Julius Yego believes 90m throws can be on the cards at NC Classic 2025
Two-time world champion Peters was ruled out of the World Athletics category A javelin event due to an ankle injury just a few days before the competition, with Poland's Cyprian Mrzyglod replacing him in the lineup.
Peters' withdrawal came just a day after India's Asian Games silver medallist Kishore Jena was ruled out of the competition due to an ankle injury. His fellow Indian javelin thrower Yash Vir Singh replaced Jena in the final entry list for the comprtition.
"It's a shame that Peters was not able to be here. He is a good friend of ours. We really wanted him to compete,' Yego told IANS. 'But then, you know, your health is very important, and I wish him a quick recovery so that he comes back stronger. We made this sport very interesting."
Despite Peters' absence, Yego remains upbeat about the competition's quality. "Those of us here are very good athletes. Thomas Rohler has thrown 90m, Neeraj has thrown 90m. The others too have thrown 84m or 85m. They can be able even to do 90m. Who knows, they can even do it tomorrow," he said.
Yego, who learned the fundamentals of javelin by watching YouTube videos and has been trailblazing javelin's rise in Africa, signed off by highlighting the larger purpose of the event which is to promote and popularise the javelin in India. 'It's all about enjoying the sport and making javelin more popular in India,' he said.
As a World Athletics-sanctioned Gold level meet, the Neeraj Chopra Classic 2025 becomes India's first-ever international javelin competition. The event is officially sanctioned by the Athletics Federation of India (AFI).
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Why it's Testing times for coach Gautam Gambhir and Team India
It seemed like the arc of a big-budget Bollywood drama: the arrival of a fiery new lead, an early rush of optimism, some swaggering victories, and then—just as the music swells—an abrupt turn into trouble. Gautam Gambhir's tenure as India's head coach has so far been part thriller, part family saga and part box-office the former opener took over from Rahul Dravid in July 2024, ahead of a white-ball tour of Sri Lanka, it was billed as a new era: intense, fearless and unflinchingly direct. Few, however, anticipated how quickly the romance of appointment would give way to the grind of responsibility. India won the T-20 series 3-0 in Sri Lanka but lost the ODIs there has been silverware—the Champions Trophy crown in February 2025 and an almost unblemished T20 record that includes clean sweeps against Sri Lanka and Bangladesh, besides beating South Africa 3-1 in November 2024 and England 4-1 in January-February this year. But Test cricket—that old, unsparing critic—has been far less Gambhir took charge, India have played 11 Tests: won three, lost seven and drawn one. The win percentage—just 27.3 per cent—is unsettling by Indian standards. The contrast between formats couldn't be starker: in white-ball cricket, India have thrived. In the longest form, they've stumbled, often spectacularly. But as in any great script, the coach is not the only character in this unfolding drama. The supporting cast has fumbled its lines too—dropped catches, misfiring bowlers, fragile middle orders. Gambhir's role is under scrutiny, yes. But so is the very fabric of India's Test would be safe to surmise that Gambhir's apprenticeship as India's head coach is now firmly behind him. When the former opener succeeded Rahul Dravid in July 2024, ahead of a white-ball tour of Sri Lanka, few could have anticipated how quickly the romance of appointment would give way to the reality of pressure. But in cricket, as in life, the longer format remains the true crucible. And there, the figures are far less LITMUS TESTIndia's Test troubles began last year at home—ironically, their fortress. In a rain-curtailed match in Bengaluru against New Zealand, Rohit Sharma opted to bat first on a damp surface. India were skittled for 46, their lowest-ever home total. What could have been dismissed as a freak collapse turned into a pattern as India went on to lose 0-3 to the visiting Kiwis, the spinners feasting on frail techniques and poor whitewash inflicted by New Zealand stripped much of the sheen from India's 2-0 Test series victory over Bangladesh in September 2024—a series where the opposition offered little resistance. Then came the marquee tour of Australia, stretching from November to January. A famous 295-run triumph in Perth briefly rekindled hope, but it was swiftly extinguished by three