Tech war: Huawei develops computer chips in move away from Intel, Windows
Huawei Technologies has taken a step forward in phasing out American hardware and software from its personal computers, as it navigates ongoing US sanctions.
The government-backed China Information Technology Security Evaluation Centre said on Friday that the Kirin X90 chip - a central processing unit (CPU) developed by Huawei's chip design arm, HiSilicon - received a Level 2 national certification for security reliability.
The certification, which is voluntary, allows companies to assess the security levels of their domestically designed and produced computers, server CPUs and systems. It often serves as a precursor to adoption.
Do you have questions about the biggest topics and trends from around the world? Get the answers with SCMP Knowledge, our new platform of curated content with explainers, FAQs, analyses and infographics brought to you by our award-winning team.
Huawei's self-developed Kirin 9000C, used in its Qingyun W515x personal computer (PC) launched last May, as well as the Kirin 9006C featured in the Qingyun L540 laptop, both received certifications previously. The Qingyun computer series is designed for government and enterprise users.
Richard Yu Chengdong, chairman of Huawei's consumer business group, holds a Matebook X Pro at a launch event in April 2024. Photo: Handout alt=Richard Yu Chengdong, chairman of Huawei's consumer business group, holds a Matebook X Pro at a launch event in April 2024. Photo: Handout>
The company's efforts come as the US-sanctioned company seeks to replace American components in its PC business. In May, Washington revoked special licences that had allowed chip suppliers Qualcomm and Intel to sell older-generation semiconductors to Huawei for use in its laptops and smartphones.
Most of Huawei's consumer laptops were powered by Intel's Core processors, with exceptions such as the Matebook E Go, which uses Qualcomm's Snapdragon chip.
Huawei's licence to use Microsoft's Windows operating system is also set to end this month without renewal, and the Chinese company plans to launch PCs running its own HarmonyOS system later this year, according to a report from Chinese news outlet Thepaper.cn on Friday.
Huawei on Monday declined to comment on its plans regarding PC chips and operating systems.
The company's most recent major PC launch was the MateBook GT 14 in August. The device featured an Intel Core processor and Windows software.
Richard Yu Chengdong, chairman of Huawei's consumer business group, told state broadcaster China Central Television in September that its current laptops might be the last to run on Windows, with future models expected to use HarmonyOS.
Huawei is intensifying its efforts to expand its growing PC business. Its desktop and notebook shipments grew 15 per cent in 2024, reaching 4.3 million units, according to a Canalys report last week. Huawei captured 11 per cent of the mainland Chinese market, while rival Lenovo Group led with a 35 per cent share.
However, Huawei's momentum weakened in the fourth quarter owing to a lack of new product launches, with PC shipments falling 7 per cent to 1.1 million units, Canalys data showed.
This article originally appeared in the South China Morning Post (SCMP), the most authoritative voice reporting on China and Asia for more than a century. For more SCMP stories, please explore the SCMP app or visit the SCMP's Facebook and Twitter pages. Copyright © 2025 South China Morning Post Publishers Ltd. All rights reserved.
