How to protect biometrics data from falling into the wrong hands
When you think of identity theft, you probably think about personal information, such as Social Security Numbers, said Action 9 investigator Jason Stoogenke.
You must now consider biometrics, as well, including using your fingerprint to unlock your phone, your face or voice for online banking, or your palm at the doctor's office.
ACTION 9: Secret Service recovers multiple skimming devices in statewide EBT fraud crackdown
Some companies use your biometric information to verify your identity, which is intended to make it harder for thieves to impersonate you.
The idea is to prevent identity theft.
However, thieves who get their hands on your biometrics may be able to access your devices, accounts, a secure building where you work, and the list goes on, Stoogenke said.
The Identity Theft Resource Center released this report recently.
It says 87% of the people surveyed were asked to provide a biometric identifier in the past year and 91% agreed.
However, 63% still had serious concerns about it, and only 35% trust companies to protect the data well.
Consumers have questions.
'How the information is being used. How it's being stored. What else you're doing with it?' ITRC's Eva Velasquez told Stoogenke.
Biometrics or not, Stephanie Fountain wants as little of her information out there as possible. She says someone stole her identity.
'I freaked out, like I started bawling my eyes out,' she said.
She says she went to file taxes and found out someone already did in her name.
'My credit's been ruined,' she said. 'It's just impacting me big time.'
If you're worried about sharing your biometric information, read the company's privacy policy.
If you don't like what the company is gathering or how they're using it, see if you can opt out or, as a last resort, do business with someone else.
A red flag: If a company contacts you out of the blue, walk away. Don't share personal information, biometric or not.
If you're not sure what to do, ask a nonprofit:
Identity Theft Resource Center
Biometrics Institute
National Cyber Security Alliance
If you fall victim to ID theft
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Alabama officials recommend locking food stamp cards to prevent out-of-state fraud
HUNTSIVLLE, Ala. (WHNT) — The Alabama Department of Human Resources (DHR) is recommending that all EBT cardholders utilize the new Lock/Unlock feature on the ConnectEBT app and website, especially the 'Lock Card Everywhere' option which will help block out of state fraud. From May 2023 to Dec. 20, 2024, Alabama DHR replaced $15.9 million of SNAP benefits due to EBT fraud. From October to December 2024, over 26,000 reimbursements were approved for $10.5 million. The Department believes that 100 percent of the funds were stolen from outside of the state. Data shows that around $1.8 million in Alabama EBT expenditures happened in the state of New York and around $2.2 million was spent in Pennsylvania. DHR said it believes most, if not all, of this is fraud. 'The very best thing our SNAP clients can do is lock their card when they aren't using it,' said Alabama DHR Commissioner Nancy Buckner. 'With the funds being stolen by utilizing out of state EBT terminals, we believe using our newest feature on ConnectEBT and locking the EBT card will truly combat this type of fraud.' Clients can choose from two options when locking their card: 'Lock Card Everywhere' or 'Lock Card'. 'Lock Card Everywhere' completely locks cards to ALL purchases anywhere. The 'Lock Card' option will lock cards from purchases outside of Alabama but does allow online purchases. DHR strongly recommends the 'Lock Card Everywhere' option at all times when the card is not in use. In the event a card is used at a location for a food purchase, the business can access the amount due, even if the card is then immediately locked by the user. Authorization for the purchase is in real-time and based on the card status at the time of the transaction. If the card is locked when the card is swiped or keyed in, then the retailer's transaction will fail due to the locked card status. But if the cardholder locks the card, even if it is immediately AFTER the transaction is complete, the transaction would have already been authorized and completed and the transaction would be successful as long as available funds were in the account at the time of the purchase. EBT cardholders may also sign up for alerts through the ConnectEBT app and website. These alerts include account activity alerts through the app, text, and/or email.
Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
FDIC Points to Covert CIA Project to Justify Denial of Records
Welcome back to another edition of FOIA Files! My quest to unearth documents related to the case of the ' lost ' FOIA requests linked to two convicted hackers has been met with a Glomar by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Plus, a look behind the scenes as the Secret Service prepared agents for Trump's indictment in the classified documents case, which took place two years ago this weekend. If you're not already getting FOIA Files in your inbox, sign up here. A couple of weeks ago, I broke the story about a massive data breach at Opexus, a Washington-based company that contracts with federal agencies to provide software applications to manage FOIA requests and other government records. Opexus is owned by private equity company Thoma Bravo.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
USSS Ordered Destruction of White House Cocaine Day After Closing Case
Two years after the U.S. Secret Service discovered a bag of cocaine in the White House in July, 2023, documents showing orders for its destruction within 24 hours after the agency closed the case are raising new questions about the scrupulousness of the investigation. A U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency documenttitled "Destruction" states that the bag of cocaine was sent to the Metropolitan Police Department for incineration. That document obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request, doesnt display a date for the destruction. But other internal Secret Service records show that the cocaine was tested by the Secret Service, the D.C. Fire Department hazmat technicians, and the FBI before being sent back to the Secret Service for storage on July 12. Two days later, it was transferred to the D.C. police department for destruction. The Secret Service shut down the cocaine investigation 11 days after discovering it. The destruction of narcotics evidence must comply with environmental and safety regulations, and the D.C. police department has an Environmental Protection Agency-approved incinerator that federal agencies often use to destroy narcotics that are not involved in active legal cases. D.C. police officials referred all questions about the cocaines apparent destruction to the FBI. Theres no entry or date for the cocaines actual destruction. Early last week, FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino announced that he was re-opening the investigation into the cocaine found in the White House, as well as the leak of the Supreme Courts Dobbs decision overturning Roe v. Wade and the discovery of a pipe bomb at the Democratic National Committee headquarters on Jan. 6, 2021. Bongino reiterated his commitment to getting to the bottom of those cases in a Wednesday night interview with Fox News Sean Hannity. "Well, I get a kick out of it on social media," Bongino said. "People say, 'This case isnt a big deal. I dont care. Well, I care. … You dont care that a [potentially] hazardous substance made its way into the White House? We didnt know what it was, and we dont seem to have answers? Well, were going to get them. Ive got a great team on it." While the cocaine bag found in the White House appears to have been destroyed, internal Secret Service documents show that the agency retained and stored a second piece of evidence, an envelope of three tubes of DNA that the FBI attained from the plastic bag of cocaine. Its unclear how much DNA those tubes contain, though the Secret Service has stood by its statements that the FBI found insufficient DNA to pursue any investigative leads. When the Secret Service closed its investigation into who left the cocaine in the White House on July 13, the agency issued a statement explaining its decision. Secret Service spokesman Anthony Guglielmi asserted that camera surveillance footage didnt provide any "investigative leads or any other means for investigators to identify who may have deposited" the cocaine in the White House, adding that FBI laboratory results "did not develop latent fingerprints and insufficient evidence was present for investigative comparisons." But neither the FBI nor the Secret Service has publicly released the FBI laboratory results, and DNA experts say the only fool-proof way to demonstrate whether sufficient DNA existed on the baggie now to run against hits in national and state criminal DNA databases is to test it again. "The only way to really tell, is to test it again and see what happens," Gary Clayton Harmor, chief forensic DNA analyst at the Serological Research Institute in Richmond, California, told RCP. "Some labs will test anything, and others are more reluctant if they think its not a good enough sample to [test against national DNA databases]. The FBI, knowing them, theyre probably very conservative, and it may be that they said, 'Nope, theres not enough here to do anything meaningful with. It really depends on whos doing the testing and how they did it." RealClearPolitics over the last week submitted a FOIA request for the FBI laboratory findings on the cocaine bag to the FBI and the Secret Service, but so far, the Secret Service FOIA office has denied RCPs request for expedited service and the FBIs counterpart has yet to respond. Two sources tell RCP that Secret Service surveillance video clearly shows all the White House staff and other individuals who entered through the West Wing entrance, where the agency says the cocaine was found inside a locker in a vestibule leading to a lobby area down the hall from the Situation Room. The Secret Service, however, never interviewed that group of individuals, citing the FBIs alleged inability to find sufficient DNA evidence to link the cocaine to anyone. There are strict narcotics evidence retention policies for many federal law enforcement agencies. Department of Justice agencies, including the DEA and the FBI, must retain the narcotics evidence for two months before destroying it unless it is deemed abandoned or no longer needed as evidence. The Homeland Security Department, which oversees the Secret Service, has no specific publicly documented policy for destroying abandoned narcotics. The