NASA scientists find icy water on the most unexpected planet beyond the Earth, with the hottest temperatures
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
With the advancement in technology and every discovery, we're reminded that our solar system holds more surprises than we ever imagined.
While Mars is often the most commonly discussed planet with water beyond the Earth, in 2012, NASA scientists discovered strong evidence of water ice on the most unexpected planet with one of the most extreme environments in the solar system.
The most unlikely planet for water ice
Finding water in the solar system usually involves looking for hospitable environments, places with mild temperatures, underground water reservoirs, or atmospheres thick enough to shield and preserve moisture.
But this time it has been found on Mercury, which defies all these expectations. With an atmosphere so thin that it's barely there, a scorching surface, and a day that lasts nearly six Earth months, it seems like the last place water could survive.
Yet, during NASA's MESSENGER mission in 2012, scientists detected areas on Mercury that were not only cold but permanently shielded from sunlight. These polar regions, inside deep craters, showed something unusual, which included strong radar reflections that were highly suggestive of ice.
'The radar signatures show high reflectivity and strong depolarization,' NASA reported, which were the classic signs of water ice on planetary surfaces.
How was this discovery made?
The discovery was made without setting foot on Mercury by using instruments like the Arecibo radio telescope, the Goldstone antenna, and the Very Large Array (VLA); researchers studied radio signals bouncing off Mercury's surface. The high reflectivity and depolarization effects, especially near the poles, were strong indicators of water ice, despite the hostile surroundings.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Why does ice stay frozen on a planet so close to the Sun?
Well, that is all about geography; the craters on Mercury's poles never see sunlight. Without exposure to heat, temperatures in these shadows remain cold enough for ice to persist for possibly billions of years.
But how did ice get there? NASA offers two possible theories. One is that water was delivered via meteorites and comets, especially during the chaotic early years of the solar system. The second is that Mercury may have once released water vapor from within, which later froze in the cold, shadowy craters.
This discovery significantly changed how scientists view planetary water sources. It proves that temperature and atmosphere aren't the only deciding factors; specific geological and orbital conditions matter, too.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
3 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Meteorite that hit home in US this summer is older than earth, researchers say
A meteorite that crashed into a home in Atlanta, Georgia, is older than our planet Earth, according to a scientist who examined a fragment of the space rock. 'This particular meteor that entered the atmosphere has a long history before it made it to the ground of McDonough, and in order to totally understand that, we actually have to examine what the rock is and determine what group of asteroids it belongs to,' said Scott Harris, a researcher in the UGA Franklin College of Arts and Sciences' department of geology. Harris examined 23 of the 50 grams of meteorite fragments recovered from a piece the size of a cherry tomato that struck a man's roof like a bullet and left a dent in the floor of the home outside Atlanta. 'It belongs to a group of asteroids in the main asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter that we now think we can tie to a breakup of a much larger asteroid about 470 million years ago,' Harris says. 'But in that breakup, some pieces get into Earth-crossing orbits, and if given long enough, their orbit around the sun and Earth's orbit around the sun end up being at the same place, at the same moment in time.' The geologist used optical and electron microscopy to determine that the rock was a chondrite, a type of meteorite that originated in the early solar system and is rich in carbon, water, and clay materials. In fact, according to NASA, chondrites are the most abundant type of stony meteorite. Harris said that scientists at the University of Georgia, along with colleagues from Arizona State University, plan to submit their findings to the Nomenclature Committee of the Meteoritical Society. They have proposed naming the space rock the McDonough Meteorite, reflecting the name of the Georgia city where it struck the Earth. The University of Georgia said the meteorite studied by Hariss and the team , was the the 27th meteorite recovered in the history of the state, and was among the sixth witnessed fall. 'This is something that used to be expected once every few decades and not multiple times within 20 years,' Harris said. 'Modern technology in addition to an attentive public is going to help us recover more and more meteorites.' Over the years, scientists have sought to understand the role of meteorites in the formation of the solar system. Earth formed roughly 4.5 billion years ago. In its infancy, it was bombarded by meteorites, comets, and other material from space. In June, the American Meteor Society received reports of a fireball that streaked across the southeastern U.S. sky in broad daylight. NASA confirmed that the meteor entered Earth's atmosphere during the Bootids meteor shower, a relatively minor celestial event occurring in the last week of June. Around the same time, a resident of Henry County, Georgia, reported that a rock, now identified as the McDonough Meteorite, crashed through their ceiling, according to the National Weather Service in Peachtree City. The object broke through the roof and ceiling before cracking the flooring inside the home. 'I suspect that he heard three simultaneous things. One was the collision with his roof, one was a tiny cone of a sonic boom and a third was it impacting the floor all in the same moment,' Harris said. 'There was enough energy when it hit the floor that it pulverized part of the material down to literal dust fragments.'
Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
NASA plans to build a nuclear reactor on the Moon – a space lawyer explains why, and what the law has to say
Mississippi, Aug 11 (The Conversation) The first space race was about flags and footprints. Now, decades later, landing on the Moon is old news. The new race is to build there, and doing so hinges on power. In April 2025, China reportedly unveiled plans to build a nuclear power plant on the Moon by 2035. This plant would support its planned international lunar research station. The United States countered in August, when acting NASA Administrator Sean Duffy reportedly suggested a US reactor would be operational on the Moon by 2030. While it might feel like a sudden sprint, this isn't exactly breaking news. NASA and the Department of Energy have spent years quietly developing small nuclear power systems to power lunar bases, mining operations and long-term habitats. As a space lawyer focused on long-term human advancement into space, I see this not as an arms race but as a strategic infrastructure race. And in this case, infrastructure is influence. A lunar nuclear reactor may sound dramatic, but its neither illegal nor unprecedented. If deployed responsibly, it could allow countries to peacefully explore the Moon, fuel their economic growth and test out technologies for deeper space missions. But building a reactor also raises critical questions about access and power. The legal framework already exists Nuclear power in space isn't a new idea. Since the 1960s, the US and the Soviet Union have relied on radioisotope generators that use small amounts of radioactive elements – a type of nuclear fuel – to power satellites, Mars rovers and the Voyager probes. The United Nations' 1992 Principles Relevant to the Use of Nuclear Power Sources in Outer Space, a nonbinding resolution, recognises that nuclear energy may be essential for missions where solar power is insufficient. This resolution sets guidelines for safety, transparency and international consultation. Nothing in international law prohibits the peaceful use of nuclear power on the Moon. But what matters is how countries deploy it. And the first country to succeed could shape the norms for expectations, behaviours and legal interpretations related to lunar presence and influence. The 1967 Outer Space Treaty, ratified by all major spacefaring nations including the US, China and Russia, governs space activity. Its Article IX requires that states act with 'due regard to the corresponding interests of all other States Parties.' That statement means if one country places a nuclear reactor on the Moon, others must navigate around it, legally and physically. In effect, it draws a line on the lunar map. If the reactor anchors a larger, long-term facility, it could quietly shape what countries do and how their moves are interpreted legally, on the Moon and beyond. Other articles in the Outer Space Treaty set similar boundaries on behaviour, even as they encourage cooperation. They affirm that all countries have the right to freely explore and access the Moon and other celestial bodies, but they explicitly prohibit territorial claims or assertions of sovereignty. At the same time, the treaty acknowledges that countries may establish installations such as bases — and with that, gain the power to limit access. While visits by other countries are encouraged as a transparency measure, they must be preceded by prior consultations. Effectively, this grants operators a degree of control over who can enter and when. Building infrastructure is not staking a territorial claim. No one can own the Moon, but one country setting up a reactor could shape where and how others operate – functionally, if not legally. Infrastructure is influence Building a nuclear reactor establishes a country's presence in a given area. This idea is especially important for resource-rich areas such as the lunar south pole, where ice found in perpetually shadowed craters could fuel rockets and sustain lunar bases. These sought-after regions are scientifically vital and geopolitically sensitive, as multiple countries want to build bases or conduct research there. Building infrastructure in these areas would cement a country's ability to access the resources there and potentially exclude others from doing the same. Critics may worry about radiation risks. Even if designed for peaceful use and contained properly, reactors introduce new environmental and operational hazards, particularly in a dangerous setting such as space. But the UN guidelines do