logo
Maine mobile home owners are pushing back against private investors

Maine mobile home owners are pushing back against private investors

Yahoo23-03-2025
Mar. 23—For four years, residents of Bowdoin's Mountain View Estates mobile home park have approached Aug. 1 with a mounting sense of dread.
It's the day they find out how much they'll have to pay to rent the land their homes sit on and, for many residents already struggling to make ends meet, even a small increase can become a hardship.
The 53-home park has withstood four years of consecutive rent hikes since it was purchased by a New York real estate firm in 2021. The first three weren't major, just $35 a month. But last year, the $75 jump was harder to swallow.
As another Aug. 1 approaches, a growing unease has permeated the park.
"These people are just hurting ... we're all scared," said Jerry Highfill, 79, who has lived in the park since 2001. "They're just increasing their income at the poor people's expense. There ain't nobody living in a mobile home park that's wealthy."
Mobile home parks in Maine and across the county are increasingly being purchased by out-of-state investors that then raise the monthly lot rents, sometimes by as much as twice or even three times the price, according to national data.
Homeowners like Highfill are left with few options.
But several bills in the Legislature are working to get ahead of the problem and help communities purchase their parks before investors can. So far, two communities have successfully purchased their parks, and another is under contract. But more than twice as many have tried and failed. For communities that aren't able to buy, lawmakers and residents are trying to institute rent control to try to protect what many see as one of the last true forms of affordable housing.
When Highfill first moved in, the monthly lot rate on his $27,000 mobile home was $265.
Over the next 20 years, he saw his monthly rate increase by just $80.
But in the four years since Philips International took over, his monthly rent has jumped $180, an increase of 52%. Philips International did not respond to questions about the rent increases.
Highfill pays $525 a month, but new residents are paying closer to $700.
"In reality, the last affordable housing in Maine that a young family or retirees can get into is going to become a memory," he said.
'TENANTS ARE ALMOST CAPTIVE'
During the pandemic, when housing prices began to rise, capital equity firms that had long invested in strip malls or multiunit housing started eyeing mobile home parks. Since people own their homes and rent the lots, the parks made an attractive investment — as landlords, they're not on the hook if a refrigerator breaks.
Around the country, investors began snapping up mobile home parks, increasing the rents and then sitting back and collecting profits.
"Capital equity players started recognizing these types of investments as quite lucrative," said Pat Schwebler, co-director of the Cooperative Development Institute's New England Resident-Owned Community Program. The organization assists manufactured housing communities looking to purchase their parks and provides ongoing support after the purchase.
In 2020 and 2021, institutional investors accounted for 23% of national manufactured home purchases, up from 13% between 2017 and 2019, according to a joint project between the nonprofit Private Equity Stakeholder Project and Manufactured Housing Action, an organization of homeowners.
Meanwhile, "Maine became the best thing since sliced bread," Schwebler said.
People and investors alike flocked to the state.
Prices on any type of housing skyrocketed, causing some people to seek out mobile home parks and leaving many longtime residents with few options other than to stay put.
"Mobile" home is a bit of a misnomer. Moving a manufactured home is complicated and expensive. If a homeowner could even find another park to take them, it would still cost at least $10,000 to move.
"For most folks, that's not very doable ... it would take a lot for them to actually pick up their unit and move," she said. "The tenants are almost captive."
Investors know this, she said, making their acquisition all the more enticing.
There's a startling lack of statewide data surrounding mobile homes.
According to the Maine Manufactured Housing Board, there are 468 active licensed parks in Maine, but it's unknown how many lots or residents there are, what the median lot rent is, or what share of the communities are owned by out-of-state corporations, though the Bangor Daily News estimates it could be as high as 20%.
In 2019, the median home sale price in Maine was $225,000. Five years later, it was more than $390,000.
Mobile home-specific sales data has been harder to come by. Manufactured homes are categorized as personal property, so park sales are not tracked by the Maine Association of Realtors. But prices have increased along with other types of housing.
Manufactured home prices on Zillow vary, but most well-maintained homes are priced above $100,000. A new home in Kittery's Yankee Settlement park is listed for $389,000 with a monthly lot fee of $685. One 2005 double-wide in Saco's Blue Haven Mobile Home Park is listed for $241,000. The lot rent or "HOA fee" is $750.
LAWMAKERS TAKE NOTICE
"People living in mobile home communities are unique in the sense that they own their home, but not the land on which it sits, so it presents a really difficult dilemma when the land sells, oftentimes to a person who is intent on using it as an investment," said Erik Jorgensen, senior director of government for MaineHousing.