sobering vulnerabilities were laid bare by their second-innings batting collapses: 175 in Adelaide (a 10-wicket loss), 8 without loss in Brisbane (match drawn), 155 in Melbourne (a 184-run defeat), and 157 in Sydney (defeated by six wickets). Such performances with the bat simply do not win you Test in the very Perth Test they won, India had been bowled out for just 150 in the first innings. Yet they rallied spectacularly in the second, declaring at 487 for 6—a commanding total that piled pressure on Australia and paved the way for a memorable came June 2025—and with it, England. In Leeds, India walked into Headingley in the throes of transition: no Rohit Sharma, no Virat Kohli, no R. Ashwin. This, for all intents and purposes, was Gambhir's India—a fledgling side led by Shubman Gill, flanked by the youthful promise of Yashasvi Jaiswal, Sai Sudharsan and Rishabh Pant. The result? Another defeat. But this one was as humbling as it was a seaming Headingley pitch, India's batting order once again unravelled—not so much from lack of ability as from an alarming absence of application. Despite producing five centuries across the match, the side's brittle underbelly was ruthlessly exposed. In the first innings, only five batters reached double figures; of the remaining six, three were dismissed for second innings echoed the same dysfunction: three ducks, three others scoring 4, 4 and 8, with just five again crossing into double digits. The five centuries—so valuable in isolation—were effectively nullified by the anaemia of the rest. And yet, the blame cannot rest solely with the coach Gambhir, for all his vaunted cricketing intelligence and warrior's mindset, must shoulder a measure of responsibility. His combative persona may have set the press gallery alight, but his strategic imprint on this Test side remains elusive. The batting group, in particular, has displayed no coherent plan against lateral movement—a curious blind spot in a country where the ball is known to speak from the first session to the makes it more confounding is that Gambhir's own playing career was built on grit and adaptability, especially in challenging overseas conditions. His teams, thus far, have shown worryingly little of GAME, BIG PICTUREBut here's the inconvenient truth: a coach is only as good as his players. And cricket, most cruelly in Tests, offers no hiding place for errors that unfold over five that first Test against England, one top-order batter played across the line, gifting his wicket cheaply. A slip fielder shelled a regulation catch. A star bowler—expected to lead the attack—failed to take a single second-innings wicket. Gambhir could do little. In such a scenario, India were always destined to lose. It was not strategy that failed, but said, the coach is not blameless. Selection calls, rotation management, field settings and the overall tactical narrative remain squarely his remit. Why persist with some bowlers in conditions unsuited to them? Why the hesitation to groom a left-arm spinner when most of India's defeats have come without them? And why this inconsistency in trusting youth, one match too soon or one series too late?Gambhir's supporters argue he is still early into the job. His critics wonder aloud whether the learning curve, given the stakes, can afford to be so Gambhir was never expected to be Dravid. His appointment wasn't about calm stewardship—it was about changing gears. If Dravid was 'The Wall', Gambhir was brought in to rattle it, to infuse aggression, self-belief and a harder edge. That philosophy has, to some extent, delivered dividends in white-ball cricket. But Test cricket, with its long shadows and slower reckonings, demands more than passion. It demands patience, systems and the quiet, meticulous art of Gambhir must now decide is whether he is content to be a man of mood and momentum—or if he can become a craftsman of the format that still defines cricket's highest to India Today Magazine- EndsMust Watch
News18
an hour ago
- News18
Denying Visas To Athletes On Political Grounds Violates Olympic Charter, May Risk Future Hosting Rights
