logo
Why a Pilates workout should be every runner's secret weapon

Why a Pilates workout should be every runner's secret weapon

USA Today25-02-2025

Exercises to prevent injury and elevate your game
Pilates and running are complementary workouts — Photo courtesy of Photology1971 / iStock Via Getty Images Plus
Advertisement
I've been running for daily exercise since I was 22. I'm no stranger to logging miles in snowstorms, below freezing temperatures, and even the day after I had three wisdom teeth removed. It wasn't until I suffered a serious running injury that I had to hit pause. That year, I had completed 16 races and was recognized in the top three in my age group in several races. I was feeling great — that is, until I tripped and face-planted during an early morning run.
Despite the pain, I continued to run for several more weeks, taking over-the-counter pain relievers to dull the sensation. However, the discomfort didn't go away; it only got worse. I finally scheduled an appointment with an orthopedist, who diagnosed me with a stress fracture on my left pelvis. He said I was lucky I didn't break my hip because I kept running after the initial injury. He predicted I may never run again and would be lucky if I didn't end up with a hobbling gait. Devastated, I asked him what I could do to maintain my fitness if running was no longer an option. He suggested Pilates.
His advice literally changed my life. I booked private Pilates sessions and did Pilates exercises on my own every day. After six months of recovery, I was able to run again — and I kept Pilates as part of my exercise routine, because I could see how it was making me a better runner. My posture was better, and I was activating my core as I ran, which gave me more stability and endurance. Fueled by the results, I pursued a Pilates certification. While working full time, I started teaching Pilates on weekends. Eventually, I took a leap of faith and left my corporate job to open Studio Cloud 9 Pilates.
What I've learned is that Pilates can be a runner's secret weapon, resulting in improved core strength, flexibility, and mobility — all of which go miles in building endurance and preventing injury. Whether you're an avid runner or looking to level up your exercise regimen, here's why Pilates is a surefire way to a better, stronger you — and some exercises to get you started.
What is Pilates?
Reformer Pilates requires equipment, which is really the only disadvantage — Photo courtesy of Studio Cloud 9 / Anne Nuun Photography
Pilates is a group of exercises that focus on strengthening the core while improving flexibility through controlled movements. People often think Pilates is similar to yoga, but these modalities are entirely different. Pilates was founded by Joseph Pilates, a German fitness trainer who developed the method while being held at an internment camp during World War I. He originally called it Contrology. He believed that by improving control over core muscles and breathwork with your mind, practitioners could "develop the body uniformly, correct wrong postures, restore physical vitality, invigorate the mind, and elevate the spirit."
At the internment camp, Mr. Pilates witnessed injured soldiers wasting away on hospital beds, so he created the reformer, a bed-like frame with a rolling carriage and spring coils to provide resistance. He saw that the resistance of the springs helped to build strength and lengthen muscles. The patients got stronger as they moved against the weights, which lifted their spirits, thereby improving their mental health. Over the course of his lifetime, Mr. Pilates developed more than 26 pieces of equipment and 600 exercises.
What's the difference between mat Pilates and reformer Pilates?
Mat Pilates can be done anywhere — Photo courtesy of Jean Chen Smith
The main difference between mat Pilates and reformer Pilates is that mat Pilates requires no equipment and can be done anywhere. Also, in mat Pilates, you're using your body weight for resistance, while in reformer Pilates, the machine leverages the springs as weights for additional resistance. Both methods are beneficial; one isn't better than the other. The only disadvantage of reformer Pilates is that it requires equipment.
What does Pilates do for runners?
Reformer Pilates uses the springs as resistance — Photo courtesy of Jean Chen Smith
