Hurd comments on new legislation regarding tariffs
GRAND JUNCTION, Colo. (KREX) — U.S. Rep. Jeff Hurd, along with other congressional representatives, introduced bipartisan legislation to return Congress' constitutionally authorized role in setting and approving U.S. Trade policy.
The legislation is the companion bill to Sens. Chuck Grassley and Maria Cantwell's legislation, the Trade Review Act of 2025.
Hurd provided us with comment on the new bill.
'This legislation simply makes sure that congress has some oversight with respect to tariffs that may be implemented by the president. It gives Congress 60 days in which to approve an executive order for example that the president implements that imposes tariffs. It serves as a check on that process to make sure that congress has some oversight when it comes to these issues that matter for our economy and that matter for Coloradans throughout western and southern Colorado.'
Hurd joins Reps. Don Bacon of Nebraska, Josh Gottheimer of New Jersey and Gregory Meeks of New York in introducing the bill.
The bill establishes a process for Congressional review of new or increased tariffs (duties) imposed by the President. Specifically, it would:
Require the President to notify Congress within 48 hours of imposing or increasing a duty on imported goods, including an explanation and an assessment of its impact on U.S. businesses and consumers.
Limit the duration of such duties to 60 days, unless Congress enacts a joint resolution of approval to extend them.
Allow Congress to end the duty early by passing a joint resolution of disapproval.
Exclude antidumping and countervailing duties, which are governed by other statutes.
Provide expedited procedures in Congress for considering resolutions of approval or disapproval
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tesla Stock Is Sinking. Trump-Musk Tensions Are Just One Reason Why.
Tesla shares slid Thursday, extending Wednesday's decline. The losses come as reports this week showed sales continued to decline in May across several European countries, and CEO Elon Musk criticized President Trump's signature budget legislation. Recent declines have rolled back some of Tesla's gains after CEO Elon Musk in April said he would spend more time at his (TSLA) shares dropped Thursday, falling for a second straight day, amid a public spat between CEO Elon Musk and President Donald Trump. The stock was down close to 9% in recent trading, extending Wednesday's decline. It has lost about one-quarter of its value since the start of the year. Musk left his role in the Trump administration last week. He has since attacked the Trump-backed budget reconciliation bill currently working its way through Congress, calling it a "disgusting abomination," and urging the Senate to "kill the bill." Trump at an event with the Chancellor of Germany on Thursday said he is "very disappointed" in Musk's recent attacks. Trump said that Musk "knew everything" about the bill, and claimed that the Tesla CEO only turned against the bill because of the cuts it would make to electric vehicle mandates and programs. "Elon and I had a great relationship," Trump said. "I don't know if we will anymore." "Whatever," Musk said in a post responding to a video of Trump's comments. "Keep the EV/solar incentive cuts in the bill, even though no oil & gas subsidies are touched (very unfair!!), but ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill." In a separate post, Musk called Trump's assertion that he knew details about the bill "false," and said that members of Congress did not read it before voting on it. "Without me, Trump would have lost the election," Musk posted minutes later. Tesla has also gotten more disappointing sales news in recent days: Auto industry groups in several European countries reported sales data for May showing declines in Tesla sales as overall EV sales rose. Despite the weak sales, some analysts have pointed to the planned launch of fully autonomous Tesla rides in Austin, Texas this month as a coming positive catalyst for the stock. The stock's recent declines have rolled back some of Tesla's gains after Musk in April said he would spend more time at his companies, and left the Trump administration in May. This article has been updated since it was first published to include additional information and reflect more recent share price values. Read the original article on Investopedia Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Wes Moore: ‘I don't need studies. Just do the work.'
COLUMBIA, S.C. — Wes Moore is not running for president. The governor of Maryland will say that anywhere: In a TV studio, at a press conference in Annapolis, at a Democratic Party gathering in an early presidential primary state. After a roaring response from the crowd at the Democrats' Blue Palmetto dinner and Rep. Jim Clyburn's (R-S.C.) 'world famous fish fry,' Moore skipped the party's all-day convention, which might have fueled even more 2028 speculation; he met instead with an early 2008 supporter of Barack Obama at his home in the suburbs. Moore did take time, during the trip, to talk to Semafor. His speech had urged Democrats to take a page from Donald Trump and act boldly and quickly, not get bogged down in studies or meetings. We followed up on that, as well as local criticism of how he'd vetoed a study of reparations for the descendants of slaves, and how the deportations and asylum cancellations affected Maryland and every other state. And Moore described an active, faith-based liberalism that could respond effectively to the Trump administration, now and when it's over. This is an edited transcript of the conversation. David Weigel: When you talked about the speed Trump moves at, I was curious — how much of what he's dismantled should Democrats be rebuilding? Wes Moore: I don't think that's what Democrats should do. That's basically making the argument that everything was perfect before, and he's just dismantling something that was perfect. I'm not defending that, because I think you're trying to defend the indefensible. There were real problems before. I think about my own life and journey — my journey has been the consequences of, in many cases, some really bad policies that have been put in place, and not just by Republicans. So I don't think that the answer is: Let's just go and rebuild what was there before. Truthfully, there were people being left behind before. Saying we have to move with a sense of speed and urgency does not mean we have to put things back the way they were, as fast as possible. On immigration; The Supreme Court just let Trump remove temporary status from 500,000-odd people. Some got asylum status while they were here, but most of these people, from Venezuela and Haiti, lost their TPS. Why was that wrong? What we're seeing is an exploitation of an already broken process. Immigration has been broken for a very long