logo
Trump Considering Buying Foreign Ships To Make Up Gap With China

Trump Considering Buying Foreign Ships To Make Up Gap With China

Yahoo11-04-2025

Upset by the pace of domestic shipbuilding, President Donald Trump said he may look to foreign companies to produce vessels for the U.S. His comments came after his sweeping executive order seeking to revamp the American shipbuilding industry that pales in comparison to China's, which has been assessed to have a whopping 200-times larger capacity than the United States. Trump didn't spell out whether he was talking about commercial ships, naval vessels or both. However, this makes particular sense for expanding the U.S. Navy and is an option we have repeatedly highlighted in the past, given the litany of issues the service is facing.
'We may order, would have to go to Congress for this, but we may buy some ships from other countries that we're close to and do great jobs with ships,' Trump told reporters on Thursday. 'But we're going to start the process of rebuilding. We don't really essentially build ships anymore, which is ridiculous. It's going to be very big business for us in the not-too-distant future. But in the meantime, we have countries that do very well at building ships, and we'll be dealing with those countries. So we may be ordering top-of-the-line ships from those countries. And within a fairly short period of time, we'll be building our own ships. So we'll probably have to go to Congress for that, but we're not going to have a problem.'
.@MikeWaltz47: "Last year, the Chinese received 1700 orders for new ships. American shipyards received 5. Under your leadership… we are going to revitalize and make shipbuilding and maritime great again." pic.twitter.com/8wIELGLSRm
— Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) April 10, 2025
We reached out to the White House for clarification about what kinds of ships sparked Trump's interest. However, his remarks come amid concerns about the growth of the Chinese Navy in both mass and capability. You can read more about that yawning gap here.
As we have explained in past reporting, both South Korea and Japan are building vessels now that are related to the Arleigh Burke class that currently serves as the backbone of the U.S. Navy. This puts both countries in a unique position to build U.S.-spec Burke destroyers, or at least substantial parts of them. They also have other models that are unlike those currently in the fleet, including smaller warships. Logistics ships and sea bases are also well within their capabilities.
South Korea has already made inroads into the U.S. shipbuilding industry. The Hanwha Ocean Co. recently purchased the Navy shipyard in Philadelphia and secured Korea's first contract to overhaul a U.S. Navy ship. Hanwha's main Korean competitor, HD Hyundai Heavy Industries, recently pitched a shipbuilding plan to the U.S. government, according to a report from the South Korean Chosun news outlet in March.
'If maritime defense cooperation with the U.S. becomes full-fledged, we can build up to five ships per year, and there is room for further expansion,' Woo-man Jeong, managing director of the Specialized Ship Business Unit at HD Hyundai Heavy Industries, told the publication last month. 'We have over 250 engineers who can design and build Aegis ships with the same performance as the U.S. HD Hyundai Heavy Industries is the only shipbuilder in Korea that directly designs and builds Aegis ships. It is also directly building five of the six Aegis ships that the Korean Navy will possess.'
Woo-man likened the Aegis ships to the Arleigh Burke class U.S. guided missile destroyers.
Last year, the Republic of Korea Navy (ROKN) commissioned the first of its new KDX-III Batch 2 destroyers, ROKS Jeongjo the Great. The service's largest ship, among the many advanced features incorporated in this class is the latest version of the Korean Vertical Launch System.
#HyundaiHeavyIndustries has successfully delivered ROKS Jeongjo the Great, the first KDX-III Batch II AEGIS destroyer, to the #ROKNavy. It is recognized as the most advanced next-generation AEGIS destroyer in service. #KDXIII #AEGIS #AdvancedWarships pic.twitter.com/nonwmI9tBr
— Hwarang (@KDefenseInsight) November 27, 2024
Japan builds a large array of warships, including three classes of destroyers that are related to the Arleigh Burke class. In terms of unique designs, two years ago, Japan launched its eighth Mogami class frigate, JS Yūbetsu. The stealthy Mogami class 30FFM Multi-Function Frigates will have the ability to perform various mission sets for the Japanese Maritime Self-Defense Force.
There is also the possibility that the U.S. could plug into its AUKUS submarine deal with Australia and leverage its conventional shipbuilding capacity for its needs.
Trump's suggestion about purchasing foreign ships was a response to statements by National Security Director Mike Waltz about how China was vastly outproducing the United States in total shipbuilding capacity.