Sources in the sports ministry said that the Olympic Charter states that every individual must have access to the practice of sport without discrimination of any kind, in line with internationally recognised human rights. Non-Discrimination Principle The Charter prohibits discrimination based on nationality, ensuring all qualified athletes can participate in international competitions, regardless of political relations between countries. Political Neutrality of Sport The Olympic Movement emphasises autonomy and independence from political interference. Denying visas on political grounds violates this principle. Impact on Future Hosting Rights International Precedent There are many precedents of IOC sanctions on India. India denied visas to athletes from Kosovo in 2018 for participation in the World Boxing Championship 2018. India denied visas to 2 athletes and one official from Pakistan for participation in the ISSF Rifle/Pistol World Cup in 2019. The International Olympic Committee, in its letter on 21.2.2019, informed that its Executive Board took the following decisions: (i) Suspend all discussions with the Indian NOC and government regarding potential applications for hosting future events and Olympic-related events in India until clear written guarantees are obtained from the Indian government to ensure the entry of all participants in events in full compliance with the rules of the Olympic Charter. (ii) Revoke the Olympic qualification status of the specific event (men's 25-metre Rapid Fire Pistol) (iii) Recommend that international federations neither award nor hold sports events in India until guarantees are obtained. There are a few international precedents as well. In the 2019 World Para Swimming Championships, Malaysia denied visas to Israeli athletes. The IPC stripped Malaysia of hosting rights, reinforcing the expectation that hosts must allow entry to all qualified athletes. The event was moved to London, and the IPC reaffirmed its commitment to inclusivity and the separation of sport and politics The United Arab Emirates in 2009 denied a visa to Israeli tennis player Shahar Pe'er in the Dubai Tennis Championships. The WTA fined Dubai organisers and required future compliance. The following year, visas were granted after international pressure. India at the 2019 ISSF World Cup denied visas to Pakistani shooters post-Pulwama attack. The IOC suspended India's right to host Olympic qualifiers until assurances were given for future non-discrimination.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
'I wouldn't pick this gentleman': Ex-England captain slams Prasidh Krishna after another disappointing performance for India
On a day when Indian pacers, Mohammed Siraj and Akash Deep, went all over on England, Prasidh Krishna had a day to forget. Noting his performance, a former England captain has given a harsh verdict on Prasidh. read more Mohammed Siraj and Akash Deep emerged as the heroes for Team India on Day 3 of the Edgbaston Test against England. The duo picked up the entire English lineup- Siraj took 6 wickets and Akash Deep snared 4 dismissals. While Siraj and Akash prevailed in attaining purchase from the surface, it was a different scenario for the third bowler of the Indian pace battery. Prisidh Krishna went wicketless and was hammered by Jamie Smith and Harry Brook intermittently. He was given only 13 overs to bowl and in it, he conceded 73 runs, which can be adjudged quite expensive in the world of Test cricket. Krishna had a forgetful outing in the Oval Test as well, and after yet another flop show experts are losing patience on him. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Also Read | Harry Brook and Jamie Smith smash records as England mount thrilling comeback against India at Edgbaston Michael Atherton goes harsh on Prasidh Krishna Former England captain Michael Atherton showcased his angst with Shubman Gill and Gautam Gambhir over the selection of Prisidh Krishna. Atherton did not mince any words and went harsh by stating that if he were at the place of Shubman Gill then he would not have picked Krishna, but rather entrusted Kuldeep Yadav to do the job for him. 'I wouldn't pick this gentleman, Prasidh Krishna. I would have picked Kuldeep Yadav,' said Atherton in commentary when Krishna was being hammered all over the ground by Smith and Brook. While Prasidh Krishna has had a dry run till now in the series, there is still time left for him to overturn the tide. However, he would have to perform in the second innings and justify his selection in the team. India gain massive advantage over England on Day 3 Having posted a massive total of 587 on the board, Team India endured the batting heroics of Harry Brook and Jamie Smith, and still managed to bundle out England at the score of 407. A lead of 180 has been garnered, which took the shape of 244 at stumps, following a positive display of batting by Yashasvi Jaiswal and KL Rahul. Day 4 will be crucial and could reveal the winner. India will start the Day 4 proceedings at 64/1.
