logo
Italian citizenship referendum polarises country

Italian citizenship referendum polarises country

Yahoo4 hours ago

Sonny Olumati was born in Rome and has lived in Italy all his life but the country he calls home does not recognise him as its own.
To Italy, Sonny is Nigerian, like his passport, and the 39-year-old is only welcome as long as his latest residence permit.
"I've been born here. I will live here. I will die here," the dancer and activist tells me in what he calls "macaroni" Italian-English beneath the palm trees of a scruffy Roman park.
"But not having citizenship is like... being rejected from your country. And I don't think this is a feeling we should have".
That is why Sonny and others have been campaigning for a "Yes" vote in a national referendum on Sunday and Monday that proposes halving the time required to apply for Italian citizenship.
Cutting the wait from 10 years to five would bring this country in line with most others in Europe.
Giorgia Meloni, Italy's hard-right prime minister, has announced she will boycott the vote, declaring the citizenship law already "excellent" and "very open".
Other parties allied to her are calling on Italians to go to the beach instead of the polling station.
Sonny will not be taking part either. Without citizenship, he is not entitled to vote.
The question of who gets to be Italian is a sensitive one.
Large numbers of migrants and refugees arrive in the country each year helped across the Mediterranean from North Africa by smuggling gangs.
Meloni's populist government has made a big deal about cutting the number of arrivals.
But this referendum is aimed at those who have travelled legally for work to a country with a rapidly shrinking and ageing population.
The aim is limited: to speed up the process for getting citizenship, not ease the strict criteria.
"Knowledge of the Italian language, not having criminal charges, continuous residence et cetera - all the various requirements remain the same," explains Carla Taibi of the liberal party More Europe, one of several backers of the referendum.
The reform would affect long-term foreign residents already employed in Italy: from those on factory production lines in the north to those caring for pensioners in plush Rome neighbourhoods.
Their children aged under 18 would also be naturalised.
Up to 1.4 million people could qualify for citizenship immediately, with some estimates ranging higher.
"These people live in Italy, study and work and contribute. This is about changing the perception of them so they are not strangers anymore - but Italian," argues Taibi.
The reform would also have practical implications.
As a non-Italian, Sonny cannot apply for a public sector job, and even struggled to get a driving license.
When he was booked for hit reality TV show Fame Island last year, he ended up arriving two weeks late on set in Honduras because he had had so many problems getting the right paperwork.
For a long time, Meloni ignored the referendum entirely.
Italy's publicly owned media, run by a close Meloni ally, have also paid scant attention to the vote.
There is no substantive "No" campaign, making it hard to have a balanced debate.
But the real reason appears strategic: for a referendum to be valid, more than half of all voters need to turn out.
