WATCH: Trump-appointed judge chides colleagues' ignorance on guns in unique video dissent
In an 18-minute video uploaded to the Ninth Circuit's YouTube channel, VanDyke argued that the other judges on the appellate court lacked "the basic familiarity with firearms to understand the inherent shortcomings and obvious inadmissibility of the test that California was proposing" when they voted by a 7-4 margin Thursday to uphold the ban.
Dressed in his judicial robes, VanDyke went on to show the mechanics of his personal firearms for several minutes.
School Choice Activists Warn Parents About Blue State's Homeschool Bill With Jail-time Provision
"As an appellate body, it's obviously not our role to make factual determinations," VanDyke said in the video. "So I share this not to supplement the factual record that we're using to decide this case. Instead, I share this because a rudimentary understanding of how guns are made, sold, used and commonly modified makes obvious why California's proposed tests and the one my colleagues are adopting today simply does not work."
VanDyke went on to say he could "explain all this in writing" but that it is "much more effective to simply show" what he means through demonstrating it. He also said he had "rendered inoperable all the guns and gun parts" for the video demonstration for safety purposes.
Read On The Fox News App
In his discussion, VanDyke challenged California's argument that a magazine holding more than 10 rounds of ammunition is merely an accessory, not an arm protected by the Second Amendment, saying this argument is inconsistent with the facts of how a gun works, as a magazine plays an essential role in the function of a firearm, just like the firearm itself.
Public School Students In This State Could Soon Be Required To Take Gun Safety Courses
VanDyke asked California's counsel whether the reasoning that was used to justify banning these types of magazines could also be applied to semi-automatic firearms, which hold more rounds than older weapons, like muskets. He argued that the logic behind banning magazines could extend to banning semi-automatics altogether, which he suggested would be a broader and more extreme infringement of Second Amendment rights.
"I don't think that we could ban all semi-automatic weapons," California's attorney for the case said in the discussion. "The point I was just making is, with respect to accessories, I think we have a difference of opinion."
"That's important, because your argument turns on whether you can characterize accessories," Van Dyke responded. "So, you would say that the revolver versus semi-automatic is not an accessory, but that, but that a magazine is an accessory. So, what would you think about like a red dot sight? You know, electro optics, which are, which many, many firearms are going to, electronic optics nowadays? They're obviously an accessory, because you could have iron sights. Could you ban those?"
"Your Honor, I'm not intimately familiar with that," the counsel responded. "And I do want to answer this question and make sure that I save time for rebuttal." The state's attorney went on to say that at issue is whether, as an accessory, it is essential to exercising the right to self-defense.
Trump Surrogate Corrin Rankin Picked To Lead Blue State's Gop: 'Make California Great Again'
In her majority opinion, Clinton appointee Judge Marsha Berzon wrote that VanDyke's video was "wildly improper" and that he "in essence appointed himself as an expert witness in this case."
In 2016, the California legislature passed Senate Bill 1446, which banned the possession of so-called "large-capacity" magazines, or those that hold more than 10 rounds, starting July 1, 2017. The bill also imposed fines for those who failed to comply with this ban.
Later in 2016, Proposition 63 was approved by California voters, which incorporated the provisions of Senate Bill 1446 but also added a criminal penalty for the unlawful possession of large-capacity magazines after the July 1, 2017, deadline.Original article source: WATCH: Trump-appointed judge chides colleagues' ignorance on guns in unique video dissent
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
David Letterman Rips CBS Over ‘Late Show' Cancellation: 'Pure Cowardice'
Former Late Show host David Letterman has made his first direct comments about the cancellation of the CBS late night franchise — and they aren't positive. Speaking with his former executive producer, Barbara Gaines, in a YouTube video Friday, Letterman called the axing of The Late Show With Stephen Colbert 'pure cowardice' and said he doesn't believe the official line from CBS that the decision was purely about economics (the show has reportedly become a money-loser for the network). More from The Hollywood Reporter 'South Park' Creators Reveal Network Battle Over Premiere's Trump Penis as They Joke: "We're Terribly Sorry" Dissenting FCC Commissioner: Paramount Chose "Capitulation Over Courage" In Dealing With Trump Steve Buscemi Recalls Failed Audition for Barry Levinson's 'Tin Men': "There Was This Silence" 'The idea that they're hiding behind money — they've given [Colbert] another 10 months, that's another huge chunk of money they're gonna lose, according to them,' Letterman says in the video (watch it in full below). 'I don't think it was money. I think it was all to make sure [Skydance head David Ellison, set to become CEO of Paramount when the two companies' merger closes in early August] were solid spending dad's money.' (For much of the video, Letterman refers to Ellison as 'the Ellison twins' and 'the Oracle boys,' as in the software giant headed by Larry Ellison, David Ellison's father. Co-host Mary Barclay corrects him at one point, noting that David Ellison is not a twin, but he continues with the bit.) 'If they were losing that kind of money — you're telling me losing this kind of money happened yesterday?' Letterman continues. 'I bet they were losing this money a month ago or six weeks ago. Or they were never losing that kind of money. They did not handle Stephen Colbert, the face of that network, in the way he deserves.' Letterman's comments are his first directly addressing the cancellation of The Late Show, which he originated on CBS in 1993 and hosted until 2015. Colbert announced the cancellation on his July 17 show, although The Late Show will continue through the 2025-26 season. Letterman's YouTube channel, where his conversation with Gaines is posted, earlier this week shared a collection of Late Show clips featuring Letterman lambasting network brass. Letterman calls the decision 'sad,' though he jokes that it could be good for Colbert: 'For Stephen, I love this, because he gets to be a martyr.' He also relates the Late Show cancellation to CBS settling a lawsuit by Donald Trump against 60 Minutes for $16 million over the objections of the show's staff. 