logo
Maine mobile home owners are pushing back against private investors

Maine mobile home owners are pushing back against private investors

Yahoo23-03-2025

Mar. 23—For four years, residents of Bowdoin's Mountain View Estates mobile home park have approached Aug. 1 with a mounting sense of dread.
It's the day they find out how much they'll have to pay to rent the land their homes sit on and, for many residents already struggling to make ends meet, even a small increase can become a hardship.
The 53-home park has withstood four years of consecutive rent hikes since it was purchased by a New York real estate firm in 2021. The first three weren't major, just $35 a month. But last year, the $75 jump was harder to swallow.
As another Aug. 1 approaches, a growing unease has permeated the park.
"These people are just hurting ... we're all scared," said Jerry Highfill, 79, who has lived in the park since 2001. "They're just increasing their income at the poor people's expense. There ain't nobody living in a mobile home park that's wealthy."
Mobile home parks in Maine and across the county are increasingly being purchased by out-of-state investors that then raise the monthly lot rents, sometimes by as much as twice or even three times the price, according to national data.
Homeowners like Highfill are left with few options.
But several bills in the Legislature are working to get ahead of the problem and help communities purchase their parks before investors can. So far, two communities have successfully purchased their parks, and another is under contract. But more than twice as many have tried and failed. For communities that aren't able to buy, lawmakers and residents are trying to institute rent control to try to protect what many see as one of the last true forms of affordable housing.
When Highfill first moved in, the monthly lot rate on his $27,000 mobile home was $265.
Over the next 20 years, he saw his monthly rate increase by just $80.
But in the four years since Philips International took over, his monthly rent has jumped $180, an increase of 52%. Philips International did not respond to questions about the rent increases.
Highfill pays $525 a month, but new residents are paying closer to $700.
"In reality, the last affordable housing in Maine that a young family or retirees can get into is going to become a memory," he said.
'TENANTS ARE ALMOST CAPTIVE'
During the pandemic, when housing prices began to rise, capital equity firms that had long invested in strip malls or multiunit housing started eyeing mobile home parks. Since people own their homes and rent the lots, the parks made an attractive investment — as landlords, they're not on the hook if a refrigerator breaks.
Around the country, investors began snapping up mobile home parks, increasing the rents and then sitting back and collecting profits.
"Capital equity players started recognizing these types of investments as quite lucrative," said Pat Schwebler, co-director of the Cooperative Development Institute's New England Resident-Owned Community Program. The organization assists manufactured housing communities looking to purchase their parks and provides ongoing support after the purchase.
In 2020 and 2021, institutional investors accounted for 23% of national manufactured home purchases, up from 13% between 2017 and 2019, according to a joint project between the nonprofit Private Equity Stakeholder Project and Manufactured Housing Action, an organization of homeowners.
Meanwhile, "Maine became the best thing since sliced bread," Schwebler said.
People and investors alike flocked to the state.
Prices on any type of housing skyrocketed, causing some people to seek out mobile home parks and leaving many longtime residents with few options other than to stay put.
"Mobile" home is a bit of a misnomer. Moving a manufactured home is complicated and expensive. If a homeowner could even find another park to take them, it would still cost at least $10,000 to move.
"For most folks, that's not very doable ... it would take a lot for them to actually pick up their unit and move," she said. "The tenants are almost captive."
Investors know this, she said, making their acquisition all the more enticing.
There's a startling lack of statewide data surrounding mobile homes.
According to the Maine Manufactured Housing Board, there are 468 active licensed parks in Maine, but it's unknown how many lots or residents there are, what the median lot rent is, or what share of the communities are owned by out-of-state corporations, though the Bangor Daily News estimates it could be as high as 20%.
In 2019, the median home sale price in Maine was $225,000. Five years later, it was more than $390,000.
Mobile home-specific sales data has been harder to come by. Manufactured homes are categorized as personal property, so park sales are not tracked by the Maine Association of Realtors. But prices have increased along with other types of housing.
Manufactured home prices on Zillow vary, but most well-maintained homes are priced above $100,000. A new home in Kittery's Yankee Settlement park is listed for $389,000 with a monthly lot fee of $685. One 2005 double-wide in Saco's Blue Haven Mobile Home Park is listed for $241,000. The lot rent or "HOA fee" is $750.
LAWMAKERS TAKE NOTICE
