logo
American Airlines promises compensation for delay, to no avail

American Airlines promises compensation for delay, to no avail

Boston Globe9 hours ago

JOSEPH MUSKOVICH,
Schaumburg, Ill.
A.
That's some delay you had. American Airlines did the right thing by providing you with food and overnight accommodations, but you should have also received your legal compensation.
Advertisement
American is obligated to pay you under the
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
Fortunately, you received a promise in writing from American. (By the way, you did a great job with keeping a paper trail that shows you were owed the money.) When you contacted American, an agent confirmed your request and said that you would receive compensation. Then you followed up, and the agent said the checks were issued, but you never received them. The airline then stopped responding to your requests.
Advertisement
What's going on? Unfortunately, the European consumer regulations have no provision for requiring a timely payout of compensation. So, American could have theoretically waited as long as it wanted to before sending you the checks. I know, it's a big loophole — and the reason God made consumer advocates.
How do you speed things up? Calling can be helpful, but sending a brief, polite email to one of the American Airlines executive contacts might have done the trick. I list all of them on my consumer advocacy site,
I contacted American Airlines on your behalf. The airline investigated your case and found that it had made a mistake. The checks were issued but never delivered. American Airlines canceled the old checks and reissued new ones. You received the money a few weeks later.
Christopher Elliott is the founder of Elliott Advocacy (
), a nonprofit organization that helps consumers solve their problems. Email him at chris@elliott.org or get help by contacting him at
.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ron Insana: Trump would imperil more than just the Fed's independence by naming a ‘shadow chair'
Ron Insana: Trump would imperil more than just the Fed's independence by naming a ‘shadow chair'

CNBC

time11 minutes ago

  • CNBC

Ron Insana: Trump would imperil more than just the Fed's independence by naming a ‘shadow chair'

The saying, "No, no, a thousand times no" remains a relevant cry as a news report suggests President Donald Trump may preemptively name a new Federal Reserve chairman nearly a year before Jerome Powell 's term expires. The Wall Street Journal reported on Wednesday that the president has already narrowed his choices down to several candidates to replace Powell, who he has referred to as a " dummy " or " stupid " for not having already cut interest rates as the president wants him to do. Naming a new Fed chief this early, effectively creating a so-called "shadow" chair who can criticize the existing central bank leader, would have long-lasting consequences for the prized independence of the Fed. Packing the Fed, just as several presidents have tried to pack the Supreme Court, reduces the central bank to just another politicized arm of the executive branch. By statute, this was never intended to occur. The Fed's dual mandates and its impartiality If a president were to pressure the Fed to bend to their will, it would lead to legitimate questions about the central bank's ability to meet its statutory dual mandates of maximum sustainable employment and stable prices. Since the end of the era of Richard Nixon– a president who, in secret, tried to pressure then-Fed chief Arthur Burns to soften up on policy ahead of the 1972 election – his successors have all supported an independent Fed so that the central bank can keep the economy on an even keel. No doubt, all presidents – and most people – would love to see lower rates bring down the cost of borrowing, but at what price? Is the president willing to tolerate resurgent inflation? Are the American people, who elected President Trump to bring down prices, willing to risk the Fed's independence only to end up in the place where they started in 2024 – when they were upset and unsettled by the high cost of living? Time will tell. The erosion of trust in Treasurys and the U.S. dollar More important is whether a politicized central bank that cuts rates irrespective of economic conditions will be trusted by domestic and foreign bond market investors to maintain the safety and security of U.S. Treasury bonds, as well as the purchasing power and reserve currency status of the U.S. dollar. The answer is a resounding no, as the dollar is broadly weaker against foreign currencies, reflecting a clear protest to the Fed challenge being presented by the president. Several names have been floated as a possible early replacement for Powell. They include Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent – who raised the idea of a shadow Fed chair last year – National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett and former Fed Governor Kevin Warsh. The Journal also suggested that former World Bank President David Malpass could be in the running. While I'll leave my out my opinions about their respective qualifications, the issue is not about who will be the new leader of the Fed. This is about the process and the policy of subverting a sitting Fed chair – and that's what bothers me most. This should bother all Americans who value the absolute and relative stability of the U.S. economy, when compared to the rest of the world. We know that whether in Turkey, Venezuela or any other nation that has a dependent central bank, the results are always less than optimal. Currency debasement, inflation and unpredictable economic cycles dominate those countries while nations with independent central banks, be they New Zealand or the U.S., enjoy relative stability and prosperity. While I have long maintained that the U.S. economy is the envy of the world, my feelings would abruptly change if the Fed were to become a politicized tool influenced by executive expediency rather than economic necessity. If the day comes that a preemptive nominee emerges from the shadows, I would run for cover. The safety and soundness of the dollar and U.S. bonds would be suspect with a very long shadow cast over the nation's creditworthiness. Again, I say, "No, no, a thousand times no." —Ron Insana is a CNBC contributor.

Trumps drop 'Made in the USA' label for new phone and a debate ensues: How to define 'made'?
Trumps drop 'Made in the USA' label for new phone and a debate ensues: How to define 'made'?

