
Tighter immigration rules could hit UK net zero mission, report warns
Tough rules announced in the government's immigration white paper could jeopardise the UK's net zero mission by causing labour shortages, a report has warned.
Labour's white paper released last month included plans to raise the minimum qualification for skilled worker visas from A-level equivalent to degree and to maintain the higher salary threshold of £38,700 introduced by the outgoing Conservative government last year.
A report by the Centre for European Reform (CER), calculates that more than half of the foreign-born workers doing 'green jobs' in the UK – 260,000 out of 465,000 – would not have been allowed in under the new rules.
Ministers are relying on employers to raise wages and provide more training in order to attract domestic workers into these roles, but John Springford, an associate fellow at the CER, said that could push up the costs to consumers of going green.
'If labour shortages raise the cost of decarbonising buildings, fewer people will insulate their homes or buy heat pumps,' he said.
Using Office for National Statistics data, the CER defined a green job as one in which more than a third of the worker's time is spent on green tasks. Many of these are in the construction sector, given the need to retrofit homes with low-carbon technologies, for example.
The report also suggests construction jobs more generally may be difficult to fill under the new visa regime, casting doubt on the government's target to build 1.5m homes by the end of the parliament.
'Construction is labour-intensive and has a lot of employee turnover, because the work is physical and seasonal. Given that the government's aim is to expand housebuilding and decarbonise buildings concurrently, the sector is most at risk of labour shortages as a result of the government's immigration proposals,' the report says.
Labour has announced that the existing 'immigration salary list', which allows people doing specific types of job to be brought in on lower pay, will be replaced with a similar 'temporary shortage list'. To avoid this becoming a long-term measure, the relevant industry will be expected to set out plans to train and recruit more UK workers.
The CER said that using a shortage list as a safety valve could be problematic because the higher salary threshold elsewhere means migrants in the sectors with shortages are unlikely to be able to shift into other jobs, leaving them vulnerable to exploitation by the employer who sponsors their visa.
This problem arose in social care where holders of health and care visas were subject to exploitation by bad employers, with little chance of moving to another post.
'The government should keep an eye on labour shortages in occupations that are crucial for its net zero and housebuilding missions, and relax visa rules if needed,' Springford said. 'But offering exemptions to the rules for specific occupations is risky.'
Sign up to Business Today
Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning
after newsletter promotion
Other options mooted in the report include offering 'green visas' for jobs that contribute to achieving the government's target of hitting net zero by 2050, or reducing salary and skills thresholds right across the economy.
Keir Starmer announced the immigration crackdown last month, claiming it marked the end of 'a squalid chapter for our politics, our economy and our country' in which the post-Brexit Conservative government had overseen soaring migration.
Net migration hit a record level above 900,000 in the year to June 2023 before dropping sharply after a series of changes made by Rishi Sunak's government, including tightening the rules for visa applicants to bring in dependents. In the 2024 calendar year net migration was 431,000.
Starmer said net migration would fall 'significantly' as a result of the changes he has announced.
As well as potentially causing labour shortages in key sectors, economists have said lower net migration could prompt the independent Office for Budget Responsibility to downgrade its growth forecasts.
The government has been approached for comment.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
34 minutes ago
- The Sun
Fury as Sir Keir Starmer's Brexit deal may change flavour of smoky bacon crisps
SIR Keir Starmer has been blasted for a 'smoky bacon surrender' after his Brexit deal left Britain taking orders from Brussels on what goes in our crisps. The PM agreed to follow new EU food rules - including a ban on smoke flavourings still allowed in the UK - prompting fears much-loved bacon crisps will never taste the same. 2 Reform UK leader Nigel Farage told The Telegraph: 'Leave our smoky bacon alone. 'You have to ask what next? Changes to the way we smoke our kippers? Who knows? The truth is this is all now totally out of our hands. 'Our industries have to change to adapt to how the EU sets the rules, maybe not what our own people, our own innovators, entrepreneurs and industries would choose to do.' Shadow Cabinet Office Minister Richard Holden added: ' Labour's smoky bacon surrender is just the latest flavour of betrayal served up by their EU deal.' A No10 spokesperson insisted major crisp firms no longer use the banned flavourings and most had already changed recipes to keep selling into the EU. A Government spokesperson also told The Sun: 'Anyone claiming smoky bacon crisps are for the chop is peddling porky pies. 'The Great British crisp industry will still be able to produce mouthwatering flavours - and find it easier to bring home the bacon by exporting to new markets.' 'Sell-out' Starmer has betrayed Brexit – he should follow in Trump's footsteps instead 2


The Independent
37 minutes ago
- The Independent
LA mayor ends curfew in Downtown a week after they were imposed
Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass has lifted the curfew that was imposed on downtown Los Angeles in response to clashes between protestors and police. The curfew was initially put in place on June 10, following protests against President Donald Trump 's immigration policies. Bass, a Democrat, stated that the curfew had been successful in preventing crime and protecting businesses, residents, and restaurants from vandalism. On Monday, she reduced the curfew hours after a decrease in arrests during evening demonstrations, noting a decline in violence and vandalism in the downtown area. When the curfew was first implemented, Bass explained that the city had "reached a tipping point" after 23 businesses were broken into and robbed, incidents blamed on agitators seeking to cause disruption. The curfew covered a small area of Downtown Los Angeles, approximately one square mile, which included the primary protest locations. Los Angeles protests follow weeks of intensifying immigration enforcement Show all 5 Last week, in response to the protests over his administration's intensified enforcement of immigration laws, Trump ordered the deployment of around 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines to Los Angeles. On Sunday, Trump instructed federal immigration officials to prioritize deportations from cities run by Democrats, a decision that followed significant protests in Los Angeles and other major cities against his administration's immigration policies.