"People living in mobile home communities are unique in the sense that they own their home, but not the land on which it sits, so it presents a really difficult dilemma when the land sells, oftentimes to a person who is intent on using it as an investment," said Erik Jorgensen, senior director of government for MaineHousing.
So the question becomes, "how do we go in and dis-incentivize investor purchases and find different ways of preserving affordability for this population?" he said.
That's a question state lawmakers have been trying to tackle.
In 2023, the Legislature passed a law that requires park owners to give residents at least 60 days' notice if they plan to sell, giving the community members the chance to purchase it themselves. The park owner isn't required to accept the offer, but must negotiate "in good faith."
Last year, the governor and Maine State Housing Authority created the Manufactured and Mobile Home Park Preservation and Assistance Program — a $5 million fund to help residents purchase their parks. But the money is dwindling.
Gov. Janet Mills has earmarked an additional $3 million in the budget, and a bill proposed by Sen. Joe Baldacci, D-Penobscot, would infuse another $3.5 million.
At least four other bills this session aim to further preserve one of the last vestiges of affordable housing.
Sen. Cameron Reny, D-Bristol, has proposed two bills — one would create a tax exemption up to $750,000 to incentivize the sale or transfer of housing developments, housing parks or apartment complexes to resident-owned communities or cooperative affordable housing corporations.
"This gives residents a leg up when they try to buy their homes, which is increasingly difficult these days," she said while presenting the bill, which on Wednesday unanimously passed the committee that oversees taxation.
The second would attach a $50,000 per-lot fee to the purchase of a manufactured housing community on top of the purchase price, to be paid to MaineHousing. Resident-owned co-ops or affordable housing groups would be exempt from the fee.
Schwebler, at the Cooperative Development Institute, said lot rents in community-owned parks are "extraordinarily low" and are often only raised to fund major park improvements.
"Until the housing is secured as resident-owned, you have no guarantee it's going to be affordable," she said.
Rep. Cheryl Golek, D-Harpswell, and Rep. Cassie Julia, D-Waterville, have both put forward bills to cap the allowed annual rent increases for mobile homeowners.
None of these bills is the perfect solution, Jorgensen said, but together they provide "a box of tools that might be useful."
WINS AND LOSSES
In 2019, the residents of two communities in Camden and Arundel purchased their parks, bringing the number of resident-owned communities in Maine up to 10. But then things were silent for almost five years.
Schwebler credits the 2023 law for the recent surge in energy around resident-owned communities.
"Before, these residents didn't even stand a chance and now they do," she said.
In October 2024, the Blueberry Fields Cooperative closed on the Linnhaven Mobile Home Park in Brunswick for $26.3 million. The 278-home community became the first to purchase its park under the new law.
Last month, Cedar Falls Mobile Home Park in Bangor followed suit, closing on the 130-home park for $8 million.
And in Monmouth, residents are under contract to purchase the 42-home West Village park for $1.8 million. They expect to close in May.
All told, that's 450 units that will be preserved as affordable housing, Schwebler said. That number could increase to as many as 600 if the Brunswick and Bangor parks follow up on existing infill opportunities.
Financing can be a challenge for the park, but assistance from the Cooperative Development Institute, as well as funding from MaineHousing, the Genesis Fund and sometimes the parks' municipalities, can help push efforts over the line.
Jorgensen, at MaineHousing, noted that even with assistance, it's still a business deal. The park is real estate, and real estate is expensive. Rents will have to increase.
"The goal is to make that as tolerable as possible," he said.
In Brunswick, for example, residents were initially facing a nearly $275 increase, but additional funding from MaineHousing helped bring that down to $100, which will remain in place for three years.
Jorgensen said that the success of the Blueberry Fields Cooperative was "catalytic" for many of the proposed bills. But so were some notable losses.
While three parks have been successful, more than twice as many have failed.
Schwebler said that since 2023, eight communities have tried to buy their parks but had their offers ultimately rejected.
A year ago, two parks in Old Orchard Beach — Old Orchard Village and Atlantic Village — put forward a $40.5 million bid for their parks, which were owned by the same company. Ultimately, the owners, who feared the cooperative wouldn't be able to come up with the money, chose to go with Follett USA, a California real estate firm.
Following their defeat, the residents instead lobbied to pass a rent control ordinance that capped annual rent increases at 5%. Old Orchard Beach voters approved the change in November.
For communities that haven't been successful, or whose parks have already sold or are unlikely to be sold any time soon, rent control is the only hope for protection against constant increases.
There's currently an effort to pass rent control in Standish, and one in Bowdoin was just struck down.
Copy the Story Link