Yahoo

time15 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trumps drop 'Made in the USA' label for new phone and a debate ensues: How to define 'made'?

NEW YORK (AP) — When the Trump family unveiled a new phone before a giant American flag at its headquarters earlier this month, the pitch was simple and succinct, packed with pure patriotism: 'Made in the U.S.A.' The Trumps are apparently having second thoughts. How about 'proudly American'? Those are the two words that have replaced the 'Made in the USA' pitch that just a few days ago appeared on the website where customers can pre-order the so-called T-1 gold-toned phones with an American flag etched on the back. Elsewhere on the site, other vague terms are now being used, describing the $499 phone as boasting an 'American-Proud Design' and 'brought to life right here in the U.S.A.' The Federal Trade Commission requires that items labeled 'Made in USA' be 'all or virtually all' produced in the U.S. and several firms have been sued over misusing the term. The Trump Organization has not explained the change and has not responded to a request for comment. Neither did an outside public relations firm handling the Trumps' mobile phone business, including a request to confirm a statement made to another media outlet. 'T1 phones are proudly being made in America,' said Trump Mobile spokesman Chris Walker, according to USA Today. 'Speculation to the contrary is simply inaccurate.' The language change on the website was first reported by the news site The Verge. An expert on cell phone technology, IDC analyst Francisco Jeronimo, said he's not surprised the Trump family has dropped the 'Made in the USA' label because it's nearly impossible to build one here given the higher cost and lack of infrastructure to do so. But, of course, you can claim to do it. 'Whether it is possible or not to build this phone in the US depends on what you consider 'build,'" Jeronimo said. 'If it's a question of assembling components and targeting small volumes, I suppose it's somehow possible. You can always get the components from China and assemble them by hand somewhere.' 'You're going to have phones that are made right here in the United States of America,' said Trump's son Eric to Fox News recently, adding, 'It's about time we bring products back to our great country.' The Trump family has flown the American flag before with Trump-branded products of suspicious origin, including its 'God Bless the USA' Bibles, which an Associated Press investigation last year showed were printed in China. The Trump phone is part of a bigger family mobile business plan designed to tap into MAGA enthusiasm for the president. The two sons running the business, Eric and Don Jr., announced earlier this month that they would offer mobile phone plans for $47.45 a month, a reference to their father's status as the 45th and 47th president. The call center, they said, will be in the U.S., too. 'You're not calling up call centers in Bangladesh,' Eric Trump said on Fox News. 'We're doing it out of St. Louis, Missouri.' The new service has been blasted by government ethics experts for a conflict of interest, given that President Donald Trump oversees the Federal Communications Commission that regulates the business and is investigating phone service companies that are now Trump Mobile rivals. Trump has also threatened to punish cell phone maker Apple, now a direct competitor, threatening to slap 25% tariffs on devices because of its plans to make most of its U.S. iPhones in India. ___

Amid declining EV sales, Tesla fires vice president of manufacturing
Amid declining EV sales, Tesla fires vice president of manufacturing

UPI

time20 minutes ago

  • UPI

Amid declining EV sales, Tesla fires vice president of manufacturing

A row of Teslas charge at a Tesla power station (2018). The company announced on Thursday that it sold fewer cars in 2024 than it did in 2023, the first time sales dropped since Tesla began mass producing EVs. Its profits fell 71% in the first quarter of 2025, too. File Photo by Stephen Shaver/UPI | License Photo June 26 (UPI) -- Tesla CEO Elon Musk has fired the carmaker's vice president of manufacturing and operations following a falloff in auto sales in the nation's largest markets this year. Omead Afshar oversaw more than a half dozen upper-level employees in the company, including Troy Jones, Tesla's vice president of sales in North America, and Joe Ward, vice president of the Europe, Middle East and Africa region. The firing was first reported by Bloomberg News. Afshar is the second high-level employee to leave the company recently. His termination follows the resignation of Milan Kovac, who was the company's head of its Optimus humanoid robotics program. Kovac said in a post on X that he was leaving Tesla to spend more time with his family. Musk later thanked Kovac publicly for his time with the company. In 2022, Afshar was the subject of an internal investigation at Tesla that focused on his involvement in trying to secure construction materials for a secret project for Musk that included hard-to-get glass. Prior to his job as Tesla vice president, Afshar worked for SpaceX, Musk's aerospace company. Afshar's X account, which had not been updated, said he still works for Tesla, and he praised Musk for his leadership and work ethic following the launch of the company's Robotaxi service in Austin, Texas. "Thank you, Elon, for pushing us all," Afshar wrote. Tesla's stock price has dropped 19% this year, and took an especially hard hit following Musk's association with President Donald Trump, who appointed Musk to oversee the Department of Government Efficiency. DOGE took a broad and aggressive approach to eliminating federal employees, downsizing federal agencies and ending diversity, equity and inclusion programs at some of the nation's largest companies and universities. The company sold fewer cars in 2024 than it did in 2023, the first time sales dropped since Tesla began mass producing EVs. Its profits fell 71% in the first quarter of 2025. European sales dropped 28%, and dropped for a fifth straight month in May. The European Automobile Manufacturers Association said buyers are shifting to cheaper Chinese models.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store