Three-bin FOGO system set for Perth suburb despite concerns
All WA local governments were given until 2025 to transition to the FOGO system as part of the State Government's current waste strategy.
Councillors voted in December 2020 to implement a garden organics collection, which would be followed by a FOGO collection.
Your local paper, whenever you want it.
Last month it proceeded with a tender for the supply of FOGO bins, lids, and associated materials and services.
However, staff had recommended at the May 20 council meeting that the town hold off on rolling out FOGO bins until March 2026 at the latest so a report into processing capacities and capabilities could be prepared.
The town's general waste is sent to Tamala Park, which does not have the capacity to process FOGO waste.
A council report said there had been FOGO processing challenges, such as not enough sites that could process the waste, and a review of the Government's waste strategy could result in a less strict deadline.
But the council unanimously backed mayor Karen Vernon's proposal that the town roll out the FOGO system by August and start an education campaign from June 1.
Ms Vernon said the town could to enter into a short-term contract to start FOGO this year and there was no evidence FOGO material would end up in landfill.
'It is most optimal for the implementation of FOGO to commence well before the start of summer, and November is too late,' she said.
'The town has sufficient time to conduct a waste education campaign for the community and secure the delivery of those bins well before November 2025.
'Deferring implementation of FOGO this year and bringing only a status report back to council in March 2026 creates the risk that firstly the current FOGO service providers will reach their existing maximum capacity, leaving no options available to the town if no additional processing capacity develops in WA by 2026.
'Secondly, the town misses a valuable opportunity to assess the success of our community's adoption of FOGO and resolve any problems via a short-term contract before considering a longer-term arrangement.'
If a bin contains hazardous waste or repeated high levels of contamination, the bin may be stickered shut and not collected.
Chief operations officer Natalie Adams said there was a 'slight risk' the June 1 deadline set by the council meant the town could send out information that had not been confirmed.
'The communications team have advised they would need 10-12 weeks in preparation for a campaign on the rollout strategy,' she said.
'The waste calendar that needs to come out does require a date for us to put in.
'In order for them to roll out and say that caddies and bins are coming on a certain date, we do have to have some certainty around that.'
Ms Adams said there was a correlation between the amount of education a community received before FOGO was rolled out and contamination rates.
Town chief financial officer Duncan Olde said the deadline to print the town's waste calendar was getting close.
'I wouldn't say tomorrow but it's very soon we got to lock that in,' he said.
Ms Vernon asked if the campaign could start with educating people about what to do with the FOGO system and then telling them the rollout date once it had been decided on.
Town CEO Carl Askew said the short answer was 'no' but if the campaign was delivered in two phases — information about the delivery of bins and caddies, and then education — then 'anything is possible'.
Part of the council's debate was closed to the public as it involved confidential items.
City of Belmont CEO John Christie said more than 17,900 of its households had made the switch to FOGO since it was rolled out there in February 2024.
'Thanks to our community's efforts, over 4500 tonnes of organic waste have already been diverted from landfill, and we've seen an 11 per cent increase in recycling rates,' he said.
'It's a great example of what we can achieve when we work together.'
Belmont staff have been checking residents' bins to ensure they are putting the right materials in their bins.
Some bins have been stickered shut and residents must re-sort their rubbish out before arranging for a collection.
Mr Christie said the city's preference was to work with residents to improve how they managed their household waste.
'When a bin is found to be contaminated, the city generally collects the bin and provides residents feedback on what material goes in which bin to help them sort their waste correctly in future,' he said.
'In some cases, if a bin contains hazardous waste or repeated high levels of contamination, the bin may be stickered shut and not collected.
'Before the bin can be emptied, the resident will need to remove the hazardous or contaminated materials or contact the city to discuss their options.
