Trump Considering Buying Foreign Ships To Make Up Gap With China
Upset by the pace of domestic shipbuilding, President Donald Trump said he may look to foreign companies to produce vessels for the U.S. His comments came after his sweeping executive order seeking to revamp the American shipbuilding industry that pales in comparison to China's, which has been assessed to have a whopping 200-times larger capacity than the United States. Trump didn't spell out whether he was talking about commercial ships, naval vessels or both. However, this makes particular sense for expanding the U.S. Navy and is an option we have repeatedly highlighted in the past, given the litany of issues the service is facing.
'We may order, would have to go to Congress for this, but we may buy some ships from other countries that we're close to and do great jobs with ships,' Trump told reporters on Thursday. 'But we're going to start the process of rebuilding. We don't really essentially build ships anymore, which is ridiculous. It's going to be very big business for us in the not-too-distant future. But in the meantime, we have countries that do very well at building ships, and we'll be dealing with those countries. So we may be ordering top-of-the-line ships from those countries. And within a fairly short period of time, we'll be building our own ships. So we'll probably have to go to Congress for that, but we're not going to have a problem.'
.@MikeWaltz47: "Last year, the Chinese received 1700 orders for new ships. American shipyards received 5. Under your leadership… we are going to revitalize and make shipbuilding and maritime great again." pic.twitter.com/8wIELGLSRm
— Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) April 10, 2025
We reached out to the White House for clarification about what kinds of ships sparked Trump's interest. However, his remarks come amid concerns about the growth of the Chinese Navy in both mass and capability. You can read more about that yawning gap here.
As we have explained in past reporting, both South Korea and Japan are building vessels now that are related to the Arleigh Burke class that currently serves as the backbone of the U.S. Navy. This puts both countries in a unique position to build U.S.-spec Burke destroyers, or at least substantial parts of them. They also have other models that are unlike those currently in the fleet, including smaller warships. Logistics ships and sea bases are also well within their capabilities.
South Korea has already made inroads into the U.S. shipbuilding industry. The Hanwha Ocean Co. recently purchased the Navy shipyard in Philadelphia and secured Korea's first contract to overhaul a U.S. Navy ship. Hanwha's main Korean competitor, HD Hyundai Heavy Industries, recently pitched a shipbuilding plan to the U.S. government, according to a report from the South Korean Chosun news outlet in March.
'If maritime defense cooperation with the U.S. becomes full-fledged, we can build up to five ships per year, and there is room for further expansion,' Woo-man Jeong, managing director of the Specialized Ship Business Unit at HD Hyundai Heavy Industries, told the publication last month. 'We have over 250 engineers who can design and build Aegis ships with the same performance as the U.S. HD Hyundai Heavy Industries is the only shipbuilder in Korea that directly designs and builds Aegis ships. It is also directly building five of the six Aegis ships that the Korean Navy will possess.'
Woo-man likened the Aegis ships to the Arleigh Burke class U.S. guided missile destroyers.
Last year, the Republic of Korea Navy (ROKN) commissioned the first of its new KDX-III Batch 2 destroyers, ROKS Jeongjo the Great. The service's largest ship, among the many advanced features incorporated in this class is the latest version of the Korean Vertical Launch System.
#HyundaiHeavyIndustries has successfully delivered ROKS Jeongjo the Great, the first KDX-III Batch II AEGIS destroyer, to the #ROKNavy. It is recognized as the most advanced next-generation AEGIS destroyer in service. #KDXIII #AEGIS #AdvancedWarships pic.twitter.com/nonwmI9tBr
— Hwarang (@KDefenseInsight) November 27, 2024
Japan builds a large array of warships, including three classes of destroyers that are related to the Arleigh Burke class. In terms of unique designs, two years ago, Japan launched its eighth Mogami class frigate, JS Yūbetsu. The stealthy Mogami class 30FFM Multi-Function Frigates will have the ability to perform various mission sets for the Japanese Maritime Self-Defense Force.
There is also the possibility that the U.S. could plug into its AUKUS submarine deal with Australia and leverage its conventional shipbuilding capacity for its needs.
Trump's suggestion about purchasing foreign ships was a response to statements by National Security Director Mike Waltz about how China was vastly outproducing the United States in total shipbuilding capacity.
'Mr. President, last year, the Chinese received 1,700 orders from new ships. American shipyards received five,' Waltz said. 'Under your leadership, like so many other industries, we are going to revitalize and make shipbuilding and maritime great again with these blue-collar jobs. These are the cranes, the ports, opportunity zones, and drive that investment back in. And we have, under that executive order, and also one to streamline foreign military sales, for people that want to buy our equipment, and, of course, acquisition reform, all just this week.'
Those concerns are the crux of 'Restoring America's Maritime Dominance,' the executive order Trump signed on Wednesday seeking to boost domestic shipbuilding capacity.
'Recent data shows that the United States constructs less than one percent of commercial ships globally, while the People's Republic of China (PRC) is responsible for producing approximately half,' the executive order states. 'Rectifying these issues requires a comprehensive approach that includes securing consistent, predictable, and durable Federal funding, making United States-flagged and built vessels commercially competitive in international commerce, rebuilding America's maritime manufacturing capabilities (the Maritime Industrial Base), and expanding and strengthening the recruitment, training, and retention of the relevant workforce.'
