The skill Salesforce's AI boss says is more important than learning to code
EVP Jayesh Govindarajan said he defines agency as seeking out a problem and having the drive to solve it.
Mark Zuckerberg has a similar hiring philosophy and said he values the ability to "go deep and do one thing really well."
For years, "learn to code" was the go-to advice for anyone wanting to break into a tech career — but Salesforce's head of AI says another skill is more valuable these days.
"I may be in the minority here, but I think something that's far more essential than learning how to code is having agency," executive vice president Jayesh Govindarajan said in an interview with Business Insider.
Govindarajan said that's because Salesforce is building "a system that can pretty much solve anything for you" but "just doesn't know what to solve."
"I think far more important than knowing how to code is having that agency and that drive to go get it built out," Govindarajan said.
The AI boss gave a hypothetical example of someone trying to solve a problem for College Possible, a nonprofit that helps students prepare for college and receives funding from Salesforce. Govindarajan said that someone could interview a counselor, see what they do on a daily basis, and then use an agentic AI system to "describe what you're trying to build and it'll give you a first draft of the solution." While that first draft may not be perfect, "you go take it to this counselor, have them play with it," and listen to their feedback and any critique, he said.
"Then you'd come back and you tweak it again. No code. You'd give it instructions in English. That's very possible," Govindarajan said.
The Salesforce exec said someone who has gone through this process has demonstrated two key things.
"One, agency to go seek out a problem to solve," Govindarajan said. "And two, learn the toolset — that's a no-code tool set or a low-code tool set — to be able to go get the job done."
In that hypothetical example, once the counselor is interested in actually buying the proposed solution, a more experienced coder could then be brought in to sharpen up the edges and fine-tune the software product.
Govindarajan's remarks offer a look into how the world of software development and sales is evolving in the age of AI.
Since the emergence of AI tools like GitHub Copilot or Amazon CodeWhisperer, a number of coding tasks have been automated, creating uncertainty in a once-stable industry and new challenges for some younger entrants looking to break into software engineering.
During Google's third-quarter earnings call in October, Sundar Pichai said over a quarter of new code at the company is generated by AI, although it's still reviewed and accepted by employees. Other tech giants have similarly integrated AI into coding tasks. One Microsoft manager told BI that AI helped him cut down the time he spent on coding tasks by about 70%.
Even as coding becomes increasingly automated, some industry leaders believe learning the basics continues to be necessary, arguing that it's more important than ever to understand the fundamentals of technology in order to build on it.
Other industry leaders seem to be leaning in the direction that soft skills could be what sets candidates apart.
Mark Zuckerberg said in a July 2024 interview with Bloomberg that he believes the most important skill is "learning how to think critically and learning values when you're young."
"If people have shown that they can go deep and do one thing really well, then they've probably gained experience in, like, the art of learning something," Zuckerberg said in the interview, discussing what he looks for in job candidates.
The CEO said that skill applies to situations that could arise during a career at Meta and it's key to showcase your ability to dive deep and master whatever you're working on.
Or, as Govindarajan might put it: using the tools at your disposal to get stuff done.
Read the original article on Business Insider
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
OpenAI is at a classic strategy crossroads involving its ‘moat'—which Warren Buffett believes can make or break a business
It's an epochal moment as history's latest general-purpose technology, AI, forms itself into an industry. Much depends on these early days, especially the fate of the industry's leader by a mile, Open AI. In terms of the last general-purpose technology, the internet, will it become a colossus like Google or be forgotten like AltaVista? No one can know, but here's how to think about it. OpenAI's domination of the industry is striking. As the creator of ChatGPT, it recently attracted 78% of daily unique visitors to core model websites, with six competitors splitting up the rest, according to a recent 40-page report from J.P. Morgan. Even with that vast lead, the report shows, OpenAI is expanding its margin over its much smaller competitors, including even Gemini, which is part of Google and its giant parent, Alphabet (2024 revenue: $350 billion). The great question now is whether OpenAI can possibly maintain its wide lead (history would say no) or at least continue as the industry leader. The answer depends heavily on OpenAI's moat, a Warren Buffett term for any factor that protects the company and cannot be easily breached–think of Coca-Cola's brand or BNSF Railroad's economies of scale, to mention two of Buffett's successful investments. On that count the J.P. Morgan analysts are not optimistic. Specifically, they acknowledge that while OpenAI has led the industry in innovating its models, that strategy is 'an increasingly fragile moat.' Example: The company's most recent model, GPT-5, included multiple advances yet underwhelmed many users. As competitors inevitably catch up, the analysts conclude, 'Model commoditization is an increasingly likely outcome.' With innovations suffering short lives, OpenAI must now become 'a more product-focused, diversified organization that can operate at scale while retaining its position' at the top of the industry–skills the company has yet to demonstrate. Bottom line, OpenAI can maintain its leading rank in the industry, but it won't be easy, and betting on it could be risky. Yet a different view suggests OpenAI is much closer to creating a sustainable moat. It comes from Robert Siegel, a management lecturer at Stanford's Graduate School of Business who is also a venture capitalist and former executive at various companies, many in technology. He argues that OpenAI is already well along the road to achieving a valuable attribute, stickiness: The longer customers use something, the less likely they are to switch to a competitor. In OpenAI's case, 'people will only move to Perplexity or Gemini or other solutions if they get a better result,' he says. Yet that becomes unlikely because AI learns; the more you use a particular AI engine, the more it learns about you and what you want. 