'This applies to all bin types and the process was in place prior to the FOGO rollout.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
West Australian
5 hours ago
- West Australian
MICHELLE GRATTAN: Consensus goal may elude
One observer describes next week's economic roundtable this way: 'Chalmers has opened a can of worms — and everybody has got a worm'. Even those close to the roundtable are feeling overwhelmed by the extent of the worm farm. There are many hundreds of submissions, five Productivity Commission reports, Treasury background papers, and stakeholders in the media spruiking their opinions ahead of the event. Business, unions and the welfare sector have largely settled into their predictable wish lists. In areas such as the housing crisis, it's actually not difficult to say what should be done — you hardly need this meeting to tell you. It just seems near impossible to get the relevant players (whether they be States, local councils, the construction industry) to do it, or be able to do it. On issues of deregulation generally, when it comes to specifics, a lot is contested. As the ACTU's Sally McManus says, 'one person's regulations are another person's rights'. As much as Treasurer Jim Chalmers might like to project the sunny side of Australia's situation, independent economist Chris Richardson (who will be at the summit's day three tax session) puts it more bluntly. 'We have a problem: the average Australian saw their living standards rise by just 1.5 per cent over the past decade,' he posted on X. 'That's embarrassingly shy of the 22 per cent lift in living standards enjoyed across the rich world as a whole, and way below what Australians achieved in times past. 'You'd have hoped that both sides would have talked about tackling that challenge at the last election, but they didn't.' Richardson is hoping the roundtable can achieve 'enough consensus to change some things', which the Government can use as a springboard. But he's worried the meeting could underperform, given its 'lead-up hasn't seen much consensus', Economist Richard Holden from UNSW says to be successful, the roundtable needs to get 'broad agreement on some version of the ' Abundance agenda' (a reference to a currently fashionable book focusing on loosening regulatory blocks) – especially as it applies to housing. 'In addition, to be successful would require that big issues like federation and tax reform are referred to Treasury for serious consideration and to present the Government with options by year's end.' There are two approaches for a government that wants to promote economic reform. It can, as then treasurer Paul Keating did at the 1985 tax summit, put up a model and see how much it can make fly. Or it can, as Chalmers is doing, ask a wide range of participants for their ideas, and then decide how much of what emerges to pursue — in terms of what has wide support and what fits the Government's agenda. The closer we get to the meeting, the harder it becomes to anticipate its likely import (or lack of). Signposts are there, but they could be false signals, or ignored later. Despite all the talk about tax, the Government — specifically the Prime Minister — has flagged it doesn't have the stomach for radical reform. Certainly not this term. Anthony Albanese said last week, 'The only tax policy that we're implementing is the one that we took to the election'. This doesn't rule out new initiatives this term — the phrasing is carefully in the present tense — but from what we know of the PM's approach they would likely be limited rather than sweeping. Independent economist Saul Eslake said that a few weeks ago he was optimistic the summit would give Chalmers the licence to spend some of the vast political capital the election yielded. 'But the Prime Minister has made it clear he is not getting that licence. The Government is not prepared to venture much beyond its limited mandate from the election. 'The best that can be hoped for is a willingness to have an adult conversation with the electorate between now and the next election with a view to seeking a bold mandate in 2028,' Eslake says. Predictably, the roundtable is putting the spotlight on the Albanese-Chalmers relationship. This can be summed up in a couple of ways. The PM is more cautious when it comes to economic reform, the Treasurer is more ambitious. In political terms, it's that 'old bull, young bull' syndrome. The different styles are clear. The 'old bull' is blunt, sounding a touch impatient, for example, when he's asked about tax. The 'young bull' is publicly deferential to his leader. One of the most potentially significant discussions at the roundtable will be around AI. Unlike many well-worn issues, this is a relatively new, and quickly changing, area of policy debate. There are varying views within Government about whether firm or light guardrails are needed and whether they should be in a separate new act or just via changes to existing laws. Chalmers is in favour of light-touch regulation. The unions are not on the same page as Chalmers' regulatory preference, and they want a say for workers. The unions were the winners from the 2022 jobs and skills summit — the Government delivered to them in spades at the meeting, and later. It's not clear they are in as strong a position this time. Their big claim for the roundtable — a four-day working week — has already been dismissed by the Government. Regardless of the diversity of views among those rubbing shoulders in the cabinet room next week, one man will stand out as something of an oddity. Ted O'Brien, shadow treasurer, invited as a participant, will be as much an observer. O'Brien might say he wants to be constructive, but his role means he will want to be critical. But he has to tread carefully. Others in the room, and outside observers, will be making judgments about him. For O'Brien, the gathering should be a networking opportunity more than an occasion for performative display.
