logo
8 natural ways to lower your blood sugar, from yoga to apple cider vinegar

8 natural ways to lower your blood sugar, from yoga to apple cider vinegar

Yahoo27-03-2025

Blood sugar was once considered something people only focused on when they had diabetes. But the explosion in popularity of medications that affect blood sugar, like Ozempic and Wegovy, along with over-the-counter blood glucose monitors, has raised general awareness of the role blood sugar plays in several areas of health. That's why Jessica Cording, a dietitian and author of The Little Book of Game-Changers, says that blood sugar control is important for everyone. 'It influences so many aspects of our health,' she tells Yahoo Life, from managing inflammation to lowering the risk of unhealthy food cravings.
If you're one of the 38.4 million Americans with diabetes, it's understandable that blood sugar management be a big part of your life. But doctors say that it's important to pursue natural ways to manage your blood sugar, even if you're on medication. 'Lifestyle modification, which includes natural ways to lower blood sugar, is always recommended in combination with medication for treatment of diabetes,' Dr. Serena Cardillo, professor of clinical medicine in endocrinology, diabetes and metabolism at Penn Medicine, tells Yahoo Life. 'The effects of medication alone will be limited if the lifestyle piece isn't optimized.'
Getting a lab test is the best way to know where things stand with your blood sugar (aka glucose), but Cording says you don't necessarily need to go that route if you don't have an underlying health condition like type 2 diabetes. Instead, she recommends being on the lookout for signs of unstable blood sugar throughout your day, like feeling irritable or anxious, struggling with food cravings, having regular mood swings and dealing with energy crashing. 'These are all signs to pay attention to your blood sugar levels,' Cording says.
Whether you're trying to make smarter lifestyle choices for your health or just feel like you could be doing better on the blood sugar management front, experts say these are the best natural ways to lower your blood sugar.
'Fiber-rich foods will help with glucose spikes after meals,' Dr. Anthony Pick, clinical assistant professor of endocrinology at Northwestern Medicine, tells Yahoo Life. That's because your body can't absorb or break down fiber, he explains. As a result, it moves slowly through the stomach, helping you to feel fuller longer, Beth Mitchell, a dietitian nutritionist and diabetes education manager at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, tells Yahoo Life. (Fiber can also support good digestive and heart health, making it an excellent nutrient to have in your life, Cording points out.)
While the Dietary Guidelines for Americans recommend that adults have 22 to 34 grams of fiber a day, only 5% of Americans hit that goal. To get more fiber on your plate, Cardillo suggests focusing on apples, berries, pears, green vegetables, legumes and whole grains.
Protein, which plays a key role in growth and development, helps you feel full. That's why dietitians generally recommend trying to have protein throughout your day. Foods like meats, poultry, fish, beans, eggs, nut butter and tofu are all good sources of protein, according to the Dietary Guidelines for Americans. 'Pairing carbohydrates with protein slows the digestion of food, reducing the post-meal blood sugar spike,' Cardillo says.
Having plenty of protein in your day — the recommended amount is 0.36 grams per pound of body weight — can also help stave off cravings that happen with blood sugar fluctuations, Cardillo says. You just don't want to go overboard with protein. 'Excess protein can be converted to glucose,' which can make your blood sugar management even harder, Mitchell says. But if you stick within the recommended amounts or even go slightly over, you should be fine, Cording says.
Everyone's hydration needs are slightly different, but women should aim to have 11.5 cups (92 ounces) of fluids a day, while men should strive for 15.5 cups (124 ounces) of fluids a day, according to the U.S. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. That's from food and drink, and about 20% of your daily fluid intake is usually from foods.
