Iran to hold nuclear talks with European powers on Friday
"The meeting between Iran, Britain, France and Germany will take place at the deputy foreign minister level," Esmaeil Baghaei was quoted by Iranian state media as saying.
The talks scheduled for Friday come after foreign ministers of the E3 nations, as those European countries are known, as well as the European Union's foreign policy chief, held their first call on Thursday with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi since Israel and the U.S. attacked Iranian nuclear facilities a month ago.
The three European countries, along with China and Russia, are the remaining parties to a 2015 nuclear deal reached with Iran - from which the United States withdrew in 2018 - that lifted sanctions on the Middle Eastern country in return for restrictions on its nuclear programme.
The E3 have said they would restore U.N. sanctions on Tehran via the "snapback mechanism" by the end of August if nuclear talks that were ongoing between Iran and the U.S. before the Israel-Iran air war do not resume or fail to produce concrete results.
"If EU/E3 want to have a role, they should act responsibly, and put aside the worn-out policies of threat and pressure, including the 'snap-back' for which they lack absolutely [any] moral and legal ground," Araqchi said earlier in the week.
The snapback mechanism can be used to restore U.N. sanctions before the U.N. Security Council resolution enshrining the deal expires on October 18.
Prior to the Israel-Iran war, Tehran and Washington held five rounds of nuclear talks mediated by Oman but faced major stumbling blocks such as uranium enrichment in Iran, which Western powers want to bring down to zero to minimise any risk of weaponisation.
Tehran maintains its nuclear programme is solely meant for civilian purposes.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
31 minutes ago
- Reuters
US hits Iranian shipping network with major new sanctions
WASHINGTON, July 30 (Reuters) - The U.S. Treasury Department announced fresh sanctions on Wednesday on over 115 Iran-linked individuals, entities and vessels, in a sign the Trump administration is doubling down on its "maximum pressure" campaign after bombing Tehran's key nuclear sites in June. The sanctions broadly target the shipping interests of Mohammad Hossein Shamkhani, the son of Ali Shamkhani, who is himself an adviser to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The U.S. Treasury described the move as the most significant Iran-related sanctions action since 2018, during President Donald Trump's first administration. According to Treasury, Shamkhani controls a vast network of container ships and tankers through a complex web of intermediaries that sell Iranian and Russian oil and other goods throughout the world. Treasury accused Shamkhani of using personal connections and corruption in Tehran to generate tens of billions of dollars in profits, much of which is used to prop up the Iranian regime. Overall, the new sanctions target 15 shipping firms, 52 vessels, 12 individuals and 53 entities involved in sanctions evasion in 17 countries, ranging from Panama to Italy to Hong Kong. A U.S. official said the new move would make it "much more difficult" for Iran to sell its oil, but added that the administration did not anticipate any sustained disruption to global oil markets . The official said that Iran's oil exports had already declined to around 1.2 million barrels per day, from 1.8 million bpd at the start of the year, after the administration imposed several smaller rounds of sanctions targeting Iran's oil business. "We're still engaging further action to bring that number down even more," the official said, noting that sanctions pressure during Trump's first term had cut Iran oil flows to a few hundred thousand bpd. Iran's UN mission did not immediately respond to a request for comment. China is the top buyer of Iran's oil. The European Union sanctioned Shamkhani earlier in July, citing his role in the Russian oil trade. A U.S. official said that Wednesday's action would impact both Russia and Iran, but the action was focused on Iran. "From our perspective, given where this individual fits, given his connection to the Supreme Leader and his father's previous sanctions activities, given the Iran-related authorities, it's critically important to emphasize that this is an Iran action that is meaningful and very impactful," the official said. Ali Shamkhani, Mohammad Hossein Shamkhani's father, was sanctioned by the United States in 2020. The latest sanctions announcement came as prospects for renewed U.S.