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Landry wants special session to revive controversial legislation that died
Landry wants special session to revive controversial legislation that died

American Press

time2 hours ago

  • American Press

Landry wants special session to revive controversial legislation that died

(Special to the American Press) With just minutes to spare, Louisiana lawmakers concluded the 2025 legislative session on Thursday — but, per usual, it ended with a bang. Before lawmakers could even walk out the Capitol doors, Gov. Jeff Landry said he planned to call a special session in the future, with the hopes of reviving controversial legislation that died Thursday. It is unclear when exactly lawmakers would be asked to return. Last-minute amendments to bill, which would prohibit companies from owning both pharmacy benefits managers and drugstores, caused a frenzy in the final days of session — complete with fiery testimony from lawmakers, a massive lobbying campaign to block the measure by retail giant CVS and promises of legal action by the Attorney General. Also in the final hours of session lawmakers approved the state's $51 billion budget. Lawmakers earmarked $1.8 million for 'expenses related to the recapture of fugitive offenders' in the aftermath of a massive New Orleans jail escape. They also pulled $1.2 billion from a state savings fund mainly to spend on infrastructure improvements and spruce up sites seeking private sector investment. In a blow to Landry, the GOP-dominated Legislature allocated less than half the $93.5 million he requested for expanding a school voucher program. Traditionally this year's gathering is fiscally focused, But the GOP-dominated legislature filed hundreds of bills to tackle issues that lawmakers felt were plaguing the state, from fiscal matters to social issues. Here's a look at some of the bills. Passed ABORTION LIABILITY EXPANSION: The measure expands who can be sued over abortions, targeting out-of-state doctors and activists who prescribe, sell or mail pregnancy-ending drugs to residents in Louisiana — where abortions are banned with few exceptions. MAKE AMERICA HEALTHY AGAIN: Louisiana passed its own package of nutrition reforms. The measures restrict certain food additives in schools, set nutrition education requirements for health care providers, require food manufacturers to disclose the use of certain artificial ingredients, and order restaurants to post if they are using seed oils. INSURANCE: Despite facing stiff opposition from the insurance industry and pushback from Republican lawmakers, Landry succeeded in passing legislation giving the state's insurance commissioner more authority to block auto insurance rate increases by companies. Other passed bills aim to limit the damages for people involved in vehicle accidents, such as barring damages to cover injuries for the driver primarily responsible for a crash. IMMIGRATION: Lawmakers passed a package of legislation that expands the state's role in immigration enforcement and promises cooperation with federal efforts. One bill would make it a crime for law enforcement agents and public officials to obstruct federal immigration enforcement efforts. Another measure requires state agencies to verify and report anyone illegally in the U.S. who is receiving state services. ETHICS: Lawmakers overwhelmingly approved a bill written by the governor's personal attorney that makes it harder for the state's ethics board to investigative allegations of wrongdoing and file charges against elected officials. IVF TREATMENT: In an effort to avoid what happened in Alabama, lawmakers passed a bill that protects in vitro fertilization providers from criminal charges and lawsuits. CAMPAIGN FUNDING: Lawmakers raised the disclosure thresholds for campaign finance matters, meaning less information will be shared with the public about the donations they receive and their spending of donations. They also expanded the ways elected officials' campaign funds could be spent, including on Mardi Gras celebrations in Washington, D.C. IVERMECTIN: One measure allows the antiparasitic drug, a discredited COVID-era treatment, to be sold for over-the-counter use. WEATHER MODIFICATION: Louisiana is the latest state to prohibit anyone from 'intentionally' injecting, releasing, applying or dispersing chemicals into the atmosphere with the purpose of affecting the 'temperature, weather, climate, or intensity of sunlight.' Rejected DIVERSITY, EQUITY AND INCLUSION: After emotional pleas from Black lawmakers, a bill that bans state government DEI programs died on the vine in the Senate. SPLIT JURY: Incarcerated people, who were convicted under the now-banned practice of split juries, would have had the opportunity to ask for a new trial under one proposed measure. However, Republicans rejected the bill. MINIMUM WAGE: One bill would have gradually increased Louisiana's minimum wage, which currently stands at $7.25, over the next four years. Similar bills have repeatedly been shot down. ABORTION BAN EXCEPTIONS: For the third year, lawmakers rejected a bill that would have added rape, in cases where the victim is under the age of 17, to the narrow list of exceptions to the state's abortion ban. LGBTQ WORKPLACE PROTECTIONS: A measure that would prohibit employment discrimination based on gender identity and sexual orientation failed in committee. FLUORIDE BILL: A bill that would have outlawed fluoride in Louisiana's public water systems failed.

