MPs call for free bus travel for under-22s in England
Free bus travel is offered to under-22s in Scotland.
People aged 16-21 in Wales are entitled to a one-third discount on fares, and from next month will be able to travel for £1 per journey.
Parts of England offer discounted or free bus travel for young people, such as London for 16 and 17-year-olds.
People are entitled to free bus travel in England when they reach the state pension age, which is currently 66 but will rise from next year.
Bus fares in England for all passengers are capped at £3 until March 2027.
In a report on buses, the select committee said: 'England's patchwork of local youth concessions contrasts with national schemes in Scotland and Wales.
'A coherent national approach to ensure fair access across England is essential if the Government is serious about driving economic growth, which depends on removing barriers to education, training, and employment for the next generation.'
The report described public transport as a 'major barrier to employment for young people', especially in places with limited services.
It added: 'In some areas, transport is restricting opportunity rather than enabling it.'
The committee urged the Government to reform the way local bus services are funded, with longer-term settlements.
It also called for a national ambition for a minimum level on public transport connectivity.
Department for Transport (DfT) figures show the number of bus journeys taken in England outside London fell by 22% from 4.6 billion in 2009 to 3.6 billion in 2024.
Labour MP Ruth Cadbury, who chairs the committee, said: 'Those most affected by unreliable or even non-existent buses include the young, who need them to get to school, college, university and their first jobs.
'Denying young people these experiences denies them their life chances.
'We call for a universal, free bus pass for all under-22s to equalise opportunity.
'While the bus fare caps have been beneficial, the Government has yet to spell out a coherent strategy of what they aim to achieve, and whether more targeted options could produce better outcomes.
'While the Government's Bus Services Bill contains positive ideas, the Transport Committee's report says ministers should go further to get bums back on seats.'
The Bill, which is going through Parliament, will lead to an overhaul of buses, such as by giving all local transport authorities new powers to run their own services.
It will also reduce some of the red tape involved in bus franchising, including reducing the minimum period between local areas taking control of services and being allowed to start operations.
A DfT spokesperson said: 'After decades of decline, we're providing a record £1 billion in multi-year funding to improve the reliability and frequency of bus services across the country.
'Our landmark Bus Services Bill will protect routes and prevent services from being scrapped, bringing buses back into local control, and will put passengers at the heart of services.
'We have also stepped in to prevent a fare hike for passengers by extending the £3 fare cap until March 2027.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
21 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Rachel Reeves is coming after your inheritance, this is what you should do NOW to protect yourself, writes SIMON LAMBERT
It's a rare achievement for a tax to be incurred by just a fraction of people but to be widely detested. Inheritance tax pulls that trick off. Despite it only currently affecting about one in 20 estates, it is referred to as Britain's 'most hated tax'. Your browser does not support iframes.
Times
an hour ago
- Times
A few ‘tweaks' would make it easier to lend to small businesses
As the government focuses on backing key sectors it believes can kickstart Britain's sluggish economy, The Times is running a five-day series exploring what business leaders in these industries need if they are to deliver the growth ministers are searching for. Here, entrepreneurs in the financial and professional services sector explain why attitudes towards external capital and regulation must change Funding is a perennial problem for ambitious entrepreneurs. Most can only take their idea so far, and only grow so fast, without the leverage provided by external capital. Banks and investors in the UK are often criticised for their perceived lack of risk appetite, generally preferring to back larger, more established businesses or residential mortgages. Ison Travel, which organises travel, accommodation and events for corporate customers, made two acquisitions last year that doubled its annual revenue. Helen Cannon, founder and chief executive, does not think she would have been able to strike either of those deals had Ison not had some profits to reinvest. 'It's all been self-funded,' she says. 'When we were looking at the acquisitions last year, we did consider [outside investment] and spoke to a few different companies, but it isn't easy. It's a long process and there's an awful lot of red tape and so many hoops to jump through.' While there's a debate over whether it's supply or demand of finance that's to blame, Cannon's views are increasingly common among British businesses, with the long-running SME Finance Monitor consistently showing a growing proportion of companies preferring to grow under their own steam rather than seek external finance. That has prompted concerns about the implications for growth and productivity; less external finance usually means slower growth and less investment. Richard Davies, as chief executive of Allica, a specialist challenger bank , knows more than most about lending money to small and medium-sized businesses (SMEs). He says major high street banks have pulled back from the SME market in recent years. 'Their business model is either for millions of consumers and micro businesses, or for 20,000 large corporate businesses, but neither of those models works for the bit in between,' he explained. • Lending gap for small businesses 'is hurting UK's growth' Lending to British SMEs is now £90 billion lower than it would have been had it followed levels recorded between 1997 and 2004, research by Allica has found. Allica, and some of its peers, are trying to plug that gap. Allica has more than £3 billion in loans out at the moment, almost entirely to smaller companies. Last year, Allica was named Britain's fastest growing private company by the Sunday Times 100. It could be growing even faster, Davies says; he could increase lending by another £500 million this year if the government and regulators made some 'tweaks' to capital requirement rules. As a challenger, Allica lends only in the UK, but that means it must hold a higher percentage of liquid capital on hand than the big banks which are perceived as being safer because they operate in many different countries. 