Copyright (c) 2025. South China Morning Post Publishers Ltd. All rights reserved.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
First dibs: Taiwanese spicy noodle chain with 2-hour-long queues opening 1st Singapore outlet
Spicy Noodles 销魂面铺, which has 18 outlets scattered across Taiwan will be opening its 1st overseas outpost in Singapore on 3 Jun 2025. Located at basement 1 of Raffles City Shopping Centre, this restaurant is famed in Taiwan for drawing long queues of customers, with wait times stretching up to 2 hours. Geez… hope it's not the case here! Its name, 销魂 (xiao hun) in Chinese, translates to 'selling one's soul', which will surely steal your heart with its soul-stirring flavour. The menu closely mirrors what's offered in Taiwan. However, when I checked with my native Taiwanese friend, their response was one of disappointment — they said, 'It's a pity we can't have duck blood in Singapore!' Well, it isn't a loss for me. To preserve its authenticity, key elements like the handmade Xiao Hun noodle, master chilli sauce, master chilli oil, and noodle sauce are flown in directly from Taiwan. Enjoy it either with the Mild Beef Soup or Spicy Beef Soup options. The broth is brewed and slowly simmered with pure beef bones for at least 6 hours. The Soul Chilli Oil is said to be stir-fried painstakingly by hand for 8 hours, and its nicknamed by regulars as 'the Hermès of chilli oil'. All it needs is just a single concentrated drop to switch things up a little. My threshold for spice is quite high, so I'll see about that in a bit. We tried the Mild Beef Soup Set (S$18.80++) that came with sliced US beef and veggies in a clear broth, Xiao Hun noodles, soft-boiled eggs, and tau pok. Calling the noodles springy is an understatement. It was delightfully QQ and had an addictive chewy texture that doesn't lump together even when it gets cold. Just like a ramen restaurant, the soft-boiled eggs were also executed perfectly. The beef slices were tasty and the fatty portion wasn't chewy. The soup was also clean tasting yet full of flavour — it looks like the long simmering time really paid off! We also tried the Spicy Beef Soup Set (S$24.80++) that comes with a mixture of beef tendon and sliced US beef. Judging from the broth colouring, I was expecting to get overwhelmed by the spice. Fortunately, it was mild enough for me. The tendons were like one of the best I ever had — pillowy and melt-in-the-mouth. Being a sucker for spice, I asked for an entire dish and slathered it onto my noodles. Be warned, use it sparingly — I absolutely enjoyed it while my dining partner was scrambling for iced water. To further complement your noodles, the Fried Dough Fritters (S$4.50++) are great for soaking into the spicy broth, which absorbs all the delicious savoury goodness. If you're a beancurd lover, you MUST get the Spicy Braised Spongy tofu and Soy Chip (S$4.50) — no questions asked. If you're at Raffles City Shopping Centre for some retail therapy, head down to Spicy Noodles for a taste of Taiwan. Hong Lim Prawn Noodle: Highly-raved spot serving up gao, umami-packed prawn noodles The post First dibs: Taiwanese spicy noodle chain with 2-hour-long queues opening 1st Singapore outlet appeared first on
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Britain should ditch ‘distorting' stamp duty, says Reagan's economic tsar
Britain should ditch 'distorting' stamp duty charges that 'lock people in their homes', Arthur Laffer has urged. The economist behind the Laffer curve said property transaction taxes are such a big problem in the national tax system that the UK would be better off with an American-style annual property wealth tax. Mr Laffer, who has served as adviser to both former president Ronald Reagan and president Donald Trump, told The Telegraph that the UK would be better off if homeowners paid annual property taxes as they do in the US instead of stamp duty. He said: 'The [annual] property taxes in Britain are low, but the transaction tax is very high. The US is the reverse. We have property taxes everywhere, which is a wealth tax, and we don't have transaction taxes on houses. 'All property taxes do in Britain is lock people into their homes that they can't get out. It just distorts the whole tax system in Britain, it's just awful. 'It is one of the very biggest problems in Britain's tax system.' Mr Laffer is most famous for conceiving the Laffer Curve, an illustration of the concept that increasing tax rates can eventually lead to lower revenue because the higher taxes trigger so much behavioural change. Stamp duty is widely hated by economists and consumers alike because it makes it increasingly difficult to move home and makes the housing market inefficient – which in turn takes a toll on productivity. In America, by contrast, homeowners do not pay large taxes when they purchase their homes but instead pay an annual tax based on a percentage of their property's value. Mr Laffer said: 'Income tax is a problem in Britain, but these transaction taxes are big stuff too.' Stamp duty is taxed in bands that are not adjusted to account for house price growth, meaning homeowners get dragged into higher tax brackets as house prices rise. Since the tax bands were last adjusted in 2014, the average London house price has climbed by 30pc. Over the same time period, the stamp duty bill on the average home in the capital has surged by 54pc. The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) forecast in March that the Treasury's tax take from property transactions will nearly double from £15bn in 2024-25 to £26.5bn in 2029-30. Mr Laffer was an adviser to Donald Trump's 2016 campaign and says he has met with the US president several times since he took office earlier this year. He said he has told the Mr Trump that he should scrap US corporation tax on profits and replace it with a value added tax on sales. Although Mr Laffer is in favour of Mr Trump's tax bill, he said the president should go further with measures to boost the economy. The biggest measure in the bill will be an extension to the tax cuts that Mr Trump introduced in 2017 and are due to expire this year. Mr Laffer said: 'I know they talk about it as being a tax cut. It's not. It's just making Trump's tax cuts permanent. 