'Mr. President, last year, the Chinese received 1,700 orders from new ships. American shipyards received five,' Waltz said. 'Under your leadership, like so many other industries, we are going to revitalize and make shipbuilding and maritime great again with these blue-collar jobs. These are the cranes, the ports, opportunity zones, and drive that investment back in. And we have, under that executive order, and also one to streamline foreign military sales, for people that want to buy our equipment, and, of course, acquisition reform, all just this week.'
Those concerns are the crux of 'Restoring America's Maritime Dominance,' the executive order Trump signed on Wednesday seeking to boost domestic shipbuilding capacity.
'Recent data shows that the United States constructs less than one percent of commercial ships globally, while the People's Republic of China (PRC) is responsible for producing approximately half,' the executive order states. 'Rectifying these issues requires a comprehensive approach that includes securing consistent, predictable, and durable Federal funding, making United States-flagged and built vessels commercially competitive in international commerce, rebuilding America's maritime manufacturing capabilities (the Maritime Industrial Base), and expanding and strengthening the recruitment, training, and retention of the relevant workforce.'
The order calls for the 'Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs (APNSA), in coordination with the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Commerce, the Secretary of Labor, the Secretary of Transportation, the Secretary of Homeland Security, the United States Trade Representative (USTR), and the heads of executive departments and agencies (agencies) the APNSA deems appropriate,' to shall submit a Maritime Action Plan (MAP) within 210 days.
BREAKING:Trump signs an executive order to restore American maritime dominance and boost U.S. shipbuilding@johnkonrad @mercoglianos @cdrsalamander pic.twitter.com/38jolTg43T
— Visegrád 24 (@visegrad24) April 9, 2025
That plan includes a requirement for a six-month 'assessment of options both for the use of available authorities and resources, such as Defense Production Act Title III authorities, and for the use of private capital to the maximum extent possible to invest in and expand the Maritime Industrial Base.'
Among the options to be considered are the 'investment and expansion of commercial and defense shipbuilding capabilities, component supply chains, ship repair and marine transportation capabilities, port infrastructure, and the adjacent workforce.'
The Secretary of Defense 'shall pursue using the Office of Strategic Capital loan program to improve the shipbuilding industrial base,' the order continues.
The executive order calls for the U.S. Army, Navy, and Coast Guard to list their top recommendations for new vessels.
'Within 45 days of the date of this order, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Commerce, the Secretary of Transportation, and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall conduct a review of shipbuilding for United States Government use and submit a report to the President with recommendations to increase the number of participants and competitors within United States shipbuilding, and to reduce cost overruns and production delays for surface, subsurface, and unmanned programs,' the executive order explains. 'This report must include separate itemized and prioritized lists of recommendations for the United States Army, Navy, and Coast Guard and shall be included in the MAP.
Trump's executive order is similar to the bipartisan SHIPS Act proposed last year, which you can read about here, but it appears to go farther in some aspects, and there may be significant push back as a result.
Building ships overseas, especially naval warships, would be a major change for the U.S. government. Shipbuilding is extremely politicized and special interest driven as it is. Industrial base protectionism is a huge driver in any discussion about shipbuilding domestically, let alone overseas. But what is clear is that the Navy's demand for warships outpaces the potential supply, and just keeping the ships it already has serviced with the existing industrial base is becoming increasingly challenging, which impacts combat readiness. Expanding shipbuilding to close allies would certainly help in these regards, as would further increasing foreign yards that can service American warships. This is especially critical in a time when China's fleet size is ballooning.
While capacity could be leveraged now to build American naval ships in foreign yards, those same companies could invest in the U.S., building new infrastructure, which could help increase domestic capacity in the long term.
But once again, no matter how logical this all sounds, doing so is going to probably stoke a fight in congress. Any dollars moving away from key U.S. shipyards will be challenged. But if Trump's budget were to call for a major expansion in shipbuilding, even if the money was there, doing it would be very problematic using existing infrastructure in the U.S. alone.
Contact the author: howard@thewarzone.com

