The science sector sounds the alarm
Last month, a total of $212 million was cut from the science sector in this Budget, which reprioritises existing research funding towards commercially focused science and innovation.
A sizeable portion goes to Invest NZ and a new gene tech regulator.
The Government says it backs the sector and is prioritising industry partnerships, private-sector investment, and 'innovation outcomes with measurable economic impact.'
While officials insist the move reflects 'fiscal discipline and real-world alignment,' many in the sector say it amounts to a dismantling of the research base.
Newsroom political journalist Fox Meyer tells The Detail 'the scale of the cuts is not great for the sector, but it's also more about the lack of investment'.
'It's one thing to have cuts and reprioritisation, but people have been calling for more of just anything for some time now. Now, there is a lot of frustration.
'Science funding has been stagnant or declining for years now, and a decision to reprioritise stuff is not necessarily going to put money in the Government's pocket like they think.'
With a focus on the bottom line, is this the Government pulling off a Sir John Key 'show me the money' moment, with a scientific bent?
'That actually goes both ways,' says Meyer. 'Scientists are looking at the Government saying, 'Show me the money if you want me to produce more money', and the Government is looking back at the scientists and saying, 'Well, you show me the money, what are you bringing in, how are you lifting your weight?'.
'That is going to be a hard one to reconcile unless the Government is willing to pony up and make the investment.'
He worries the fall-out will include a 'brain drain' with our country's brightest and best scientists and researchers opting to take up positions overseas.
'My connections in the science world – plenty of them – have moved.
'The chief science adviser for the Department of Conservation has moved to Australia … that's an expert in a cutting-edge field that we have lost to a company in Australia.
'And it's not the only example of this sort of thing. We invest so much in training up these scientists, and they are very skilled scientists, and then to not give them what they are asking for and what they need, I feel it falls short of our own investment.'
In fairness, it is not all doom and gloom.
'So, the positives, there is a new funding pool for Māori-related science, that's a good thing. There's the sector-wide report that has come out, which has given us a good look at the sector. We know more now, that's a good thing. And the chief science adviser has been appointed, and the panel around him has been appointed, that's a good thing there.'
Meyer says the sector is crucial to all parts of New Zealand.
'The science sector is about answering questions. If you have questions, science is a method, and it is used to answer a lot of those questions … the more money that we put into this sector, the more questions we can answer. And the more questions we can answer, the more answers we can sell.
'If the Government is worried about economic growth, and they want to champion this sector, then you've got to put your money where your mouth is.
'I am going to be curious to see how they can steer the ship of science, when maybe what they are most suited for is selling the fruits of science.'
Check out how to listen to and follow The Detail here.
You can also stay up-to-date by liking us on Facebook or following us on Twitter.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
an hour ago
- NZ Herald
Opinion: NCEA isn't perfect but New Zealand shouldn't forget why it was introduced in the first place
The reforms are meant to address long-standing concerns over how students accumulate credits to complete their qualifications. With the NCEA, students can opt out of assessments, including final exams, once they have accumulated enough credits. But as the Government seeks to address the 'gaming' of the system, it shouldn't lose sight of why the NCEA was introduced in the first place – and who it was designed to help. While the system has its flaws, a return to an exam-based model may not make the grade either. Addressing uneven achievement The NCEA was introduced between 2002 and 2004 to replace the School Certificate, Sixth Form Certificate and Bursary qualifications. Its aim was to broaden educational success, recognising diverse forms of learning as legitimate. The previous qualifications primarily valued traditional academic subjects because those were, in large part, the only ones available for assessment. The NCEA represented a shift away from viewing vocational learning – for example, in trades or creative subjects – as less valuable and not a viable path to formal qualifications. It also marked a departure from 'norms'-based assessment, which scaled student results to fit predetermined pass and fail rates. In contrast, NCEA was 'standards'-based: if a student could demonstrate the required skills or knowledge, they received the credits. But since the early days of the NCEA, there have been concerns students could achieve the qualifications without really having gained an adequate education. The flexibility of the NCEA – allowing schools, teachers and students to tailor learning pathways – is both its greatest strength and its greatest weakness. It has been criticised for being confusing, inconsistent and lacking credibility. Last year, Mike Grimshaw, an associate professor of sociology at Canterbury University, raised concerns that students were entering university 'functionally illiterate'. He said New Zealand was 'under-educating but over-qualifying'. Concerns such as this over the NCEA have fuelled repeated calls for reform. Whiplash for schools While few dispute changes are needed, the scale and pace of the Government's proposals are another matter. Schools have already contended with numerous policy shifts under this Government, including rapid curriculum changes and new assessments in primary and secondary schools. Now they are being told the entire NCEA framework will be replaced. The sheer volume and speed of these changes puts significant pressure on teachers. This is not the only concern. Under the NCEA, a Year 12 student who worries they might fail the calculus 'standard' can still do maths, knowing they have the option not to sit the calculus exam. Under the new system, this sort of flexibility disappears. Students will either take Year 12 mathematics – or they will not. This inflexibility raises the stakes. It may deter students from taking certain subjects altogether for fear of failure. The renewed emphasis on exams is also problematic. Research has shown exam outcomes can be influenced by gender, anxiety and even personal circumstances on exam day. In other words, exams are not necessarily the 'credible' measure of learning they are made out to be. There are also important questions that the Government's policy consultation proposal does not answer. What are the options for a student who fails the certificate on their first attempt? Will schools still be able to tailor internal assessments to suit their students? Room for some optimism There are, however, reasons for cautious optimism. The Government has promised to retain the NCEA standards-based approach. Preserving the integrity of whole subjects means students are more likely to learn topics, such as algebra, that keep academic options open but are often left out in the NCEA. But this will come at a cost. The stakes will feel higher and students will face greater pressure to succeed. The NCEA delivered on the promise that we shouldn't automatically assume half of our population will fail. Over the past two decades, more young people have left school with qualifications. But did they learn more? That remains an open question. The new system will likely bring consistency and arguably credibility to high school qualifications. But some students will pay the price of this higher-stakes approach to education. David Pomeroy is senior lecturer in Mathematics Education, at the University of Canterbury.
