
The electric car market is booming. So why are British drivers still paying a premium?
The electric car revolution is no longer hypothetical, it's roaring ahead at a speed that is literally making roads quieter, communities cleaner and transforming the auto industry in real time. More than one in four cars sold this year are set to be EVs, and in China, most of them already cost less than £23,000 a piece. But if EVs are becoming cheaper and more widespread, why are British and European drivers still paying premium prices?
This week's Global EV Outlook from the International Energy Agency (IEA) offers a clear answer: the global EV market is booming, but protectionist barriers are shielding domestic carmakers from cheaper imports, particularly from China, and unfortunately that means they're keeping prices artificially high for consumers like you and me. But they're also protecting local manufacturing jobs in legacy car companies. They're protecting regional economies and brands that have literally shaped the world's economy over the last 50 years but are now struggling to keep up with the innovative supply chain superiority that Asia's biggest car makers have been perfecting for the last decade. The question is, how long can these measures protect these jobs, and is it actually worth it?
Last year, more than 17 million EVs were sold worldwide, growing by 3.5 million sales in a year, and showing no signs of slowing down. In the first quarter of 2025 alone, global EV sales are up by another 35 per cent.
Unsurprisingly, China remains the epicentre of global EV growth. More than 11 million EVs were sold there in 2024, making up nearly half of all new car sales in the country. After years of European and American car makers betting big on the Chinese market, it seems that these billion dollar symbols of industrial superiority simply can no longer compete. In 2020, foreign-branded cars made up more than two-thirds of all car sales in China, now, they've fallen to just 32 per cent, and most believe even this declining market share looks fragile. One of the biggest reasons is cost. EVs are not only cheaper to run anywhere in the world, in China, they're now cheaper to buy as well. Last year, two-thirds of EVs sold were cheaper than petrol cars in their same class, and that's without any government consumer subsidies. Contrast that with Germany, where electric cars cost 20 per cent more than their internal combustion cousins, or in the US, where Tesla's almost monopoly has pushed that gap closer to 30 per cent.
What's keeping EV prices high in Europe and the US? Local manufacturing and labour costs are one key element, but tariffs and trade policies are playing an outsized role. Last year, the EU increased tariffs on Chinese-built EVs as high as 45.3 per cent, and even before Donald Trump found his way to the White House, Joe Biden had already placed a 100 per cent tariff on Chinese EVs. The UK on the other hand didn't follow in the tariff trend last year, and is now seen as one of the best opportunity markets for Chinese EV makers, and British drivers should expect a flood of new brands and new low-cost models available this year.
The reality though is that Chinese companies are not just winning on sticker price, they're dominating on everything from supply chains to automation, efficiency and even choice. China accounts for more than 70 per cent of global EV production and there is so much competition, it's driving down global battery prices at a rate of knots. Battery prices had already been falling for years, but in China they dropped by an additional 30 per cent last year. But they're also dramatically expanding choice. In the US, where Chinese cars are effectively banned, drivers could choose from 24 new electric car models launched last year. Across the EU there are close to 290 models to choose from, but in China, consumers can choose from over 700 different EVs.
Since an electric vehicle is effectively a battery on wheels, this dramatic decline in battery prices and ramp-up in choice brings us to a challenging question: Is the West pricing itself out of the EV transition to protect local jobs? And if it is, is this a price worth paying?
The case for protecting domestic jobs is real. The auto industry employs millions of people across Europe and the US, and global supply chains put these jobs at a real risk. If Chinese consumers have already abandoned foreign cars en masse, will European consumers remain loyal, and pay more for these marquee local brands? Last year's tariffs suggest that policymakers at least don't believe they will.
And this is genuinely something worth protecting. But this also comes at a real, everyday cost. EVs are cleaner, quieter and cheaper to run, and transport emissions across the EU, US and UK remain stubbornly high. Every family that can't afford to switch to a cheaper EV remains locked into ongoing petrol bills and higher maintenance costs. Even if oil prices fell to $40 a barrel, charging an EV at home in Europe would still be half the cost of filling up a conventional car.
That's the real policy dilemma facing just about any country with a local car industry right now. Should we hold on, and protect local jobs and local brands as long as we can by blocking Chinese competition? Or should we do everything possible to support cheaper, cleaner and quieter cars on the road? This is a fine balance, and one with risks on both sides.
There's no easy answer. But as policymakers in Washington, Westminster and Brussels contemplate whether or not to hold onto protectionist tariffs or open up their markets to this new generation of cars, they should be honest about the real trade-offs, and prepare to support those workers in the long-term, and aim to at least achieve a fair transition, even if its not the fastest.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
21 minutes ago
- Reuters
China's forex reserves up $3.6 billion in May, less than expected
BEIJING, June 7 (Reuters) - China's foreign exchange reserves rose by a less-than-expected $3.6 billion in May, official data showed on Saturday, as the dollar continued to weaken against other major currencies. The country's foreign exchange reserves, the world's largest, rose 0.11% to $3.285 trillion last month, below the Reuters forecast of $3.292 trillion. They were $3.282 trillion in April. The increase in reserves was due to "the combined effects of factors such as exchange rate conversion and asset price changes," China's State Administration of Foreign Exchange said in a statement. The yuan weakened 1.05% against the dollar in May, while the dollar slid 0.23% against a basket of other major currencies .


