logo
'Constructive criticism not amounting to sedition'

'Constructive criticism not amounting to sedition'

RTHK7 hours ago

'Constructive criticism not amounting to sedition'
Secretary for Justice Paul Lam said people don't have to worry about falling foul of the SAR's sedition laws so long as their criticism is aimed at suggesting improvement to the authorities.
The justice chief told the RTHK programme NSL Chronicles III that there are clear stipulations about how certain acts and comments do not constitute sedition in the home-grown national security law under Article 23 of the Basic Law.
"For example, when we have different opinions or criticisms about government policies, the law is clear in this regard," Lam said.
"If you're expressing views with the intent of wishing the government to do better, or making so-called criticism with good intentions, the law states in black and white that these do not amount to [the crime of] seditious intention."
Lam said according to the Safeguarding National Security Ordinance, it is also legal to suggest improvement to the legal or political system as well as the constitutional order, so long as there's no intent to incite hatred or contempt.
On the other hand, Lam explained how people may violate seditious laws under Article 23 even if they don't intend to incite violence.
He noted there had been instances where some comments "could harm the public's views towards the government", causing hatred or enmity, even if they don't specifically ask people to take up arms to confront the SAR government.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

HK stocks end down as Mideast fears weigh on markets
HK stocks end down as Mideast fears weigh on markets

RTHK

time3 hours ago

  • RTHK

HK stocks end down as Mideast fears weigh on markets

HK stocks end down as Mideast fears weigh on markets The Hang Seng Index ended down 80.69 points, or 0.34 percent, to close at 23,980.30. File photo: RTHK Mainland Chinese and Hong Kong stocks ended lower on Tuesday as sentiment was weighed down by fresh signs of Middle East tensions after US President Donald Trump urged Iranians to evacuate Tehran. In Hong Kong, the benchmark Hang Seng Index ended down 80.69 points, or 0.34 percent, to close at 23,980.30. The Hang Seng China Enterprises Index fell 0.4 percent to end at 8,694.67 while the Hang Seng Tech Index fell 0.15 percent to end at 5,291.85. On the mainland, the benchmark Shanghai Composite Index closed down 0.04 percent at 3,387.40 while the Shenzhen Component Index closed 0.12 percent lower at 10,151.43. The ChiNext Index, tracking China's Nasdaq-style board of growth enterprises, lost 0.36 percent to close at 2,049.94. The retreat came as Israel and Iran attacked each other for a fifth straight day. Trump left the Group of Seven summit in Canada a day early due to the situation in the Middle East, the White House said on Monday, prompting broad risk-off sentiment in global financial markets. "One thing that is clear is that the situation continues to be highly uncertain and risks of escalation should not be ignored," analysts at Maybank said in a note. "Safe havens should continue to be better bid and the US dollar should be better supported." Oil and gas shares were an outperformer, as the geopolitical tensions drove crude prices higher. A sub-index tracking the sector gained 0.92 percent. Apart from the Middle East tensions, the focus was also on the annual Lujiazui Forum this week, traders and analysts said. "The Lujiazui forum is likely to be the key window for financial and yuan internationalization-related policies, while the July Politburo economic meeting is likely to provide further guidance on the monetary and fiscal stance for H2 this year," said Ju Wang, head of Greater China FX and rates strategy at BNP Paribas. (Reuters/Xinhua)

Beijing official Xia Baolong to visit Hong Kong ahead of 5th anniversary of nat. security law
Beijing official Xia Baolong to visit Hong Kong ahead of 5th anniversary of nat. security law

HKFP

time4 hours ago

  • HKFP

Beijing official Xia Baolong to visit Hong Kong ahead of 5th anniversary of nat. security law

Beijing's top official on Hong Kong affairs will visit the city for five days this week to attend a forum marking the fifth anniversary of the national security law, Chief Executive John Lee has announced. Xia Baolong, director of the Hong Kong and Macao Affairs Office (HKMAO), will visit Hong Kong from Wednesday to Sunday, Lee said at a weekly press briefing on Tuesday, ahead of the Executive Council meeting. The main focus of Xia's visit will be to attend a national security law forum organised by the Hong Kong government on Saturday, Lee said. The Chinese official, whom Lee said 'knows Hong Kong's situation very well,' will also inspect the city's 'economic situation and social development' during his five-day visit. Lee added that he was 'very encouraged' by Xia's trip. The Hong Kong leader said the government will maintain 'close communication' with the HKMAO before announcing details of Xia's itinerary. Xia first visited Hong Kong in April 2023, during which he gave a keynote speech on the National Security Education Day. At that time, he said the city 'seems peaceful' but some 'undercurrents are still simmering,' adding that the root of the 2019 extradition bill unrest had not been eliminated. He made inspection visits to Hong Kong in February this year and last year. He visited Macau for six days last month. Lee also said on Tuesday that a total of 332 people had been arrested for national security offences since the national security law was enacted on June 30, 2020. The chief executive pointed out that on average, 66 people were apprehended under the security law each year – far lower than the average annual number of total arrests, which stood at around 30,000. 'Sixty-six out of 30,000, the percentage is 0.2. When we promulgated the national security law, we made it very clear that the law is aiming at only a small portion of people who endanger national security. This figure reinforces that clear message,' Lee said. Beijing inserted national security legislation directly into Hong Kong's mini-constitution in June 2020 following a year of pro-democracy protests and unrest. It criminalised subversion, secession, collusion with foreign forces and terrorist acts – broadly defined to include disruption to transport and other infrastructure. The move gave police sweeping new powers and led to hundreds of arrests amid new legal precedents, while dozens of civil society groups disappeared. The authorities say it restored stability and peace to the city, rejecting criticism from trade partners, the UN and NGOs. In March 2024, Hong Kong enacted its homegrown Safeguarding National Security Ordinance, which targets treason, insurrection, sabotage, external interference, sedition, theft of state secrets and espionage. It allows for pre-charge detention of up to 16 days, and suspects' access to lawyers may be restricted, with penalties involving up to life in prison. Article 23 was shelved in 2003 amid mass protests, remaining taboo for years. But, on March 23, 2024, it was enacted having been fast-tracked and unanimously approved at the city's opposition-free legislature.

'Constructive criticism not amounting to sedition'
'Constructive criticism not amounting to sedition'

RTHK

time7 hours ago

  • RTHK

'Constructive criticism not amounting to sedition'

'Constructive criticism not amounting to sedition' Secretary for Justice Paul Lam said people don't have to worry about falling foul of the SAR's sedition laws so long as their criticism is aimed at suggesting improvement to the authorities. The justice chief told the RTHK programme NSL Chronicles III that there are clear stipulations about how certain acts and comments do not constitute sedition in the home-grown national security law under Article 23 of the Basic Law. "For example, when we have different opinions or criticisms about government policies, the law is clear in this regard," Lam said. "If you're expressing views with the intent of wishing the government to do better, or making so-called criticism with good intentions, the law states in black and white that these do not amount to [the crime of] seditious intention." Lam said according to the Safeguarding National Security Ordinance, it is also legal to suggest improvement to the legal or political system as well as the constitutional order, so long as there's no intent to incite hatred or contempt. On the other hand, Lam explained how people may violate seditious laws under Article 23 even if they don't intend to incite violence. He noted there had been instances where some comments "could harm the public's views towards the government", causing hatred or enmity, even if they don't specifically ask people to take up arms to confront the SAR government.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store