time, and again, Donald Trump didn't break it. Donald Trump is actually exposing breakage. We know that Congress, actually, is the one with the authority to really reform and rethink and make sure that we have an immigration process that matches the aspirations of our country and comes up with a sane and systematic way for allowing immigrants to come into the country. Congress has decided that they're not going to do this. The President has decided that he is not going to work with Congress to do this… so, in the last five months, we've taken a broken immigration process and we've just thrown kerosene on it. Were the people who fled those countries enriching our country by being here? Haitians in Springfield, Venezuelans around Florida — was the country better because they were here, and weaker because they're not? We have to fix the immigration side. It's — we have a system that is now allowing for exploitation. We have a system that is now allowing for choices about what rules to follow and what rules not to follow, what court decisions to enforce and which not to enforce. We have an absolute mess on our hands… [it] highlights the problem in the first place. Because what the President is doing, in many cases, the President doesn't have the authority to do. The President is taking advantage of the fact that we have a broken system. Tim Walz spoke here; he's compared ICE, recently, to the Gestapo. You agree with that assessment? I think we have an immigration system in this country that allows way too much room for interpretation. It allows way too much space for people to try to fill into the void — and in some cases, illegally. That's the reason that the guidance that I've given to all of our state agencies is, in the state of Maryland, we've got to follow the Constitution. The constitution is very clear about where jurisdictional authority on immigration enforcement begins and ends. One legislator here, John King, told Politico that he would skip the dinner because he was frustrated with your veto of the reparations study in Maryland. Was the issue with that, hey, we don't need another study? Or was it, reparations are not worth pursuing? This would be the fifth study in 25 years. What are we studying? We have got to stop being the party of bureaucracy and multi-year studies on things that we know the answers to, and be the party of action. There is nobody in the state of Maryland or elsewhere who can legitimately question my commitment to these issues, right? Just in the past two and a half years, we've had over $1.3 billion of investments in our state's HBCUs. That's a 60% increase. We've been able to have the largest mass pardon in the history of the United States of America for misdemeanor cannabis convictions. We're giving assistance when it comes to first time home-buying. We've been able to address procurement policies and invest over $800 million in black-owned businesses. There is nobody who can argue that we are not doing the work of repair right now. My point is, the bill says we are going to spend two years studying this and then bring the recommendations to the governor. Well, I am the governor, and I don't need two years. Let's work now. I have the largest amount of vetoes from a Democratic governor of Maryland in a generation. There was something about a data center study — vetoed it. We did something around an energy study — vetoed it. I don't need studies. Just do the work. Do you find, talking to people in Maryland, some who look at Trump and say: Hey, he's doing something? At least he's acting? That's where this goes, back to this idea that Donald Trump doesn't need a multi-year study to dismantle the Constitution. Donald Trump doesn't need a multi-year study to be able to say that he is going to put together a tax package that is literally giving billionaires a tax cut and leaving the rest of us with the bill. He didn't need a white paper to explain that to him. So I think people, we have to look at his actions as, in many cases, inhumane and unconstitutional, and we have to be able to call it out, but we would be foolish not to understand there is something about speed that Donald Trump gets that we need to start getting as a party too. Maryland's a state. When Republicans pass the laws people are fleeing, it's sometimes couched in religious terms. How does your faith inform your tolerance toward transgender rights? My faith informs how I think about humanity. I mean, I'm a deeply faithful person. I believe that if we're all God's children, then by definition, we're brothers and sisters. And I think it's important that we act accordingly. My faith really does shape how I think about the love of humanity, a love for the least of these, our ability to fight for those who need and deserve a champion. It's part of our responsibility to emulate and try to be vessels of God on earth. There's nothing Christian about bullying.
The Hill
16 minutes ago
- The Hill
Texas Republican on deficit spending in GOP bill: ‘It's not a perfect world'
Rep. Pete Sessions (R-Texas) lamented the deficit spending in the GOP's 'big, beautiful' spending package, but framed the issue as a necessary compromise to avoid having to negotiate with Democrats. 'I don't want to have any deficit spending. But what I'm trying to suggest to you is that we are stuck in a paradigm where we have to pass this ourselves,' Sessions told CNN's John Berman in an interview Thursday morning. The Texas Republican said he conceded on demands from a handful of Republicans representing blue-leaning states who pushed to raise the cap on state and local tax (SALT) deductions, adding, 'It's a balance there.' 'What we're trying to do is balance out where the American people get jobs and job creation. We really don't want to see people just leave these blue states because of taxes that they can't afford their property,' Sessions said. 'So, it is not a perfect world, John.' He also pointed out that if the sprawling legislative agenda is not passed through the reconciliation process, then Republicans would have to turn to Democrats — which, Sessions argued, would not necessarily reduce deficit spending but would mean less of Trump's agenda could make it through Congress. 'The bottom line is, is that this has to come together as a piece of legislation. You see, John, if we do not pass our one big, beautiful bill, then we negotiate with Democrats, essentially nine Democrats, that simply raises spending to get us where we get the tax cuts that we save them, where they ought to be,' the GOP lawmaker said. 'So it is, no question about it, not a perfect battle for Republicans,' he added. The interview comes amid criticism from tech billionaire Elon Musk that has slowed momentum in the Senate on the bill. The Congressional Budget Office on Wednesday projected that the 1,116-page House passed bill would add $2.4 trillion to the deficit over the next decade.