The order calls for the 'Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs (APNSA), in coordination with the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Commerce, the Secretary of Labor, the Secretary of Transportation, the Secretary of Homeland Security, the United States Trade Representative (USTR), and the heads of executive departments and agencies (agencies) the APNSA deems appropriate,' to shall submit a Maritime Action Plan (MAP) within 210 days.
BREAKING:Trump signs an executive order to restore American maritime dominance and boost U.S. shipbuilding@johnkonrad @mercoglianos @cdrsalamander pic.twitter.com/38jolTg43T
— Visegrád 24 (@visegrad24) April 9, 2025
That plan includes a requirement for a six-month 'assessment of options both for the use of available authorities and resources, such as Defense Production Act Title III authorities, and for the use of private capital to the maximum extent possible to invest in and expand the Maritime Industrial Base.'
Among the options to be considered are the 'investment and expansion of commercial and defense shipbuilding capabilities, component supply chains, ship repair and marine transportation capabilities, port infrastructure, and the adjacent workforce.'
The Secretary of Defense 'shall pursue using the Office of Strategic Capital loan program to improve the shipbuilding industrial base,' the order continues.
The executive order calls for the U.S. Army, Navy, and Coast Guard to list their top recommendations for new vessels.
'Within 45 days of the date of this order, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Commerce, the Secretary of Transportation, and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall conduct a review of shipbuilding for United States Government use and submit a report to the President with recommendations to increase the number of participants and competitors within United States shipbuilding, and to reduce cost overruns and production delays for surface, subsurface, and unmanned programs,' the executive order explains. 'This report must include separate itemized and prioritized lists of recommendations for the United States Army, Navy, and Coast Guard and shall be included in the MAP.
Trump's executive order is similar to the bipartisan SHIPS Act proposed last year, which you can read about here, but it appears to go farther in some aspects, and there may be significant push back as a result.
Building ships overseas, especially naval warships, would be a major change for the U.S. government. Shipbuilding is extremely politicized and special interest driven as it is. Industrial base protectionism is a huge driver in any discussion about shipbuilding domestically, let alone overseas. But what is clear is that the Navy's demand for warships outpaces the potential supply, and just keeping the ships it already has serviced with the existing industrial base is becoming increasingly challenging, which impacts combat readiness. Expanding shipbuilding to close allies would certainly help in these regards, as would further increasing foreign yards that can service American warships. This is especially critical in a time when China's fleet size is ballooning.
While capacity could be leveraged now to build American naval ships in foreign yards, those same companies could invest in the U.S., building new infrastructure, which could help increase domestic capacity in the long term.
But once again, no matter how logical this all sounds, doing so is going to probably stoke a fight in congress. Any dollars moving away from key U.S. shipyards will be challenged. But if Trump's budget were to call for a major expansion in shipbuilding, even if the money was there, doing it would be very problematic using existing infrastructure in the U.S. alone.
Contact the author: howard@thewarzone.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
NC House bills will undercut services to homeless vets
People experiencing homelessness in Raleigh pack to leave an encampment off of Highway 70 near Interstate 40. (Photo: Greg Childress) As a U.S. Navy veteran, I am honored to manage a team that serves other veterans who find themselves without a home in North Carolina. In my role as director of outreach for Veterans Services of The Carolinas (VSC), our team collaborates daily with the faith-based community, mental health and substance use providers, LME/MCOs, law enforcement, housing providers, and others across all 100 counties of North Carolina. That experience has provided us with deep insight into what works and what doesn't. Two pending bills in the North Carolina General Assembly will have a direct impact on our communities, service providers, law enforcement, and those we serve. Both are promoted—as they were in other targeted states —by an interest group out of Austin, Texas, called Cicero Action. Joe Lonsdale, its founder, is a venture capitalist with ties to those in private prison contracting, including technology for the newer field of e-carceration. One bill – House Bill 437 – would criminalize nonprofits like ours by threatening felony charges if drug activity occurs within 100 feet of our facilities — an extreme and unworkable standard that punishes service providers for circumstances beyond their control. The other — House Bill 781 — establishes new requirements on cities and counties to set up state-sanctioned homeless encampments for up to a year without additional funding. Going after nonprofits and supporting unfunded mandates is not on-brand for the state of North Carolina, but neither is disrespecting our faith-based and veteran leaders who the Cicero lobbyists characterize as unserious activists. Representatives for four bishops overseeing 1200 North Carolina Episcopal and United Methodist churches joined VSC and other veterans in sharing concerns about these bills and the impacts they will have at multiple House committee podiums. And yet, the bill passed out of the House and now awaits a round of committee hearings in the Senate. Under the guise of a self-described think tank, the Cicero Institute—in the absence of data—blames the Housing First model for the increase of homelessness. From Texas, it declares there is no lack of affordable housing in North Carolina and glosses over how two out of three of its residents experiencing homelessness in recent years are experiencing it for the first time. Prioritizing housing with wrap-around services—the housing first model—has been the U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs approach