Peter Dutton's taxpayer-funded flight to ‘long lunch' on Noosa River was investigated by expenses watchdog
The expenses watchdog launched an investigation into then-home affairs minister Peter Dutton's use of a taxpayer-funded flight to attend a 'long lunch' on a luxury island on the Noosa River in 2019, internal documents reveal.
Dutton billed taxpayers $465 for a flight from Sydney to Maroochydore on 19 July 2019, the same day he was to appear alongside the then-Queensland opposition leader, Deb Frecklington, as a special guest at a private event on Makepeace Island, a resort island part-owned by Richard Branson.
The invitation to the event, seen by Guardian Australia, describes it as an 'exclusive long lunch on Makepeace Island with special guests Hon. Peter Dutton MP, minister for home affairs, and [redacted]'.
Guests were ferried to the private island from the Noosa marina at 12pm, returning at either 4pm or 4.45pm. The drive from the Sunshine Coast airport – where Dutton landed – to the Noosa marina takes about 30 minutes.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
The investigation found that Dutton's use of expenses was within the rules, and Guardian Australia is not suggesting otherwise. The rules state that parliamentarians are required to use expenses in good faith, 'for the dominant purpose of conducting parliamentary business' and in a way that achieves 'value for money'.
Documents obtained under freedom of information by the Guardian and former freelance journalist William Summers show the Independent Parliamentary Expenses Authority (Ipea), which oversees MPs' expense claims, conducted a preliminary assessment of Dutton's travel following Guardian's reporting in 2021.
The preliminary assessment concluded that Dutton had used parliamentary business resources for the trip and recommended that a more thorough investigation, known as an assurance review, be conducted.
The documents show the full review was completed six months later, on 9 September 2021, and determined that Dutton's expense claim was in accordance with the rules.
That was because the invitation to the event 'addressed the Minister as Minister for Home Affairs' and 'the Minister was an invited guest to the 'Long Lunch on Makepeace Island' event, which he attend in his official capacity as a Minister'.
This made the trip parliamentary business and entitled Dutton to claim travel in association with it, the watchdog ruled. It found he had not used taxpayer funds 'for his travel from Maroochydore to Makepeace Island or from Makepeace Island to his home base of Brisbane'.
'On the basis of the assessment conducted, IPEA has concluded the travel was for parliamentary business as defined in Schedule 4(b) of the Determination, as the Minister was an invited guest to the 'Long Lunch on Makepeace Island' event, which he attend in his official capacity as a Minister,' the watchdog ruled.
Ipea declined to comment further on its ruling.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
There was little other indication from Dutton's social media accounts of him attending community events in or near Maroochydore at the time. On 19 July 2019 he posted a video filmed in the outer Brisbane suburb of Ironbark Gully, which is in his electorate of Dickson, 100km from Maroochydore. It featured an RSL sub-branch president, whom he hailed as one of 'Dickson's heroes'.
The website for Makespeace Island describes it as a 'private luxury resort home, set on an exclusive-use island and nestled in the tranquil waters of the Noosa River'. The island is used for corporate retreats and functions, among other things.
For those staying overnight, a master villa attracts a nightly rate of $19,950 for eight guests.
Anthony Whealy, a former New South Wales supreme court judge and current chair of the Centre for Public Integrity, said the expenses system needed review.
He said it allowed a grey area for MPs to claim travel in circumstances the public would not always accept as fair.
'I think the public demand that these sorts of systems be shaken up every now and again because clearly they're not satisfactory,' Whealy said.
'There's always this grey area where integrity is being threatened. That's because people slot their behaviour into systems and rules without those systems being examined closely enough.'