So the question becomes, "how do we go in and dis-incentivize investor purchases and find different ways of preserving affordability for this population?" he said.
That's a question state lawmakers have been trying to tackle.
In 2023, the Legislature passed a law that requires park owners to give residents at least 60 days' notice if they plan to sell, giving the community members the chance to purchase it themselves. The park owner isn't required to accept the offer, but must negotiate "in good faith."
Last year, the governor and Maine State Housing Authority created the Manufactured and Mobile Home Park Preservation and Assistance Program — a $5 million fund to help residents purchase their parks. But the money is dwindling.
Gov. Janet Mills has earmarked an additional $3 million in the budget, and a bill proposed by Sen. Joe Baldacci, D-Penobscot, would infuse another $3.5 million.
At least four other bills this session aim to further preserve one of the last vestiges of affordable housing.
Sen. Cameron Reny, D-Bristol, has proposed two bills — one would create a tax exemption up to $750,000 to incentivize the sale or transfer of housing developments, housing parks or apartment complexes to resident-owned communities or cooperative affordable housing corporations.
"This gives residents a leg up when they try to buy their homes, which is increasingly difficult these days," she said while presenting the bill, which on Wednesday unanimously passed the committee that oversees taxation.
The second would attach a $50,000 per-lot fee to the purchase of a manufactured housing community on top of the purchase price, to be paid to MaineHousing. Resident-owned co-ops or affordable housing groups would be exempt from the fee.
Schwebler, at the Cooperative Development Institute, said lot rents in community-owned parks are "extraordinarily low" and are often only raised to fund major park improvements.
"Until the housing is secured as resident-owned, you have no guarantee it's going to be affordable," she said.
Rep. Cheryl Golek, D-Harpswell, and Rep. Cassie Julia, D-Waterville, have both put forward bills to cap the allowed annual rent increases for mobile homeowners.
None of these bills is the perfect solution, Jorgensen said, but together they provide "a box of tools that might be useful."
WINS AND LOSSES
In 2019, the residents of two communities in Camden and Arundel purchased their parks, bringing the number of resident-owned communities in Maine up to 10. But then things were silent for almost five years.
Schwebler credits the 2023 law for the recent surge in energy around resident-owned communities.
"Before, these residents didn't even stand a chance and now they do," she said.
In October 2024, the Blueberry Fields Cooperative closed on the Linnhaven Mobile Home Park in Brunswick for $26.3 million. The 278-home community became the first to purchase its park under the new law.
Last month, Cedar Falls Mobile Home Park in Bangor followed suit, closing on the 130-home park for $8 million.
And in Monmouth, residents are under contract to purchase the 42-home West Village park for $1.8 million. They expect to close in May.
All told, that's 450 units that will be preserved as affordable housing, Schwebler said. That number could increase to as many as 600 if the Brunswick and Bangor parks follow up on existing infill opportunities.
Financing can be a challenge for the park, but assistance from the Cooperative Development Institute, as well as funding from MaineHousing, the Genesis Fund and sometimes the parks' municipalities, can help push efforts over the line.
Jorgensen, at MaineHousing, noted that even with assistance, it's still a business deal. The park is real estate, and real estate is expensive. Rents will have to increase.
"The goal is to make that as tolerable as possible," he said.
In Brunswick, for example, residents were initially facing a nearly $275 increase, but additional funding from MaineHousing helped bring that down to $100, which will remain in place for three years.
Jorgensen said that the success of the Blueberry Fields Cooperative was "catalytic" for many of the proposed bills. But so were some notable losses.
While three parks have been successful, more than twice as many have failed.
Schwebler said that since 2023, eight communities have tried to buy their parks but had their offers ultimately rejected.
A year ago, two parks in Old Orchard Beach — Old Orchard Village and Atlantic Village — put forward a $40.5 million bid for their parks, which were owned by the same company. Ultimately, the owners, who feared the cooperative wouldn't be able to come up with the money, chose to go with Follett USA, a California real estate firm.
Following their defeat, the residents instead lobbied to pass a rent control ordinance that capped annual rent increases at 5%. Old Orchard Beach voters approved the change in November.
For communities that haven't been successful, or whose parks have already sold or are unlikely to be sold any time soon, rent control is the only hope for protection against constant increases.
There's currently an effort to pass rent control in Standish, and one in Bowdoin was just struck down.
Copy the Story Link
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mayor Eric Adams deserves credit for his stunning housing wins
Mayor Eric Adams deserves credit for his stunning housing wins

