Putin hardliners call for Russia to 'take up arms' for Iran after US strikes
Hardliners close to Vladimir Putin have demanded Russians "take up arms" in a furious response to the US attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities. US President Donald Trump sanctioned the bombings of three nuclear sites in Iran overnight, escalating the Middle East crisis further. Missiles were dropped from American B-2 stealth bombers, including on Iran's Fordow nuclear site, which has caused some Russian oligarchs to demand military support for Tehran.
Oligarch Konstantin Malofeev, who runs propaganda empire Tsargrad, demanded: 'It's high time we helped Tehran with satellite intelligence, air defence, and missiles.' He accused Trump of mocking Putin by 'pretending to be peacekeepers' in the Ukraine conflict. Demanding military support for Iran, he declared: 'Two can play this game. Fate is giving us a historic chance.
The Kremlin has yet to issue an immediate reaction to the attack by the US on Iran., with which Moscow has a 'comprehensive strategic partnership' signed by Putin in January. Despite no formal mutual defence clause, the treaty includes assurances regarding security cooperation and non-support for aggressors.
Multiple Russian sources noted the date of the strike - the same day, June 22, 1941 - as Hitler attacked his former ally, the Soviet Union. Putin's former deputy premier and space agency chief Dmitry Rogozin, now a warmongering senator, said: 'Today is Sunday, June 22. America has struck Iranian nuclear facilities.
'The internationalisation of armed conflicts is evident. Their main provocateurs are two people - Zelensky and Netanyahu. Let's mark this for history.'
He went on to claim Russians must be ready for a world war. 'Whether our grandchildren will be proud of their grandfathers depends on you and me, on our national instinct for self-preservation, on our readiness to take up arms, learn the high-tech rules of modern warfare and end it with a convincing victory,' he said. The one who is ready to go to the end always wins.'
Former Putin speechwriter Abbas Gallyamov - now a critic - praised an alleged US misinformation campaign ahead of the strikes. 'Part of the work to prepare the American strike was the leak to Reuters of 'information' about disagreements between Israel and the United States,' he said.
'At the very moment when the ayatollahs were rubbing their hands with glee, reading the report that [vice president J D] Vance accused Israel of trying to drag America into war, the B-2s were taking off." Other Russian outlets played down the impact of the strikes, stressing Iranian denials that the three nuclear facilities were destroyed, as the Trump administration claimed.
There was only 'minor damage' at the Fordow facility, several reports claimed. Pro-Kremlin pundit Sergey Mardan warned that Putin's nightmare of a US bid to assassinate Iran's supreme leader was clearly now on the agenda.
'Earlier this week, several US officials told CBS News that Trump opposes Israel's plans to assassinate Iran's Ayatollah Ali Khamenei,' he posted. The Iranians, of course, can believe this. But only if they really want to. Then they will face more strikes.'
One Telegram channel - On The Frontline - warned the likely Iranian response was 'a retaliatory salvo at American bases". It added: "The targets could be – US air bases in Qatar and Saudi Arabia.
'Yemeni forces have already announced that they will attack US ships in the Red Sea. Now they have a formal pretext. All logistics through Suez are at risk. The most severe scenario is blocking the Strait of Hormuz. Closing it even for 72 hours will lead to an increase in oil prices and potential disruptions in energy supplies to Europe and Asia and the likelihood of the US having to launch a naval operation to lift the blockade.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
10 minutes ago
- The Independent
Mapped: Russian-held Ukrainian territory Zelensky could be ‘prepared to cede' under peace deal
Swathes of Russian-held Ukrainian territory could be handed over to Moscow as part of a peace deal potentially negotiated by Donald Trump, according to reports. Volodymyr Zelensky is prepared to cede the territory as part of a peace deal set in motion by the US president and Vladimir Putin's meeting in Alaska this week, The Daily Telegraph has reported. This could mean handing Russia control of territory it occupies in the five provinces of Luhansk, Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia, Kherson and Crimea, which has been held since 2014. The reports comes, however, after Mr Zelensky urged European countries to push back on any settlement proposed by Mr Trump that would see Kyiv handing over land Ukraine still holds in these regions. Here, The Independent takes a closer look at what territory could be ceded under the reported concessions. Russia currently occupies about a fifth of Ukrainian territory, while Ukraine holds barely any Russian territory. On Monday, Mr Trump told a White House press conference of his talks with Mr Putin, "This is really a feel-out meeting." He said he would know "probably in the first two minutes" whether progress was possible. 'I'm going to go and see the parameters now. I may leave and say, 'Good luck.' And that'll be the end. I may say, 'This, this is not going to be settled,'' he added. Mr Trump said a future meeting could include Mr Zelensky and the US goal was a speedy ceasefire in the conflict. He plans to talk to European leaders soon after his talks with Mr Putin. He added: 'There'll be some land swapping going on. I know that through Russia and through conversations with everybody, to the good of Ukraine.' He said Russia had occupied some 'very prime territory' but 'we're going to try to get some of that territory back'.