Because of the consistent, repetitive motion of running, runners often experience shortening and tightening of certain muscles, which constricts their range of movement. Over time, this shortening and tightening of muscles can cause strain on the vertebrae and lumbar spine, which can lead to potential back pain and injury. A Pilates workout helps runners build core strength, improve flexibility, and increase mobility. Not only can Pilates help you recover from injury, it can prevent injury.
How often should you do Pilates?
As an instructor, I tell my clients that incorporating a Pilates workout three times a week is the best way to see results. However, consistency is the key. If you can't commit to three days, start with two. You can build it into one of your recovery days, when you take a day off from running. With Pilates, you'll build abdominal strength, improve spinal mobility, and increasing range of motion.
All these exercises will benefit your running in the long term. Everyone can do Pilates, and it's never too late to get started. Pilates also helps with proprioception and balance as we age. If you're new to Pilates, make sure to tell your instructor if you have any injuries. If an exercise doesn't feel good aside from being challenging, ask for a suggested modification.
Three Pilates exercises to get you started
Here are three Pilates exercises that can be done anywhere, anytime.
The Pilates Hundred
The Pilates Hundred warms up the abdominal muscles — Photo courtesy of Jean Chen Smith
This exercise involves engaging core muscles and bending the spine forward. A strong core can help alleviate lower back pain.
Try it: Lie on your back with your knees bent at a 90 degree angle. This is known as the 'tabletop position." On an exhale, lift your shoulders and head off the floor, tuck chin to chest, and extend your arms and legs. The legs extend at a high diagonal for the full expression of the exercise. Arms stay close to hip level. If you have lower back pain or tight hip flexors, keep your legs in tabletop position. You also can keep your head and shoulders on the floor if raising them causes too much tension on your neck.
Begin vigorously pumping your arms up and down while you inhale for five counts through the nose and then exhale for five counts through the mouth. Repeat 10 times to equal a count of 100.
Mermaid
Mermaid stretches the obliques, which is great for runners — Photo courtesy of Jean Chen Smith
This simple stretch lengthens the side body while engaging your obliques and back muscles. It also stretches your hips, which is excellent for runners, cyclists, and those who sit all day in front of a computer.
Try it: Sit on one side of your bottom and fold both legs to the other side. Sit up as straight as you can. Place the hand that's on the same side as your folded legs on top of your shins. Raise the other arm up toward the ceiling. Lean toward the side of your folded legs, bending at the waist. Try to hold the stretch for at least 30 seconds. Gaze straight ahead and try to keep the shoulders relaxed. Repeat on the other side.
Seated Spine Twist
Seated Spine Twist invites mobility for a flexible spine — Photo courtesy of Jean Chen Smith
Spinal twisting improves spinal mobility and engages the core and obliques. Although there are many different exercises to achieve this, the spine twist is one of my favorites. Done correctly, it challenges your abdominal and pelvic floor muscles.
Try it: Sit upright with your legs stretched out in front of you. Glue your inner thighs together and extend your arms out to a T-position. Stretch your fingertips long. On an exhale, twist your entire upper torso to one side two times, before returning to your starting position and exhaling and twisting to the other side. The important part is to not shift the lower half of your body (i.e., your legs) from side to side as you twist. If you have tight hip flexors and find it hard to sit up with a tall spine, you can sit on a blanket, pillow, or yoga block for added support.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Biden should've been given multiple cognitive tests while in the White House, Obama's doctor says
Biden should've been given multiple cognitive tests while in the White House, Obama's doctor says