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

馬斯克宣布將離開川普政府 最新發文曝光
馬斯克宣布將離開川普政府 最新發文曝光

Yahoo

time31 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

馬斯克宣布將離開川普政府 最新發文曝光

特斯拉執行長馬斯克(Elon Musk)稍早在社群平台X發文,宣布自己將結束在美國總統川普(Donald Trump)政府中「特殊政府僱員」的身份,並表示感謝川普總統給我這個削減浪費性開支的機會,也表示自己主導推動的DOGE計畫將持續壯大,「它成為整個政府的生活方式」。 馬斯克(Elon Musk)在個人社群平台X發文寫下:「As my scheduled time as a Special Government Employee comes to an end, I would like to thank President@realDonaldTrumpfor the opportunity to reduce wasteful spending. The @DOGEmission will only strengthen over time as it becomes a way of life throughout the government.」 延伸閱讀影/川普趕走外國學生全球名校招手 帥化民諷:自毀長城影/美債大爆雷!「最大債主」撐不住也崩了 蔡正元揭川普下狠手內幕全球政經周報/全球經濟即將「黑洞化」?美元、美債崩盤:未來世界比你想像更驚悚…

快訊/馬斯克官宣即將離開川普政府 個人X社群發送分手信
快訊/馬斯克官宣即將離開川普政府 個人X社群發送分手信

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

快訊/馬斯克官宣即將離開川普政府 個人X社群發送分手信

財經中心/王文承報導 ▲馬斯克突宣布即將離開川普政府。(圖/翻攝自馬斯克X) 特斯拉(Tesla)執行長馬斯克(Elon Musk)再拋震撼彈!稍早他在個人社群平台「X」發文,正式宣布自己即將結束在美國總統川普(Donald Trump)政府中「特殊政府僱員」的身份,引發國際政商圈高度關注。 馬斯克表示:「As my scheduled time as a Special Government Employee comes to an end, I would like to thank President@realDonaldTrumpfor the opportunity to reduce wasteful spending. The @DOGEmission will only strengthen over time as it becomes a way of life throughout the government.在我作為(川普)特殊政府僱員的時間即將結束之際,我想感謝川普總統給我這個削減浪費性開支的機會。」這番言論立即在全球社群瘋傳,尤其他還強調,自己主導推動的DOGE計畫將持續壯大,並預言:「它將成為整個政府的一種生活方式。」 根據外媒報導,馬斯克自2020年起與川普陣營保持密切互動,甚至祕密受邀擔任特別顧問,協助美國政府進行開支審核與科技政策建議,而這段合作如今似乎已劃下句點。 更多三立新聞網報導人潮爆滿!南台灣最大誠品首日試營運 民眾排隊繞館一圈像螞蟻回巢屁股開花!台男遊新加坡做1事遭判鞭刑 自曝痛苦經歷:希望從沒出生過ETF理專之亂 王世堅不忍了!怒批:金融機構成「有牌詐騙集團」情侶深夜街頭「活春宮」!女趴汽車引擎蓋激戰 影片瘋傳網炸鍋

'The Handmaid's Tale' had a remarkable ending — for real-world reasons
'The Handmaid's Tale' had a remarkable ending — for real-world reasons