Secret Service also did not respond to a request for any written policy it followed when it sent the cocaine bag to D.C. police for destruction. The push to quickly destroy the cocaine factors into allegations RCP reported last fall in which three sources alleged that former Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle and others in top agency leadership positions wanted to destroy the cocaine quickly but faced internal resistance from the Secret Service Uniformed Division and the Forensics Services Division. The Uniformed Division, which is charged with protecting the facilities and venues for presidents, was a key player in the decision-making because one of its officers had discovered the cocaine on July 2, 2023, a quiet Sunday when President Biden and his family were at Camp David in Maryland. On Sunday night, after Secret Service Technical Services Division officers couldnt identify the white substance, the Uniformed Division locked down the White House and called in the D.C. Fire Department hazmat teams to ensure that it wasnt anthrax or ricin. The discovery of the bag of cocaine posed a problem for Cheatle, who resigned in the face of bipartisan pressure after the July 13 assassination attempt against Donald Trump. Hunter Biden had a well-documented addiction to cocaine, crack cocaine, and other substances for many years but repeatedly claimed to be sober since 2021, an assertion that had prompted former President Biden to often proclaim how "proud" he is of his son. While neither Joe nor Hunter Biden were at the executive mansion when the cocaine was found, it was discovered after a period when Hunter had been staying there. Cheatle became close to the Biden family while serving on Vice President Joe Bidens protective detail - so close that Biden tapped Cheatle for the director job in2022, in part because of her close relationship to first lady Jill Biden. During the feverish speculation in the days and weeks after the cocaines discovery, the White House refused to answer whether the cocaine came from a Biden family member and labeled as"irresponsible"reporters who asked about a possible link to Hunter or another Biden family member. Its unclear exactly when Cheatle and other top officials tried to persuade the Forensics Services Division to destroy the evidence. At some point during the brief investigation, Matt White, the vault supervisor, received a call from Cheatle or someone speaking on her behalf asking him to destroy the bag of cocaine because agency leaders wanted to close the case, according to two sources in the Secret Service community. Whites boss, Glenn Dennis, head of the Forensics Services Division, then conferred with the Uniformed Division, which first discovered the cocaine. At some point, Cheatle appears to have overruled Richard Macauley, who appears to have paid a price in his Secret Service career - at least temporarily - for standing his ground. At the time of the cocaines discovery, Macauley was serving as the acting chief of the Uniformed Division after the recent retirement of Alfonso Dyson Sr., a 29-year veteran of the agency. When Dyson left his position, Macauley, who is black, and was named the Secret Services Uniformed Division Officer of the Year in 2018, became acting director. Despite Cheatles push to hire and promote minority men and women, Macauley was passed over for the job of Uniformed Division chief in what some in the agency suspected was an act of retaliation for supporting those who refused to dispose of the cocaine. Cheatle brought in Mike Buck, an agent who was in retirement, to serve in the top U.D. role instead of Macauley. After Trump chose Sean Curran to lead the agency, however, Buck left, and Curran tapped Macauley to replace him. Shifting Secret Service public statements, overly redacted documents, and media misinterpretations have contributed to an avalanche of lingering questions about the cocaine. Several major media outlets initially reported that the Secret Service had discovered the drug in the White House library, citing a D.C. Fire EMS dispatch call that appeared to state that the substance was found there. This information was based on early communications from a firefighter on the hazardous materials team who radioed into headquarters about a "yellow bar saying cocaine hydrochloride" and another statement about "no match found in the library" during the response to the incident. Several hazmat experts tell RCP that the reference to the "library" was not a physical location in the White House but a reference to the chemical library from a handheld device known as a "Gemini" that fire departments and others use to identify substances. Mike Parsons, a product manager for Thermo Fisher Scientific, the company that manufactures the Gemini handheld device, said the term "library" is used to identify the collection of chemical spectra that the Gemini can identify and display on its screen. "The library is built on known samples and substances," Parsons said in an interview. "Its going to compare the spectra collected in the field to the spectra in the library and make an identification match." After correcting mistaken reports that the cocaine was found in the White House library, media reports then cited a Guglielmi statement that the cocaine was found in a "West Wing workspace." Days later, Guglielmi clarified further that it was found in a small locker in a vestibule near the West Executive Avenue entrance to the West Wing, a heavily trafficked area where visitors and lower-level staff store electronics before VIP tours. A FOIA-released internal Secret Service document further muddied the waters by claiming that the cocaine was found in the "[redacted] lobby floor," creating even more suspicion surrounding the location where the cocaine was first discovered. Sources familiar with the statement in a Secret Service Protective Division document said it was not a reference to the physical floor of a room, but the lobby level of the West Wing where the lockers were located in a vestibule leading into it. The Secret Service has confirmed that "locker 50," where the cocaine was allegedly left, has a missing key. Susan Crabtree is RealClearPolitics' national political correspondent.