The Australian
12 hours ago
- The Australian
South Australia bans soy sauce fish packets in plastics fight
Takeaway soy sauce fish packets will soon be a thing of the past in South Australia. Straws attached to drink containers and spoons and forks attached to pre-packaged foods are also on the chopping block from September 1, along with plastic fruit stickers. 'These bans encourage reusable, recyclable or compostable alternatives,' South Australian Deputy Premier Susan Close said. 'South Australians are increasingly looking at ways to reduce their reliance on single-use plastics which devastate our environment. Plastic soy sauce fish packets will be banned in South Australia in September. Picture: Supplied 'The state government will continue to assist South Australian businesses via various programs to assist them transition. 'Many South Australian businesses have already moved away from single-use items and are embracing reusable and compostable items.' In September 2023, the government banned plastic stemmed cotton buds, plastic pizza savers, single-use plastic plates and bowls. Then a year later, it banned plastic bags, plastic balloon sticks, plastic balloon ties, plastic confetti, plastic bread tags and single-use plastic coffee cups and plastic lids, among other items. SA Deputy Premier Susan Close said the ban on single use plastics would help preserve the environment. Picture: NewsWire / Naomi Jellicoe Since 2021, the government credits local business with removing more than eight million single-use plastic items. Evergreen Deli's Elliott Horner said the move away from plastics would help preserve the natural world. 'Being nestled within Adelaide Botanic Garden, environmental consciousness is our constant companion, as we care for the very place we call home,' the venue and events manager said. Multiple states have moved to ban single use plastics, including NSW and Victoria. Read related topics: Adelaide Duncan Evans Reporter Duncan Evans is a reporter for News Corp's NewsWire service, based in Adelaide. Before NewsWire, he worked as a resources and politics reporter for The Daily Mercury in Mackay, Queensland and as a reporter at CQ Today, an independent newspaper based in Rockhampton. He was raised in Emerald and Brisbane and studied English Literature and American Studies at the University of Sydney. He began his career in journalism working for the Jakarta Post in Indonesia for over two years as an editor, translator and writer. He is fluent in Indonesian. @Duncanevans01 Duncan Evans
West Australian
17 hours ago
- West Australian
Three days to turn up ideas for three budgets: Jim Chalmers has big roundtable ambitions
By Thursday evening you should know what the Albanese government wants to do with its next three years in power. At least, that's the best case scenario for Treasurer Jim Chalmers. But the wooden bugs inlaid in the ceiling of the Cabinet room have heard a lot of hot air and ideas in their decades. So, too, the old political hands who suspect next week's economic roundtable will be another in a long line of ambitious talk fests that lead to minimal change. The money man and his hand-picked roundtable participants are sifting through hundreds of suggestions for how to fix poor productivity, a budget mired in red ink and bolster economic resilience. They'll spend three days next week in the sacred Cabinet room, locked away from distractions and prying eyes, aiming for genuine conversation to thrash out potential solutions. Dr Chalmers has promised a late and lengthy press conference on Thursday evening to relay the next steps to the public. But he insists that even if only a handful of concrete pledges emerge the intense consultation over the past several weeks has already made the exercise worth it. 'We've shaken the tree. There's a whole bunch of ideas. We've got people grappling with the big trade-offs that governments have to make in economic policy,' he told Agenda during a one-on-one interview this week. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and his Treasurer unleashed the beast in June when they announced the roundtable in twin National Press Club speeches delivered a week apart. The Government has expressed surprised at just how many ideas people had stashed away and were willing to voice. Treasury has received almost 900 submissions and the Productivity Commission another couple of hundred for its 'five pillars' reports feeding in to next week's talks. The core group of 22 attendees spending the whole three days next week in the cabinet room, and the 25 others invited to attend individual sessions, will bring their own thoughts. Regulators have also offered up 140 new ideas to cut red tape. Dr Chalmers has met with more than 75 of the nation's top business leaders over the past month, while ministerial colleagues have collectively heard from more than 700 people across 41 pre-roundtable meetings in their own portfolios. In fact, the sheer onslaught of suggestions has led the Government to tamp down expectations over the past fortnight. 'I see this as three days to help inform three budgets,' Dr Chalmers said. 'There'll be a lot of work that begins on Thursday, not ends on Thursday. 'I'm pretty confident that the directions that people are encouraging us to take, that there will be elements of that that we'll be able to pick up and run with.' Mr Albanese has also been keen to emphasise that the talks might be in the Cabinet room, but they are not Cabinet discussions. His Government will pick and choose what it does with the suggestions that emerge — and that will take time. 