'If it were not passed, there would be a huge increase in taxes across the board, which would be very detrimental. The bill going through the Senate right now does not create something wonderful but it saves us from a disaster.' Mr Laffer said that America should establish a free trade agreement with the UK, and that Ireland should leave the EU to become part of the trading bloc too. He said: 'One thing I really hope Trump does with Britain is really bring into a free trade relationship with the US. 'You're gonna hate me for this, but I think it should be with Ireland too. I think they should get out of the EU and should become part of the sort of the US/ UK/Ireland group. I think that would be a terrific free trade group.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Chicago Tribune
22 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Ashley Nunes: Outrage over President Donald Trump's electric vehicle policies is misplaced
Electric car subsidies are heading for the chopping block. A tax bill recently passed by House Republicans is set to stop billions in taxpayer cash from being spent on electric vehicle purchases. If embraced by the Senate and signed into law by President Donald Trump, the bill would gut long-standing government handouts for going electric. The move comes on the heels of another climate policy embraced by Republicans. Earlier this year, Trump announced plans to roll back burdensome rules that effectively force American consumers to buy electric, rather than gas-fueled, cars. The Environmental Protection Agency has called that move the 'biggest deregulatory action in U.S. history.' Not everyone sees it that way. Jason Rylander, legal director at the Center for Biological Diversity's Climate Law Institute, assailed Trump's efforts, noting that his 'administration's ignorance is trumped only by its malice toward the planet.' Other similarly aligned groups have voiced similar sentiments arguing that ending these rules would 'cost consumers more, because clean energy and cleaner cars are cheaper than sticking with the fossil fuels status quo.' Backtracking on EV purchasing mandates seems to have hit Trump haters particularly hard. That mandate — established by President Joe Biden — would have pushed U.S. automakers to sell more EVs. Millions more. Electric cars currently account for 8% of new auto sales. Biden ordered — by presidential fiat — that figure to climb to 35% by 2032. If you believe the hype, the result would be an electric nirvana, one defined by cleaner air and rampant job creation. I'm not convinced. For one thing, cleaner air courtesy of electrification requires that EVs replace gas-powered autos. They're not. In fact, study after study suggests that the purchase of EVs adds to the number of cars in a household. And two-thirds of households with an EV have another non-EV that is driven more. Hardly a recipe for climate success given that EVs must be driven — a lot — to deliver climate benefits. Fewer miles driven in an EV also challenges the economic efficiency of the billions Washington spends annually to subsidize their purchase. Claims of job creation thanks to EVs are even more questionable. These claims are predicated around notions of aggressive consumer demand that drives increased EV manufacturing. This in turn creates jobs. A recent Princeton University study noted, 'Announced manufacturing capacity additions and expansions would nearly double US capacity to produce electric vehicles by 2030 and are well sized to meet expected demand for made-in-USA vehicles.' Jobs would be created if there were demand for EVs. Except that's not what's happening. Rather, consumer interest in EVs has effectively cratered. In 2024, 1.3 million EVs were sold in the United States, up from 1.2 million in 2023. This paltry increase is even more worrying given drastic price cuts seen in the EV market in 2024. Tesla knocked thousands of dollars off its best-selling Model 3 and Model Y. Ford followed suit by cutting prices on its Mach-e. So did Volkswagen and Hyundai. Despite deep discounts, consumer interest in electrification remains — to put it mildly — tepid at best. So, when people equate electrification with robust job creation, I'm left wondering what they are going on about. Even if jobs were created, EV advocates are coy about how many of those jobs would benefit existing autoworkers. Would all these workers — currently spread across large swaths of the Midwest — be guaranteed jobs on an EV assembly line? If not, how many workers should expect to receive pink slips? For those who do, will they be able to find new jobs that pay as much as their old ones? Touting job creation for political expediency is one thing. Fully recognizing its impact on hardworking American families today, another. Some Americans may decry Trump's actions on climate, but they have only themselves to blame. Many of the pro-climate policies enacted, particularly during the Biden era, deliver little in the way of climate benefits (or any benefit for that matter) while making a mockery of the real economic concerns businesses and consumers have about climate action. No more. In justifying climate rollbacks, the president says many of his predecessor's policies have hurt rather than helped the American people. He's right and should be commended for doing something about it. Ashley Nunes is a senior research associate at Harvard Law School.
