Seven beloved motors BANNED from car parks over new ‘length rule' – check full list of models affected
Your car could be affected if you live in a certain area
PARKING MAD Seven beloved motors BANNED from car parks over new 'length rule' – check full list of models affected
SEVEN popular motors have been banned from UK car parks with drivers facing fines if they break the rules.
Owners of well-known car models from top manufacturers will have their parking restricted because of a little known "length rule".
1
Five councils have confirmed they're enforcing the rule
Credit: AFP
This will affect the owners of popular cars including Tesla, Kia, BMW and Mercedes.
Some of the best-selling vehicles affected include a Mercedes S-Class, Tesla Model S, BMW 7 series, Range Rovers, the Audi A8 and the Kia EV9.
A Rolls Royce Cullinan as well as other high end sports car would also be barred.
British automotive magazine, Autocar, reported that it has received confirmation of the rule from five local councils.
Vehicles that are too long to fit into a parking space are now officially banned from parking in any of their council-run car parks.
If your motor is longer than five metres, you'll be unable to use their parking bays which measure at 4.8 metres.
Drivers could be hit with fines by the council if their car doesn't fit the bay.
This poses a problem with cars getting bigger and larger over the years and which are now commonplace on British roads.
Many of the spaces in these council-run car parks haven't been updated for decades.
New Forest Council explained: "The standard parking space has remained at a consistent size for several decades.
"However, national research has shown that on average, cars have got larger over time, both in width and in length.
"In 1965 the top five models sold in the UK had an average width of 1.5 m and average length of 3.9 m, compared to an average width of 1.8 m and length of 4.3 m for the top five sellers of 2020."
Autocar sent a Freedom of Information (FOI) request to every council in the UK asking whether they planned to extend parking bays to accommodate longer cars.
The five local authorities implementing the ban are Wokingham, South Hampshire, Broadland, South Suffolk and West Devon.
They confirmed to Autocar they had effectively banned any cars which fail to fit into their spaces.
Wokingham Council addressed the FOI on its website.
When asked whether cars exceeding a certain length were banned from their car parks, they confirmed the size rule was in place.
They responded: "We have a limit on size of vehicle and weight of vehicle allowed to use the car parks these were introduced at different dates as shown below.
""Since June 2023, all motor vehicles whose maximum length does not exceed 5,00 metres and overall height exceeds 2.10 metres and whose gross weight does not exceed 3050 kilogrammes, except for access."
Between 2017 and 2024, Wokingham found 153 instances of vehicles falling foul of the "length rule".
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
17 minutes ago
- Reuters
Exclusive: Tesla executives questioned Musk after he denied killing $25,000 EV project
June 2 (Reuters) - Some senior Tesla executives were alarmed last year when Elon Musk denied a Reuters report that the company had killed a planned all-new $25,000 EV that investors had expected to drive explosive vehicle sales growth, according to people familiar with the matter. 'Reuters is lying,' Musk had posted on X, minutes after the story published on April 5, 2024, halting a 6% decline in Tesla's stock. Tesla shares recovered some of the loss after Musk's post, but the stock was down 3.6% at market close. The executives knew that Musk had, in fact, canceled the low-cost vehicle, which many investors called the Model 2, and pivoted Tesla to focus on self-driving robotaxis, the people said. The company had told employees the project was over weeks earlier, Reuters reported, citing three sources and company documents. Musk's post was so confusing to some senior managers that they asked him whether he'd changed his mind. Musk rejected their concerns and said the project was still dead, according to the people with knowledge of the matter. The executives' concerns, which haven't been previously reported, shed light on the company's struggle to deliver a low-cost, mass-market EV, considered a core promise of the company. Some other Tesla executives were unconcerned about Musk's X post, said people familiar with the matter. The automaker keeps its product plans flexible, one person said, to respond to market conditions. A year later, struggling with a dated lineup and falling sales around the world, Tesla