How many people are in asylum hotels and who is to blame for the UK using them
The Government faces an asylum hotel crisis as councils line up to launch legal challenges which could see thousands of people kicked out.
On Tuesday the High Court granted a temporary injuction preventing the Bell Hotel in Epping from housing migrants after weeks of tension. Home Office lawyers had warned that such a ruling 'could put Britain's asylum hotel scheme at risk of falling apart' as ministers grapple to shut down venues.
Dozens of local authorities are now exploring similar challenges, with the Government now drawing up contingency plans. Labour has vowed to end the use of hotels by the end of this Parliament after the Tories resorted to using them when the asylum system descended into chaos. Experts said a "failure of public policy", with years of not processing asylum claims by the Conservatives, led to people being put in expensive accommodation.
In 2023, when the asylum backlog was a mammoth 175,000, more than 400 hotels were in use, housing over 56,000 people. At the time Robert Jenrick, who was immigration minister, bragged at the speed he was securing rooms.
He said, in a quote dug up by Labour this week: "More hotels have been coming online almost every month throughout the whole of this year. So Suella Braverman and her predecessor Priti Patel were securing more hotels. What I have done in my short tenure is wrap that up and secure even more."
The brazen Shadow Justice Secretary has been vocal on the issue of asylum hotels in recent weeks, joining demonstrations outside the Bell Hotel to protest about problems his party caused. The backlog swelled after the UK lost its legal right to return migrants to Europe after Brexit, while a string of botched laws under the Tories failed to drive down small boat crossings. The Conservatives pinned their hopes on being able to send people to Rwanda as the number of people in the asylum system grew and grew.
Labour has pledged to get a grip of the chaos, but says it will take time to see the results. At the end of March this year there were 32,345 people living in asylum hotels, Home Office figures show. This was up from 29,585 when Labour came to power. It means 31% of asylum seekers were receiving asylum support earlier this year.
Security Minister Dan Jarvis said the Government accepts that hotels are not the most appropriate place for asylum seekers to be housed. And in the immediate aftermath of the Epping judgment, border security minister Dame Angela Eagle said Labour had "inherited a broken asylum system".
Dame Angela said the Government would "continue working with local authorities and communities to address legitimate concerns" around asylum hotels. Imran Hussain, from the Refugee Council, told Sky News: "Nobody thinks asylum seekers should be kept in hotels while their case is being assessed.
"It's very expensive. It's not good for the asylum seekers. It's isolating. It's an isolating experince I think even before the protests, with the protests it's incredibly terrifying for people.
"And of course as we've seen for local communities, there's a lot of tension, some of which is being exploited by people on the far- right. So no one thinks it's a good idea."
And explaining how hotels came to be used, Mr Hussain continued: " This isn't a planning issue, really. This is a failure of public policy. For 20 odd years that we've supported asylum seekers through, the system worked perfectly well.
"We had accommodation for people without using hotels. But the last few years there's been a huge backlog of cases that's grown up because the previous government (the Tories) stopped making decisions on cases because it wanted to send people to Rwanda.
"The backlog has meant the accommodation that was existing was full and people have had to use hotels."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
32 minutes ago
- Reuters
South Korea's Lee says plans record $25 bln govt spending on research in 2026
SEOUL, Aug 22 (Reuters) - South Korean President Lee Jae Myung said on Friday the government planned to boost research spending by nearly a fifth to a record 35.3 trillion won ($25.23 billion) in 2026 to help drive the development of artificial intelligence technologies. In televised remarks, Lee said South Korea had managed to transform into an industrial powerhouse through investing in the years since Japanese colonial rule ended in 1945. South Korea is "the only country in the world that was liberated from a colony and succeeded in both industrialisation and democratisation, and that was because we invested in the future," Lee said. The decision to increase the budget for research spending by almost 20% reversed spending cuts made under the previous administration of now-ousted Yoon Suk Yeol, government data shows. ($1 = 1,399.2900 won)
Daily Mail
32 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Dick Smith's urgent warning to Australia as Anthony Albanese's renewable energy rollout continues