But many Americans aren't drinking enough. A 2024 Yahoo News/YouGov survey of 1,746 U.S. adults found that 8% say they rarely or never drink water, while 25% drink just one to two glasses of water a day. Experts say that's not enough. 'Dehydration can lead to higher blood sugar levels, so it is very important to stay hydrated,' Cardillo says. She also recommends limiting caffeinated beverages, which can be dehydrating because they have a diuretic effect.
Apple cider vinegar has been a wellness trend for years and does have some health benefits. There is some data to suggest that apple cider vinegar can help manage blood sugar levels, so don't hold back if you like the taste of it. (If it isn't your thing, however, there's no need to force it.)
A 2021 analysis of existing studies found that people with type 2 diabetes who had apple cider vinegar lowered their fasting blood glucose by about 8 milligrams per deciliter. Another small study published in 2023 looked at the impact of having about 2 tablespoons of apple cider vinegar daily on A1C, a test that measures average blood sugar levels over three months. The researchers found that A1C levels dropped from 9.21% to 7.79% in those who had a daily dose of apple cider vinegar over eight weeks.
Probiotics are live microorganisms that support good digestive health, along with many other perks, according to the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH). They may also help with blood sugar, though indirectly: 'Probiotic-rich foods help improve gut health and are recommended for the general population,' Mitchell says. 'Some studies show that a healthy gut can help enhance insulin sensitivity.'
Research suggests that some probiotics may help to lower A1C levels, Pick points out. While you can take probiotics in supplements (though there is some debate about their effectiveness), you can find them in certain healthy foods like yogurt, kimchi, kefir, miso, tempeh and sourdough bread.
Regular exercise can help lower blood sugar levels and maintain them, Cardillo says. The American Diabetes Association (ADA) recommends getting 150 to 300 minutes of moderate-intensity aerobic exercise (such as walking) or 75 to 150 minutes of vigorous-intensity aerobic exercise a week (such as high-intensity interval training, or HIIT), along with strength training two or more times a week.
There are two major perks from taking up an exercise habit: Cardiovascular exercise can cause your blood sugar to lower in the moment, Cardillo explains. But there are also lasting blood sugar management benefits to regular exercise. 'Increasing lean muscle mass can also provide long-term benefits in helping your body process insulin and glucose more efficiently,' Cardillo says.
It seems a bit random, but emotional stress can influence your blood sugar. Specifically, stress hormones like cortisol can make your blood sugar rise or fall unpredictably, according to the CDC. Cardillo says emotional stress is a common reason why your blood sugar might go up, and that it can be tough to predict or manage.
That's why she recommends the practice of yoga. 'Yoga is one form of exercise that can help lower blood sugar levels through muscle strengthening and breathing,' she says. (It also helps to hit those exercise goals, Mitchell says.)
Meditation is also helpful for managing stress, Cardillo adds. The ADA says that mindfulness exercises may lower blood sugar as much as some diabetes medications in certain people.
Some supplements may help to lower your blood sugar, with Pick recommending berberine, myo-inositol, alpha-lipoic acid, cinnamon powder and chromium as options to consider. But Cardillo notes the importance of talking to a health care professional before starting any supplement, including these.
If you have diabetes, Cardillo says it's crucial to come up with a blood sugar management plan under the care of a doctor. 'While natural methods are always a beneficial and healthy way to manage blood sugar, they may not be enough as a stand-alone approach,' she says. 'You should consult with your health care provider regarding the need for medication in addition to lifestyle modification for safe and effective comprehensive treatment.'
But if you're just looking to better manage your blood sugar and are otherwise healthy, Mitchell says natural methods are a great way to go. 'These are good recommendations for everyone,' she says.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What's a Medicaid cut? Senate GOP tiptoes around $800B question
What's a Medicaid cut? Senate GOP tiptoes around $800B question