1News
7 hours ago
- 1News
Kuia devastated over use of her image on anti-Māori ward billboards
A kuia has been left devastated after Hobson's Pledge used her image in a billboard campaign against Māori wards. 'I feel trampled. I did not do any of those. I did not give anyone permission to use my mug, my moko kauae.' Ellen Tamati spoke to Aukaha News about her experience. She said she was woken up in the middle of the night by her mokopuna who had spotted one of the billboards. '[My mokopuna] kept ringing and ringing to wake me up and she told me what was happening. I didn't know what she was talking about, I had no idea. I didn't realise my face was on a billboard, she just kept saying to me, 'Nan what's going on?'' Tamati's image was available for editorial use on stock image sites iStock and Shutterstock. She said she was not asked for permission for her image to be used in the campaign. ADVERTISEMENT Ellen Tamati's image on iStock (Source: Te Karere) On the billboards her image was accompanied with the headline, 'My mana doesn't need a mandate. Vote no to Māori wards' - a message that goes against her beliefs. Responding to a question on how she feels, she gestured to the moko on her chin: 'My moko kauae represents... my right side is my Te Arawa waka and my left side is my Mataatua waka, so this means more to me than what they're trying to say.' Granddaughter Anahera Parata said her nan has only every been a staunch Te Pāti Māori supporter and 'pro-Māori'. 'Even at her age she's still giving back to our iwi,' she said. Tamati said she was sad and angry, and invited the group to 'come and see me'. 'But the damage has been done. And to all those wards out there, please go and vote for our Māori wards. That's all I can say to you. Go and vote for them because we need them. We need them. I did not authorise the Hobson's Pledge to put my face up.' ADVERTISEMENT Hobson's Pledge leader Don Brash told Te Karere that they have taken down the billboards out of respect for the hurt caused to Tamati. 'We bought the photograph from a regular photography supplier and we assumed therefore that we had the rights to use it. We understand that the woman concerned is upset about that fact and we're doing our best to contact her, and of course we'll apologise for her hurt.' Glossary moko kauae - traditional Māori tattoo on a women's chin mokopuna - grandchild/ren Te Arawa waka - ancestral canoe Mataatua waka - ancestral canoe
NZ Herald
11 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Pro-Trump nationalist Karol Nawrocki becomes Poland's President amid tensions
Presidents in Poland can initiate as well as veto legislation, and have some influence over the country's foreign and defence policies. The outgoing President, Andrzej Duda, had already been at loggerheads with Tusk over many issues, including opposing easing an almost total ban on abortion. 'Annoy us' But relations are likely to be even worse under Nawrocki as the political climate heats up before parliamentary elections planned for 2027, analysts say. Karol Nawrocki's victory highlights Poland's political polarisation and his presidency may strain relations with the Government. Photo / Getty Images 'I have no doubt that Mr Nawrocki will do everything to annoy us,' said Tusk, who warned that he would not let Nawrocki 'demolish' his Government. Nawrocki has repeatedly branded Tusk's Government as 'the worst in the history' of democratic Poland. He has promised to be 'an active president' from the start and has said he wants to 'stimulate' the Government with various bills. In a video posted on social media on Tuesday, he said his inauguration would open 'a new chapter in the history of our beloved Poland. 'Let us unite,' he said. The Government holds a parliamentary majority but the Government and the President may be forced to make some compromises. 'Both parties should realise that engaging in intense confrontation is obviously not the way forward,' said Piotr Trudnowski, a member of Klub Jagielloński, a Christian-Democrat think tank. 'Poland First, Poles First' Ewa Marciniak, a political scientist at the University of Warsaw, said Nawrocki would have to work with the Government on foreign policy – in which he has 'no experience'. During the election campaign, he highlighted the importance of ties with the United States and his close ties with Trump. 'It is precisely from this that he will build his foreign policy, at least initially,' Marciniak said. One major difference could be relations with Ukraine. Trudnowski said Nawrocki would 'not be as enthusiastic' as his predecessor on Ukraine. During his campaign, Nawrocki opposed the idea of Nato membership for Ukraine and criticised Kyiv for not having 'shown gratitude for what the Poles have done'. Under his slogan 'Poland First, Poles First', he was critical of some of the benefits received by the more than one million Ukrainians who have fled to the country. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has congratulated Nawrocki and emphasised the importance of close ties with Poland – a vital transit country for military and humanitarian supplies to his country as it fights off Russia's invasion. After speaking to Nawrocki by phone last week, Zelenskyy said the two had agreed to visit each other and seek forms of co-operation 'that will bring real results for both our countries and our people'. Zelenskyy said he was 'thankful for the readiness to work together and for the assurance of continued support for Ukraine'. – Agence France-Presse
