
Low risk to life but Middlemarch flooding still takes toll
By Tess Brunton of RNZ
The Otago Regional Council says there is no simple solution to stop the rural town of Middlemarch from flooding, but the risk to life is lower than expected.
In recent years, flooding has spread water and contaminated muck through homes, businesses and streets, impacting bores and blocking roads.
On Tuesday, the council hosted a community meeting to discuss the latest flood update and potential ways to reduce them.
The sound of heavy rains sparked anxiety for some Middlemarch residents, as swelling streams flowed down the Rock and Pillar Range towards the town.
In 2018, a deluge turned some streets into sewage ponds with one business flooding to knee-deep filthy water.
Ruth Manning has owned a holiday home in Middlemarch for more than 20 years - it has been hit twice in recent floods.
"So about 50 to 60 centimetres up the wall the water damage spread. I've had to have the carpet fully replaced twice and most of the furnishings that were in the cottage replaced as well," she said.
"That's two insurance claims and we have been advised now that we won't be insured again should it happen again and our excess has gone up to $5000."
The community hall was packed with Middlemarch residents who wanted to hear about the latest science and solutions from Otago Regional Council.
The council found existing culverts, channels and bridges were too small, there were no easy solutions and they would likely be costly and challenging to implement.
But council's flood hazard analyst Nathan Anderson said there was also some good news, including debris flow not being a major concern.
"The risk of people losing their lives or getting injured ... is what specifically our focus was and that is relatively low because we don't have areas that are getting extremely deep or moving very fast," he said.
One resident told the meeting that calling it low risk did not properly account for the toll it took on the community.
"I think that underplays and undervalues the stresses that people have that live in the flood-prone areas and when the rain hits, I get a number of phone calls from people that live in those areas that have been flooded and they're damned anxious," he said.
Nathan Anderson acknowledged the concerns, saying that the risk to life might be low but the council was aware of the other impacts from flooding.
A flooded caravan did not deter Patrick Flanagan from settling here about five years ago.
"It didn't stop us from building, we just had to build 400 millimetres above any known flood height," he said.
"For the community, it was a bit devastating because some businesses closed down and, obviously, it puts a lot of stress on people whose places are very close to flooding."
He was pleased to see the council were taking the issue seriously and he hoped to see more solutions that would help to protect homes in the community.
Ruth Manning was keen to see some longer term solutions that could help Middlemarch to grow, saying it was an affordable place to live.
"There's multiple residential properties here in the area and I think people are put off by the risk of flooding and actually buying in the first place," she said.
"But if we had a good flood mitigation scheme, then it would actually attract more people to this area."
In 2023, the council installed a new rain gauge to boost flood forecasting in the area.
Improving channels, creating a diversion channel and debris basins were among the possible solutions, but Nathan Anderson said there was no silver bullet solution despite using modelling to test a range of different options.
The ballpark figures ranged from about $2 million to upwards of $15 million and did not include design or land costs.
"We're here to help solve their problems. That's really what we hope to get out of it," Anderson said.
"At the end of the day, it really comes down to it's going to be their decision of how they want to achieve that balance between cost and effectiveness."
Another resident told the meeting that the flooding hit their water bores and could potentially take weeks to fix, forcing people to boil their water to brush their teeth or rely on water tankers.
Angela and Shane Foster hoped to start building their Middlemarch home in the next 12 months.
Armed with information from the council and locals, they were opting for a foundation that would raise it up on piles to give them more protection, he said.
"We are on a wee bit of an incline so we believe from what we've been told it doesn't get that far up but one in 100 year (flood) could get that far up," he said.
Angela Foster said the community wanted to see some action.
"There has been a lot of modelling done in offices. There's been a lot of interesting work done behind the scenes, but there doesn't seem to be much happening on the ground," she said.
"I think if people see things happening on the ground, whether it be widening of creeks or clearing out of creeks or whatever it may be, if they could see some actual work it might help people's view that they're being helped and not just being forgotten about."