"They don't want to raise awareness of the significance of the referendum," Professor Roberto D'Alimonte of Luis University in Rome explains. "That's rational, to make sure that the 50% threshold won't be reached."
The prime minister eventually announced she would turn up at a polling station "to show respect for the ballot box" - but refuse to cast a vote.
"When you disagree, you also have the option of abstaining," Meloni told a TV chat show this week, after critics accused her of disrespecting democracy.
Italy's citizenship system was "excellent", she argued, already granting citizenship to more foreign nationals than most countries in Europe: 217,000 last year, according to the national statistics agency, Istat.
But about 30,000 of those were Argentines with Italian ancestry on the other side of the world, unlikely even to visit.
Meanwhile, Meloni's coalition partner, Roberto Vannacci of the far-right League, accused those behind the referendum of "selling off our citizenship and erasing our identity".
I ask Sonny why he thinks his own application for citizenship has taken over two decades.
"It's racism," he replies immediately.
At one point his file was lost completely, and he has now been told his case is "pending".
"We have ministers who talk about white supremacy - racial replacement of Italy," the activist recalls a 2023 comment by the agriculture minister from Meloni's own party.
"They don't want black immigration and we know it. I was born here 39 years ago so I know what I say."
It is an accusation the prime minister has denied repeatedly.
Insaf Dimassi defines herself as "Italian without citizenship".
"Italy let me grow up and become the person I am today, so not being seen as a citizen is extremely painful and frustrating," she explains from the northern city of Bologna where she is studying for a PhD.
Insaf's father travelled to Italy for work when she was a baby, and she and her mother then joined him. Her parents finally got Italian citizenship 20 days after Insaf turned 18. That meant she had to apply for herself from scratch, including proving a steady income.
Insaf chose to study instead.
"I arrived here at nine months old, and maybe at 33 or 34 - if all goes well - I can finally be an Italian citizen," she says, exasperated.
She remembers exactly when the significance of her "outsider" status hit home: it was when she was asked to run for election alongside a candidate for mayor in her hometown.
When she shared the news with her parents, full of excitement, they had to remind her she was not Italian and was not eligible.
"They say it's a matter of meritocracy to be a citizen, that you have to earn it. But more than being myself, what do I have to demonstrate?" Insaf wants to know.
"Not being allowed to vote, or be represented, is being invisible."
On the eve of the referendum, students in Rome wrote a call to the polls on the cobbles of a city square.
"Vote 'YES' on the 8th and 9th [of June]," they spelled out in giant cardboard letters.
With a government boycott and such meagre publicity, the chances of hitting the 50% turnout threshold seem slim.
But Sonny argues that this vote is just the beginning.
"Even if they vote 'No', we will stay here - and think about the next step," he says. "We have to start to talk about the place of our community in this country."
Additional reporting by Giulia Tommasi
Italy tightens rules for Italian descendants to become citizens
Italy faces big setback over migrant camps in Albania