'This is pure cowardice,' Letterman says. 'You're telling me 60 Minutes, the pinnacle of journalistic excellence and integrity for decades … they decided, 'Aw, we're sorry, let us give you $20 million.' I believe this is in the wake of that.' Letterman closes with one last swipe at CBS and Paramount management. 'I think one day, if not today, the people at CBS who have manipulated and handled this are going to be embarrassed,' he says. 'This is gutless.' Best of The Hollywood Reporter 'The Studio': 30 Famous Faces Who Play (a Version of) Themselves in the Hollywood-Based Series 22 of the Most Shocking Character Deaths in Television History A 'Star Wars' Timeline: All the Movies and TV Shows in the Franchise Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Jay Leno Criticizes Political Late-Night Hosts: 'Nobody Wants to Hear a Lecture'
Jay Leno took aim at late-night hosts whose political humor appeals to only 'half their audience' by making jokes targeting only one side of the ideological spectrum. The 75-year-old former Tonight Show host made the comments during a recent interview with the Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation. While the interview was taped at least two weeks ago — likely before CBS made its shock announcement that it was canceling The Late Show With Stephen Colbert on July 17 — the portion of the interview containing the late-night criticism was posted on YouTube last week and has been making the rounds this weekend due to recent headlines. More from The Hollywood Reporter 'Late Show' Musicians' Union Calls Colbert's Cancellation "Censorship" 'South Park' Creators Reveal Network Battle Over Premiere's Trump Penis as They Joke: "We're Terribly Sorry" Steve Buscemi Recalls Failed Audition for Barry Levinson's 'Tin Men': "There Was This Silence" David Trulio, the president and CEO of the foundation, kicked things off by noting to Leno that his jokes were equally balanced between mocking Democrats and Republicans. 'I got hate letters saying, 'You and your Republican friends,' and another saying, 'I hope you and your Democratic buddies are happy' — over the same joke,' Leno says. 'That's how you get a whole audience. Now you have to be content with half the audience, because you have to give your opinion.' Continued Leno: 'Rodney Dangerfield and I were friends. I knew Rodney 40 years and I have no idea if he was a Democrat or Republican. We never discussed politics, we just discussed jokes. I like to think that people come to a comedy show to get away from the pressures of life. I love political humor — don't get me wrong. But people wind up cozying too much to one side or the other.' Leno concluded by saying: 'I don't think anybody wants to hear a lecture … Why shoot for just half an audience? Why not try to get the whole? I like to bring people into the big picture. I don't understand why you would alienate one particular group — or just don't do it at all. I'm not saying you have to throw your support [on one side]. But just do what's funny.' Leno hosted The Tonight Show for 17 years across two separate stints, starting in 1999 and concluding in 2014. During that time, the NBC series was often the top-rated late-night show. CBS abruptly announced The Late Show would conclude in May 2026, and called the move a 'financial decision.' But it came days after Colbert criticized the network for paying 'a big fat bribe' to President Donald Trump in the form of a $16 million settlement over a 60 Minutes interview. Newsbusters, a right-wing media watchdog, claimed The Late Show has hosted 176 outwardly left-leaning guests since 2022 and only one Republican, and booked 43 left-leaning guests since the start of 2025. Other late-night hosts — including current Tonight Show host Jimmy Fallon — have rallied behind Colbert since the decision, with fellow talents working under parent company Paramount Global having been especially scathing. 'What made you that money are shows that say something, shows that take a stand, shows that are unafraid…' Stewart said. 'If you believe — as corporations or as networks — that you can make yourselves so innocuous that you can serve a gruel so flavorless that you will never again be on the boy king's radar … Why would anyone watch you?' Best of The Hollywood Reporter 'The Studio': 30 Famous Faces Who Play (a Version of) Themselves in the Hollywood-Based Series 22 of the Most Shocking Character Deaths in Television History A 'Star Wars' Timeline: All the Movies and TV Shows in the Franchise Solve the daily Crossword
Fox News
4 hours ago
- Fox News
Kavanaugh cites 3 presidents in explaining Supreme Court's ballooning emergency docket
As President Donald Trump has faced an onslaught of legal bids to block his agenda during his second term in office, Trump-nominated Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh spoke at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit judicial conference on Thursday, according to reports. "Executive branches of both parties over the last 20 years have been increasingly trying to issue executive orders and regulations that achieve the policy objectives of the president in power," Kavanaugh said, according to the New York Times. "And I think presidents, whether it's President Obama – I think the phrase was 'pen and phone' – or President Biden or President Trump, have really done more of that, and those get challenged pretty quickly in court," he said, according to CNN. Unlike regular Supreme Court rulings that fully explain the rationale behind the decision, decisions on the high court's emergency docket may go unexplained. "We've been doing certainly more written opinions on the interim orders docket than we've done in the past," Kavanaugh said, according to CNN. Though he noted that issuing written opinions may pose the "risk" of "lock-in effect" in which that opinion does not "reflect the final view," reports indicate. Kavanaugh described the court's "collegiality" as "very strong," noting that the nine members on the bench "look out for each other" and consider one another "patriots" and "good people," according to reports. Trump nominated Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court during his first term in office. He also nominated Amy Coney Barrett and Neil Gorsuch, meaning he chose one third of the current justices.