New York Post

time4 hours ago

  • New York Post

Biden should've been given multiple cognitive tests while in the White House, Obama's doctor says

WASHINGTON — Joe Biden's doctor should've made him undergo multiple neurocognitive tests during his presidency, former President Barack Obama's physician told The Post. Jeffrey Kuhlman, who served as Obama's doctor from 2009 to 2013, highlighted in a phone interview Saturday how Biden — and all politicians over the age of 70 — should be submitted to 'a few hours' of annual mental exams and release those results to the public. 'My position is that a 78-year-old candidate, Trump at the time, an 82-year-old president [Biden] would both benefit from neurocognitive testing,' said Kuhlman, who published a book 'Transforming Presidential Healthcare,' recommending that in November 2024. Advertisement 'Any politician over the age of 70 has normal age-related cognitive decline,' Kuhlman said, pointing out that he's been making the recommendation for nearly a year — and did so in a New York Times op-ed on the day Biden bowed out of the 2024 race. 'If you look at his three physicals that were released as president, Dr. [Kevin] O'Connor wrote five to six pages, single-spaced. He referenced 10 to 20 specialist physicians.' 5 Joe Biden's doctor should've made him undergo multiple neurocognitive tests during his presidency, former President Barack Obama's physician told The Post. Getty Images Advertisement But the tests did not include any neurocognitive work, nor did Biden submit to the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, as Trump did in his first term, a two-minute screening comprising around 30 questions to test for signs of dementia, according to Obama's ex-physician. 'I have no doubt that President Trump aced it,' he said of the test, but said the current White House, in the interest of full transparency, should also release CT scans that were taken after the assassination attempt against the Republican candidate in Butler, Pa., last July. Kuhlman added the Montreal Cognitive Assessment isn't adequate to determine more serious mental slippage, one of the three main areas that medical professionals should be considering when evaluating the president, along with cancer and cardiovascular issues. Memory, reasoning, speed of processing and spacial visualization all begin to decline around the age of 60, he also said. Advertisement 5 Kevin O'Connor served as Biden's doctor during his vice presidency, overlapping with Kuhlman in the White House medical unit. David Lienemann/The White House O'Connor served as Biden's doctor during his vice presidency, overlapping with Kuhlman in the White House medical unit. Kuhlman said he 'respects' O'Connor's 'medical judgment,' but also told The Washington Post: 'Sometimes those closest to the tree miss the forest.' In apparently his only media interview during Biden's term, O'Connor insisted to The Post in July 2024 that the president's cognitive health was 'excellent' — days after being forced out of a re-election bid and replaced by Vice President Kamala Harris due to a dismal debate performance June 27. Advertisement 5 Kuhlman said he 'respects' O'Connor's 'medical judgment,' but also told The Washington Post: 'Sometimes those closest to the tree miss the forest.' Getty Images In a break from his predecessors, Biden's doctor never answered questions from the press in the White House briefing room but submitted annual physical reports that noted some physical ailments without addressing the president's mental acuity, other than to say he was 'fit for duty.' 'The president doesn't need a cognitive test,' claimed White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre in a February 2024 briefing following what would be Biden's final physical as commander-in-chief. 'He passes a cognitive test every day.' White House visitor logs show the oldest-ever president did submit to evaluation from an expert in Parkinson's disease and 20-year veteran of Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Dr. Kevin Cannard, but O'Connor said the January 2024 meeting was part of Biden's annual physical. 'If somebody turns up a report that Kevin Cannard said he has Parkinson's,' said Kuhlman, 'then that's a completely different story, but we have 14 years of Kevin Cannard evaluating him and that's who I would trust.' 5 O'Connor said that was part of his annual physical and ruled out a Parkinson's diagnosis, though other doctors expressed skepticism. American Osteopathic Association O'Connor said that was part of his annual physical and ruled out a Parkinson's diagnosis, though other doctors expressed skepticism. 'I could've diagnosed him from across the Mall,' neurologist Dr. Tom Pitts told NBC in July 2024, pointing to Biden's 'rigidity,' 'shuffling gait' and 'slow movement.' Advertisement Special Counsel Robert Hur, who determined that Biden 'willfully' hoarded classified documents after leaving the Obama White House, chose not to bring charges months earlier that year in February, in part because a jury would view the president as a 'sympathetic, well-meaning elderly man with a poor memory.' The Republican-led House Oversight Committee subpoenaed O'Connor on Thursday to appear for questioning about the former president's mental abilities on June 27. 5 The Republican-led House Oversight Committee subpoenaed O'Connor on Thursday to appear for questioning about the former president's mental abilities on June 27. AP Oversight Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) in a cover letter accompanying the subpoena suggested the doctor's past 'financial relationship with the Biden family' may have 'contributed to an effort to hide former President Biden's fitness to serve from the American people.' Advertisement Jean-Pierre, who left the Democratic Party and is publishing a tell-all book about the 'broken' Biden administration, is also expected to be hauled in for testimony. Days before a book was set to be published alleging a vast cover-up of his decline during his last two years in the White House, Biden announced that he had been diagnosed with prostate cancer that had spread to his bones. The book, 'Original Sin,' notes that O'Connor was reluctant to administer a cognitive test, according to co-authors Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson. Advertisement Kuhlman said O'Connor had conducted tests for that kind of cancer between 2009 and 2014 when they served together in the White House, but it may not have been 'worth doing in the next 10 years' based on the findings of that final exam, known as a PSA, in the vice presidency. 'I hope that Kevin O'Connor had that conversation every year with his patient, Joe Biden, and documented that in the medical record,' he said. 'If he did the PSA and chose not to release it, I don't agree with that.'