'If you keep putting questions into ChatGPT, which learns your behaviors better, and you like it, there's no reason to leave as long as it's competitive.' Now combine that logic with OpenAI's behavior. 'It seems like their strategy is to be ubiquitous,' Siegel says, putting ChatGPT in front of as many people as possible so the software can start learning about them before any competitor can get there first. Most famously, OpenAI released ChatGPT 3.5 to the public in 2022 for free, attracting a million users in five days and 100 million in two months. In addition, the company raised much investment early in the game, having been founded in 2015. Thus, Siegel says, OpenAI can 'continue to run hard and use capital as a moat so they can do all the things they need to do to be everywhere.' But Siegel, the J.P. Morgan analysts, and everyone else knows plenty can always go wrong. An obvious threat to OpenAI and most of its competitors is an open-source model such as China's DeepSeek, which appears to perform well at significantly lower costs. The venture capital that has poured into OpenAI could dry up as hundreds of other AI startups compete for financing. J.P. Morgan and Siegel agree that OpenAI's complex unconventional governance structure must be reformed; though a recently proposed structure has not been officially disclosed, it is reportedly topped by a nonprofit, which might worry profit-seeking investors. As for moats, OpenAI is obviously in the best position to build or strengthen one. But looking into the era of AI, the whole concept of the corporate moat may become meaningless. How long will it be, if it hasn't been done already, before a competitor asks its own AI engine, 'How do we defeat OpenAI's moat?' This story was originally featured on Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk urged businesses to ditch Delaware. Nevada saw an opportunity.
Elon Musk urged businesses to leave Delaware after a 2024 clash with its Court of Chancery. Other states, like Nevada, are eager to attract those corporations. Clark County, home to Las Vegas, is building an innovation district focused on tech. Elon Musk has made his feelings about the state of Delaware clear. "Companies should get the hell out of Delaware," Musk wrote last August on X. Although Delaware's Secretary of State told Business Insider its role as the "corporate capital of the world" is not under threat, states like Wyoming, Texas, and Florida — and especially Nevada — have emerged as popular alternatives. Musk's unhappiness with Delaware began in 2024 after a judge for the state's Court of Chancery denied his multi-billion-dollar pay package. In response, Musk attacked the court on X and advised others to avoid incorporating in Delaware. The billionaire has since moved Tesla and SpaceX to Texas. Musk wasn't the only business leader ready to ditch Delaware, as it turns out. VC firm Andreessen Horowitz announced its departure from the state in July, saying recent rulings in the Court of Chancery undermined its "reputation for unbiased expertise." Roblox, Dropbox, and Trump Media have also left Delaware. Delaware is considered a premier state for businesses to incorporate, in part, because of the Delaware General Corporation Law. The business-friendly statute is the foundation of its corporate law. While there are various reasons a business might incorporate outside Delaware, Musk and companies like Andreessen Horowitz said they are seeking a more favorable legal landscape. Nevada sees an opening Some of the companies that have left Delaware have chosen Nevada as their new corporate home. Andreessen Horowitz is one. The company said in its blog post that Nevada law provided less "legal uncertainty" than Delaware. Bill Ackman, the billionaire CEO of Pershing Square Capital Management, said in February that his firm would also move from Delaware to Nevada. "Top law firms are recommending Nevada and Texas over Delaware," Ackman posted to X at the time. Nevada isn't just seeking companies to incorporate there, however, it also wants to attract their offices and workers. "What it's about is making sure that we're not just getting those businesses to incorporate on paper, but we also want their physical assets here," Clark County Commissioner Michael Naft told Business Insider. Clark County is home to Las Vegas. Len Jessup, a general partner with Desert Forge Ventures, which is based in Las Vegas and invests in early-stage companies, told Business Insider that he's seen more corporations choose Nevada as a home. "We've seen founders moving here — a lot of them from California because it's adjacent — but they're coming from all over," Jessup said. They're being drawn to Nevada for a variety of reasons, including no state income tax on individuals, no capital gains tax, and what Jessup described as lighter regulations. While Nevada doesn't have an individual income tax, it does enforce a commerce tax on businesses earning more than $4 million in gross revenue. Lindsey Mignano, a founding partner of SSM Law PC who represents emerging tech companies, said the different tax structures "may make less of a difference" in the early stage because "revenue