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Jamestown Public Schools won't hold special election for referendum
Jamestown Public Schools won't hold special election for referendum

Yahoo

time44 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Jamestown Public Schools won't hold special election for referendum

Jun. 7—JAMESTOWN — The Jamestown Public School District will not hold a special election for a referendum to build a new elementary school that addresses declining future enrollment and facility needs. Superintendent Rob Lech said at a special meeting of the Jamestown Public School Board on Thursday, June 5, that results of a community-wide survey show that it is not the right time to make a request for a referendum. "We have reached out to the community and said, 'We want your feedback,'" he said. "I think it's important that we listen to what that feedback was." School Board President Heidi Larson said Thursday was the last day the school board could call for a special election before a state law goes into effect on Aug. 1 that requires votes on referendums to be held at either a primary or general election. "We either had to move forward before August 1 or at a primary or a general election," Lech said. A community survey was conducted this spring to help guide the school board in determining future actions. The survey gathered feedback on the school district's two options for a potential referendum to build a new elementary school at the Washington Elementary School site. Washington Elementary School officially closed in May. Beginning in the 2025-26 school year, the school district will operate four elementary schools with seven elementary classrooms of each grade level for K-5. If the school district continued to operate five elementary schools, the general fund would have been projected to dry up by the 2029-30 school year, The Jamestown Sun reported in September. With the district already capped for its general fund levy, the cost to operate the same facilities and staff as the 2023-24 school year would result in a complete loss of the general fund balance by the 2029-30 school year. Closing Washington saves the school district $1.3 million in annual operating costs. The school board approved on March 3 a new boundary system for the elementary schools. The plan expands the Lincoln Elementary School boundary to the west into the current Washington boundary, Louis L'Amour expands to the north into the current Lincoln boundary south of the railroad, and Roosevelt Elementary expands to the west into the Lincoln boundary south of the railroad to the James River. In the future, the school board could bring a referendum forward for a new elementary school to address declining future enrollment and facility needs. The referendum options are: * Option one: Close Lincoln Elementary School and build a new elementary school on the Washington school site for Lincoln students within the new boundaries. The estimated cost is $23 million to build the elementary school with two classrooms for each grade in K-5. * Option two: Close Lincoln and Louis L'Amour elementary schools and build a new elementary school on the Washington school site large enough to serve students and staff from the two schools. The estimated cost is $29 million to build the elementary school with three classrooms for each grade in K-5. If the school board decides to move forward with either option, 60% voter approval would be required. City and rural residents in the school district would be eligible to vote. For option one, the estimated property tax increase would be $87 per year for a house with a market value of $100,000, $97 per year for commercial property, 98 cents per year for each cropland acre and 20 cents per year for each noncropland acre. For option two, the estimated property tax increase would be $110 per year for a house with a market value of $100,000, $122 per year for commercial property, $1.24 per year for each cropland acre and 25 cents per year for each noncropland acre. The school district worked with School Perceptions to conduct the survey that received 1,173 respondents, or a 14.1% response rate, with a plus or minus 2.92% statistical margin of error. School Perceptions helps educational leaders gather, organize and use data to make strategic decisions, according to its website. The survey results show 81% of JPS staff, 51% of parents with a student enrolled in the school district and 44% of nonparents/nonstaff would support a plan to replace one or more of the remaining elementary schools with a new facility. Daren Sievers, project manager at School Perceptions, said survey respondents were asked which option for a referendum they would support. Survey results show 26% of JPS staff, 19% of parents with a student enrolled in the district and 20% of nonparents/nonstaff would support only option one. Survey results show 12% of JPS staff, 9% of parents and 8% of nonparents/nonstaff would only support option two. Survey results also show 42% of JPS staff, 29% of parents and 22% of nonparents/staff would support either option. Sievers said School Perceptions added the results for the support of either option to the results of supporting options one or two. The survey results then show 68% of JPS staff, 48% of parents and 42% of nonparents/nonstaff would support option one, and 54% of JPS staff, 38% of parents and 30% of nonparents/nonstaff would support option two. Sievers said School Perceptions took into account that 20% of parents and 80% of nonparents/nonstaff would cast a ballot. With that weighted representation, survey results show 43.2% of parents and nonparents/nonstaff would "definitely" or "probably" support a bond referendum for option one, and 31.6% of parents and nonparents/nonstaff would "definitely" or "probably" support a referendum for option two. Each result has a plus or minus 2.92% statistical margin of error. School board member Aaron Roberts said the board should see analysis on comments from survey respondents. He said the comments would help the school board understand what issues need to be addressed moving forward. School board member Jason Rohr said survey results also show areas that the school district can improve its communication on. Survey respondents were asked how the school district is doing in four areas — delivering high-quality education, keeping the public informed, managing funds appropriately and building pride in the community. Survey results show about 68% of respondents chose "great" or "good" for delivering high-quality education, 54% chose "great" or "good" for keeping the public informed, 45% chose "great" or "good" for managing funds appropriately and 56% chose "great" or "good" for building pride in the community. Larson said the survey results will be referred to the facilities committee and the school board could hold a retreat later to discuss the school district's next steps.

Andrew Malkinson ‘not finished' fighting for reform after wrongful conviction
Andrew Malkinson ‘not finished' fighting for reform after wrongful conviction

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Andrew Malkinson ‘not finished' fighting for reform after wrongful conviction

