King Participates in the Third Global Disability Summit in Germany - Jordan News
The summit brings together global, regional, and national stakeholders who share a vision for the inclusive development of people with disabilities and humanitarian work, bridging the gap between integrating individuals with disabilities and development cooperation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Jordan News
14 hours ago
- Jordan News
Hassan: Executive Program for Economic Modernization Vision Being Prepared for the Next Three Years - Jordan News
Prime Minister Jaafar Hassan stated during a Cabinet session held in Jerash Governorate on Tuesday that the workshops taking place at the Royal Hashemite Court regarding the Economic Modernization Vision aim to introduce necessary updates and developments to activate and stimulate various sectors. This effort seeks to keep pace with global developments across industries and expand sectoral engagement as much as possible, in order to recover missed opportunities caused by regional challenges in recent years. اضافة اعلان Hassan emphasized that the Prime Ministry will organize intensive workshops with stakeholders across all sectors to develop the government's executive program for the Economic Modernization Vision over the next three years. This will include a detailed action plan for the government as a whole and for each ministry individually.
Jordan News
14 hours ago
- Jordan News
13 Investors Granted Jordanian Citizenship in Q2 2025 - Jordan News
Minister of Government Communications and official spokesperson for the government, Mohammad Al-Momani, announced that 13 investors were granted Jordanian citizenship during the second quarter of 2025. اضافة اعلان In comparison, 17 investors had obtained citizenship in the first quarter, with a total investment value of around 32 million dinars, generating approximately 600 job opportunities for Jordanians. Minister of Investment, Muthanna Gharaibeh, stated that since 2018, a total of 561 investors have been granted Jordanian citizenship, noting that Syrian and Iraqi investors top the list of recipients. He explained that recent amendments to the regulations governing the granting of citizenship to investors aim to increase job opportunities and enhance the value added to the Jordanian economy. Gharaibeh also noted that the investment encouragement decision will stimulate stock market activity without causing inflation in the Amman Stock Exchange, adding that the move will energize the financial market in Amman. During a session held on Wednesday, chaired by Prime Minister Dr. Jaafar Hassan, the Cabinet approved new criteria for granting Jordanian citizenship or residency through investment, based on recommendations by the special investors committee. Under the new regulations, investors or non-investors may be granted a five-year residency — or have their existing residency renewed — regardless of their previous duration of stay in the Kingdom, provided they purchase real estate from a licensed developer valued at no less than 200,000 dinars (based on the Department of Land and Survey's appraisal), retain the property for at least five years without selling or mortgaging it, and receive a recommendation from the investors committee at the Ministry of Interior. For residency renewal, the applicant must still own the same property or a new one of equal value. After being reviewed by the technical committee, the application is forwarded directly to the Minister of Interior's delegate at the investment window, without requiring the property to be held in escrow.
Ammon
16 hours ago
- Ammon
Defusing the Sweida Crisis: Jordanian-Turkish diplomatic synergy
Jordan played a prominent diplomatic role in calming the volatile situation in the Sweida Governorate in southern Syria, which has witnessed an escalation in violence and internal fighting over the past months. This role, which was consistent with regional and international efforts aimed at preventing southern Syria from sliding into total security chaos, yielded tangible results on the ground. These included reaching understandings that led to a cessation of hostilities and a freeze in Israeli escalation at some border points near southern Syria, particularly in light of worrying indications of indirect Israeli support for some armed groups there. The Jordanian role was characterized by wisdom and balance, reflecting the depth of vision and the shrewdness of the Hashemite leadership, which has long been known for its ability to navigate the maze of regional crises within a complex political landscape and shifting challenges. The Kingdom has been keen to deal with the crisis in Sweida with a high sense of responsibility, avoiding direct involvement in Syrian affairs, while preserving its national security, which is under increasing pressure on its northern border from drug, arms, and drone smuggling. In this complex landscape, which requires a mind capable of deciphering the changing regional landscape, the Jordanian leadership has chosen a dual approach: protecting the border as a bulwark of national security, in parallel with soft Hashemite diplomacy that reshapes the contours of stability. This approach is harmoniously intertwined with regional actors, within a tapestry of interests and concerns that can only be managed with wisdom and deliberation. In this context, Jordanian-Turkish cooperation has emerged as one of the key factors contributing to de-escalation. Despite diverging interests between Amman and Ankara on the Syrian issue in recent years, developments on the ground have forced a local convergence between the two parties, particularly with regard to maintaining stability in southern Syria and avoiding the disintegration of the social fabric in Sweida, which has long served as a safety valve for sectarian and political balances in Syria. The two capitals exchanged messages through direct and indirect diplomatic channels, addressing ways to support local initiatives for calm and contain any Israeli interventions that could lead to an explosive situation on the ground, harming the security of neighboring countries. Jordan, given its precise geopolitical position and experience in dealing with regional crises, realized that any security explosion in Sweida, especially if linked to external interventions, would have serious repercussions for the Kingdom's internal security and its northern borders. Accordingly, Jordanian efforts focused on supporting local efforts to calm the situation within Sweida, without siding with any party, while encouraging Druze religious and social leaders to prevail and preserve the province's unique position within the Syrian context. In parallel, Jordan intensified its regional efforts to contain the Israeli escalation, which coincided with tensions in southern Syria. There is a growing conviction among decision-makers in Amman that some Israeli activities in the south, including indirect support for some armed groups or the tolerance of drone activity, aim to distract the Syrian state and transform the south into a gray zone of influence, serving as a soft security buffer for Israel, but at the expense of the stability of both Jordan and Syria. Therefore, Jordanian messages to the relevant capitals were clear: the continuation of these provocations will not go unanswered, even through diplomatic means, and that Jordan will not stand idly by in the face of any project that threatens its border security or reproduces outlaw groups under a new geographical umbrella. Turkey has assisted in this regard by using its channels with affiliated armed factions in northern Syria to pressure them not to engage in the battles in the south or send reinforcements that would raise concerns in Sweida and the adjacent areas. Ankara also worked in parallel to curb the influence of some radical groups that viewed the escalation of the southern front as an opportunity to expand their influence. This converged Turkish interests with the Jordanian vision, despite their different starting points, as both parties realized that stability in the south was in the interest of regional stability. Jordan's role was not limited to political mediation. It also included providing development and service initiatives, in coordination with international organizations, to restore life to some affected areas in an attempt to prevent a recurrence of chaos. Jordan also continued to coordinate the refugee issue and limit smuggling from Syrian territory, in cooperation with moderate local forces. This was a clear message that Amman does not seek to impose influence or agendas, but rather a partnership that maintains border security and prevents the situation from escalating. Joint Jordanian-Turkish efforts succeeded in creating a relative calm that allowed for a decline in tensions in Sweida, the repositioning of some armed groups away from the conflict zones, and the halting of Israeli attacks, which were exploiting the chaos to impose new facts on the ground that violated Syrian sovereignty and threatened regional security. This achievement was not a coincidence; rather, it was the result of calculated diplomatic action based on calm security coordination and the opening of multiple channels of communication with various parties, including local and international actors. Turkey played a complementary role by controlling some supply lines and influencing affiliated factions, while Jordan focused on preventing the spillover of events toward its borders and enhancing coordination with the Syrian side on security and humanitarian issues. This would not have materialized without Jordan's deep understanding of the nature of the crisis, its keen understanding of the balance of power, and its use of soft yet effective diplomatic tools, which strengthened its regional position as an honest and effective mediator capable of resolving the most complex issues.