since 2012. More than 133,000 veterans were housed and provided with supportive services to help them retain housing over the last three years. The practice was first introduced by the George W. Bush Administration and has enjoyed subsequent bipartisan support because of data showing its effectiveness. The average number of returns to homelessness across the state utilizing Housing First is less than 13%. The City of Raleigh estimates it costs $96,000 a year in emergency services, law enforcement and health care for a homeless person living outside. As Raleigh's News & Observer reported recently, putting someone in a home and making services available costs $20,000 — saving taxpayers' $76,000 per person. In contrast, another local government projected the cost of installing just one Greenflow unit to provide the bill's requirement of running water and restrooms at up to $200,000 alone. Will local governments have to add this cost and others in their capital improvement or their regular budgets to meet the state's approval? Will property tax increases be required to move the state-sanctioned encampments around each year? Additionally, legal counsels from local governments have raised concerns about increased liability and incarceration along with decreased local control–as reported by their colleagues in states where the Cicero bills have passed into law. Cicero offers no data to indicate its proposal will do anything to end homelessness—just make it less visible. A month after the Florida encampment law went into effect last year, the first lawsuit was filed, resulting in a hasty sweep of an encampment without a plan for where people would go. Ongoing treatment for substance use and medications for mental illness are interrupted or lost when caseworkers and peer support specialists cannot find those they serve. State-sanctioned, compulsive homeless encampments will drive unsheltered veterans further from the resources needed and further away from sustainable recovery, while putting the onus on our local law enforcement. Especially in the context of yesterday's annual observance of Memorial Day, it makes no sense for our leaders to pass laws that criminalize those who have given up so much for the freedoms we enjoy. Our General Assembly members would serve their communities more effectively by investing in solutions that have been proven to work and are cost effective.


Fox News
13 minutes ago
- Fox News
Federal judge blocks Trump's attempt to kill NYC congestion pricing program
A federal judge on Tuesday temporarily halted the Trump administration's effort to kill New York City's controversial congestion pricing program. U.S. District Court Judge Lewis Liman issued a temporary restraining order barring the administration from getting rid of the program and withholding federal funding if the city failed to nix the program. Liman's Tuesday restraining order keeps the tolls in place through at least June 9 and prevents Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy from retaliating against the city. In February, Trump posted an image of himself wearing a crown and wrote, "CONGESTION PRICING IS DEAD. Manhattan, and all of New York, is SAVED. LONG LIVE THE KING!" Fox News Digital has reached out to the White House for comment. The program was launched in January, using electronic license plate readers and charging most drivers a $9 toll during peak periods to enter Manhattan south of 60th Street in an attempt to reduce congestion and raise funds to improve mass transit. The city said the program has dramatically reduced congestion on the roadways. There have been about 5.8 million fewer cars than expected in the congestion zone between January and March, or a reduction of about 8% to 13%, officials said. New York City Comptroller Brad Lander said the program was better for businesses, the city's tourism industry and bus and taxi rides. He noted that car crashes, noise complaints and traffic were down.

Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's Targeting Of Apple Isn't Random — Analyst Says It's A Calculated Move For Maximum Political Gain
Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) isn't a company usually associated with national security, but it is in the crosshairs of President Donald Trump, now an expert has given his take on the Happened: On Friday, Ming-Chi Kuo, an analyst at TF Securities, took to X, formerly Twitter, and outlined three key reasons why Trump persistently targets Apple in public. First, he noted, Trump knows that pressuring a global brand like Apple guarantees widespread media attention. "Forcing Apple, the world's most famous company, and its iconic iPhone to adopt 'Made in America' policies generates maximum exposure." Trending: Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing — Second, Apple rarely pushes back publicly, making it a low-risk target. "Apple is reluctant to openly contest Trump's statements or mount significant opposition," Kuo added, stating that it makes it easier for Trump to apply pressure without facing serious backlash. Finally, Kuo explained that Trump benefits regardless of Apple's response. "If Apple moves iPhone assembly back to the U.S., Trump can promote it as a major 'Made in America' achievement and key policy win." On the other hand, if Apple negotiates a deal to avoid tariffs, Trump still gains leverage — and he can always reignite pressure later, Kuo stated. Why It's Important: Earlier on Friday, Trump demanded that iPhones sold in the U.S. must be manufactured domestically, or the company could face a 25% tariff. Trump's remarks were a direct response to Apple's expanding footprint in India, where its major supplier, Foxconn, also known as Hon Hai Precision Industry Co. Ltd (OTC:HNHAF), is constructing a $1.5 billion display module facility near Chennai, India. Following this, Kuo said that Apple would likely find it more financially viable to absorb a 25% tariff on U.S. iPhone sales than to relocate its iPhone assembly operations back to the U.S. Read Next: Hasbro, MGM, and Skechers trust this AI marketing firm — Invest before it's too late. 'Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones. You can invest today for just $0.30/share with a $1000 minimum. Photo Courtesy: Joey Sussman on Send To MSN: Send to MSN Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? This article Trump's Targeting Of Apple Isn't Random — Analyst Says It's A Calculated Move For Maximum Political Gain originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.