Andrew Malkinson, who spent 17 years in prison for a rape he did not commit, says his fight to reform the legal system's handling of miscarriages of justice is far from over. The 59-year-old had his conviction overturned in 2023 after years protesting his innocence. Mr Malkinson, who told The Sunday Times his 'life was desolated' by the wrongful conviction, says he is determined to change the justice system, starting with the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC). 'I haven't finished. I want to change a lot more,' he said. 'It's a good feeling that something so dreadful and tragic is leading to real change.' It comes amid news Dame Vera Baird KC will become the interim chairwoman of the CCRC. The barrister will take up the post from June 9 until December 8 next year, and is tasked with carrying out an urgent review into the running of the independent body and making sure lessons have been learnt from previous cases. Mr Malkinson said he remained 'incandescent' at the CCRC, as well as the Government's compensation scheme, which makes it difficult for wrongly-convicted people to receive payouts. 'This is an assault on innocent people,' he said. 'It's an assault on the public, because any member of the public could end up where I was. Anybody could be the next victim, because there will be more.' Despite having his conviction quashed in 2023, he had to wait until February to get his first compensation payment. Mr Malkinson had been living on benefits and food banks from his release until then. Under the 2014 Antisocial Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act, payments are only awarded to people who can prove innocence beyond a reasonable doubt. Ministry of Justice data showed that only 6.5% of people who had applied for compensation due to a miscarriage of justice between April 2016 and March 2024 were awarded payouts. Of 591 people who applied, 39 were granted compensation. Figures showed that 35 have since received money, with average amounts totalling £68,000. In a statement in February, lawyer Toby Wilton welcomed the payment, but said the £1 million cap on compensation payouts should be lifted. This is currently the maximum amount that can be paid to victims of miscarriages of justice who are wrongly jailed for at least 10 years. 'The Government should lift the current cap on compensation, and end the twisted quirk that whilst awards under other compensation schemes are excluded from assessment for benefits,' he said.

Italy holds referendum on citizenship, workers' rights
Italy holds referendum on citizenship, workers' rights

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Italy holds referendum on citizenship, workers' rights

Italians vote on Sunday and Monday in a referendum on easing citizenship rules and strengthening labour laws, with Giorgia Meloni's government opposing both changes and urging people to abstain. A non-EU adult resident without marriage or blood ties to Italy must currently live in the country for 10 years before they can apply for citizenship -- a process which can then take years. The referendum proposal, triggered by a grassroots campaign led by NGOs, would cut this to five years, putting Italy in line with Germany and France. Campaigners say around 2.5 million people could benefit from the reform, which is being backed by the centre-left Democratic Party. Meloni, whose far-right Brothers of Italy party has prioritised cutting illegal immigration even while increasing the number of legal work visas for migrants, is strongly against it. She said Thursday that the current system "is an excellent law, among the most open, in the sense that we have for years been among the European nations that grant the highest number of citizenships each year". More than 213,500 people acquired Italian citizenship in 2023, double the number in 2020 and one fifth of the European Union total, according to EU statistics. More than 90 percent were from outside the bloc, mostly from Albania and Morocco, as well as Argentina and Brazil -- two countries with large Italian immigrant communities. Ministers agreed in March to restrict the rights to citizenship of those with blood ties to Italy from four to two generations. Meloni and her coalition partners have encouraged voters to boycott the referendum, which will only be valid if 50 percent of eligible voters plus one participate. Even if it passes, the reform will not affect the migration law many consider the most unfair, that children born in Italy to foreign parents cannot request nationality until they reach 18. Prominent rapper Ghali, who was born in Milan to Tunisian parents, has been an outspoken advocate changing the law for children, but nevertheless urged fans to back Sunday's vote as a step in the right direction. "With a 'Yes' we ask that five years of life here are enough, not 10, to be part of this country," he wrote on Instagram. - Interests of workers - Under Italy's constitution, a referendum can be triggered by a petition signed by at least 500,000 voters. This week's ballot includes one question on citizenship and four others on increasing protections for workers who are dismissed, in precarious situations or involved in workplace accidents. The changes are being pushed by the left-wing CGIL trade union. "We want to reverse a culture that has prioritised the interests of business over those of workers," CGIL general secretary Maurizio Landini told AFP. The Democratic Party is also backing the proposals -- even if it introduced some of the laws the CGIL wants to repeal while in office in the past. The proposals are notably aimed at measures of the so-called Jobs Act, passed a decade ago by the government of the Democratic Party prime minister, Matteo Renzi, in order to liberalise the labour market. Supporters say the act boosted employment but detractors say it made work more precarious. Under new leadership, the Democratic Party -- which is polling at around 23 percent, behind Meloni's Brothers of Italy at about 30 percent, according to an SWG survey this week -- is seeking to woo working-class voters by backing the referendum reform. str-ar/ide/ams/djt/dhw

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store