outline rigorous safety protocols, and following them could potentially mitigate these concerns. Why nuclear? Because solar has limits The Moon has little atmosphere and experiences 14-day stretches of darkness. In some shadowed craters, where ice is likely to be found, sunlight never reaches the surface at all. These issues make solar energy unreliable, if not impossible, in some of the most critical regions. A small lunar reactor could operate continuously for a decade or more, powering habitats, rovers, 3D printers and life-support systems. Nuclear power could be the linchpin for long-term human activity. And it's not just about the Moon – developing this capability is essential for missions to Mars, where solar power is even more constrained. A call for governance, not alarm The United States has an opportunity to lead not just in technology but in governance. If it commits to sharing its plans publicly, following Article IX of the Outer Space Treaty and reaffirming a commitment to peaceful use and international participation, it will encourage other countries to do the same. The future of the Moon won't be determined by who plants the most flags. It will be determined by who builds what, and how. Nuclear power may be essential for that future. Building transparently and in line with international guidelines would allow countries to more safely realise that future. A reactor on the Moon isn't a territorial claim or a declaration of war. But it is infrastructure. And infrastructure will be how countries display power – of all kinds – in the next era of space exploration. (The Conversation) GRS GRS
Indian Express
3 hours ago
- Indian Express
NASA and Google develop an AI medical assistant to be used by astronauts on deep‑space missions
Google and NASA are working on a medical assistant powered by artificial intelligence that could be used for extended trips to the space, starting with its Artemis campaign to return to the moon. The Crew Medical Officer Digital Assistant (CMO‑DA) is powered by Google AI trained on spaceflight literature. It's designed to support a crew medical officer or flight surgeon in keeping the flight crew healthy. The AI medical assistant provides real‑time analysis of crew health and performance, enabling medical decisions driven by data and predictive analytics. Google said the AI assistant is being tested with simulated scenarios and evaluated using a clinical framework designed to assess the performance of medical students. The model performed well in early tests with a diagnostic accuracy of 88 per cent for the ankle injury case, 80 per cent for ear pain, and 74 per cent for flank pain, according to a TechCrunch report. 'Early results showed promise for reliable diagnoses based on reported symptoms,' the blog reads. 'Google and NASA are now collaborating with medical doctors to test and refine the model, aiming to enhance autonomous crew health and performance during future space exploration missions.' The project is being implemented under a fixed contract with Google Public Sector, which includes cloud computing, infrastructure for application development, and model training. NASA owns the source code of the application and the agency will participate in the finalisation of the models. Vertex AI provides access to both Google models and third-party solutions. NASA plans to gradually expand the system's capabilities. Future versions will incorporate real‑time data from onboard medical devices and learn to detect spaceflight‑specific health conditions such as the effects of microgravity on the human body. Google Cloud and @NASA have collaborated on a new AI-powered proof of concept tool to help astronauts autonomously diagnose and treat symptoms during deep space missions, a significant step that could also benefit remote medical care on Earth. — Thomas Kurian (@ThomasOrTK) August 7, 2025 Both NASA and NASA are now working with doctors to refine the model, with the goal of improve autonomous medical care for future missions to the moon, Mars and beyond. The technology could also help deliver quality medical care to people in remote parts on Earth. This isn't the first NASA project to incorporate artificial intelligence. Earlier this year, the space agency's Jet Propulsion Laboratory successfully tested a new AI system called Dynamic Targeting, which allows Earth‑observing satellites to autonomously decide where and where not to point their cameras in under 90 seconds, without human intervention. Developed over more than a decade, this technology mimics how a human might interpret imagery.