Wyoming lawmakers seek to eliminate SIPA, again, in effort to simplify budget process
Wyoming lawmakers seek to eliminate SIPA, again, in effort to simplify budget process

Yahoo

time12 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Wyoming lawmakers seek to eliminate SIPA, again, in effort to simplify budget process

CHEYENNE — Wyoming lawmakers will try again to eliminate the state's Strategic Investments and Projects Account (SIPA) in a continued effort to make the state's budget process more transparent for the public. Efforts have been made in past legislative sessions to eliminate Wyoming's many financial 'coffee cans.' In 2024, lawmakers successfully repealed the School Capital Construction Account and its related accounts. This year, the Legislature successfully eliminated the Budget Reserve Account (BRA) through Senate File 168 and nearly eliminated SIPA through the passage of SF 169. However, Gov. Mark Gordon line-item vetoed SF 169 and kept SIPA online. The governor maintained his long-term support of simplifying the state's budget process, but he disapproved of the Legislature's approach in SF 169. Gov. Mark Gordon Gov. Mark Gordon '(SIPA) was originally a compromise between a previous legislature and the then-serving governor,' Gordon wrote in his veto letter. He served as state treasurer in 2013, when SIPA was first created. 'The compromise recognized the value of the governor's authority to use some of the funds when making budget recommendations.' Gordon argued the original structure of the bill limited his ability to make budget recommendations. Currently, excess funds from the state's Permanent Mineral Trust Fund (PMTF) account are split evenly between SIPA and the state's main savings account (the Legislative Stabilization Reserve Account, or LSRA). SF 169 originally eliminated SIPA by July 2026 and transferred all excess funds into the LSRA. Wyoming statute prohibits the governor from proposing appropriations from LSRA in excess of the 5% statutory reserve account. In other words, he can't make budget recommendations from this account. 'It is a cagey strategy to undermine a long-standing compromise between the executive and legislative branches and breach the original intent of SIPA,' Gordon wrote. One effect of Gordon's veto removed the split of funds flowing into SIPA and LSRA; now, all excess funds go directly into SIPA, effective immediately. He reasoned this action is necessary, as he expects the state will see greater pressure to fund public schools with the passage of more tax cuts and diversions, along with falling oil and natural gas prices. 'The combined effects of these factors create substantial pressure on the general fund to cover any school funding deficit and still meet the ongoing costs of government,' Gordon wrote, 'as well as provide services to Wyoming families and businesses.' Impact of veto During the Legislature's Select Committee on Capital Finance meeting on Thursday, lawmakers moved to draft a bill similar to SF 169 and, in a sense, make it 'veto-proof.' Sen. Larry Hicks, R-Baggs, who was the primary sponsor of SF 169, said Gordon's veto 'left … quite a dilemma here.' 'The net effect of this line-item veto, if we allow this to stay in statutes the way it currently is, it zeros out the reserve accounts,' Hicks said. Sen. Larry Hicks, R-Baggs (2025) Sen. Larry Hicks, R-Baggs Legislative budget and fiscal staff provided a comparison of the two versions of the bill and their long-term fiscal impacts, based on numbers from the January long-term forecast of the state's fiscal profile. The SIPA transfers 45% of what it retains to the School Foundation Program (SFP) account, the state's main spending account to fund public schools. If the SIPA is entirely repealed, the SFP loses that funding. Before SF 169 was signed into law, the LSRA and SFP were estimated to receive $124.1 million and $369.4 million, respectively, from SIPA over a six-year forecast period. Under the version passed by the Legislature, LSRA was estimated to receive $191.6 million in that same time period. The SFP would receive a total of $111.4 million in the first two fiscal years, and then not receive anything starting in fiscal year 2027 with the repeal of SIPA. Under Gordon's vetoes, the SFP is estimated to receive $470 million over the six-year forecast period, and the LSRA will receive no funding at all. 'But I want to point out that, starting in FY 28 the (PMTF) reserve account can't guarantee the full amount, and it falls short by about $60 million,' said LSO senior fiscal analyst Polly Scott. 'As Sen. Hicks did state … the estimate is that the reserve account is depleted somewhere in (fiscal year 2028).' Under the version adopted by the Legislature, the reserve account's life is extended beyond the six-year forecast, Scott added, because the state is relying on it less. Lawmakers respond State Treasurer Curt Meier noted that the PMTF reserve account is acting the way the LSRA should act. He suggested removing the 1.25% guarantee from the PMTF reserve account into SIPA so it can 'function (as) what it was supposed to do.' 'You're spending money you don't have and then you're trying to catch up … so you can spend it in this year's legislative session,' Meier said. 'Let the reserve account stand on itself, rather than putting more pressure on it than what it can afford to bear.' Then, the Legislature could move the unrealized capital gains into the LSRA, he said. The LSRA already provides $100 million to the school spending account once it drops below a certain threshold. Sen. Tara Nethercott, R-Cheyenne (2025) Sen. Tara Nethercott, R-Cheyenne Chairwoman Sen. Tara Nethercott, R-Cheyenne, suggested also discussing lifting this cap from the LSRA into the SFP at the committee's next meeting in September. For now, committee members voted to draft a bill that eliminates the SIPA, with a provision to remove the 1.25% flow guarantee from the PMTF reserve account, and discuss it at the next meeting. 'The elimination of the SIPA account is important, I think, to the Legislature as a whole, in order to simplify and provide transparency to the budget process,' Nethercott said. 'Because the SIPA account has been butchered. It's been tortured ... and no longer serves its intended purpose, creating a transparency issue.'