CNN

time34 minutes ago

  • CNN

'The Handmaid's Tale' had a remarkable ending — for real-world reasons

Hollywood studios and streamers aren't exactly craving politically provocative shows and movies right now. Producers are thinking twice about liberal-sounding storylines. Media companies are downplaying diversity initiatives. And 'The Apprentice,' a biopic about President Trump that contained some critical scenes, struggled to gain US distribution last year. That's what makes the timing of 'The Handmaid's Tale' finale all the more remarkable. The acclaimed Hulu drama, which streamed its final episode earlier this week, was unavoidably and unapologetically political. In the series, based on the 1985 novel by Margaret Atwood, America has been transformed into Gilead, a totalitarian theocratic regime where women are treated like property. The 'handmaid' in the title is June Osborne, played by Elisabeth Moss. Get Reliable Sources newsletter Sign up here to receive Reliable Sources with Brian Stelter in your inbox. The actors and producers started working on the first season of the show in 2016 with the belief that Hillary Clinton would be the first woman president. They described in interviews how the entire cast and crew were shocked by President Trump's victory. Trump's election — following campaign trail narratives about misogyny and bigotry — changed how the show was received. The premiere in April 2017 spawned a thousand think pieces. Some anti-Trump protesters even donned red robes and white bonnets inspired by the show. The show's producers leaned in. They didn't hesitate when asked about real-world comparisons to the radicalism portrayed on screen. 'We're on a very, very slippery slope toward Gilead,' executive producer Warren Littlefield told me back in 2019. While awaiting the finale this week, I checked back in with Littlefield. He perceives that the slope is even more treacherous today. 'Our America is getting harder to recognize each and every day,' he said, 'and Margaret's speculative fiction written 40 years ago on a rented typewriter in Berlin becomes closer to reality.' Moss, the cover star of this week's Variety magazine, was asked if the Supreme Court's 2022 decision overturning Roe v. Wade created a 'new urgency on set.' She said the vibe was already pretty urgent: 'The only way we've ever made this show was to have this sense of immediacy and relevancy that is not pleasant but is definitely galvanizing.' Maybe the political overtones turned off some would-be viewers. But 'The Handmaid's Tale' didn't meaningfully suffer in this polarized media climate. Instead, it benefited — because it evoked meaningful emotions and was elevated by current events. 'Handmaid's Tale' had something to say, and a unique time to say it, and isn't that every artist wants? 'In early Handmaid's days,' Littlefield said, 'we present a world that was too preoccupied staring into their phones to see Gilead coming until it's upon our characters and taken over their lives.' Over the years, many reviewers have pointed to that as one of the enduring takeaways from the show. 'Handmaid's' 'showed the ease with which the unthinkable can become ordinary — a lesson crucial in the age of the Big Lie,' The Atlantic's Megan Garber wrote in 2021. The final season of the series was in production while Kamala Harris lost to Trump, and began streaming in April. The Hollywood Reporter TV critic Daniel Fienberg credited the show with 'perfect — or perfectly awful — timing' over the years, and said 'the show's topicality sometimes hit so close to the bone that it became difficult to watch.' One of the showrunners, Yahlin Chang, posited in a recent interview with TheWrap that the show 'kind of failed' to serve as a cautionary tale, 'or we didn't caution enough people.' 'It's shocking to me, when I think about when I joined the show, I had more rights as a woman than I have now,' she said. Conversely, Chang said in an oral history of the show that 'Handmaid's' was an opportunity to tell big-budget stories 'about refugees and displaced people' – in this case, about American characters who fled to Canada to escape tyranny. 'You can't just walk into a Hollywood studio and pitch that,' she said. 'The fact that we're able to give voice to have our characters as Americans go through what, unfortunately, people all throughout the world go through and where we can really empathize with them fills me with hope for humanity.' The final episodes manage to be uplifting, at least in part, and Littlefield said, 'Our message this year, in hopefully a compelling dramatic way, continues to be — like June, don't give up the fight.' Many of the 'Handmaid's Tale' producers are now working on a sequel series called 'The Testaments,' which will pick up about 15 years in the fictional future. It will be another test of audience (and studio) interest in a show that both entertains and asks a serious question: 'Could it happen here?'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store