'Unite for Vets' rally in Washington, D.C., protest overhaul of VA
'Unite for Vets' rally in Washington, D.C., protest overhaul of VA

UPI

time7 hours ago

  • UPI

'Unite for Vets' rally in Washington, D.C., protest overhaul of VA

1 of 8 | Veterans, military families and demonstrators gather on the National Mall in Washington, D.C.,, to participate in a Unite for Veterans Rally to protest the Trump Administration's cuts to staffing and programs at the Department of Veterans Affairs. Photo by Annabelle Gordon/UPI | License Photo June 6 (UPI) -- Several thousand veterans converged on the National Mall on Friday at a rally among 200 events nationwide against a proposed overhaul that includes staffing reduction and some services shifted. The Veterans Administration counters the new proposed budget is higher than last year, processing of claims have sped up and it's easier to get benefits. Veterans, military families and others participated in the Unite for Veterans, Unite for America Rally on the 81st anniversary of D-Day, which was the Allies' amphibious invasion of German-occupied France. The protests, which were organized by a union, took place at 16 state capitol buildings and more than 100 other places across 43 states. "We are coming together to defend the benefits, jobs and dignity that every generation of veterans has earned through sacrifice," Unite for Veterans said on its website. "Veteran jobs, healthcare, and essential VA services are under attack. We will not stand by." Speakers in Washington included Democrats with military backgrounds: Sen. Tammy Duckworth of Illinois, former Rep. Conor Lamb of Pennsylvania and California Rep. Derek Tran. There were signs against President Donald Trump, VA Secretary Doug Collins and Elon Musk, the multi-billionaire who ran the Department of Government Efficiency. They said those leaders are betraying the country's promises to troops. "Are you tired of being thanked for our service in the public and stabbed in our back in private?" Army veteran Everett Kelly, the national president of the American Federation of Government Employees, asked the crowd. "For years, politicians on both sides of the aisle have campaigned on their support of veterans, but once they get into office, they cut our benefits, our services. They take every opportunity to privatize our health care." The Trump administration plans to cut 83,000 VA staffers and shift more money from the federal health care system to private-sector clinics. The administration's proposed budget for the VA, released on Friday, slashes spending for "medical services" by $12bn - or nearly 20% - an amount offset by a corresponding 50% boost in funding for veterans seeking healthcare in the private sector. The Department of Veterans Affairs employs approximately 482,000 people, including 500,000 workers at 170 hospitals and 1,200 local clinics in the nation's largest health care system. In all, there are 15.8 million veterans, which represents 6.1% of the civilian population 18 years and older. VA officials said the event was misguided. "Imagine how much better off veterans would be if VA's critics cared as much about fixing the department as they do about protecting its broken bureaucracy," VA press secretary Peter Kasperowicz said in a statement to UPI. "The Biden Administration's VA failed to address nearly all of the department's most serious problems, such as rising health care wait times, growing backlogs of veterans waiting for disability compensation and major issues with survivor benefits." Kasperowicz told UPI disability claims backlog is already down 25% since Trump took office on Jan. 20 after it increased 24% during the Biden administration. He said VA has opened 10 new healthcare clinics around the country, and Trump has proposed a 10% budget increase to $441.3 billion in fiscal year 2026. The administration's proposed budget for the VA reduces spending for "medical services" by $12 billion - or nearly 20% - which is offset by a 50% boost in funding for veterans seeking healthcare in the private sector. Kasperowicz said the "VA is accelerating the deployment of its integrated electronic health record system, after the program was nearly dormant for almost two years under the Biden Administration." The event was modeled after the Bonus Army protests of the 1930s, when veterans who served in World War I gathered in the nation's capital to demand extra pay denied after leaving the service. Irma Westmoreland, a registered nurse working at a VA hospital and the secretary-treasurer of National Nurses United, told the crowd in Washington: "It's important for every person to keep their job, from the engineering staff to the housekeeper to the dietary staff. When cuts are made, the nursing and medical staff will have to pick up all their work that needs to be done."