The Independent
10 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump's prediction about Zelensky-less Ukraine summit with Putin in Alaska: ‘I'll know in the first two minutes'
Donald Trump claimed that he would know 'in the first two minutes' of his upcoming meeting with Vladimir Putin if a peace deal could be reached between Russia and Ukraine. 'We're going to have a meeting with Vladimir Putin, and at the end of that meeting, probably in the first two minutes, I'll know exactly whether or not a deal can be made,' the president told reporters at a press conference Monday. Asked how he would know, the president replied: 'Because that's what I do. I make deals.' However, Trump later appeared to contradict himself, after saying that it was 'not up to him' if a deal was made or not. 'I'm not going to make a deal. It's not up to me to make a deal. I think a deal should be made for both,' he said. The president is set to meet with the Russian president Friday in Alaska for the 'highly anticipated' meeting, during which the pair will discuss bringing an end to the conflict that has raged since the invasion of Ukraine by Russian forces in February 2022. Trump briefly appeared to forget the location of the meeting, telling reporters at the press conference that he would be travelling to Russia for the meeting, instead of The Last Frontier. He added that Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky 'could' attend the bilateral, but also appeared to question if it would help a deal be reached. 'He wasn't a part of it,' Trump said, speaking about the setting up of the talks. 'I would say he could go, but he's been to a lot of meetings. You know, he's been there for three and a half years. Nothing happened.' He added that, should a 'fair' deal be reached, he would inform the European Union as well as Zelensky, who he would call first 'out of respect.' 'And I may say, 'lots of luck, keep fighting.' Or I may say 'we can make a deal,' he said. Either way, Trump said that a meeting between Putin and Zelensky would be necessary in the future. 'Ultimately, I'm going to put the two of them in a room. I'll be there, or I won't be there, and I think it'll get solved.' Friday's meeting will be the first between a U.S. president and Putin since 2021, when Joe Biden met him in Switzerland, and marks the first time the Russian president has set foot on American soil in a decade. His visit is due to go ahead as planned, despite the fact that he faces an arrest warrant from the International Criminal Court. Critics have also noted that Alaska was once owned by Russia, who claimed it during the 1770s and sold it back to the U.S. in 1867. Russian traditionalists have long-since demanded the return of the territory.
Reuters
10 minutes ago
- Reuters
Oil gains as US-China tariff truce extension boosts trade hopes
SINGAPORE, Aug 12 (Reuters) - Oil prices rose on Tuesday as the United States and China extended a pause on higher tariffs, easing concerns an escalation of their trade war would disrupt their economies and crimp fuel demand in the world's two largest oil consumers. Brent crude futures gained 27 cents, or 0.4%, to $66.90 a barrel by 0540 GMT, while U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude futures rose 24 cents, or 0.4%, to $64.20. U.S. President Donald Trump extended a tariff truce with China by another 90 days, a White House official said on Monday, staving off triple-digit duties on Chinese goods as U.S. retailers prepared for the critical end-of-year holiday season. This raised hopes that an agreement could be attained between the world's two largest economies and avert a virtual trade embargo between them. Tariffs risk slowing global growth, which could sap fuel demand and drag oil prices lower. Oil's gains have also been supported by fresh signs of softness in the U.S. labour market, which have boosted expectations for a Federal Reserve rate cut in September, said Priyanka Sachdeva, senior market analyst at brokerage Phillip Nova. Also on the radar is U.S. inflation data later in the day, that could shape the Fed's rate path. Interest rate cuts typically boost economic activity and oil demand. Potentially weighing on the oil market, Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin are due to meet in Alaska on Friday to discuss an end to the war in Ukraine. "The U.S.-Russia diplomatic track on the Ukraine conflict remains a wildcard, with traders monitoring for any geopolitical surprises that could disrupt supply routes or sanction regimes," Sachdeva said. The meeting comes as the U.S. steps up pressure on Russia, with the threat of harsher penalties on Russian oil buyers such as China and India if no peace deal is reached. "Any peace deal between Russia and Ukraine would end the risk of disruption to Russian oil that has been hovering over the market," ANZ senior commodity strategist Daniel Hynes wrote in a note. Trump set a deadline of last Friday for Russia to agree to peace in Ukraine or have its oil buyers face secondary sanctions, while pressing India to reduce purchases of Russian oil. Washington also wants Beijing to stop buying Russian oil, with Trump threatening to impose secondary tariffs on China. The risk of those sanctions being enacted has receded ahead of the August 15 Trump-Putin meeting.