The Hill

time30 minutes ago

  • The Hill

What's a Medicaid cut? Senate GOP tiptoes around $800B question

When is a Medicaid cut not actually a cut? That's the $800 billion question facing Senate Republicans as they write their own version of the sweeping House-passed tax and spending bill. Administration officials and senators defending against attacks on the bill have coalesced around a message that there will be no cuts to benefits, and the only people who will lose coverage are the ones who never deserved it to begin with: namely immigrants without legal status and 'able-bodied' individuals who shouldn't be on Medicaid. 'This bill will preserve and protect the programs, the social safety net, but it will make it much more commonsense,' Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought said during a recent CNN interview. 'That's what this bill does. No one will lose coverage as a result.' Among many provisions, the House bill would require states to deny Medicaid to people who can't prove they are working, looking for work, in school or volunteering for 80 hours a month. It would prohibit states from using their own money to cover immigrants without legal status and would deny coverage to other lawfully present immigrants who are currently eligible. According to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the legislation will result in nearly 11 million people losing health insurance coverage over the next decade. The Medicaid provisions alone would result in 7.8 million people losing their insurance. Those coverage losses would equate to hundreds of billions of dollars in savings for the federal government. However, GOP lawmakers and administration officials insist the legislation will protect Medicaid for 'deserving' people such as the elderly and disabled, while forcing others to prove they aren't freeloading. 'It's important for us to provide a nudge to some Americans to remember that they have agency over their future,' Mehmet Oz, the administration's Medicare and Medicaid chief, told reporters on Wednesday, following a closed-door meeting with GOP senators. Later Wednesday in an interview on Fox Business, Oz elaborated. 'Go out there, do entry-level jobs, get into the workforce, prove that you matter. Get agency into your own life,' he said. Republicans are wary about being attacked over health care cuts, and they're eager to reframe the debate and try to go on offense. Voter backlash over the 2017 ObamaCare repeal effort led to widespread GOP losses and cost them control of the House in the 2018 midterms. 'Give me a break, This is just fear-mongering from Democrats,' Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) said in a post on the social platform X. 'No one's losing health care—unless you count the 1.4 million illegal immigrants getting Medicaid on your dime.' Most immigrants without legal status can't qualify for Medicaid at the federal level, but some blue states have extended health care coverage to them. The legislation would penalize those states if they continued to offer coverage by lowering their federal matching rate. In a CNBC interview Thursday, Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.) said the people who lose Medicaid coverage will merely transition to employer-sponsored health care. 'It's not kicking people off Medicaid. It's transitioning from Medicaid to employer-provided health care. So yes, we've got 10 million people that are not going to be on Medicaid, but they then are going to be on employer-provided health care,' Lankford said. Yet according to the CBO, 'few of those disenrolled from Medicaid because of the policy would have access to and enroll in employment-based coverage.' A bloc of Republican senators has been raising concerns about some of the Medicaid provisions, and some have said they do not like the idea of anything that could be interpreted as a cut. But by and large, they've signaled the coverage losses aren't what's troubling. '[We need to] protect the program for the people that really deserve and need the help and need the program, you know, and that's children, disabled, seniors, on and on and on,' said Sen. Jim Justice ( 'That's what we got to do. You know, at the end of the day, we shouldn't be protecting the program for people that are abusing or people that shouldn't be eligible, or whatever.' Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) has said he worries about the bill's potential impact on rural hospitals and pledged to withhold support from any bill that cuts Medicaid benefits. But what is a benefit cut? 'If my state tells me that, because of legislative changes in the House bill, the Senate bill, we're going to have to cut benefits. That's a benefit cut,' Hawley told The Hill. Missouri has 1.3 million Medicaid beneficiaries, but Hawley said he thinks there would only be a small number impacted by the work requirements. 'I'm fine with people who are able-bodied and not working … I'm all for that. So you know what, cut benefits from illegal aliens. Yeah, I'm fine with that, but I'm concerned about people who are here legally, residents of my state, citizens of my state, who are working and would lose health care coverage,' he said. Hawley has said that President Trump reiterated his opposition against any Medicaid cuts during recent conversations about the 'big, beautiful bill,' though the president supported the House version. Health experts say the impact of the cuts will go far beyond the small slice of the population Republicans claim. Work requirements will likely add layers of red tape for people to prove they meet the threshold. 'The people losing coverage aren't people who aren't working … but they're actually people who should satisfy the work reporting or should qualify for an exemption, but they can't navigate the complex systems for either reporting one's hours for work or other activities,' said Edwin Park, a research professor at the Georgetown University McCourt School of Public Policy. The legislation includes some exemptions, like for caregiving, but it doesn't specify what would qualify or how beneficiaries would prove they qualify. There's no requirement that states exempt people automatically, Park said, so many people who would be eligible likely wouldn't be enrolled. No matter how Republicans spin it, Park said, 'these are huge Medicaid cuts. They're going to take away coverage from millions of low-income people.' 'And those cuts are going to affect everyone throughout the Medicaid program, not just the expansion group, but also kids, seniors and people with disabilities,' he added. 'And it's going to have big ripple effects throughout the health care system.'