Otago Regional Council hoped to have more detailed options to show the community in the next year, but said it was clear that the community wanted to hear more about solutions.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Spinoff
32 minutes ago
- The Spinoff
The group that wants to make Christchurch denser, more connected and more fun
Aiming to be an urbanist voice for Christchurch, Greater Ōtautahi formed last year to advocate for more public transport and affordable housing. Shanti Mathias attends a meet-up. It's a sunny afternoon in the new Christchurch, and the third spaces are bustling. People cross Cathedral Square, passing all the scaffolding. Someone walks past with an immaculately groomed poodle, skirting around three greyhounds on leashes going in the other direction. The cafe on the ground floor of the Tūranga library is popping off most of all. A man on a bike stops to talk to his friend, joking about the Bumble date he's on the way to. A toddler grips a fluffy while her dad trails behind her with a pile of just-checked-out books. The urbanists are loving it. Sitting at the outdoor tables, a meeting of public transport advocacy group Greater Ōtautahi has convened. It's a social catch-up, with much of the discussion seeming to stem from gossip shared on, I gather, multiple group chats. Very urbanist, very nerdy gossip. 'I wish City Nerd had come to Christchurch,' I hear, a reference to an urbanist YouTuber who recently visited Auckland. Others discuss developments in housing recommendations made by independent hearings panels in councils around the country. 'I can't believe they're called independent!' exclaims one person. Someone moans about a proposed building increasing the amount of parking around the hospital; another wonders if there's anything going on that Greater Ōtautahi can submit on. Not much, is the conclusion: everyone's in a bit of a holding pattern until the local government elections get under way. Greater Ōtautahi formed around August 2024, a conglomeration of Christchurch residents who had mostly met online. 'We noticed a real lack of a positive vision around public transport and housing in Christchurch,' says M Grace-Stent, the group's chairperson. The aim was to be non-partisan, but optimistic. 'We see so much room for growth and development here.' Other parts of the country had voices like urbanist blog Greater Auckland or Wellington group A City for People, which mobilised around last year's Wellington District Plan. It was time for a Christchurch equivalent. For Greater Ōtautahi, that has looked like lots of engaging with Christchurch City Council and Environment Canterbury. Members keep an eye on decisions going through councils, and have released submission advice for policies like Canterbury's regional public transport plan and become go-to media spokespeople for public transport issues like the bikes on buses ban. The group meets with elected members and city officials to discuss upcoming decisions and provide a pro-dense housing, pro-efficient and effective public transport perspective. Grace-Stent says that while Greater Ōtautahi is focused on Christchurch, Christchurch's issues are far from unique. 'I think the challenges cities have faced are the same in lots of different places – like, we could learn so much from Japan about how they've built earthquake-safe cities.' The ongoing impact of the 2010-11 earthquakes is noticeable, meaning that Christchurch has more space than cities like Wellington, because so many places have had to be rebuilt. To Greater Ōtautahi, that shouldn't be a disincentive to build denser housing around the city, rather than rely on the growth of commuter towns like Rangiora and Rolleston which lock people into using cars. 'We want people to be living near the city centre, near the amenities, not pushed out further and further into the Canterbury Plains,' Grace-Stent says. Engaging with local government means focusing on small details that can make a big difference. Greater Ōtautahi put lots of energy into a decision about Church Corner, an intersection in Riccarton, when changes to the road layout were being discussed at the end of 2024. While most submissions were brief, the organisation wrote a detailed, multi-page submission supporting a pedestrian crossing and the removal of a right-hand turn from a main road, to improve public safety and connectivity for pedestrians and cyclists. That doesn't mean it always gets its way; the group's preferred option wasn't supported by the council, but at least an option that didn't include cycleways in both directions and made pedestrians wait in the middle was rejected. Greater Ōtautahi is intentionally open – meet-ups are publicly advertised and new people leave with an invitation to join the Discord group chat. Members lean younger, but come from across the political spectrum. 'We've benefitted a lot from secondhand Auckland and Wellington escapees,' says group member Peter Galbraith. Some are experienced transport planners or geographers (Grace-Stent did a master's degree looking at inclusive urban design) but others have only learned about urbanism online. 'It's worked well for us doing lots of stuff in person, to meet people where they're at – we have a really wide range of knowledge from people who do this as their job to people who have seen a few YouTube videos and become interested that way,' Grace-Stent says. The group is still figuring out its strategy around the upcoming local body elections. It isn't endorsing particular candidates (although several Greater Ōtautahi members are considering running). 'We want prospective elected members to move beyond the residents associations and the sort of traditional community groups and go out and listen to stuff that is really happening in their communities,' says Grace-Stent. The group also wants to encourage more young people to vote and be engaged with the process, although it hasn't figured out what exactly that looks like. For Grace-Stent, the key thing is to hold onto the idea that accessible and affordable housing and public transport options that give people choice about where to go and how to get there is a means, not an end. 'Our vision for the city is a place where people can be friendly and spend time together,' they say. 'Being able to live in the city, being able to bike around, having public spaces – these things can make it possible for that friendship and connection to be experienced by lots of people.'