'There will be some things that are put forward that can be done immediately. Some things can be the result of legislation, some things will feed into next year's Budget, some things will feed into a future commitments about future terms,' he said this week. Many of the core participants are reluctant to outline their thinking publicly ahead of the roundtable, but there is clear consensus already building in areas such as speeding up environmental and planning approvals and reducing duplication across State and Federal processes. This was reflected in leaked Treasury advice obtained by media this week which set out options for speeding up approvals and clearing a backlog of housing applications as possible outcomes from the talks. Dr Chalmers, who has been briefed weekly on all the submissions, said his interests lay in making the Federation work more effectively, better regulation and faster approvals. 'My broad view, as you know, is that if it's good for Western Australia, it's usually good for the nation,' he said, talking about whether the States would get on board. 'WA plays a key defining role in our national economy, and so we work closely with Rita and Roger and the West Australian colleagues to find these win-wins and to make progress.' State treasurers, meeting on Friday, agreed to work across jurisdictions on faster approvals for major projects, cutting red tape and reducing overlap, boosting competition and building more homes faster. They also agreed to continue work on a model for road user charges — needed to replace fuel excise as more people start driving EVs — but cautioned that would take time. Independent MP Allegra Spender has been speaking to fellow roundtable participants and said there was clear recognition across the board that environmental laws were failing to protect nature and stymieing progress on renewables and housing. 'Reforming these in line with Graeme Samuel's recommendations is an urgent priority for almost everyone I've spoken to,' she said. Commonwealth Bank chief executive Matt Comyn has also pointed to housing supply and the energy transition as key priorities, while unions back a 'fast to yes, faster to no' approach for renewables projects. 'We think there is a growing consensus on the need to tackle intergenerational inequality in Australia. We hope the roundtable participants work together to help address this,' ACTU secretary Sally McManus said. ACCC head Gina Cass-Gottlieb has also been speaking with other participants and a spokeswoman said there was a shared interest in competition, innovation and 'right fit regulation'. Red tape is also in the sights of business participants. Council of Small Business Organisations Australia chair Matthew Addison said that 'regulatory burden and complex compliance obligations (were) impacting businesses of all sizes'. The Business Council of Australia, representing some of the nation's largest companies, this week estimated red tape cost the country more than $110 billion a year in compliance costs and called for a target to cut this by 25 per cent by 2030. The idea is similar to one put forward by the Productivity Commission as well as that being pursued in the UK by Keir Starmer and is in line with Dr Chalmers' thoughts about the 'Abundance agenda' (after Ezra Klein and Derek Thompson's influential book). Better regulation aside, artificial intelligence and tax are proving to be more contentious topics. Take the proposal from the Productivity Commission to lower company tax rates for all but the 500 largest businesses, partially offset by a new 'cashflow tax'. Big business rejected the whole plan, but COSBOA backed the company tax cut element, although it signed on to a BCA-led statement against the cashflow tax element. Mr Comyn said of course the Commonwealth Bank would like a tax cut, 'but I don't think that's the highest priority'. Last week, Dr Chalmers warned participants that he wanted them to start talking before gathering in Canberra and that any ideas costing money had to come with suggestions on how to offest the extra burden. His message has been heeded in part. Not the money part, though. 'We need to make sure that the ideas that people put forward are affordable, and I see that our political opponents and others have criticised that,' Dr Chalmers said. 'But the alternative to that is telling people to bring unaffordable ideas. The alternative to this roundtable is to involve people less.' One person — involved in preliminary discussions but not heading to Canberra — thought Treasury should simply reject any proposals that didn't detail where the money would come from. Ms Spender says she believed there was appetite for a proper tax reform process, while the BCA called for a snap three-month review. 'Everyone acknowledges that we can't fix our tax system in a single afternoon, but there's appetite to kick start a reform process that can examine the many interesting proposals put forward to date,' she said. But shadow treasurer Ted O'Brien indicated in a speech on Friday that taxes were a red line for the Coalition. 'From recent media reports, it looks like the roundtable has been engineered to rubber stamp a doubling down on Labor's failed tax and spend strategy,' he said. 'Let me be crystal clear: the Coalition will be no such rubber stamp. And we reject any suggestion Labor has a mandate to hike taxes.' He also likened the roundtable to Willy Wonka's famed chocolate factory, with Dr Chalmers as the candy man himself offering up 'the tasty temptation of higher taxes mixed with big doses of debt', in a speech that might leave the Treasurer reconsidering Mr O'Brien's invitation. Nevertheless, Dr Chalmers said he had an 'overwhelming sense of gratitude' that people had largely approached the talks in the right spirit. 'I don't see my role as … banging heads together. I'm trying to draw the threads together where there is sufficient common interest and sufficient common ground for the Government to do further work,' he said. 'Our job is to make the most of this opportunity before this window of opportunity shuts.'