Dr. Richard Goldberg: Preventive care and cancer screenings are critical to your health
Dr. Richard Goldberg: Preventive care and cancer screenings are critical to your health

Chicago Tribune

time30 minutes ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Dr. Richard Goldberg: Preventive care and cancer screenings are critical to your health

The news of President Joe Biden's prostate cancer diagnosis came as a shock to the country. But preventive screening can protect you from having a similar shock of your own. While we don't know all the details about the former president's personal medical decisions, what we do know is this: Preventive care is absolutely critical to our health. Everyone should get the screenings appropriate to their age and individual health profiles. I have served as an oncologist for over four decades, helping thousands of cancer patients and their families navigate difficult diagnoses as well as helping thousands of other Americans catch a problem early when taking appropriate action can be curative. I have seen too many heartbreaking situations among my patients that could have led to better outcomes if a problem had been caught earlier. I have also seen firsthand the startling rise in the incidence, in particular, of colorectal cancer among younger adults at a time when incidence rates in older Americans are falling. Colorectal cancer is now the second-deadliest cancer for men and the third-deadliest cancer for women. The rise in early-onset colorectal cancer has been so dramatic that the recommended age for regular colonoscopy in people with no special risk factors was lowered in 2021 from age 50 to age 45. Some might think that moving up the screening age by five years is a small step, but it is not — certainly not in terms of outcomes. I have already witnessed examples where screening five years earlier has been consequential in identifying premalignant polyps and identifying early cancers before they metastasize when they are most likely to be cured. In many cases the polyps and even early cancers can simply be removed during a colonoscopy. I cannot urge this message strongly enough: All Americans of average risk that are over 45, and especially those exhibiting symptoms, need to get tested. One alternative is to have a colonoscopy at least every 10 years or more often if there are abnormal findings. Alternatives include stool-based studies such as Cologuard or Hemoccult testing, which need to be done more often to be most effective. New technologies are unlocking the potential for blood-based screening tests as well. The reason for this alarming increase in colorectal cancer incidence in younger adults is still being studied and the potential causes are debated in the scientific community. It is possible that there are several or even many different causes compounding the problem. As someone who practices risk-reducing dietary and activity strategies to protect my own health, I commend President Donald Trump and Health and Human Services Secretary Robert Kennedy Jr. for their emphasis on disease prevention and identifying the causes of America's chronic illness epidemic and finding measures to prevent disease like colorectal cancer. It is critical for all Americans to know what screenings are recommended at each stage in life. In general, everyone should get an annual physical, and see a dentist regularly — and everyone should receive the standard childhood vaccines. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends women over 21 should get screened for cervical cancer and women over 40 to be screened for breast cancer. The task force recommends that smokers over 50 get checked for lung cancer. And men aged 55 to 69 are recommended to be screened for prostate cancer with a prostate specific antigen test. These and other screenings can help catch cancer or even precancerous growths as early as possible. Unfortunately, surveys show that a large number of Americans don't get these tests done, including for reasons of cost. I understand why people might do this, but getting a checkup and talking to your health care provider about what screening tests are appropriate for you is the first step to taking action to improve our health and our lives. Fortunately, there are also some positive trends in oncology to celebrate. Science continues to deliver great promise for the most vulnerable among us: the sick. In spite of some concerning short-term trends, cancer mortality has dropped by one-third since 1991, mainly because of a dramatic decrease in smoking. Life expectancy rose by almost a full year from 2022 to 2023. In my field, recent studies have shown exciting potential for people with confirmed cancers that are called immuno-oncology approaches. These are cancer treatments that enable the immune system to kill cancer cells, rather than using the more traditional treatment methods including chemotherapy, radiation and radical surgery, which often have harrowing and sometimes lifelong side effects. These approaches are changing the model in cancer care and particularly in my area of clinical practice and research, colorectal cancer. The benefits of these immune targeted therapies are changing treatments in many types of cancer. However, only a small subset, about 5%, of colorectal cancers respond to this approach using currently approved therapeutic regimens. More research is needed on this treatment approach to determine how to best harness this powerful tool and get new drugs approved by the FDA to help the large majority of colorectal cancer patients. But doctors, patients, and their loved ones can reasonably hope that the thousands of scientists around the world who are working to find better treatments and cures will change our current standards of care. All of us should ensure that we receive the screenings and vaccines appropriate to our age — and that our kids do the same. An ounce of prevention is still worth at least a pound of cure.