New York Post

time5 hours ago

  • New York Post

Mayor Eric Adams deserves credit for his stunning housing wins

It's odd how little credit Mayor Eric Adams gets for his relentless, steady and successful drive to get more housing, including more affordable homes, built in New York City. In under four years, he's arguably done more than his predecessors achieved in the previous two decades, winning changes that will make a huge difference in the long term rather than offering empty promises of instant miracles. The latest: The City Council just OK'd Adams' plan to rezone Midtown South, opening the door for nearly 10,000 new housing units, 2,800 of them affordable, in an area that was largely zoned for (outdated) industrial uses. Advertisement Some of those units will come from converting commercial space to residential, an obvious next step for older, vacant office buildings. All told, Adams' rezoning push starting in 2021 has cleared the way for 100,000 new units to be built across the city, with 30,000 more on the way if the City Council approves his plans for Jamaica and Long Island City. Advertisement That's more housing gained via zoning changes than added in the Bloomberg and de Blasio years combined. Another unheralded gain, from years of steady effort and deft alliances: getting the Legislature to lift the floor-area-ratio cap of 12, which arbitrarily restricted the height of residential buildings. Between the mayor's massive City of Yes package, which the council approved last year, and other efforts, including the preservation of about 134,700 existing units, City Hall counts the number of units added to or kept in the Big Apple's housing supply under Adams at about 426,000. Yes, that includes the totals from proposals that still need to go through the approval process — and a good chunk, like those enabled through rezoning, won't be fully realized for years. Advertisement It doesn't help when lefty ideologues sabotage projects like the Brooklyn Marine Terminal, which would offer 6,000 new units, because they'd rather have no new housing than let any market-rate apartments get built on public land. But the mayor's full-court press means he's already changed the city's long-term housing landscape for the better even if some plans fall through — and he could do even more in a second term. We know: 'Methodical' doesn't match the Adams' image, but perhaps that's because so little of the local media pays attention to day-in-day-out reality; it's so much easier to fawn over, say, Zohran Mamdani's flashy promises to freeze rents. Advertisement Even though the mayor's strategy, unlike Mamdani's, works. Freezing rent on rent-regulated apartments would force more landlords to abandon their buildings altogether or allow units to fall into disrepair, making the city's housing situation worse. Meanwhile, Adams is dramatically boosting supply, which will organically push rents lower over time. In a city where hysterically anti-development progressives constantly do their best to thwart common-sense housing fixes, Adams' success in ushering in lasting change is stunning. And though the fruits of his labor will take time to fully appear, generations of New Yorkers will benefit. As the mayoral race exits the summer 'silly season,' perhaps voters will start to realize who's actually delivering the housing solutions New York needs.

