Queensland DNA lab at 'point of critical failure' with victims of crime waiting years for testing, report finds
An investigation into Queensland's beleaguered forensics lab has found it is at a "point of critical failure", leading to years-long delays in the justice system.
It follows two commissions of inquiry into Forensic Science Queensland (FSQ), which found evidence may have been compromised for criminal trials dating back to 2007 and potentially led to miscarriages of justice.
The report, led by Dr Kirsty Wright, found serious issues persisted despite those inquiries.
"Victims are waiting over a year for the rape kits to be tested. In other jurisdictions, that's taking five to 10 days, so you can see the chasm in the service that we need to rebuild."
More than 13,000 samples still need to be retested, which is expected to take two years to complete.
Cases in the magistrates' court relying on DNA evidence are being delayed by up to three years, the report found.
Recommendations from the first inquiry saw changes to the DNA testing method, but the report found this had been done incorrectly, noting a "poor quality culture".
"We've found systemic contamination. We've found shortcuts are being taken. We've found that the accreditation standards aren't being adhered to as well," Dr Wright said.
"Test methods are being used that haven't been properly tested. So we need to go back and examine that further to see how many cases in the last two-and-a-half years might have been compromised."
Dr Wright found testing was being done in a "dirty lab", resulting in environmental contamination on a weekly basis.
"There was evidence of this for at least a year, a year and a half."
The second six-week inquiry was launched in 2023, after lobbying from Dr Wright and the family of stabbed Mackay woman Shandee Blackburn, where DNA evidence was central to the case.
In a letter, Ms Blackburn's mother Vicki and sister Shannah said their trauma had been compounded following the revelations exposed in each inquiry.
"We hope no-one endures losing a beloved family member in the way we have. However, that is not a reality," they said.
An anonymous victim-survivor noted in a letter to the review that there had been no progress in the result from a rape kit she submitted in April 2024, and no information as to when it might be processed.
"The uncertainty — not knowing when or if justice will be done — prevents survivors from healing and moving forward," they said.
The report outlined the tangible impact of DNA processing delays on the courts.
On one occasion, a case went to trial without DNA evidence despite the prosecution pleading its relevance. In another, an alleged murderer, who was "considered a risk of reoffending", was released on bail due to delays in samples.
The government has appointed former NSW Police Commissioner Mick Fuller to head a new expert team to overhaul operations at the lab.
"I think it's disastrous. I'm not lost in terms of the challenges, but to be clear, I'm not here to do another review. I'm here to drive the recommendations," Mr Fuller said.
The review made 26 recommendations, which Dr Wright said would provide a "comprehensive blueprint" for change.
"This report isn't a box of Band-Aids. My team and I have looked thoroughly into what needs to be changed within the laboratory," she said.
"But also from the system, across the policing system and the DPP, how can the lab better serve the courts and the police?"
Former director of the facility, Dr Linzi Wilson-Wilde, resigned last month following "contamination issues" being identified.
Dr Wright said she wasn't interested in the role and would continue assisting victims in other ways.
Premier David Crisafulli was pressed on whether anyone would be held responsible for failings at the lab.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Perth Now
14 minutes ago
- Perth Now
Women's app makes case to 'disadvantage' for equality
A social media app has defended ejecting a transgender woman, claiming that certain groups could be lawfully disadvantaged by efforts to advance women's rights. The Giggle for Girls app is seeking to overturn a 2024 finding that it discriminated against a transgender user by removing her from the women-only platform in September 2021. The platform was a "special measure" exempt from discrimination law as it sought to achieve substantial equality between men and women, an appeal court was told on Monday. The ability to create these kinds of special measures to promote equality would be frustrated if Justice Robert Bromwich's findings remained because they would - by definition - discriminate against some group of people, Noel Hutley SC said. "A special measure will exclude someone necessarily because it's otherwise not special," he told the Full Court of the Federal Court on Monday. Lawyers from the Sex Discrimination Commissioner have challenged this, telling the court that this would permit "invidious discrimination" to take place under the shield of a special measure. When Mr Hutley said this was an "extreme example" and did not need to be considered, one judge pushed back - asking why someone seeking to actively harm another group would be protected. "Why would the (Sex Discrimination Act) then say that's OK?" Justice Melissa Perry asked. Mr Hutley replied by saying parliament had to form a compromise when enacting the legislation. "So you say as long as you have a purpose of achieving substantive equality between one of the protected groups, you're in, irrespective of the nature of any other purpose?" the judge asked. "Quite," Mr Hutley replied. "If your purpose was to advance women, (if another) purpose was to disadvantage men then there's nothing wrong with that." Roxanne Tickle - who was born male but identifies as female - was removed from the app in September 2021. Ms Tickle has also filed her own challenge to Justice Bromwich's decision, seeking to increase the $10,000 in damages he awarded her in August 2024. She further claims the judge wrongly found that she was not directly discriminated against by Giggle and its founder Sall Grover. The judge found that a condition by the platform that its members had the appearance of cisgender women did not specifically target Ms Tickle but indirectly discriminated against her. The hearing continues. Lifeline 13 11 14 Fullstop Australia 1800 385 578