-Iran diplomacy remained dim in the aftermath of the U.S. bombing of Iranian nuclear sites last month. Trump warned on Monday that he would order fresh U.S. attacks should Tehran try to restart the nuclear sites the U.S. had already struck. He also told reporters Iran has been sending out "nasty signals" and that any effort to restart its nuclear program would be immediately quashed. The United States held five rounds of talks with Iran prior to its airstrikes in June, which Trump said had "obliterated" a program that Washington and its ally Israel say is aimed at developing a nuclear bomb. Some experts have questioned the extent of the damage. Iran denies seeking a nuclear weapon. A senior White House official said last week that Washington was open to talking directly to Iran. But European and Iranian diplomats have said there is little prospect of Iran re-engaging with the U.S. at the negotiating table for now.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
DAILY MAIL COMMENT: Gesture politics will not end Gaza's agony
No country is more acutely aware of its history than Israel. And for good reason. Created as a permanent Jewish homeland after the horrors of the Nazi holocaust, it has constantly had to fight for survival against belligerent Arab neighbours. In 1948, 1967 and 1973, those neighbours tried to destroy it. They failed, but ever since there have been countless terrorist outrages and rocket attacks on Israeli civilians, many carried out by militant groups directed and funded by Iran. The UK has always sympathised with Israel's existential struggle and staunchly backed its right to self-defence. Until now. Sir Keir Starmer 's announcement that Britain will recognise Palestine as a sovereign state unless Israel 'ends the suffering in Gaza ' seriously undermines the Jewish state and gives succour to terrorists. The PM wants to put pressure on Israel to stop bombarding Gaza and commit to a future two-state solution. But how can there be a lasting ceasefire while Hamas is still holding up to 50 Israeli hostages? Their unconditional release – or return of their bodies – must surely come before any discussion of statehood. And what does a two-state solution mean in practice? What would be the boundaries of this new Palestinian state? What would prevent it being ruled by Islamist extremists like Hamas? What safeguards would Israel have against being attacked by it? None of this detail is addressed by Sir Keir. Released hostage Ilana Gritzewsky with photos of her boyfriend, Matan Zangauker, who is being held hostage by Hamas in the Gaza Strip The assumption is that Israel should retreat to its pre-1967 borders, giving up Gaza and the West Bank. But this ignores both history and present-day reality. Israel occupied these areas after the Six-Day War, because they are of vital strategic importance and could provide a launchpad for further enemy attacks. Handing them over to a potentially hostile government would still be a very real threat to Israeli national security. Furthermore, 600,000 Jewish settlers live in the West Bank, some of whom have been there more than half a century. Should they all be evicted? And if so, where to? Then there is East Jerusalem, also occupied in 1967 and housing the Old City and the Wailing Wall, Judaism's holiest site. It had previously been annexed (illegally) by Jordan, which expelled Jews, destroyed synagogues and restricted access to the holy places. What is to stop similar human rights abuses happening again? There are still 28 UN countries that don't even recognise Israel's right to exist. Like Hamas and Hezbollah, they favour a one-state solution – with no Jews. No one could fail to be moved by the plight of Gazans since Hamas launched its blitzkrieg of rape, slaughter and abduction on October 7, 2023. Israel has retaliated with extreme force – many would say too extreme – in its bid to eliminate the terror threat and free the remaining hostages. But recognising Palestinian statehood will do nothing to alleviate Gaza's agony. Indeed, it could prolong it, emboldening militants to carry on the struggle. It's obvious Sir Keir made this announcement to appease the large anti-Zionist faction within his party. In doing so he has alienated the only democracy in the Middle East, rewarded terrorism and made British Jews feel less safe. It's gesture politics of the most desperate kind from a Prime Minister who is clearly losing control of his party. Instead of showing courage and leadership, he has cravenly abandoned a longstanding ally in time of need.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Trump accused of ‘attack on Brazilian democracy' after sanctioning Bolsonaro trial judge
