchable.
Since late 2022, Microsoft has led the charge in AI infrastructure, thanks to its multibillion-dollar partnership with OpenAI. The race to dominate generative AI sparked a frenzy in data center development, GPU acquisition, and global capacity expansion. But in recent weeks, that expansion has shown signs of slowing.
💵💰Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter 💰💵
'We may strategically pace our plans,' Microsoft's Head of Cloud Operations Noelle Walsh wrote in a LinkedIn post earlier this month.
She said Microsoft had undertaken the 'largest and most ambitious infrastructure scaling project' in its history but would now be 'slowing or pausing some early-stage projects.'
In the past six months, Microsoft has pulled back from more than two gigawatts of AI cloud capacity across the U.S. and Europe, analysts at TD Cowen noted. In Ohio, a $1 billion data center was recently shelved.
Still, analysts say this is less about abandoning AI and more about shifting from the costly infrastructure buildup toward more selective investments.
'Over the past few quarters, Microsoft has 'overspent' on land and buildings but is now going back to a more normal cadence,' Barclays analyst Raimo Lenschow wrote, according to Business Insider.
Microsoft's () stock is down 11.8% year-to-date as of April 17, yet this is the smallest drop among the Magnificent 7 tech giants. By comparison, Nvidia () , and Tesla () have shed 22% and 40%, respectively.
Compared to Nvidia, Apple () , and Tesla, Microsoft is less exposed to tariff impact as it doesn't deal much in physical or consumer products.In Microsoft's fiscal year 2024, its cloud segment, which includes Azure, was the company's largest revenue contributor, generating about 43% of the company's total revenue.
What's more, Microsoft's focus on enterprise customers means that a big portion of its revenue streams is tied to long-term contracts, giving Microsoft extra stability.
Still, Microsoft isn't entirely immune to the pressures.
In its latest-reported quarter ended December 2024, Microsoft posted earnings per share of $3.23 on revenue of $69.6 billion, both topping consensus estimates.
But growth in Azure, Microsoft's AI-focused cloud platform, came in softer than expected, and the company's revenue outlook for the current quarter fell short of forecasts. Revenue from Azure and related cloud services rose 31% year over year, slightly below the 33% growth reported in the previous quarter.
Microsoft expects $67.7 billion to $68.7 billion in fiscal third-quarter revenue compared with the $69.78 billion consensus.
The company is set to report earnings for its fiscal third quarter on April 30 after market close.
Citi analysts led by Tyler Radke lowered the firm's price target for Microsoft to $480 from $497 while maintaining a buy rating, according to a research note on April 17.
The price cut aligned with Citi's view for a broader economic slowdown, with analysts moderating estimates broadly by roughly 3 points across Microsoft's three key segments.For the March quarter, Citi projects Azure growth will land at the lower end of its 31% guidance, with potential for further slowdown in the fourth-quarter guidance.
More Tech Stocks:
Top analyst revisits Tesla stock price target as Q1 earnings loom
Google's Waymo is planning a move that's downright creepy
Analyst reboots Apple stock price target after tariff meltdown
Revenue from Microsoft's Intelligent Cloud, including Azure, accounted for roughly 37% of the company's total revenue in the December quarter.
"Despite this incremental caution, the decline post Q2 results provides a more palatable entry point, and we continue to view MSFT as a more defensive asset within large cap tech," the analyst wrote.Sign in to access your portfolio
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Lawyers could face ‘severe' penalties for fake AI-generated citations, UK court warns
The High Court of England and Wales says lawyers need to take stronger steps to prevent the misuse of artificial intelligence in their work. In a ruling tying together two recent cases, Judge Victoria Sharp wrote that generative AI tools like ChatGPT 'are not capable of conducting reliable legal research." 'Such tools can produce apparently coherent and plausible responses to prompts, but those coherent and plausible responses may turn out to be entirely incorrect,' Judge Sharp wrote. 'The responses may make confident assertions that are simply untrue.' That doesn't mean lawyers cannot use AI in their research, but she said they have a professional duty 'to check the accuracy of such research by reference to authoritative sources, before using it in the course of their professional work.' Judge Sharp suggested that the growing number of cases where lawyers (including, on the U.S. side, lawyers representing major AI platforms) have cited what appear to be AI-generated falsehoods suggests that 'more needs to be done to ensure that the guidance is followed and lawyers comply with their duties to the court,' and she said her ruling will be forwarded to professional bodies including the Bar Council and the Law Society. In one of the cases in question, a lawyer representing a man seeking damages against two banks submitted a filing with 45 citations — 18 of those cases did not exist, while many others 'did not contain the quotations that were attributed to them, did not support the propositions for which they were cited, and did not have any relevance to the subject matter of the application,' Judge Sharp said. In the other, a lawyer representing a man who had been evicted from his London home wrote a court filing citing five cases that did not appear to exist. (The lawyer denied using AI, though she said the citations may have come from AI-generated summaries that appeared in 'Google or Safari.') Judge Sharp said that while the court decided not to initiate contempt proceedings, that is 'not a precedent.' 'Lawyers who do not comply with their professional obligations in this respect risk severe sanction,' she added. Both lawyers were either referred or referred themselves to professional regulators. Judge Sharp noted that when lawyers do not meet their duties to the court, the court's powers range from 'public admonition' to the imposition of costs, contempt proceedings, or even 'referral to the police.' Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data