has still not released the low-cost EV that Musk once called pivotal to the company's future. Neither Musk nor Tesla has explicitly confirmed killing an all-new model that investors and Tesla enthusiasts have long referred to as the Model 2 because it would slot in below the current cheapest model in Tesla's lineup, the $42,500 Model 3. On Wednesday, Musk announced that he is leaving his role as a special advisor to U.S. President Donald Trump to return his focus to his companies, including Tesla, SpaceX, xAI, Neuralink, and the social media company X. Tesla and Musk did not respond to requests for comment. Weeks after Musk's post on X, Tesla published an investor update, opens new tab that assured Tesla still planned 'new vehicles, including more affordable models' that will be built on current manufacturing lines. Musk and Tesla had said previously that the planned $25,000 EV would be an all-new model, designed and built from scratch on a new platform. Musk had touted the project as a testbed for groundbreaking manufacturing innovations that would lower the cost of electric vehicles. But instead of an all-new model, Tesla is working on stripped-down versions of the Model 3 sedan and Model Y compact SUV, Reuters reported in April. No pricing on those models has been announced and the cars, set to roll out in the first half of 2025, have been delayed. On Tesla's earnings call in April, engineering chief Lars Moravy said that the affordable models would 'resemble in form and shape the cars we already make.' 'The key is they'll be affordable,' he added, 'and you'll be able to buy one.' After Musk denied the Reuters report about killing the Model 2, executives questioned Musk about what the company should tell perplexed suppliers and investors, people familiar with the matter said. Some executives told associates the denial made no sense -- investors and the public would inevitably learn the truth -- and worried it would hurt Tesla sales as buyers delayed purchases to wait for a $25,000 Tesla that, in reality, it had decided not to build. Their concerns were not universally shared at the company. One of the sources familiar with the internal deliberations about Musk's public denial told Reuters that Tesla has considered a variety of strategies for producing low-cost EVs over the years. Gary Black, a Tesla investor who manages money for the Future Fund LLC, said he didn't view Musk's statement as a 'denial' at the time, noting that Musk often makes 'brief and abrupt' comments that 'can be about anything.' That said, Black told Reuters he recently sold his fund's $1.2 million position in Tesla in part out of concern the affordable new vehicle will be a "stripped down Model Y" rather than a "differentiated product." Some Tesla executives told associates they were worried that denying the Model 2 was dead could land Musk in hot water with the Securities and Exchange Commission for misleading investors about a future product line that had been baked into their forecasts for the company. Musk had previously paid a $40 million settlement in 2018 over another social media post that the agency alleged misled investors that Musk planned to take Tesla private. Reuters could not determine whether executives approached Musk directly with the SEC enforcement concern, nor if they alerted the SEC itself. An SEC spokesperson declined to comment. Musk's agreement with the SEC requires him to have his social media posts about certain aspects of Tesla, such as new business lines and forecasts about the company, first vetted by a lawyer. Musk despises the settlement, according to people familiar with his thinking, and has told associates he doesn't post anything that needs attorney approval. The same day Musk denied the Reuters report, he lifted Tesla's stock again in after-hours trading with a post saying 'Robotaxi unveil 8/8,' for August 8, a plan he had not widely announced to Tesla employees, said people familiar with the matter. The Hollywood-style debut of a two-door 'Cybercab' ended up being delayed until October and underwhelmed investors. Many investors long ago gave up hope for a transformational $25,000 EV that would juice sales. Instead, Tesla posted its first annual vehicle sales decline in 2024 and sales were down 13% in the first quarter of 2025 amid rising competition and public protests against Musk's work in the Trump administration. In April, Chinese automaker BYD outsold Tesla in Europe for the first time and is taking the global lead in affordable EVs. BYD's entry-level Seagull electric hatchback costs less than $10,000 in China and sells competitively for more than double that price in export markets.