Allies of Brazil's president, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, have accused Donald Trump of launching 'a direct attack on Brazilian democracy' after the US treasury slapped sanctions on Alexandre de Moraes, the supreme court judge widely credited with helping save Brazilian democracy from a 2022 rightwing coup. The highly controversial US move was announced on Wednesday by the secretary of the treasury, Scott Bessent, shortly before Trump followed through on a threat to hit Brazilian imports with 50% tariffs by signing an executive order 'to deal with the recent policies, practices, and actions by the government of Brazil'. Trump has partly attributed those tariffs to his outrage at the supposed political 'witch-hunt' against his far-right ally the former Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro, who is on trial for allegedly seeking to seize power after losing the 2022 presidential election to Lula. De Moraes is presiding over the trial, which is widely expected to result in Bolsonaro being convicted and sentenced to up to 43 years in jail, as well as several other criminal investigations into Bolsonaro and his family. Announcing the Magnitsky sanctions, Bessent accused De Moraes of being 'responsible for an oppressive campaign of censorship, arbitrary detentions that violate human rights and politicized prosecutions – including against former president Jair Bolsonaro'. 'Alexandre de Moraes has taken it upon himself to be judge and jury in an unlawful witch-hunt against US and Brazilian citizens and companies,' Bessent claimed. The US secretary of state, Marco Rubio, tweeted: 'Let this be a warning to those who would trample on the fundamental rights of their countrymen – judicial robes cannot protect you.' A White House statement confirming the 50% tariffs on Brazil – albeit with numerous major exemptions, including oil, orange juice, timber and aircraft – said they were a result of 'the government of Brazil's politically motivated persecution, intimidation, harassment, censorship, and prosecution of former Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro and thousands of his supporters'. Hundreds of hardcore Bolsonaro supporters have been put on trial and jailed for taking part in the 8 January 2023 rightwing riots in the capital, Brasília, during which the supreme court, congress and presidential palace were stormed and ransacked. The sanctions were celebrated by Bolsonaro's relatives and supporters, who see US pressure as the only way of helping the former president escape a hefty jail term and, perhaps, save his political future. 'We Brazilians will never forget this action of yours [Rubio and Trump],' tweeted Bolsonaro's congressman son, Eduardo Bolsonaro, who has spent recent weeks in the US lobbying the Trump administration to fight for his father's cause by imposing sanctions. 'Today I have a feeling of mission accomplished but our journey won't end here,' Eduardo Bolsonaro vowed in a social media video. But members of Lula's government denounced the move as a dramatic escalation of what they see as Trump's crusade to undermine Brazilian democracy. José Guimarães, a congressperson from Lula's leftwing Worker's party (PT), called the sanctions 'not just an affront to a supreme court minister … [but also] a direct attack on Brazilian democracy and sovereignty'. 'We will not accept foreign interference in … our justice system,' Guimarães wrote on X, calling the sanctions 'the fruit of a Bolsonaro family conspiracy against Brazil'. Gleisi Hoffmann, a top minister and one of Lula's closest allies, called Trump's move a 'violent and arrogant act' and expressed the government's 'utter repudiation' of the 'absurd' measure. The Magnitsky sanctions were named after Sergei Magnitsky, a Russian tax lawyer who died in a Moscow prison in 2009 after being imprisoned for exposing high-level corruption. They have been used since 2017 to sanction individuals accused of involvement in serious human rights abuses. Past targets have included Saudi Arabian officials involved in the 2018 murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi, Nicaraguan officials linked to a deadly crackdown designed to keep its dictator Daniel Ortega in power, Communist party leaders involved in the repression of members of the Uyghur ethnic group in west China and military chiefs in Myanmar involved in alleged acts of ethnic cleansing. Legal experts and human rights activists voiced astonishment and consternation that such sanctions had been used to target a judge in Latin America's largest democracy. Thiago Amparo, an international law and human rights professor from Brazil's Getulio Vargas Foundation, said the sanctions exposed 'Trump's distorted view of what a human rights violation is'. Amparo said Trump appeared to think that one of his ideological allies being given a fair trial for allegedly trying to stage a coup was equivalent to 'torture, genocide or other grave violations … to which laws such as Magnitsky are meant to apply'.