TechCrunch
31 minutes ago
- TechCrunch
Lawyers could face ‘severe' penalties for fake AI-generated citations, UK court warns
The High Court of England and Wales says lawyers need to take stronger steps to prevent the misuse of artificial intelligence in their work. In a ruling tying together two recent cases, Judge Victoria Sharp wrote that generative AI tools like ChatGPT 'are not capable of conducting reliable legal research.' 'Such tools can produce apparently coherent and plausible responses to prompts, but those coherent and plausible responses may turn out to be entirely incorrect,' Judge Sharp wrote. 'The responses may make confident assertions that are simply untrue.' That doesn't mean lawyers cannot use AI in their research, but she said they have a professional duty 'to check the accuracy of such research by reference to authoritative sources, before using it in the course of their professional work.' Judge Sharp suggested that the growing number of cases where lawyers (including, on the U.S. side, lawyers representing major AI platforms) have cited what appear to be AI-generated falsehoods suggests that 'more needs to be done to ensure that the guidance is followed and lawyers comply with their duties to the court,' and she said her ruling will be forwarded to professional bodies including the Bar Council and the Law Society. In one of the cases in question, a lawyer representing a man seeking damages against two banks submitted a filing with 45 citations — 18 of those cases did not exist, while many others 'did not contain the quotations that were attributed to them, did not support the propositions for which they were cited, and did not have any relevance to the subject matter of the application,' Judge Sharp said. In the other, a lawyer representing a man who had been evicted from his London home wrote a court filing citing five cases that did not appear to exist. (The lawyer denied using AI, though she said the citations may have come from AI-generated summaries that appeared in 'Google or Safari.') Judge Sharp said that while the court decided not to initiate contempt proceedings, that is 'not a precedent.' Techcrunch event Save $200+ on your TechCrunch All Stage pass Build smarter. Scale faster. Connect deeper. Join visionaries from Precursor Ventures, NEA, Index Ventures, Underscore VC, and beyond for a day packed with strategies, workshops, and meaningful connections. Save $200+ on your TechCrunch All Stage pass Build smarter. Scale faster. Connect deeper. Join visionaries from Precursor Ventures, NEA, Index Ventures, Underscore VC, and beyond for a day packed with strategies, workshops, and meaningful connections. Boston, MA | REGISTER NOW 'Lawyers who do not comply with their professional obligations in this respect risk severe sanction,' she added. Both lawyers were either referred or referred themselves to professional regulators. Judge Sharp noted that when lawyers do not meet their duties to the court, the court's powers range from 'public admonition' to the imposition of costs, contempt proceedings, or even 'referral to the police.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump says his relationship with Musk is over, slamming the door on the once-staunch ally who tried to de-escalate their feud
The feud between Donald Trump and Elon Musk appears to have caused irreparable damage as the president told NBC News that he has no desire to repair their relationship and assumes it is over. The comments came after Musk appeared to make attempts at de-escalating a feud that exploded in public on Thursday over Trump's budget bill. President Donald Trump is seemingly done with Tesla CEO Elon Musk after they engaged in a feud on Thursday that unfolded publicly and escalated stunningly. In an interview with NBC News on Saturday, Trump was asked if he has any desire to mend his relationship with Musk, and the president replied 'no.' And when asked if he thinks his relationship with Musk is over, Trump said, 'I would assume so, yeah.' He added that he has 'no intention of speaking' to Musk anytime soon, saying 'I'm too busy doing other things' and accusing Musk of disrespecting the presidency. 'I think it's a very bad thing, because he's very disrespectful. You could not disrespect the office of the President,' Trump said. The comments came after Musk, who once embraced the moniker 'first buddy' to Trump, appeared to make attempts at de-escalating their feud. On Saturday, he deleted his X posts about Trump's association with the infamous Jeffrey Epstein. On Thursday night, Musk replied to a post from Pershing Square CEO Bill Ackman calling for peace between the tech billionaire and Trump, saying 'You're not wrong.' Also on Thursday, Musk backtracked on a threat to decommission SpaceX Dragon vehicles, which have become workhorse capsules that the Pentagon and NASA rely on to access Earth orbit. But the damage was already done. Musk had suggested Trump should be impeached, took credit for Trump's election victory, and said his tariffs would cause a recession later this year. That's after trashing Trump's tax and spending bill in the days leading up to their meltdown. Trump's signal that Musk is now persona non grata dashes hopes from top Republicans like Vice President JD Vance and House Speakers Mike Johnson who said they hoped the two men would reconcile. Meanwhile, Trump also warned Musk—who was the top GOP donor last year with nearly $300 million in campaign contributions—against backing Democrats. 'If he does, he'll have to pay the consequences for that,' Trump told NBC News, without elaborating. 'He'll have to pay very serious consequences if he does that.' For his part, Musk asked X users on Thursday if it's time to form a new political party 'that actually represents the 80% in the middle,' drawing support from 80% of respondents. Tesla didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. This story was originally featured on