Sonnen's Pet Shop, among city's oldest stores, closes after over 130 years downtown
Sonnen's Pet Shop, among city's oldest stores, closes after over 130 years downtown

Yahoo

time16 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Sonnen's Pet Shop, among city's oldest stores, closes after over 130 years downtown

After more than 130 years in downtown St. Paul and 91 under the ownership of the Sonnen family, Sonnen's Pet Shop, one of the city's oldest retail stores, has quietly closed. Second-generation owner David Sonnen, 81, has retired, and the last day for the store — a tiny alcove in the historic Hamm Building that sold birds, fish and other animal accessories — was in May. Up until its final days, the store famously looked nearly identical to how it had in decades past. But the city around it had changed, David Sonnen said, and downtowns in St. Paul and elsewhere simply no longer serve the same purpose they once did, as a city's main retail hub. 'When I think back 20 or 30 years ago, it was just constant people, all day long, walking back and forth,' he said. 'They came down to go shopping. Everything was down here. But then, of course, the (suburban shopping centers) came and people started going to those, and the online stuff now. Times have changed.' The business first began in the 1890s as an animal and seed store near what's now the corner of Cedar Street and Kellogg Boulevard, and moved several times. In 1934, amid the Great Depression, the then-owner's widow told young employee Louis Sonnen he could either buy the store or be out of a job. He took up her offer, renamed the store, stopped selling the cats and dogs he found smelly and, during World War II, moved the store to its longtime Hamm Building location. David Sonnen officially took over operations in the 1970s but his father, who died in 2001, remained active in the business. 'I liked being downtown, I liked the atmosphere and I liked taking care of the birds and the fish,' David Sonnen said. 'If things were better (downtown), I'd stay, because it was fun, and I grew up with it. But it just got to a point where it wasn't worth it anymore.' As for why David Sonnen decided to close the store rather than finding a new owner, all his kids pursued different career paths, and he felt it 'wouldn't be fair for somebody to buy the place when it isn't in a location that's any good anymore and you can't make a living at it,' he said. During its heyday, though, the store attracted not only everyday shoppers but the occasional celebrity, too. Jack Lemmon would stop in to buy dog food while shooting 'Grumpy Old Men' in the 1990s, David Sonnen said. As for David Sonnen himself, he now has more time to take care of projects around the house, he said. He doesn't currently have any pets at home, though, he said with a laugh. Expect traffic headaches Saturday with protest, sports, music, I-94 closure Twin Cities transit: The B Line replaces the Route 21 on Saturday MN Legislature: Xcel Energy Center shut out of bond funding for renovations World's largest woodturning expo comes to RiverCentre this weekend St. Paul Downtown Development Corp. seeks to acquire Alliance Bank Center

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store