Ban on TV adverts for foods high in fat, salt and sugar delayed until 2026
The delay to the ban, which was to have come into effect from October, comes as ministers prepare to amend legislation to ensure brand-only advertising, which does not show specific HFSS products, is not caught under the rules.
Regardless, key industry stakeholders including ITV, Channel 4, the Advertising Association and the British Retail Consortium, have committed to complying with the restrictions from October 1.
The restrictions will legally take effect on January 5.
A Government spokesman said: 'Obesity robs children of the best start in life and sets them up for a lifetime of health problems, which costs the NHS billions.
'We have secured a unique and public commitment from advertisers and broadcasters so that from October 1 2025, adverts for identifiable less healthy products will not be shown on TV before 9pm or at any time online, and this will be a legal duty from January 2026.
'The junk food advertising restrictions on TV and online are a crucial part of our plan for change to raise the healthiest generation of children ever. By reducing children's exposure to junk food advertising, we will remove up to 7.2 billion calories from UK children's diets each year.'
It is understood that a four-month pause will now allow the Department of Health and the Advertising Standards Authority to work on a clearer interpretation of the restrictions.
This is despite many retailers, including major grocers, previously committing to a voluntary October 2025 start.
An Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) spokesman said: 'The Government has set out its intention to bring in amending legislation to push back the implementation date on LHF (less healthy food and drink) ad restrictions and to consult on changing the law on brand exemption.
'We recognise the importance of this issue for a range of stakeholders, therefore, together with Ofcom, we will now carefully assess what this means for the process to develop and implement the rules and guidance and will provide a further update as soon as possible.'
The decision comes amid concerns raised by retailers and broadcasters about the impact of the ban.
In April, the Government was forced to reassure businesses that pure brand messages are not 'in scope' of the upcoming ban.
However, it added that brands might have to be more creative in the way they showcase their food ranges.
Addressing the House of Commons last month, health minister Ashley Dalton said, 'While it is for a court to interpret the legislation, the Government's view remains that pure brand advertising is not in scope of this policy.
'This is because the legislation only restricts adverts that could reasonably be considered to be for identifiable less healthy products, and not adverts that could be reasonably understood to be advertising brands.
'We therefore expect that businesses will still have opportunities to promote their brands, provided that their adverts do not identify a less healthy product.'
Ms Dalton also said that the final interpretation of the junk food ad guidelines would be up to regulators, with the law providing 'considerable discretion' in how the new rules can be enforced.
Speaking at the Retail Technology Show earlier this year, M&S chairman Archie Norman said the government's new HFSS advertising rules 'probably mean we can't run a Christmas ad', due to many festive foods not adhering to HFSS guidelines.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
For some Zimbabwe children with heart disease, a rare lifeline restores hope
Zimbabwe Heart Surgeries HARARE, Zimbabwe (AP) — Tubes snaked across 3-year-old Gracious Chikova's bandaged chest in the intensive care unit of a government hospital in Zimbabwe's capital, Harare. Just a day earlier, surgeons had opened her tiny heart to repair a defect that threatened her life. Now she sipped a drink from a syringe, her mother anxiously watching her every breath. 'I had given up. Those with money have been taking their children to India for surgery, but I simply couldn't afford it,' said Vimbainashe Chakanungwa as she helped her daughter sip her meal. Chakanungwa's monthly salary as a teacher is about $300, barely enough for household basics, let alone surgery. Gracious is one of 10 children who received free open-heart surgery in July at Parirenyatwa Hospital from a visiting team of Egyptian surgeons working alongside Zimbabwean doctors. In a country with just a handful of cardiothoracic specialists and chronic shortages of functioning equipment in public hospitals, the 'heart camp' offered hope to families who can't imagine raising the $15,000 needed for surgery abroad. Zimbabwe has only five cardiothoracic surgeons, including Dr. Kudzai Kanyepi, the country's first and only female heart surgeon. 'There is no medication that can replace surgery. The burden of disease remains, and unfortunately some of the children pass away without getting the help they desperately need,' Kanyepi said. 'It is the reason why we continue to work in our country. There is nothing greater than helping your own people.' Zimbabwe resumed open-heart operations in 2023 after they were paused in 2018 due to economic turmoil. Since then, local surgeons have operated on 55 children. Another 19 have benefited from two surgical camps last year and in July with Egyptian assistance and supported by nongovernmental organizations such as Gift of Life International. Globally, about one in every 100 children is born with congenital heart disease, making it the world's most common birth defect, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In Zimbabwe, an estimated 4,500 children are born with heart disease each year, with many unable to access surgery, said Dr. Simukayi Machawira, head of cardiology at the hospital. Of those, 30% — or around 1,200 infants — are likely to die in their first year if untreated, he said. 'You can imagine, it's quite a lot of children,' he said. Dr. Hesham Shawky, the Egyptian team leader, has organized similar camps in Kenya and Uganda. 'This is the only solution for many people in Africa because they can't afford private care,' he said. On the ward in Zimbabwe, mothers hovered over their children, relief etched on their faces. Machines beeped softly as nurses adjusted tubes. One baby slept beside a balloon scrawled with a smiley face. For Chakanungwa, the joy over her child was hard to measure. 'I had resorted to prayer, just hoping for a miracle,' Chakanungwa said, smiling. 'It's impossible to open my heart to show my gratitude and happiness. I was afraid that I could lose my baby, but here is the baby. She's back to life.' ___ For more on Africa and development: The Associated Press receives financial support for global health and development coverage in Africa from the Gates Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at Solve the daily Crossword
CNN
17 hours ago
- CNN
RFK Jr. fires top aides in HHS shakeup
US Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has fired two of his top aides in an abrupt shakeup of the leadership at the nation's sprawling health department, two people familiar with the matter told CNN. Kennedy's chief of staff, Heather Flick Melanson, and deputy chief of staff for policy Hannah Anderson left HHS after only a handful of months on the job, following internal clashes that culminated in both of their removals this week. After this story published, Flick Melanson said in an email, 'It's simple. I was not fired. I resigned.' Anderson did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Flick Melanson had initially pushed to oust Anderson over dissatisfaction with her performance, three of the people familiar with the matter said. But the firing was not carried out through the proper processes, the people said, including taking the White House by surprise. Those complications angered Kennedy and triggered his decision to then fire FlickMelanson over his loss of confidence in her as well. In a statement, an HHS spokesperson confirmed the moves and said the department's White House liaison, Matt Buckham, would serve as acting chief of staff. 'He brings valuable experience in personnel strategy and organizational management to this new role,' the spokesperson said. 'Secretary Kennedy thanks the outgoing leadership for their service and looks forward to working closely with Mr. Buckham as the Department continues advancing its mission to Make America Healthy Again.' Kennedy has not decided on permanent replacements for Flick Melanson and Anderson, the people familiar said. The move leaves Kennedy needing to fill key senior positions at HHS just months into his tenure, as the department has come under growing scrutiny over its efforts to overhaul the nation's vaccine policies and advance a range of major health and food priorities. Flick Melanson was among Kennedy's most experienced Washington hands, having served at HHS during President Donald Trump's first term, first as its acting general counsel and then as acting secretary for administration and a senior adviser to then-HHS Secretary Alex Azar. Anderson joined HHS after stints on Capitol Hill as a GOP staffer, including as health policy adviser to Republicans on the Senate's main health committee. She had most recently headed up health care issues at the Trump-aligned America First Policy Institute think tank. This story has been updated with a statement Flick Melanson provided after publication. CNN's Sarah Owermohle contributed to this report.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
One in five NHS doctors considering leaving UK profession, report warns
The Government's pledge to cut hospital waiting lists is at risk unless more is done to retain doctors in the NHS, the medical regulator has warned. Almost one in five (19%) of doctors are considering quitting being a doctor in the UK, the General Medical Council (GMC) said. And one in eight (12%) are considering leaving the UK to work abroad, according to GMC figures. The main reason given for considering a move abroad was that doctors are 'treated better' in other countries, with an increase in pay cited as the second most common reason for plans to emigrate. Overall, some 43% of doctors told the GMC that they had researched career opportunities in other countries. Some 15% of doctors reported they had taken 'hard steps' towards leaving UK practice – such as applying for roles overseas or contacting recruiters. 'We must be alive to the ongoing risks to retention of doctors and the impact of losing talented staff,' the authors of the GMC's latest report wrote. 'This could threaten Government ambitions to reduce waiting times and deliver better care to patients.' Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has pledged that, by July 2029, 92% of patients will be seen within 18 weeks for routine hospital treatment such as hip and knee replacements. The GMC's latest report also raised concerns about career progression for medics. The report highlighted that 8% of doctors who felt they could progress their career said they were likely to leave the UK medical profession and had taken hard steps towards doing so, compared with 27% of those who did not feel this way. Overall one in three doctors said they are unable to progress their education, training and careers in the way they want, according to the report, which is based on responses from 4,697 doctors around the UK. It found that those who did not feel as though their careers were progressing the way they would wish were at higher risk of burnout and were less satisfied with their work. The GMC said that workloads, competition for posts, and lack of senior support for development are adversely impacting career hopes for UK doctors. Charlie Massey, chief executive of the GMC, said: 'Like any profession, doctors who are disillusioned with their careers will start looking elsewhere. 'Doctors need to be satisfied, supported, and see a hopeful future for themselves, or we may risk losing their talent and expertise altogether. 'Achieving this requires modernising the current training system, so it meets the needs of doctors and patients.' It comes as Health Secretary Wes Streeting and the British Medical Association are locked in talks to avert further strike action by resident doctors after a five-day walkout in July. Resident doctors, formerly known as junior doctors, are in a dispute with the Government over pay and a lack of places for doctors in training. Commenting on the GMC report, Billy Palmer, senior fellow at the Nuffield Trust think tank, said: 'Pay and industrial action have been a lightning rod for dissatisfaction among doctors but this survey puts a spotlight on the wider difficulties facing the medical profession. 'Job guarantees, better rotas and placements, and protection of training time all need to be on the table. 'Addressing the burden of medical graduates' student debt by gradually writing off loans could also be a promising way to reward doctors' NHS service. With fewer than three in five doctors in 'core training' remaining in the NHS eight years later, unless warnings from this survey are dealt with, we'll continue to lose these skilled clinicians.' A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: 'The findings in this report are further evidence of what we know, that after more than a decade of neglect, doctors have legitimate complaints about their conditions, including issues with training bottlenecks and career progression. 'We want to work with them to address these and improve their working lives, which includes our plans set out in the 10 Year Health Plan to prioritise UK graduates and increase speciality training posts. 'This Government is committed to improving career opportunities and working conditions, bringing in ways to recognise and reward talent – as well as freeing up clinicians' time by cutting red tape.'