Newsroom
35 minutes ago
- Newsroom
The science sector sounds the alarm
New Zealand's science sector, once hailed for its agility and ingenuity during the pandemic and natural disasters, is now grappling with what researchers say is a crisis of confidence, fuelled by shrinking budgets, unstable funding pathways, and policy decisions that increasingly favour commercial returns over long-term public good. Last month, a total of $212 million was cut from the science sector in this Budget, which reprioritises existing research funding towards commercially focused science and innovation. A sizeable portion goes to Invest NZ and a new gene tech regulator. The Government says it backs the sector and is prioritising industry partnerships, private-sector investment, and 'innovation outcomes with measurable economic impact.' While officials insist the move reflects 'fiscal discipline and real-world alignment,' many in the sector say it amounts to a dismantling of the research base. Newsroom political journalist Fox Meyer tells The Detail 'the scale of the cuts is not great for the sector, but it's also more about the lack of investment'. 'It's one thing to have cuts and reprioritisation, but people have been calling for more of just anything for some time now. Now, there is a lot of frustration. 'Science funding has been stagnant or declining for years now, and a decision to reprioritise stuff is not necessarily going to put money in the Government's pocket like they think.' With a focus on the bottom line, is this the Government pulling off a Sir John Key 'show me the money' moment, with a scientific bent? 'That actually goes both ways,' says Meyer. 'Scientists are looking at the Government saying, 'Show me the money if you want me to produce more money', and the Government is looking back at the scientists and saying, 'Well, you show me the money, what are you bringing in, how are you lifting your weight?'. 'That is going to be a hard one to reconcile unless the Government is willing to pony up and make the investment.' He worries the fall-out will include a 'brain drain' with our country's brightest and best scientists and researchers opting to take up positions overseas. 'My connections in the science world – plenty of them – have moved. 'The chief science adviser for the Department of Conservation has moved to Australia … that's an expert in a cutting-edge field that we have lost to a company in Australia. 'And it's not the only example of this sort of thing. We invest so much in training up these scientists, and they are very skilled scientists, and then to not give them what they are asking for and what they need, I feel it falls short of our own investment.' In fairness, it is not all doom and gloom. 'So, the positives, there is a new funding pool for Māori-related science, that's a good thing. There's the sector-wide report that has come out, which has given us a good look at the sector. We know more now, that's a good thing. And the chief science adviser has been appointed, and the panel around him has been appointed, that's a good thing there.' Meyer says the sector is crucial to all parts of New Zealand. 'The science sector is about answering questions. If you have questions, science is a method, and it is used to answer a lot of those questions … the more money that we put into this sector, the more questions we can answer. And the more questions we can answer, the more answers we can sell. 'If the Government is worried about economic growth, and they want to champion this sector, then you've got to put your money where your mouth is. 'I am going to be curious to see how they can steer the ship of science, when maybe what they are most suited for is selling the fruits of science.' Check out how to listen to and follow The Detail here. You can also stay up-to-date by liking us on Facebook or following us on Twitter.


Newsroom
35 minutes ago
- Newsroom
Daily crossword, Friday 6 June
Sign in with Google Or Enter the code sent to your email. Email address Enter your password Sign in by entering the code we sent to , or clicking the magic link in the email. Continue Resend code Email me a one-time code instead Create an account Sign in to an existing account Go back