We're secretly winning the war on cancer
We're secretly winning the war on cancer

Vox

time9 hours ago

  • Vox

We're secretly winning the war on cancer

is a senior editorial director at Vox overseeing the climate teams and the Unexplainable and The Gray Area podcasts. He is also the editor of Vox's Future Perfect section and writes the Good News newsletter. He worked at Time magazine for 15 years as a foreign correspondent in Asia, a climate writer, and an international editor, and he wrote a book on existential risk. Thousands of people gather on the National Mall in Washington, DC, on September 26, 1998, to demand that the cause, the care, and the cure of cancer be made top research and healthcare priorities in the US. Paul J. Richards/AFP via Getty Images On November 4, 2003, a doctor gave Jon Gluck some of the worst news imaginable: He had cancer — one that later tests would reveal as multiple myeloma, a severe blood and bone marrow cancer. Jon was told he might have as little as 18 months to live. He was 38, a thriving magazine editor in New York with a 7-month-old daughter whose third birthday, he suddenly realized, he might never see. 'The moment after I was told I had cancer, I just said 'no, no, no,'' Jon told me in an interview just last week. 'This cannot be true.' Living in remission The fact that Jon is still here, talking to me in 2025, tells you that things didn't go the way the medical data would have predicted on that November morning. He has lived with his cancer, through waves of remission and recurrence, for more than 20 years, an experience he chronicles with grace and wit in his new book An Exercise in Uncertainty. That 7-month-old daughter is now in college. You could say Jon has beaten the odds, and he's well aware that chance played some role in his survival. ('Did you know that 'Glück' is German for 'luck'?' he writes in the book, noting his good fortune that a random spill on the ice is what sent him to the doctor in the first place, enabling them to catch his cancer early.) Cancer is still a terrible health threat, one that is responsible for 1 in 6 deaths around the world, killing nearly 10 million people a year globally and over 600,000 people a year in the US. But Jon's story and his survival demonstrate something that is too often missed: We've turned the tide in the war against cancer. The age-adjusted death rate in the US for cancer has declined by about a third since 1991, meaning people of a given age have about a third lower risk of dying from cancer than people of the same age more than three decades ago. That adds up to over 4 million fewer cancer deaths over that time period. Thanks to breakthroughs in treatments like autologous stem-cell harvesting and CAR-T therapy — breakthroughs Jon himself benefited from, often just in time — cancer isn't the death sentence it once was. Our World in Data Getting better all the time There's no doubt that just as the rise of smoking in the 20th century led to a major increase in cancer deaths, the equally sharp decline of tobacco use eventually led to a delayed decrease. Smoking is one of the most potent carcinogens in the world, and at the peak in the early 1960s, around 12 cigarettes were being sold per adult per day in the US. Take away the cigarettes and — after a delay of a couple of decades — lung cancer deaths drop in turn along with other non-cancer smoking-related deaths. But as Saloni Dattani wrote in a great piece earlier this year, even before the decline of smoking, death rates from non-lung cancers in the stomach and colon had begun to fall. Just as notably, death rates for childhood cancers — which for obvious reasons are not connected to smoking and tend to be caused by genetic mutations — have fallen significantly as well, declining sixfold since 1950. In the 1960s, for example, only around 10 percent of children diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukemia survived more than five years. Today it's more than 90 percent. And the five-year survival rate for all cancers has risen from 49 percent in the mid-1970s to 69 percent in 2019. We've made strikes against the toughest of cancers, like Jon's multiple myeloma. Around when Jon was diagnosed, the five-year survival rate was just 34 percent. Today it's as high as 62 percent, and more and more people like Jon are living for decades. 