The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
All the shops closing this weekend including iconic department store shutting after 124 years
A HOST of stores are shutting for good this weekend including a historic department store. Retailers have struggled over recent years as shoppers' wallets and purses take a hit from high inflation. 1 An increase in employer National Insurance contributions and wage costs since April has added to the pressure. Combined with soaring business rates, energy and rental costs, some retailers have been forced to hike prices and even shut stores. It's worth bearing in mind of course that retailers close shops for a host of reasons and not always because of a poor economic backdrop. Sometimes chains will shut a poorly-performing branch in one area and open another further afield where they think they'll see better footfall. Plenty of retailers are moving away from high streets and towards out-of-town retail parks too. In any case, five shops will shut this weekend including a more than 120-year-old department store. Here is the full list of shops we know are closing down permanently. Ginger Norwich-based Ginger will pull down its shutters for the final time on Saturday. The shop was founded by David and Rodger Kingsley in 1978 following the success of their sister company Jonathan Trumbull in 1971. But current store manager Beckie Kingsley said the store will close due to the economic climate and aftermath of Covid-19. Britain's retail apocalypse: why your favourite stores KEEP closing down She said: "It's with truly heavy hearts that, after 46 unforgettable years, we have made the incredibly difficult decision to close the doors at our beautiful, beloved and historic Timber Hill home. "We've weathered many storms over the decades, but there's been ongoing challenges of today's financial climate - coupled with the lasting impact and huge shifts within the retail landscape since Covid. "This led us to ask - does it still work for us? After deep reflection, the answer, sadly, is no." Daniel of Ealing Historic department store Daniel of Ealing, in London, will shut for good on Sunday, after opening 124 years ago. Prices have been slashed across homeware, fashion, toys, sportswear and shoes, with up to 50% off. Shoppers finding out the iconic shop will close have shared their dismay online. One posted saying: "Loved this shop and it's top floor restaurant." While another added: "Ealing has lost its heart, soul and uniqueness!" The Works Stationer The Works is shutting its Margate store on Sunday, with shoppers' next nearest branches in Westwood Cross Shopping Centre or Ramsgate Garden Centre. A spokesperson for the chain said the decision to shut the branch had been made "as part of ongoing plans to optimise our store portfolio". The move has been met with sadness by shoppers, with one online stating: "No I love The Works." Another dejectedly added: "Be nothing left in the town soon." Emporium Worthing Independent bar and shop Emporium Worthing is closing to the public on Sunday "with a heavy heart". The owners posted a lengthy statement on Facebook announcing the closure. It said: "We share the challenging decision to close Emporium Worthing after five memorable years of serving you. "This has been a tough choice for us, but after careful reflection, we believe it is the best path forward and the right choice for us at this time." A huge closing down sale has been launched to clear stock, even including fixtures and fittings from inside. It's not all bad news though as the Emporium will be moving online and selling hardwares. New Look New Look is closing its branch in the Northfield Shopping Centre, Birmingham, on June 8. A picture recently posted on Facebook of the shop window advertised the closure and signposted customers to the retailer's website. Customers finding out about the closure have been left gutted. One posted on Facebook: "Will soon be a ghost town, absolutely nothing left." A New Look spokesperson said: "We would like to thank all of our colleagues and the local community for their support over the years. "We hope customers continue to shop with us online at where our full product ranges can be found." RETAIL PAIN IN 2025 The British Retail Consortium predicted that the Treasury's hike to employer NICs would cost the retail sector £2.3billion. Research published by the British Chambers of Commerce earlier this year shows that more than half of companies planned to raise prices by early April. Separately, the Centre for Retail Research (CRR) has also warned that around 17,350 retail sites are expected to shut down this year. It comes on the back of a tough 2024 when 13,000 shops closed their doors for good, already a 28% increase on the previous year. Professor Joshua Bamfield, director of the CRR said: "The results for 2024 show that although the outcomes for store closures overall were not as poor as in either 2020 or 2022, they are still disconcerting, with worse set to come in 2025." Professor Bamfield has also warned of a bleak outlook for 2025, predicting that as many as 202,000 jobs could be lost in the sector. "By increasing both the costs of running stores and the costs on each consumer's household it is highly likely that we will see retail job losses eclipse the height of the pandemic in 2020."


BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
India leads in remittances - but Trump's tax could deal a blow
A study by Center for Global Development, a Washington-based think tank, suggests the proposed tax could sharply cut formal transfers, with Mexico facing the biggest hit - over $2.6bn annually. Other major losers include India, China, Vietnam and several Latin American nations like Guatemala, the Dominican Republic and El Salvador. To be sure, there's still some confusion surrounding the tax, and final approval is pending Senate action and the President's signature. "The tax applies to all non-citizens and even embassy and UN/World Bank staff. But those who pay taxes can claim a tax credit. Thus, the remittance tax would apply only to those migrants who do not pay taxes. That would mostly include unauthorised migrants (and diplomats)," Dilip Ratha, the World Bank lead economist for migration and remittances, told the BBC. Dr Ratha wrote in a note on LinkedIn that migrants would try to cut remittance costs by turning to informal methods - hand-carrying cash, sending money through friends, couriers, bus drivers or airline staff, arranging local currency payouts via friends in the US, or using hawala, hundi and cryptocurrencies. "Will the proposed tax deter unauthorised immigration to the US? Will it encourage unauthorised migrants to return home?" wonders Dr Ratha. Not quite, he says. A minimum wage job in the US earns over $24,000 a year - roughly four to 30 times more than in many developing countries. Migrants typically send home between $1,800 and $48,000 annually, estimates Dr Ratha. "A 3.5% tax is unlikely to deter these remittances. After all the main motivation for migration - migrants trying to cross oceans and rivers and mountains - is to send money home to help helpless family members."