The Independent
30 minutes ago
- The Independent
It was not right – Max Verstappen takes blame for crash with George Russell
Max Verstappen has issued a veiled apology for his wild crash with George Russell by admitting it 'was not right and should have not happened'. The four-time world champion was hit with a 10-second penalty by the stewards for causing a collision with Russell with two laps remaining of Sunday's Spanish Grand Prix. Russell said he felt Verstappen's move was deliberate and accused the Red Bull driver of letting himself down. He also suggested that Verstappen should have been disqualified for the crash. Verstappen refused to accept blame for the coming together after the race and even sarcastically offered Russell a tissue after he was informed of his British rival's criticism. However, in a message posted on social media on Monday, Verstappen said: 'We had an exciting strategy and good race in Barcelona, till the safety car came out. 'Our tyre choice to the end and some moves after the safety car restart fuelled my frustration, leading to a move that was not right and shouldn't have happened. 'I always give everything out there for the team and emotions can run high. You win some together, you lose some together. See you (at the next race) in Montreal.' Verstappen, who was on the slower hard tyre compound, lost third place to Charles Leclerc after he opened the door to the Ferrari driver when he made a mistake on the exit of the final corner in a six-lap shootout to the flag following the deployment of a safety car. Russell then attempted to sling his Mercedes underneath Verstappen's Red Bull at the first corner before the Dutchman took to the escape road and remained ahead of the Briton. 'Max, can you let Russell through, please?' said Verstappen's race engineer, Gianpiero Lambiase. 'What? I was ahead, mate. What the f***! He just ran me off the road.' Verstappen slowed down at turn five to allow Russell past, but then accelerated and drove into his rival's Mercedes. 'What the f***'?' Russell said on the radio. Verstappen later moved out of Russell's way and crossed the line in fifth. However, he was hit with a timed penalty by the stewards – demoting him to 10th – and also punished with three penalty points on his licence which leaves him just one point away from a race ban. He now trails championship leader Oscar Piastri by 49 points in the standings. It marked another controversial chapter in Verstappen's career following run-ins last year with Lando Norris and multiple clashes with Lewis Hamilton in their title duel four years ago. Mercedes team principal Toto Wolff, who has been linked with a move for Verstappen, said: 'I don't know exactly what the motivations were and I don't want to jump on it and say it was road rage, but it wasn't nice. 'The great ones, whether it's in motor racing or in other sports, you just need to have the world against you and perform at the highest possible level. 'That's why sometimes these greats don't recognise that actually the world is not against you, it's just you who has made a mistake or screwed up.'
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Max Verstappen issues fresh statement amid backlash over actions at Spanish GP
Max Verstappen has admitted he was wrong to slam into George Russell during the Spanish Grand Prix. In the latter stages of the race, the Dutchman lost his temper and appeared to deliberately hit into the Mercedes of his British rival. When asked after the race if he had done it on purpose, Verstappen was unapologetic and simply replied: "Does it matter?". But now, having slept on it, the Red Bull racer has taken to social media to admit that he crossed a line – though he did not apologise. He wrote: "We had an exciting strategy and good race in Barcelona, until the safety car came out. Our tyre choice to the end and some moves after the safety car restart fuelled my frustration, leading to a move that was not right and shouldn't have happened. "I always give everything out there for the team and emotions can run high. You win some together, you lose some together. See you in Montreal." Verstappen had been angered after a safety car restart with six laps to go, when he felt two other drivers initiated contact with his Red Bull. One of them was Charles Leclerc and the other was Russell, who the Dutchman felt had forced him off at turn one. Shortly after, Verstappen was advised by his race engineer Gianpiero Lambiase to cede his place to Russell, Red Bull clearly worried that their driver had left the track and gained an advantage by staying in front of the Mercedes. That prompted a furious response over the radio from the four-time Formula 1 champion. He then slowed down and appeared to be complying with that request, until he then suddenly sped up again and banged wheel with Russell's Mercedes. The stewards were unimpressed and, though they did not disqualify Verstappen as Nico Rosberg wanted, they handed him a 10-second time penalty which dropped him to 10th place in the final classification. That meant he scored just one point and lost significant ground to rivals Oscar Piastri and Lando Norris in the title race. Formula 1 fans can watch every practice, qualifying and race live with Sky's new Essential TV and Sky Sports bundle in a new deal that saves £192. As well as Sky Sports access, this includes more than 100 TV channels and free subscriptions to Netflix and Discovery+. Perhaps even more pertinently, three more penalty points were placed on his racing licence. He now has a tally of 11, meaning one more before any of his current points expire – two of them will become void at the end of June, after the next two races – will incur an automatic race ban.