is not yet high, but at the later stages of a company's lifecycle, this can absolutely add up." Clark County is hoping to draw more companies to the region by developing what it's calling an "innovation district." "It has been something that we've been really methodical about. We've gotten stakeholders together, but at the end of the day, Clark County's innovation district is really about lifting up what's happening here organically and using those assets to attract more like-minded businesses and individuals to be part of that space," Naft said. For Jessup, getting companies to incorporate in Nevada is a way to expand the state's economy, which mostly relies on its hospitality and tourism industries. "My goal is, 10 years down the road, I want to have helped to create companies in tech and biotech — so, outside of gaming, hospitality, sports, and entertainment — that add to the ecosystem and help to diversify the economy," Jessup said. The Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority reported that the number of visitors declined 11.3% this June compared to the same time last year. "The state still does these cycles of boom and bust. I'd like to see us add more companies locally, like Switch's data center company, that are a little bit more recession-resistant," Jessup said, referring to the AI, cloud, and data center company. Naft said officials are still determining details about the Clark County innovation district, but are hopeful it could help solidify it's foothold as a business capital. "We want to make sure that people understand that we are open to new ideas," he said. Read the original article on Business Insider
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘My Kid Will Never Ever Be Smarter Than an AI': OpenAI's Sam Altman Warns Most Kids Won't Know a World Without AI
Artificial intelligence (AI) is now so advanced that some experts believe no child will ever surpass its intelligence again. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, a central figure in the world of artificial intelligence, recently reflected on the transformative potential of AI advancements, and particularly their impact on the next generation. Speaking on a podcast, he remarked, 'My kid will never ever be smarter than an AI. That will never happen. You know, kid born a few years ago. They had a brief period of time. My kid never will be smarter.' More News from Barchart Warren Buffett Cautions Ill-Informed Investors: 'The Market, Like the Lord, Helps Those Who Help Themselves,' But Markets Are Unforgiving Can Archer Aviation Become the Tesla of the Skies? As Kodak Terminates Its Pension Plans, What Top Companies Still Offer This Retirement Perk? Our exclusive Barchart Brief newsletter is your FREE midday guide to what's moving stocks, sectors, and investor sentiment - delivered right when you need the info most. Subscribe today! Altman's statement captures a profound and ongoing shift, both in technology and society. As the current leader of OpenAI, the organization behind breakthroughs like the GPT-language model series and other advanced AI technologies, Altman's insights carry significant weight. His views are shaped by daily interactions with researchers pushing the boundaries of what AI can achieve — tasks ranging from language generation and autonomous reasoning to problem-solving at a superhuman scale. When Altman says 'my kid will never be smarter than an AI,' he is not lamenting a loss, but observing a turning point in technology. Historically, each new generation had the chance to exceed the achievements of earlier ones, shaped by new education, tools, and inventions. Now, he says, a rapidly accelerating AI trajectory means that children born today will coexist with machines that learn and develop orders of magnitude faster, with access to vast data and computational resources. Altman's comment reflects both a recognition of what has already changed and a sense of inevitability about the future. The authority behind Altman's remark comes from his central role at OpenAI. Since its founding in 2015, OpenAI has led the development of generative AI with a philosophy that blends technological optimism and public caution. Altman, previously a leading Silicon Valley investor and technologist, has often spoken about the responsibility of the sector and the need for flexible, thoughtful policy as AI becomes increasingly integrated into everyday life and the economy. His assertion that no human — no matter how young or well-educated — could ever outpace AI is rooted in empirical reality. AI models now routinely outperform humans in specialized knowledge domains, can process and generate language with uncanny fluency, and are applied across finance, healthcare, logistics, and creative fields. The 'brief period of time' when a child or their peers could match or exceed machine intelligence may well have effectively vanished, as Altman suggests, replaced by a world where coexistence and collaboration with increasingly capable AI systems is the norm. This perspective is particularly salient as debates about job displacement, educational outcomes, and the essence of human endeavor gain prominence. Altman's comment is not simply an observation about his own family, but a reflection of the collective transition underway: society must adapt to new definitions of intellect, capability, and value in an era dominated by artificial intelligence. Experts suggest this requires a renewed emphasis on skills such as creativity, adaptability, and ethical reasoning — areas where machines may never fully overtake human strengths. For now, Altman's remark encapsulates the magnitude of change artificial intelligence is bringing to global culture, labor, and the imagination of what people can become. As AI evolves, the notion of human uniqueness is being redefined, not diminished — and it's a process that will shape the upbringing and prospects of generations to come. On the date of publication, Caleb Naysmith did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