ABC News
14 minutes ago
- ABC News
New vision shows police seizing mushroom murderer Erin Patterson's phone
Victoria's Supreme Court has released police footage of Erin Patterson handing over a "dummy" phone to officers as they investigated the mass poisoning at her Leongatha home. Patterson, who was last month found guilty of murdering three relatives with beef Wellingtons containing death cap mushrooms and attempting to murder a fourth, can be seen handing over the device to a homicide detective in August 2023. In the days after the fatal lunch on July 29, 2023, Patterson embarked on a cover-up to distance herself from the horrific illnesses suffered by Don and Gail Patterson, Heather Wilkinson and sole survivor Ian Wilkinson. Patterson switched her phone and provided police with another device that had been factory reset on numerous occasions. She also dumped a food dehydrator used to prepare the deadly meal. Prosecutors alleged Patterson feigned illness to doctors, claiming to have eaten the same contaminated meal. In the newly released footage, Patterson can be seen sitting at her dining table opposite Detective Sergeant Luke Farrell, as officers conduct a thorough search of her house. "Thanks for your patience today, Erin," Detective Sergeant Farrell says. "We're completing our search. The only outstanding item is that mobile phone that you've got there, so I'll seize that from you. "Is there a pin code on your phone? Do you know what it is?" Patterson replies, however the phone unlocks without a pin code, and is taken by the detective. "Makes your job easy," Patterson quips. The device, which came to be nicknamed Phone B, had already been factory reset by Patterson, who managed to remotely wipe the device a final time after it was in a police safe. During Patterson's trial, prosecutors said nothing meaningful was found on the Samsung device. The main phone Patterson had been using in the lead-up to the lunch, nicknamed Phone A, was never located. However, officers were able to retrieve cell tower data, which placed Phone A in the vicinity of sites where death cap mushrooms were growing. Patterson denied hiding Phone A, and insisted it had been missed by officers who searched her home. The Supreme Court also released footage of Patterson dumping a dehydrator at the Koonwarra Transfer Station four days after the lunch. She can be seen parking her red SUV and carrying the dehydrator into a large green shed which houses electronic waste bins. Testing on the dehydrator later revealed traces of death cap mushrooms. Patterson is yet to be sentenced over the murders of Don and Gail Patterson and Heather Wilkinson, and the attempted murder of Ian Wilkinson. She has always maintained her innocence and argued that she did not deliberately include death cap mushrooms in the meal served up to the lunch guests. Patterson's police interview, in which she told further lies to detectives, was tendered as evidence during the trial but has not been released by the court. During the trial, prosecutors did not allege a motive for the crime, but argued Patterson's relationship with her in-laws had been in decline.

ABC News
14 minutes ago
- ABC News
Former WA Police officer Gary Edward Fitzgerald allegedly had sex with teenager in police station
A WA Police officer had a sexual relationship with a 16-year-old girl he met while on duty, and even had sex with her in the interview room at Fremantle Police Station, a Perth court has been told. WARNING: This story contains details which may distress some readers. The District Court has heard the former officer encouraged her to participate in threesomes, with the complainant thinking she "couldn't say no" because he was with the police force. Gary Edward Fitzgerald, 55, is on trial, charged with five counts of sexual penetration of a child over 16, under their care, supervision or authority. The time period covered by the prosecution case is from 1999 through to 2001, when Mr Fitzgerald was a serving officer. The prosecution said Mr Fitzgerald first went to the 16-year-old girl's home with another officer after she had called police, worried about a housemate who had run away. Following some "flirty comments", he handed her his card with his mobile phone number on it, prosecutor Danya Borkowski said. She said a sexual relationship soon started, with encounters "every week or so". On one occasion, the court heard, Mr Fitzgerald said he had "too much paperwork" and asked her to go to Fremantle Police Station with a made-up story about "an incident at Coles". When they were in the interview room, the pair had sex, Ms Borkowski said. Mr Fitzgerald later asked for the teenager to have a threesome with himself and a woman at his Samson home, the court was told. The prosecutor said the pair also had a threesome with a man Mr Fitzgerald was living with in Bull Creek. Ms Borkowski told the jury a 16-year-old can't be considered as giving consent if Mr Fitzgerald was in a position of authority as a police officer. "She believed she couldn't say no," the prosecutor said. Mr Fitzgerald's lawyer said his client thought the complainant was an adult woman at the time. Defence lawyer David McCallum called on the jury to give his client "a fair go". He told the court that what would be in dispute was whether the then teenager was in his care, supervision or authority. "He was never in a position to have any lawful authority over her," Mr McCallum said. Appearing in court via videolink, the complainant described in detail the sexual acts she engaged in with Mr Fitzgerald and others. She told the court that when she first met Mr Fitzgerald, and they had gone looking for her housemate in Cottesloe, she made a flirty comment. She was sitting alongside him in the police vehicle and found there was something "digging" into her. "Is that your gun or are you happy to see me," she said she asked him. The woman told the court she believed she was seeing the officer for about a year but said it was "sex on call" and was not "really a relationship". She said she felt it was the "price to pay" for him being available for issues related to her housemate. She told the court she believed she "owed him" for being on call, but she also described herself as "naive". The trial continues.