'I'm not sure if you're a small bank that [the regulator] should be saying 'go and lend in lots of countries because that's going to be safer',' he says. 'It makes no sense to me. If that was changed, I could lend an extra £400 million or £500 million to SMEs this year.' Crowdfunding platforms are also trying to fill the financing gaps left by mainstream banks, but Bruce Davis, a fintech entrepreneur and chairman of the UK Crowdfunding Association, believes they are being held back by too much bureaucracy. To get involved with crowdfunding, people need to pass an 'appropriateness test' introduced by regulators, which is failed by close to half of those who apply. It has had a dramatic impact on the market. 'What we've seen is a big drop-off in terms of people wanting to go through that process, which we've argued is overkill,' Davis says. 'The government wants more innovation and more growth, so the [Financial Conduct Authority] is looking again at how it defines high-risk investment. It wouldn't need a lot of changes to make [partaking in crowdfunding] simpler without removing the safeguards.' There is a 'lighter touch regulatory regime' for crowdfunding in Europe, where there are hundreds of platforms and a 'bigger pool of investors', Davis says. His concern is that UK businesses will inevitably be competing with European peers which have access to more investment. 'I just think we are constraining UK businesses. If you're a UK business in artificial intelligence, for example, and you're competing with a French AI business and you're finding it harder to raise capital, you're going to lose.' That is not what the government says it wants. As part of the industrial strategy it published this summer, the government has promised to support small, fast-growing businesses which have the capacity to punch above their weight in helping to deliver growth. Ultimately, the government wants its industrial strategy to help push today's ambitious SMEs to the next level. Labour has promised to 'slash red tape' to drive growth but onerous paperwork and box-ticking is still bemoaned by many bosses, including Aminash Patel, chief executive of Penta Consulting. Penta, which finds skilled workers for technology companies including Microsoft and IBM, employs and contracts 800 or so people in 12 offices across Asia, the Middle East and Africa. 'Because our business is across many different geographies, the mobility of our people can be quite difficult,' Patel says. 'We could have one of our consultants who is working in the UK for six months but then they may have to go off to mainland Europe for a year and then maybe go over to the US. Some of the red tape around cross-border movement of our employees causes a lot of delays for us.' Those delays, he thinks, are only getting worse. 'It's taking longer to get clearance and visas and work permits — it's not flowing as quickly as it used to. Ten or fifteen years ago you could deploy people [to other countries] much faster and more easily with less paperwork and justification.' Davies, of Allica, shares Patel's frustrations about the speed of decision-making and receiving feedback from regulators and officials. Back in 2013, the government launched a start-up unit to help new banks go through the authorisation process, which Davies says has been a 'big success'. The problem is that once a bank has established itself but is still growing quickly, such as Allica, 'there's nothing there' to help. 'We've been big advocates of a scale-up unit to ensure you've got high-speed and high-frequency interactions with regulators,' he says. 'Ironically, most fintechs want more interaction with regulators, not less. We want resolution [on issues] really quickly, we don't want to wait nine months, we want it resolved in a few weeks.' Cannon would also like support from regulators and the government to be easier to access, particularly in the early days 'which can be really lonely'. She points to research and development tax credits as an example. 'We've never used any and I don't know how to access them or whether we even qualify. It'd be great if there was someone there to help you.' • Debt load of businesses seeking finance is double pre-Covid level Patel, meanwhile, would have liked more support from the government when Penta made an international sales push. He did find advice, but from various trade bodies and organisations rather than official channels. 'It's not something the government has made available to us. There's been a lot of self-teaching,' he said. 'If you're a UK company and you want to go and sell your products or services in four or five other countries, where do you start? Some help around understanding the tax implications or the restrictions [of operating overseas] would make sense.' Davies says the UK's growth challenge must be tackled at its roots, by doing a better job of educating entrepreneurs that external finance is not a bad thing. That attitude towards debt is 'a UK problem' and not one really seen in other countries, particularly the US, he says. 'There's been a really big hang-up from the financial crisis and things like Royal Bank of Scotland's restructuring division screwing businesses,' he says. 'The statistics are shocking: the Bank of England found that four in five businesses would rather grow slower than borrow to grow faster. Banks and the government have got to get businesses feeling confident to borrow to invest again.' 