Viral Beauty Routines Are Damaging Tween and Teen Skin, Study Warns
Viral Beauty Routines Are Damaging Tween and Teen Skin, Study Warns

Newsweek

time6 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Viral Beauty Routines Are Damaging Tween and Teen Skin, Study Warns

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. "Get ready with me" videos are overflowing on TikTok, drawing millions to watch influencers and the like walk through their skincare routines. But lately, a new wave of content creators is entering the frame: middle schoolers or even children as young as seven layering serums, eye creams and exfoliants onto already delicate, youthful skin. Now, new research has confirmed these types of videos can put teens at risk of lifelong skin allergy. Young teenager recording 'Get Ready With Me' beauty blog from cozy bedroom applying clay facial mask. Young teenager recording 'Get Ready With Me' beauty blog from cozy bedroom applying clay facial mask. Mariia Vitkovska The new peer-reviewed study from Northwestern Medicine, published today on June 9 in Pediatrics, is raising red flags about the popular trend of teen skincare routines shared on social media. The study is the first of its kind to examine the dermatological and psychological risks tied to these viral beauty regimens. Authors found girls between the ages of seven and 18 are applying an average of six different skincare products daily, with some layering more than a dozen. "It's problematic to show girls devoting this much time and attention to their skin," said corresponding author Dr. Molly Hales, a postdoctoral research fellow and board-certified dermatologist in the department of dermatology at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine. The financial cost is also concerning. The average teen skincare routine costs $168 a month, according to the study, with some reaching upward of $500. Despite the hype, the routines often neglect the basics: only 26 percent of daytime regimens included sunscreen—a critical oversight, especially for developing skin. Yet it's not just money being wasted. The study found that the top-viewed skincare videos featured an average of 11 potentially irritating active ingredients. This cocktail of acids, retinoids and fragrances increases the risk of allergic contact dermatitis—a lifelong skin allergy that can permanently restrict a person's use of certain soaps, shampoos and cosmetics. "That high risk of irritation came from both using multiple active ingredients at the same time, such as hydroxy acids, as well as applying the same active ingredient unknowingly over and over again when that active ingredient was found in three, four, five different products," Hales said. In one analyzed video, a content creator applied 10 separate products in just six minutes. By the end of the clip, her face was visibly red and irritated. "As she's applying the products, she begins to express discomfort and burning, and in the final few minutes, she develops a visible skin reaction," said senior author Dr. Tara Lagu, adjunct lecturer of medicine and medical social sciences at Feinberg and a former Northwestern Medicine hospitalist. The researchers also observed an unsettling pattern in the aesthetics and messaging of these viral videos. "We saw that there was preferential, encoded racial language in some cases that really emphasized lighter, brighter skin," Lagu said. "I think there also were real associations between use of these regimens and consumerism." The videos tend to offer little to no health benefit for the children watching them, researchers concluded. Yet they're virtually impossible for parents or pediatricians to monitor, thanks to the untrusted algorithms that power TikTok's "For You" page. "We're setting a very high standard for these girls," Hales said. "The pursuit of health has become a kind of virtue in our society, but the ideal of 'health' is also very wrapped up in ideals of beauty, thinness and whiteness. The insidious thing about 'skin care' is that it claims to be about health." Funding for the study was provided by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases of the National Institutes of Health (grant number 5T32AR060710-11). Other Northwestern authors include Drs Amy Paller and Walter Liszewski, and medical student Sarah Rigali. Newsweek reached out to TikTok via email on 06/06/2025.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store