The Independent
40 minutes ago
- The Independent
MPs vote in favour of measures to decriminalise abortion for women
MPs have voted in favour of measures to decriminalise women terminating their own pregnancies. The Commons voted 379 to 137, majority 242, to back Labour MP Tonia Antoniazzi's amendment to the Crime and Policing Bill. The Gower MP said it will remove the threat of 'investigation, arrest, prosecution or imprisonment' of any woman who acts in relation to her own pregnancy. Ms Antoniazzi told MPs she had been moved to advocate for a change in the law having seen women investigated by police over suspected illegal abortions. During the Bill's report stage, Ms Antoniazzi assured her colleagues the current 24-week limit would remain, abortions would still require the approval and signatures of two doctors, and that healthcare professionals 'acting outside the law and abusive partners using violence or poisoning to end a pregnancy would still be criminalised, as they are now'. She also told MPs: 'This is the right change at the right time. I implore colleagues who want to protect women and girls and abortion services to vote for new clause one. Let's ensure that not a single desperate woman ever again is subject to traumatic, criminal investigation at the worst moments in their lives.' On issues such as abortion, MPs usually have free votes, meaning they take their own view rather than deciding along party lines. Justice minister Alex Davies-Jones indicated the Government is neutral on decriminalisation and that it is an issue for Parliament to decide upon. But winding up for the Government after Tuesday's debate, Ms Davies-Jones suggested ministers would work to ensure the law change was workable if MPs voted for it. She told the Commons: 'If it is the will of Parliament that the law should change, the Government in fulfilling its duty to ensure that the legislation is legally robust and workable will work closely with my honourable friends to ensure that their amendments accurately reflect their intentions and the will of Parliament, and are coherent with the statute book.' Though the Government took a neutral stance on the vote, several high-profile Cabinet ministers were among the MPs who backed the amendment. They included Energy Secretary Ed Miliband, Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster Pat McFadden, Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall, Defence Secretary John Healey, Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander, Environment Secretary Steve Reed, Northern Ireland Secretary Hilary Benn, Scotland Secretary Ian Murray, Wales Secretary Jo Stevens and Commons Leader Lucy Powell. Kemi Badenoch and many members of the Conservative frontbench voted against it, but shadow education secretary Laura Trott voted in favour. Abortion in England and Wales currently remains a criminal offence but is legal with an authorised provider up to 24 weeks, with very limited circumstances allowing one after this time, such as when the mother's life is at risk or the child would be born with a severe disability. It is also legal to take prescribed medication at home if a woman is less than 10 weeks pregnant. Efforts to change the law to protect women from prosecution follow repeated calls to repeal sections of the 19th-century law the 1861 Offences Against the Person Act, after abortion was decriminalised in Northern Ireland in 2019. The measures to decriminalise abortion still need to complete their legislative journey through both the Commons and the Lords before they can become law. The step was welcomed by the British Pregnancy Advisory Service (BPAS). Heidi Stewart, chief executive of the charity, said: 'This is a landmark moment for women's rights in this country and the most significant change to our abortion law since the 1967 Abortion Act was passed. 'There will be no more women investigated after enduring a miscarriage, no more women dragged from their hospital beds to the back of a police van, no more women separated from their children because of our archaic abortion law.' The Society for the Protection of Unborn Children (SPUC) said it was 'horrified' by the vote. Alithea Williams, of SPUC, said: 'If this clause becomes law, a woman who aborts her baby at any point in pregnancy, even moments before birth, would not be committing a criminal offence.' She added: 'Our already liberal abortion law allows an estimated 300,000 babies a year to be killed. Now, even the very limited protection afforded by the law is being stripped away.' Stella Creasy, the Labour MP for Walthamstow, had proposed an amendment with a more strident means of decriminalising abortion, but repealing laws from the 19th century and the inter-war period. She claimed on social media site X following the Commons debate that 'what passed knocked out our chance to decriminalise abortion', as her amendment fell as a result. Ms Antoniazzi, who tabled the rival amendment, said her fellow Labour MP had faced 'unforgivable abuse' outside Parliament on Tuesday from anti-abortion campaigners. A third amendment from Tory MP Dr Caroline Johnson, requiring those having an abortion to have an in-person consultation in a bid to strengthen protections, was rejected by the Commons.