Letters to the Editor: Is anyone surprised that oil refineries are leaving California?
Letters to the Editor: Is anyone surprised that oil refineries are leaving California?

Los Angeles Times

time3 days ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Letters to the Editor: Is anyone surprised that oil refineries are leaving California?

To the editor: With regard to your article ('Newsom's push to reduce fossil fuels is clashing with California's thirst for gasoline,' Aug. 11), why are Gov. Gavin Newsom and Democratic members of the state Legislature surprised? The Legislature passes bills that primarily are intended to score points and do more to harass oil companies than they do to reduce air pollution. Newsom applauds these political bills and urges them to pass more. Many years ago, Democrats in the Legislature pretended to be petroleum engineers and designed a funky political kind of gasoline not used by the other 49 states. This political gasoline is the only kind allowed to be sold in California. It is more costly to make and can only be made by oil refineries modified at great expense. When oil companies charge more for this extra-cost gasoline, Newsom accuses them of price gouging. If California cannot find oil refiners outside the U.S. who are willing to modify their refineries to make 'California-only' gasoline, and who are willing to put up with the state government's false acquisitions and harassment, some owners of gasoline-powered cars will have to relearn their childhood skills at riding bicycles. Gordon Binder, Pasadena ... To the editor: All this Sturm und Drang over the closing of two refineries in California is misplaced. Any serious study of market trends would conclude that the end of internal combustion will be as soon as 2035, a mere decade from now. Instead of telling readers that a reduction in oil refining is going to cause price increases because of a scarcity of gasoline, point them in the direction of getting off of gas entirely by switching to an electric vehicle. Americans buy more than 40,000 new cars — about 3,300 of them are EVs — every single day on average. The cheapest gas car is a basic econobox from Nissan for about $17,000. That much money will buy you an excellent used EV that will serve you better without polluting the air or supporting oil companies. And since you aren't buying gas, demand goes down, reducing the need to raise prices. I'd like to see California use the talents of our film industry to produce commercials that dissuade folks from buying new gas cars. Reduce demand for gas cars and we'll get to the end of internal combustion sooner than later. Paul Scott, Santa Monica

CT Sen. Fazio officially enters race for governor in 2026 against Lamont, Stewart, others
CT Sen. Fazio officially enters race for governor in 2026 against Lamont, Stewart, others

Yahoo

time4 days ago

  • Yahoo

CT Sen. Fazio officially enters race for governor in 2026 against Lamont, Stewart, others

