Up 97% in 2 years, Is Walmart a No-Brainer Dividend King Stock to Buy Now?
Walmart (NYSE: WMT) stock nearly doubled in the last two years while the S&P 500 (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC) gained 43.3%.
Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Learn More »
In addition to the impressive gains in the share price, Walmart has been making some monster dividend raises. Its latest boost increased the dividend by 13% -- marking the 52nd consecutive year that Walmart has bumped its payout. That streak makes Walmart one of 55 companies that have raised their payouts for at least 50 consecutive years -- known as Dividend Kings.
Let's dive into Walmart's latest earnings report and how management is positioning the company amid tariff tensions and pressures on consumer spending to see if the Dividend King is a no-brainer buy now.
Tariffs are hitting Walmart's bottom line (and customers' wallets)
Walmart has improved its supply chain, which will help it cushion the blow from tariffs. On its latest earnings call, Walmart said that over two-thirds of what it sells in the U.S. is made, assembled, or grown in the U.S. and that, because it moves a lot of products, it can adjust quantities over time to navigate tariffs instead of stocking up on inventories and hoping they sell. But even with these advantages, Walmart can't offset all of the added costs from tariffs. Walmart CEO Doug McMillon said the following on the latest earnings call: "We will do our best to keep our prices as low as possible. But given the magnitude of the tariffs, even at the reduced levels announced this week, we aren't able to absorb all the pressure given the reality of narrow retail margins."
In other words, Walmart is saying that if tariffs keep up, it will raise prices. But it remains to be seen how already strained consumers will respond to price hikes.
The cloudy outlook is already reflected in Walmart's guidance. Full-year fiscal 2026 sales in constant currency are only expected to increase 3% to 4% year over year, adjusted operating income is expected to grow by 3.5% to 5.5%, and adjusted earnings per share (EPS) is expected to be $2.50 to $2.60 compared to $2.51 in fiscal 2025.
The glass-half-full outlook on Walmart is that the slowing growth is OK, given that Walmart is coming off a record year, and therefore, the comps are tough. There's also a fair argument that even a little bit of growth is impressive, given the operating environment. But investors care more about where a company is headed than where it is today. And there are signs that the rally in Walmart stock may be getting overextended.
A high-flying Dividend King
Walmart's business model has never been better thanks to investments in e-commerce, new store openings, existing store renovations, the build-out of services, and its growing advertising segment. However, given macro challenges, the company is likely going to have a harder time sustaining the growth rate investors have grown accustomed to in recent years. And the stock is far from cheap, with a forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 38.5 based on the midpoint of its fiscal 2026 adjusted EPS guidance.
Because Walmart is such a better company today than in years past, it definitely deserves a higher-than-historical valuation. But Walmart's 10-year median P/E is 27.4. So investors aren't just paying a little more for the stock, they are paying a lot more. And that premium is hard to justify given the challenges Walmart is facing.
Although Walmart's last two dividend raises have been sizable, it only yields 1% because of how strong its stock price has been performing. That's lower than the S&P 500 average of 1.3%. So while investors are getting the track record of Walmart's decades of dividend increases, they aren't getting nearly the yield that can be obtained from other Dividend Kings.
For example, Procter & Gamble yields 2.6%, Coca-Cola yields 2.8%, and PepsiCo yields an all-time high 4.4%. And all of those Dividend Kings sport valuations far lower than Walmart's.
In no-man's-land
Investors may be willing to take a lower yield for Walmart if it were growing quickly or if the valuation were dirt cheap. But Walmart is priced to perfection, and its growth has stalled.
Ultra-risk-averse investors who aren't focused on passive income may still want to buy or hold Walmart because it's a business that can be counted on no matter what the economy is doing. But most folks are better off scooping up shares in other Dividend Kings or pivoting to tariff-resistant growth stocks.
For example, Microsoft has a less expensive valuation than Walmart, is still growing at a solid rate, is tariff-resistant, and has a 0.7% yield.
Add it all up, and it makes little sense for investors to put their hard-earned savings in Walmart at this valuation, given the alternatives.
Should you invest $1,000 in Walmart right now?
Before you buy stock in Walmart, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Walmart wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $642,582!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $829,879!*
Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is975% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to172%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.