Dutton's office did not respond to a request for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
11 minutes ago
- The Guardian
A nuanced approach to ageing, sex and gender
Born in 1976, I am around the same age as Susanna Rustin and the generation of 'middle-aged, gender-critical women' who believe that their biological sex should underpin and define their rights (Why is there such a generational divide in views on sex and gender in Britain?, 5 June). I am not one of those people. Forty-nine years' experience of living in a female body in a world deformed by class, caste and economic and racial inequality – never mind environmental destruction – has only made me wonder quite why it matters so much to some people. A truly progressive society should be moving towards seeing the person first, both beyond and in profound recognition of their politicised identities. One can see biological sex as both fundamental and immaterial at the same time. As I approach 50, it's clear to me that it's possible to hold both these thoughts simultaneously. My menopausal womanhood matters as it gets in the way of things I want to do in life. But there's no way it matters to me above all else, and there's no chance it gets in the way to a greater degree than the various effects of social and economic inequality. It is a fallacy to suggest that trans inclusivity is more compatible with capitalism than with collective liberation. If the Progress Pride flag is flown from a corporate building – a rare sight in my experience compared with the rainbow Pride flag – it's not because it 'suits them', in Rustin's words, to shift attention away from class politics towards individual expression. Perhaps younger people better understand that corporate interests don't engage with class politics anyway, so how's a flag going to hurt anyone? I was born with breasts and ovaries, and still have them; I have given birth twice. These facts have had undeniable effects on my life – but so has the disadvantage of my class of birth and the continuing advantage of my whiteness. If I were to look at every aspect of my life through the prism of my reproductive organs, I would be limiting the possibilities of looking at the multiple effects of all those factors in the whole – the effects of which can only lead one to conclude that they are human, a person, first. It's called intersectionality, and that term was come up with by Kimberlé Crenshaw, who was born in 1959. Lynsey HanleyLiverpool Susanna Rustin lists several possibilities for why gen Z are more likely to advocate for the inclusion of transgender women in single-sex spaces. One thing she did not mention is that it may be due to the personal relationships that this demographic is more likely to have with transgender individuals, and how much more easily it is to sympathise with the struggles of those we know. As an older member of gen Z, I have had two openly trans peers in my cohort during my time at university, my former neighbour was transgender, and now in my workplace I have a transgender colleague. This resembles the norm – a Guardian article from June 2022 suggests that 50% of British gen Zers said they knew at least one transgender person. I would argue that gen Z more openly fights for the inclusion and protections of transgender women because we're more likely to see them as truly women, rather than 'self-identifying' individuals, due to our personal connections with them. To me, my trans female colleague would intrude on my bodily privacy the same amount as my cis female colleague would. As always, I implore others to seek out the voices and stories of transgender people if knowing them personally may be outside your generational demographic, so we can better empathise with this often scapegoated BarkerCamelford, Cornwall Thank you for such a well-written and clearly argued article by Susanna Rustin. I am pleased to see the Guardian publishing this piece. It is very important to be able to speak openly about these important issues and engage in frank but respectful debate. I completely agree with the author and would also add that with age comes experience, a certain weariness, a generally more nuanced outlook on life and a deep understanding of how embodied our experiences are but also anger – anger that hard-won women's rights, protections, dignity and safety can be so easily dismissed by so-called and address supplied Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.
The Guardian
11 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Trust no one when it comes to ID cards
Polly Toynbee posits a world in which everyone has a smartphone and all government agencies can be trusted (Digital ID cards would be good for Britain – and a secret weapon for Labour against Reform, 9 June). What colour is the sky in this world?Linda MockettWinnersh, Berkshire Am I the only one thinking about Sellafield and wondering by what stretch of the imagination nuclear power can be called 'clean' (Sizewell C power station to be built as part of UK's £14bn nuclear investment, 10 June)?Dr Nigel MellorNewcastle upon Tyne This year, I received my 50 years' service badge from Aslef – a couple of years late, but we are train drivers, after all. During my career, I always 'worked on the railway', never on the trains (Letters, 8 June). Malcolm SimpsonSalisbury, Wiltshire So is an airport a plane station or a runway station?Colin ProwerChipping Norton, Oxfordshire I am sick of hearing calls to raise the price of alcoholic beverages (Letters, 8 June). This would have little or no effect on the middle and upper classes, but would punish those on lower incomes. What next? A rise in food prices to deal with the obesity problem?Noel HannonLondon Damned bold of Dave Schilling to assume Elon Musk and Donald Trump ever had anything like friendship, as opposed to plans to exploit each other (Male friendship isn't easy. Just ask Trump and Musk, 7 June).Brandi WeedWoodland, California, US Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.