'There has been a revolution in cancer survival,' Jon told me. 'Some illnesses now have far more successful therapies than others, but the gains are real.' Three cancer revolutions The dramatic bend in the curve of cancer deaths didn't happen by accident — it's the compound interest of three revolutions. While anti-smoking policy has been the single biggest lifesaver, other interventions have helped reduce people's cancer risk. One of the biggest successes is the HPV vaccine. A study last year found that death rates of cervical cancer — which can be caused by HPV infections — in US women ages 20–39 had dropped 62 percent from 2012 to 2021, thanks largely to the spread of the vaccine. Other cancers have been linked to infections, and there is strong research indicating that vaccination can have positive effects on reducing cancer incidence. The next revolution is better and earlier screening. It's generally true that the earlier cancer is caught, the better the chances of survival, as Jon's own story shows. According to one study, incidences of late-stage colorectal cancer in Americans over 50 declined by a third between 2000 and 2010 in large part because rates of colonoscopies almost tripled in that same time period. And newer screening methods, often employing AI or using blood-based tests, could make preliminary screening simpler, less invasive and therefore more readily available. If 20th-century screening was about finding physical evidence of something wrong — the lump in the breast — 21st-century screening aims to find cancer before symptoms even arise. Most exciting of all are frontier developments in treating cancer, much of which can be tracked through Jon's own experience. From drugs like lenalidomide and bortezomib in the 2000s, which helped double median myeloma survival, to the spread of monoclonal antibodies, real breakthroughs in treatments have meaningfully extended people's lives — not just by months, but years. Perhaps the most promising development is CAR-T therapy, a form of immunotherapy. Rather than attempting to kill the cancer directly, immunotherapies turn a patient's own T-cells into guided missiles. In a recent study of 97 patients with multiple myeloma, many of whom were facing hospice care, a third of those who received CAR-T therapy had no detectable cancer five years later. It was the kind of result that doctors rarely see. 'CAR-T is mind-blowing — very science-fiction futuristic,' Jon told me. He underwent his own course of treatment with it in mid-2023 and writes that the experience, which put his cancer into a remission he's still in, left him feeling 'physically and metaphysically new.' A welcome uncertainty While there are still more battles to be won in the war on cancer, and there are certain areas — like the rising rates of gastrointestinal cancers among younger people — where the story isn't getting better, the future of cancer treatment is improving. For cancer patients like Jon, that can mean a new challenge — enduring the essential uncertainty that comes with living under a disease that's controllable but which could always come back. But it sure beats the alternative. 'I've come to trust so completely in my doctors and in these new developments,' he said. 'I try to remain cautiously optimistic that my future will be much like the last 20 years.' And that's more than he or anyone else could have hoped for nearly 22 years ago. A version of this story originally appeared in the Good News newsletter. Sign up here!

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store