State Sen. Ryan Fazio is no longer considering the idea but is instead heading full steam ahead into the 2026 race for governor. Unlike some other candidates who have launched exploratory campaigns, Fazio announced Wednesday that he is all-in for the governor's race. In a 90-second campaign commercial that outlined his views, Fazio pledged to reduce electric rates, his signature issue as the ranking Senate Republican on the legislature's energy committee. 'Connecticut was once an affordable place where families could build a future,' Fazio says in the online video that is available on YouTube. 'But after years of failed leadership in Hartford, it's where dreams get buried under sky-high electric bills and taxes.' Fazio said the state's economic issues are obvious as many families are struggling from paycheck to paycheck. 'We all see it. We all feel it,' Fazio says in the video. 'Families are hurting. There is something broken in our state Capitol. But it doesn't have to be this way. Connecticut is a great state with great people. It's time for leadership that lives up to both. I'm Ryan Fazio, and I'm running for governor because this state is my home, and I refuse to just sit back and watch the decline. I still believe that Connecticut's best days are ahead of us. Together, let's cut electric rates by 20% and eliminate the public benefits charge. Let's reduce income taxes by $1,500 for the average family and cap property taxes.' Fazio is the second Republican to launch an official campaign, following First Selectman Jennifer Tooker of Westport. New Britain mayor Erin Stewart has filed an exploratory campaign, which sets limits on the amount of money that can be raised to qualify for public campaign financing. The final amounts that candidates can receive in public dollars will be adjusted by inflation and will not be released until next year, but candidates predicted that the total for the general election campaign in November 2026 will be around $15 million. While many political insiders expect Gov. Ned Lamont to seek re-election, he has not yet made any official announcements. He is expected to face state Rep. Josh Elliott, a liberal Democrat who has filed a gubernatorial campaign committee. 'Look, he's a good guy,' Lamont told reporters recently of Fazio. 'I've gotten to know him along the way down there in Greenwich. He can do what he wants to do. I like working with him. … I worked with him on the energy bill, for example.' When asked by a television reporter if he would rather run against Fazio or Stewart, Lamont said, 'That's probably not a great issue for me to get into. Look, I think I saw Ryan is going to run as a fiscal conservative. He doesn't want to raise taxes. Keep the balanced budget. I think we've done a pretty good job of that over the last six years.' Despite an amiable relationship on a personal level in their hometown, Fazio's campaign video is not complimentary of Lamont. 'Under Ned Lamont and his radical legislature, electric rates and taxes have soared to the third-highest in the country,' Fazio narrates. 'They've undermined law enforcement and driven out jobs, opportunity, and hope.' On Wednesday, Lamont's chief spokesman, Rob Blanchard, said, 'From cutting taxes for working families to championing free child care for families making less than $100,000, and getting our state budget and economy back on track, Governor Lamont is proud to put his record on affordability and opportunity up against anyone.' On the Republican side, Stewart has gained an early advantage by raising more than $300,000 in small contributions on her way toward qualifying for public financing against Lamont, a wealthy Greenwich entrepreneur who has spent millions to self-fund his statewide campaigns. Stewart has been campaigning for months in the race against Fazio, a fiscal conservative whose supporters say he will catch up in the fundraising battle. Another candidate in the race is perennial candidate Peter Lumaj of Fairfield, who ran unsuccessfully for U.S. Senate in 2012, secretary of the state in 2014, and governor in 2018. A fiscal conservative who has been outspoken at the state Capitol on electricity and taxes, Fazio blames Democrats for the state's problems. 'Under years of one-party Democrat rule in Hartford, Connecticut has become simply unaffordable,' said Fazio. 'I believe our state deserves better than the third-highest taxes and electricity bills in the country and jobs and opportunity leaving our state.' Fazio, a Greenwich Republican who also represents parts of Stamford and New Canaan, won a hard-fought race in the 2024 cycle against Democrat Nick Simmons, a well-funded former Greenwich resident who moved to Stamford. Fazio reenergized Republicans statewide by winning his seat in a special election in 2021 after former Sen. L. Scott Frantz had lost the district in 2018 to Democrat Alex Bergstein, now known as Alex Kasser. Fazio then won a squeaker against Harvard graduate Trevor Crow in 2022 by a margin of only 89 votes after recounts in all three towns in the district. Fazio's supporters believe he can defeat Stewart in a primary, adding that the pair could be a strong ticket if Stewart runs for lieutenant governor as she did in 2018 after dropping out of the governor's race. She was defeated in a three-way race by state Sen. Joe Markley, a conservative Republican who later ran on the ticket with Madison business executive Bob Stefanowski in a losing effort against Lamont. As a fellow Greenwich resident, Lamont has worked together with Fazio on various issues, including the much-debated Senate Bill 4 that aimed to reduce the cost of electricity for consumers across the state. Without explicitly saying that both Lamont and Fazio live in wealthy Greenwich, Stewart said recently that her campaign contributors are trying to make ends meet in hardscrabble towns across the state. 'People are investing because they're looking for a leader that fundamentally understands their concerns and worries — someone who, like them, understands the financial difficulties of raising a family in Connecticut, someone who comes from a community like theirs,' Stewart said. Christopher Keating can be reached at ckeating@

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store