Australian entrepreneur Dick Smith has launched a fierce attack on the government's renewable energy agenda, accusing Energy Minister Chris Bowen of overstating the reliability of wind farms. In a full-page newspaper ad, Mr Smith singled out Bowen, arguing that once the cost of battery storage is included, wind and solar power become prohibitively expensive, pushing electricity prices beyond the reach of most households. Using the proposed offshore wind farm off the Illawarra in New South Wales as an example, he claimed the necessary battery backup would cost $73 billion and last just 1.5 days during a wind drought. 'This would make electricity totally unaffordable,' he said. While stressing he supports renewable energy, Mr Smith argued it will only be viable if paired with large-scale storage, which he insists is currently unaffordable. As evidence, he pointed to the $400 million Big Canberra Battery project, which he said would power the city for only 40 minutes, and Tesla 's Adelaide 'super battery.' 'It cost $90 million and it can run Adelaide City for seven minutes,' he said. 'The problem is storage is going to be incredibly expensive. 'Batteries have been coming down in price, but they need to come down at least 10 times in price to be to allow us to afford the electricity from solar, wind and batteries.' The controversial offshore wind farm will span 93km south of Sydney, covering some of Australia's most picturesque coastline. Energy Minister Chris Bowen has claimed it will generate up to 2.9 gigawatts of reliable renewable power, enough to supply 1.8 million homes. But Mr Smith rejected that claim. 'When there's no wind blowing, it won't provide power for one home,' he said. The project has faced opposition not only from renewable energy critics but also from environmental groups concerned it could disturb seabirds and migratory whales. However, the 2024–25 GenCost report released last month by CSIRO and AEMO concluded that renewables remain the lowest-cost and most practical option for replacing Australia's ageing coal-fired power stations. Mr Smith rejected the idea that clean energy is cheaper. 'In South Australia, where they've now got to 70 per cent on average over the year, in renewables, their electricity is double what we pay in Sydney,' he said. 'In Sydney, it's about 25 cents a kilowatt hour. 'In South Australia, it's 50 cents a kilowatt hour. So just getting to 70 per cent they've doubled the price for consumers. 'For us to go to high levels of renewables is going to be mind-alteringly expensive. 'Poorer people are going to suffer. Small business will close down. It's just too expensive.' Clean Energy Council general manager of advocacy and investment, Anna Freeman, dismissed Mr Smith's claims as 'misleading.' She argued that, compared to nuclear and other emerging technologies, renewable energy remains more affordable,even when storage and transmission costs are included. 'Wind and solar power are now the cheapest forms of new electricity generation in Australia, even when combined with firming technologies such as batteries, pumped hydro and gas peaking plants,' she said. She added that Mr Smith's argument misunderstands how the energy grid functions. 'The suggestion that a single battery should back up an entire offshore wind farm for multiple days is a fundamental misunderstanding of how the electricity system operates. 'The grid draws on a mix of generation sources and storage spread across the network, ensuring reliability while keeping costs down for consumers.'
Powys County Times
36 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
Fresh wave of asylum hotel protests expected after Epping ruling
A wave of protests outside hotels used as temporary accommodation for asylum seekers is expected in the coming days. It comes as the latest figures showed there were more than 32,000 asylum seekers in hotels, marking a rise of 8% during Labour's first year in office. Stand Up To Racism is preparing to hold counter-protests outside hotels housing asylum seekers on Friday, including in Bournemouth, Cardiff and Leeds, with further demonstrations expected on Saturday. Meanwhile, councils across the country controlled by Labour, the Conservatives and Reform UK are investigating whether they could pursue legal challenges against asylum hotels. This follows a judge granting Epping Forest District Council a temporary injunction on Tuesday that blocked asylum seekers from being housed at the Bell Hotel in Essex. The council had argued the injunction was needed amid 'unprecedented levels of protest and disruption' in connection with asylum seeker accommodation. Shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick said the people of Epping who protested and its council have 'led the way', writing in The Telegraph that 'our country's patience has snapped'. His Conservative colleague Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, said on Thursday that people have 'every right' to protest over asylum hotels in their areas. Labour has pledged to end the use of hotels to house asylum seekers by the end of this parliament in 2029. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper insisted Labour had taken 'crucial steps' in the past year towards this by cutting the asylum backlog and money spent on the asylum system, increasing returns of failed asylum seekers and overhauling appeals. While the number of asylum seekers housed in hotels has risen, Government spending on asylum in the UK is down 12%, data published on Thursday showed. The number waiting on an initial decision on an asylum application in the UK at the end of June dropped below 100,000 for the first time in four years. Asylum seekers and their families can be housed in temporary accommodation, known as contingency accommodation, if they are awaiting assessment of their claim or have had a claim approved and there is not enough longer-term accommodation available. When there is not enough housing, the Home Office – which has a legal obligation to provide accommodation to asylum seekers who would otherwise be destitute – can move people to alternatives such as hotels and large sites, like former military bases. Amid hotel protests, campaigners including Rape Crisis and Refuge have warned conversations about violence against women and girls are being 'hijacked by an anti-migrant agenda' which they argued fuels divisions and harms survivors.