The Guardian
16 minutes ago
- The Guardian
While friends were partying, Conor was preparing for court. His case has now prompted Labor to act on family violence
When Conor Pall turned 18, he should have been studying for his Year 12 exams. Instead, he was preparing for court. In January 2021, his mother had successfully applied for a family violence intervention order (FVIO) protecting them both. But when Pall became a legal adult in June, that protection no longer applied to him – a fact he only learned when he tried to report a breach of the order to police. That order has since expired. To stay safe, Pall had to start the process again, this time as an applicant, all while juggling the pressures of school. 'While my friends were planning for parties and when I should've been studying, getting ready for Year 12 exams, I was briefing a barrister,' Pall says. It was a stark shift from months earlier, at 17, when he supported his mother in court but was dismissed because of his age. 'The magistrate looked at me and asked how old I was, and I replied I was 17. His response was, 'A courtroom isn't a place for kids' and he asked me to leave,' Pall says. 'How ironic that I had to attend court when I turned 18 – by myself – just five months later. What had changed? 'I didn't age out of fear, I didn't age out of risk. I was still so scared of the perpetrator.' Pall wrote to the Victorian government in early 2022 urging changes to the law. His letter has now prompted action, with Labor confirming to Guardian Australia it will introduce legislation to parliament later this year to prevent 'ageing out' of FVIOs. The Victorian Law Reform Commission is already examining the issue, with a report due in July. But the attorney general, Sonya Kilkenny, says reforms will proceed regardless of its findings. 'Having listened to people like Conor, it's a really compelling case about why change is needed,' she says. There are 'thousands and thousands of children' who are party to a family violence intervention order, but the law is 'not clear about what happens to them when they turn 18', Kilkenny says. 'That creates a heightened level of uncertainty and anxiety about what that means for them when they turn 18. Are they protected or aren't they? Do they have to go back to court, on their own, in circumstances that can be really traumatising?' Current legislation is 'silent' on the issue, leaving it to magistrates' interpretation, and Kilkenny says reforms will provide certainty by making it clear an FVIO continues to protect a person after they turn 18 until it lapses. The new legislation will also close loopholes allowing alleged perpetrators to avoid being served, including while in custody, and allow Victoria to issue FVIOs even if violence occurred interstate, helping victim-survivors in border towns or those who moved for safety reasons. Kilkenny also confirmed a default two-year length for FVIOs will be introduced, bringing Victoria into line with the ACT, New South Wales and Western Australia. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion The bill, which is guaranteed to pass the lower house but will require the support of the Coalition opposition or members of the crossbench in the upper house, will also include long-awaited changes to stalking laws. The reforms were first proposed as part of a broader women's safety package announced in 2024 and at the time some experts warned changes to FVIOs could worsen outcomes for victims misidentified as perpetrators. Kilkenny says that following consultation, the legislation will include safeguards to prevent misidentification when courts issue FVIOs and when police issue interim family violence safety notices – with the latter more prone to error. Family violence continues to surge in Victoria. In 2024, police recorded 104,786 family violence incidents, an 11.3% increase on the previous year. There were also 61,522 breaches of FVIOs. Pall has welcomed the reforms, but also called for more support to help victims 'heal and recover', noting his experience with the justice system left a lasting impact. 'I started drinking. I was diagnosed with PTSD. I was suicidal – not just because of the perpetrator's abuse but because of the system's inability to recognise me as a victim in my own right,' he says. 'It's a system that wasn't designed with adult victim-survivors in mind, let alone children and young people.' In Australia, the national family violence counselling service is on 1800 737 732. In the UK, call the national domestic abuse helpline on 0808 2000 247, or visit Women's Aid. In the US, the domestic violence hotline is 1-800-799-SAFE (7233). Other international helplines may be found via