*Stock Advisor returns as of May 19, 2025
Daniel Foelber has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Microsoft and Walmart. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
17 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Business groups urge Carney to pause Digital Services Tax in fear of Trump backlash
A group of Canadian business associations are pressing Prime Minister Mark Carney to pause the implementation of 'discriminatory' taxes that have spurred U.S. President Donald Trump to retaliate with proposed tax hikes. In a letter sent to Mr. Carney on Thursday, six industry associations representing a wide variety of businesses – including Canada's major banks, life insurers, retailers and the venture capital community – asked the government to pause the scheduled June 30 payment of the Digital Services Tax, which was introduced in 2024 and targets large U.S. technology companies. Canada passed the DST retroactively to 2022 after the Liberal government said it could no longer wait for a multilateral agreement to emerge from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development for taxing global tech giants, most of which are based in the U.S. The deadline for filling the first DST return for 2022-2024 and paying the tax is June 30. Canadian business groups press Ottawa on digital tax as U.S. bill targets investors Canada's Digital Services Tax and online regulation bills are likely Trump trade targets Implementing a DST in Canada was intended to ensure digital businesses that monetize the data and content of Canadian users are 'paying their fair share,' the federal government said in its 2024 budget document. The Canadian business groups said pausing the DST would allow negotiations ahead of – and at – the G7 summit next week, to continue without the 'risk of further escalation by the administration on current tariff actions that place considerable risk on Canadian businesses and families.' The DST is just one tax among a broader group of 'unfair' taxes Mr. Trump has flagged in his recent One Big Beautiful Bill Act. Other taxes on Mr. Trump's hit list are diverted profits taxes and the undertaxed profits rule, both of which are global initiatives meant to ensure multinational firms pay enough tax. Canada released draft legislation last year to implement a UTPR as an amendment to Canada's Global Minimum Tax Act, but did not table it in Parliament. The Canadian business associations' letter expresses concern that the DST, UTPR and GMT run counter to Mr. Carney's plan to build a single Canadian economy, strengthen relations with the U.S. and reduce costs for Canadians. 'The unintended consequence of the DST and other digital taxes is that they have handed the U.S. Administration a ready-made issue to rally support from U.S. lawmakers who are now working to retaliate,' the letter says. A key example is Section 899 of Mr. Trump's bill – a U.S. tax proposal that is targeting foreign jurisdictions that have implemented a discriminatory tax. The bill was recently passed by the U.S. House of Representatives, but still requires Senate approval. If Section 899 becomes law, Canadians could see withholding and income tax increase by five percentage points in the first year – rising to a maximum of 20 per cent for income tax and up to 50 per cent total for withholding tax, on any holding of an American asset held by a Canadian or the U.S. subsidiary of Canadian company. 'Every pension fund, retirement fund, investment account, and deeply interconnected investment funds with American holdings, held by the likes of teachers, municipal workers, elected officials, and regular everyday Canadian families, are at risk,' the Canadian business associations' letter says. If Canada wants to commit to building stronger ties with the U.S., the group said it cannot be achieved if Ottawa proceeds with its current timeline to collect a punitive retroactive tax on digital service companies on June 30. 'The dire downstream effects of this are still avoidable,' the letter says. Meanwhile, 21 members of the U.S. Congress have sent a letter of their own urging Mr. Trump to push Canada to drop the DST before the end of the month, when the first payment is due. In a June 11 letter, the U.S. Congress group said 90 per cent of what Canada would collect under its DST will come from U.S. firms. 'Allowing Canada to proceed with this unprecedented, retroactive tax on U.S. firms would send a signal to the rest of the world that they have the green light to proceed with similar discriminatory cash grabs targeting our firms, workers, and tax base,' the letter says. The June 11 letter, alongside another letter sent last week to the U.S. administration from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and other trade groups, say that Canada has the regulatory authority to delay the date of payment and other provisions of the DST without having to pass new legislation. Canada's Department of Finance did not respond Thursday to a request for comment on the tax. The Canadian group of business associations – which consists of the Canadian Chamber of Commerce, Canadian Life and Health Insurance Association, Retail Council of Canada, Canadian Venture Capital Association, Future Borders Coalition and Canadian Bankers Association – said the current political climate and risks to the Canadian economy could not have been foreseen when the DST was first introduced. 'There is still time to correct course and demonstrate that Canada is serious about strengthening alliances, improving competitiveness, and restoring affordability,' the letter says. 'The alternative will lead Canada down a very difficult path.'
CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
Yukon Chamber of Commerce closing shop, calling it a 'refresh'
The Yukon Chamber of Commerce is going out of business. Members of the advocacy group unanimously voted at its annual general meeting on Wednesday to dissolve the 40-year-old organization. However, the chamber's executive director Patti Balsillie characterizes it as a "refresh," suggesting that a new organization could be formed to take its place as the voice of Yukon's business community. "Maybe this is the phoenix coming out of the ashes. But we needed to create a crisis perhaps, to instigate what could be a better formula," Balsillie said. "The motion was, 'yes, let's dissolve,' and the ancillary was, 'and let's get back to the original intent.'" Balsillie says the chamber as it is right now is "no longer financially sustainable," with less revenue coming in. She said the COVID-19 pandemic changed how many businesses spend their money, and the chamber suffered as a result. A significant portion of the chamber's money comes from its members. She also described a changing landscape for non-profit business advocacy groups in the Yukon, with more and more of them doing similar work. "The lane is very congested," Balsillie said. "[The chamber's] relevancy was eroded by apathy, by people thinking somebody else will do the work, there are other volunteers that have my back — but no, you have to show up." She said the organization will remain open at least through the summer, to sell assets, pay bills, and plan its formal dissolution. Still, she described the end of the chamber as akin to a "pause," before something else forms to take its place. She believes there's still a role for an organization that represents businesses across the territory. "To be a part of a conversation about the end of an era sucks," she said. "More than ever, a voice for business in Yukon really needs to be represented. And the structure that we were doing it under is wasn't sustainable. So this is an opportunity to do a refresh." Community chambers 'exploring collaboration' In a news release on Thursday, three of the organization's members — the Whitehorse, Dawson City, and St. Elias (Haines Junction) chambers of commerce — say they are "saddened" by the Yukon chamber's dissolution, saying it "leaves a significant gap in territorial representation for Yukon's community Chambers and for businesses operating in Yukon communities." The three community organizations also say they are "exploring collaboration across the territory," and will "provide updates as these discussions evolve." Justine Hobbs, interim executive director of the Dawson chamber, said on Thursday that she believes there's now momentum "towards something new and exciting." "So it's sort of a mixed feeling, you know, saddened, but also excited," she said. "We're really interested in building like, a new model that focuses on Yukon-wide advocacy, policy development and just effective communication." Hobbs said there is a need for a group that represents businesses beyond their local communities. For example, she says, a Whitehorse-based business might operate in other communities and be affected by regulations or policies in those places. "I think there's a bit of a worry from business members that if they link up with a community chamber, that they won't actually be represented in the right way," Hobbs said.
Globe and Mail
2 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
Why AI Stock AppLovin Slumped Today
Very frequently, when a company's stock is targeted by a vociferous short selle r, it can take a hit to its share price. That was the dynamic behind AppLovin 's (NASDAQ: APP) 0.7% dip on Thursday after a notable "shortie" published a report that was highly critical of the company. That decline was a bit steeper than the 0.4% slide of the S&P 500 index that day. Alleged Chinese connections The short seller is a firm called Culper Research, and Thursday morning it laid out in a 30-page document its reasons for shorting AppLovin. Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue » These center around AppLovin's stated aim of owning the non-China operations of that country's runaway social media success, TikTok. Culper finds that problematic, not least due to what it considers to be significant investment in AppLovin's equity by a Chinese national, Hao Tang. It also expressed dismay about what it considers to be the company's undisclosed partnerships with two companies in the Asian country. Ultimately, wrote Culper, "AppLovin's covert Chinese ownership and operations raise not only concerns for shareholders but for national security and data security -- the very concerns AppLovin purports to address by acquiring TikTok's ex-China operations." The short seller added that Hao "is a bad actor with extensive direct and indirect ties to Chinese espionage, [Chinese Communist Party] state-sponsored propaganda, human trafficking, and money laundering operations." Muted reaction from the market The mild investor sell-off in the wake of Culper's report indicates that more than a few AppLovin shareholders aren't fully buying the firm's arguments. That said, the short seller does raise what might be valid concerns; AppLovin hasn't yet officially responded to the allegations, and it'll be worth watching to see if and when those apparent China connections come to light. Should you invest $1,000 in AppLovin right now? Before you buy stock in AppLovin, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and AppLovin wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $657,871!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $875,479!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is998% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to174%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025