'It's a real grind trying to raise single-digit millions because the pool of available capital is so much smaller,' explains one City stockbroker, whose job it is to help companies — typically on the smaller side — drum up fresh investment. It is a common gripe among growing businesses, how difficult it can be to attract the investment they need for the next stage of growth. The feeling in the City is that there are a few reasons for this, including what one senior dealmaker describes as a 'hangover from Woodford'. That is a reference to Neil Woodford, the one-time star fund manager whose Woodford Equity Income Fund collapsed in 2019 after putting too much money into smaller, illiquid businesses. Scarred by that scandal, anecdotal evidence from bankers suggests that fund managers have moved 'up the food chain' and are backing fewer small companies as a result. Simon French, chief economist and head of research at Panmure Liberum, the stockbroker, agreed that Woodford has affected the investment industry but believes there are other 'structural challenges' that are limiting how much funding is being directed at the smaller end of the market. 'Wealth managers and pension funds have also consolidated so you've got much larger asset managers out there and their propensity to invest in a small company is rather limited,' he says. 'If you're running billions of pounds [of savers' money], buying a 20 per cent stake in a £20 million company is only £4 million. Just because of the economics, you're not going to do it.' The de-equitisation of the London stock market also means there is just less money earmarked for equities. At the peak in 1990, pension funds had 40 per cent of their assets invested in UK stocks, but that has fallen to only 3 per cent. That trend partly reflects defined benefit pension schemes moving money out of stocks and into lower-risk government bonds as more of their members hit retirement. French thinks he has a solution: UK pension funds with more of their assets invested in UK equities should receive greater tax relief than those which do very little over here. 'I think we should say [to pension funds] that they can invest wherever they want, but if they only want to buy an S&P 500 tracker, they're not going to get the same scale of tax relief as if they're a pension scheme investing 90 per cent in the US but 10 per cent in the UK [stock market]. A pound invested in IQE, a semiconductor manufacturer in South Wales, has a different economic impact to a pound in Nvidia.' On Friday: Advanced manufacturers on the difference between political rhetoric and the real-world barriers to growing in the UK
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Victoria could save nearly $500m over 10 years by scrapping greyhound racing, estimates show
The Victorian government could save almost half a billion dollars if it follows Tasmania in phasing out greyhound racing in the state, according to independent analysis. A policy costing by the Parliamentary Budget Office (PBO), to be released on Thursday, estimates the government would save $451.6m between 2025–26 and 2035–36 if it stopped subsidising greyhound racing and closed the industry. The figure is based on an estimated $687.4m drop in government spending on the industry over the decade, offset by a $235.8m loss in revenue, as Victorians would no longer be able to bet on greyhound races held in the state. The analysis said the government 'increased ongoing support' to the entire Victorian racing industry, which includes thoroughbred and harness racing, in 2024. This was through a higher point of consumption tax on wagering revenue, which was increased to 15% from 10%, with half of the revenue going to racing, and a funding deed providing $90m annually. The PBO analysis didn't factor in the 'risk or cost of potential legal claims against the Victorian government' from breaking agreements, such as current racing club or racecourse licences or its wagering contract with Tabcorp. Sign up: AU Breaking News email The report was commissioned by Animal Justice Party MP Georgie Purcell, who said she was 'not surprised' but 'absolutely appalled' to learn how much the Victorian government was subsiding the industry. 'For this government to be spending hundreds of millions of dollars supporting the greyhound racing industry while they fail to fund the operation of new women's crisis shelters, fail to meet their Gonski requirement, fail to adequately fund mental health care and fail to properly support regional Victorians is frankly astounding,' Purcell said. She said according to the Coalition of Protection of Greyhounds, which collects publicly available stewards' reports after meets, 29 dogs have died on racetracks in Victoria this year. 'Meanwhile, Tasmania has made a principled and ethical decision after one dog, their Greyhound of the Year, was killed on July 28,' Purcell said. 'It certainly says a lot about the direction of the Victorian Labor government when even the Liberals are doing better than them on animal protection.' The Tasmanian premier, Jeremy Rockliff, on Sunday announced his Liberal government would end funding for greyhound racing in the state by 2029, effectively winding up the industry. In May, a report by economist Saul Eslake into the Tasmanian greyhound industry found the state government funded the sport 'more generously than any other jurisdiction, to the tune of $12.70 per head of population in 2023-24'. This includes by returning 80% of revenue from its point of consumption tax to racing. Eslake told Guardian Australia greyhound racing 'likes to style itself as an industry' but relies on the 'public purse' in most states. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion 'We don't talk about the football industry or the basketball industry or the tennis industry,' he said. 'Racing likes to call itself an industry, so maybe its claims ought to be tested in the same way as when another industry comes along wanting a handout. It should be subject to the same rigorous scrutiny.' The Victorian racing minister, Anthony Carbines, on Monday said he had no plans to end greyhound racing in the state, describing the Tasmanian government's announcement as a 'desperate' attempt to secure the support of crossbench MPs after failing to win a majority at the recent state election. 'No one's safe in Tasmania. Throw everyone overboard to form a majority,' Carbines said. He said greyhound racing generated $850m a year in economic activity and employed almost 5,000 people in full-time work in Victoria. 'The government here in Victoria backs greyhound racing,' Carbines said. In 2018, the ACT banned greyhound racing. New South Wales proposed a ban in 2016 before then premier Mike Baird backflipped after a backlash. Last year, an inquiry into the industry in the state was called, following allegations of widespread animal abuse.
