Election Commission faces troll post-reserved seats verdict
The criticism arose after the Supreme Court's constitutional bench dismissed the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI)-turned Sunni Ittehad Council's (SIC) review petition regarding the allocation of reserved seats.
The decision allowed the ruling coalition, led by the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N), to emerge as the single largest party and to consolidate a two-thirds majority in the National Assembly.
Amid shifting political dynamics, the ECP reiterated its constitutional role and defended the legality of its decisions, saying the claims were contrary to facts and intended to mislead the public.
In a statement, a spokesperson for the ECP said that some circles in the media were engaged in baseless propaganda against the Commission following the recent decision of the top court.
The spokesperson said that the Commission declares this propaganda to be contrary to facts and based on falsehoods.
The statement said that such elements were unjustifiably targeting the commission with criticism.
It added that historical facts and numerous decisions of the superior judiciary provide irrefutable evidence that the Commission has always performed its duties in light of the Constitution and law. "The Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld the position of the Election Commission," it read.
For example, in the Senate elections, the spokesperson said, the commission's stance regarding secret ballot and show of hands procedures, which was fully in accordance with Article 226 of the Constitution, was upheld by a Supreme Court bench headed by the then ex-CJP Justice Gulzar Ahmed.
In the case of the disqualification election in Daska, the official added, the Commission's decision was not only declared valid by the Supreme Court bench, led by then Chief Justice Umar Ata Bandial but also recognized as a constitutional action.
The Supreme Court bench headed by then Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa had also endorsed the legal interpretation of the Commission concerning PTI's intra-party elections, the statement maintained.
Furthermore, it said, in the case of the delisting of the All Pakistan Muslim League (APML), when the Commission delisted APML for failing to conduct intra-party elections, and this decision was challenged by APML in the Supreme Court, the Court upheld the Commission's decision.
Following this, the spokesperson said, the Commission delisted several other parties that failed to comply with the law, keeping the Supreme Court's decision in mind. The Supreme Court also accepted the Commission's appeal regarding Punjab Election Tribunals, rejecting the Lahore High Court's decision and upholding the Commission's stance.
Similarly, it was maintained, in the recent case concerning reserved seats of the Sunni Ittehad Council, first the Peshawar High Court and now the SC constitutional bench have upheld the Commission's position as constitutional and legal.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
32 minutes ago
- Express Tribune
SC new transport policy defines vehicle, driver, security entitlements
The Supreme Court has issued a policy regarding the use of official vehicles by judges. The policy, called the Transport Entitlement Policy for the Judges of the Supreme Court 2025, will apply to incumbent and retired judges of the apex court. According to the Supreme Court Judges (Leave, Pension, Privileges) Order 1997, read with the Ministry of Law, Justice and Human Rights Division's letter dated 07.06.2007, on elevation, a Supreme Court judge is entitled to use two official cars up to 1800cc. "One vehicle shall be used as the 'primary car' (for official purposes), whereas the other one as the 'secondary/family car'. The vehicles so provided shall be maintained at government expense through the budgetary allocation of the Court with POL in both the cars up to 600 litres per month (as prescribed monthly ceiling or actual use) on production of a certificate by the respective Private Secretary of the Hon'ble Judge, as decided by the Full Court on 20.01.2010." Each judge shall also be entitled to the provision of two drivers: one provided by the Court from regular strength and the other appointed on a contingent basis. In exceptional circumstances or on an urgent-need basis, if requisitioned, a third car may be provided—subject to availability—after the approval of the Registrar for a maximum period of two weeks. If such a period requires further extension, it shall be allowed only with the approval of the Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP), on payment of the prescribed charges. In any case, a third car shall not be retained beyond eight weeks in a year. Provision of Security (Escort) Vehicles The policy states that the CJP is entitled to security (escort vehicles) as per the Blue Book under the supervision of the Chief Security Officer (CSO). "Each Hon'ble Judge shall be entitled to the provision of a well-trained gunman with one security (escort) vehicle on a 1/4 ratio, provided by the Islamabad Police at the Principal Seat and by the Provincial Police Officers in case any Hon'ble Judge is in provincial jurisdiction. Where an Hon'ble Judge requires additional security given any threat, the Hon'ble Chief Justice of Pakistan shall approve a second escort." Post-Retirement Transport Entitlement The policy states that each regular judge of the Court, on retirement, may retain the primary car for a maximum period of one month, after which the vehicle shall be retrieved and returned to the Court's pool. "Each Hon'ble regular Judge of the Court, on retirement, shall be entitled to purchase a primary or secondary car at depreciated value as per existing government policy, provided that the Hon'ble Judge has not availed the facility previously." It further states that each retired judge of the Court, on demand during their stay in Islamabad or provincial capitals, as the case may be, shall be entitled to the provision of an official vehicle, subject to availability, on prescribed charges as determined by the Full Court, along with a complementary pick-and-drop facility to/from the airport. Disposal of Vehicles "According to the relevant Rules for the Use of Staff Cars, 1980, upon reaching the prescribed age/mileage limit, official vehicles shall be disposed of by prevailing law/rules. The procedure for disposal shall be transparent and in compliance with the Public Procurement Regulatory Authority (PPRA) guidelines or other applicable laws for the time being enforced." It is also clarified that all costs incurred in connection with the procurement, maintenance, fuelling and operation of the official vehicles, as well as the employment of drivers, shall be met from the sanctioned budget of the Court under the respective heads. It is further clarified that in the event of any ambiguity or uncertainty regarding the interpretation of this policy, the matter shall be placed before the CJP for appropriate orders. Funeral arrangements policies SC has issued new guidelines to manage arrangements on the demise of former judges, appointing focal persons to assist with funerals, transportation, and placement of floral wreaths. According to the office order, the Deputy Registrar (Miscellaneous) — or in his absence, the Assistant Registrar (Misc.), Senior Protocol Officer, or designated staff, will serve as focal person in Islamabad. Officers in charge of branch registries in Lahore, Karachi, Peshawar, and Quetta will perform similar duties at the provincial level. The focal person will represent the court, assist with transportation of the deceased to the funeral site, and place a floral wreath on behalf of the Chief Justice of Pakistan and sitting judges.
Express Tribune
12 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Delay often 'extinguishes justice': SC
The Supreme Court has noted that it cannot remain indifferent to the systemic malaise of delay in the adjudication of cases, adding that justice delayed is not merely justice deniedit is often justice extinguished. In a four-page verdict on an appeal filed against a high court order in an auction case, the SC lamented that the appeal of the petitioner in the case remained pending before the high court for ten years while it took three years for the SC to take up the matter. The verdict authored by Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah said the question that engaged the attention of the court was not limited to the validity of the auction; rather it extended to whether any meaningful relief could now be granted after the passage of fourteen years. "Even if the petitioner's claim had merit, the sands of time have all but eroded its potency," it stated. The verdict said it is beyond cavil that delay in adjudicating cases by the courts at any tier of the justice system corrodes public confidence in the judiciary, undermines the rule of law, and disproportionately harms the weak and vulnerable who cannot afford the cost of prolonged litigation. "Delay in adjudication carries severe macroeconomic and societal consequences: it deters investment, renders contracts illusory, and weakens the institutional legitimacy of the judiciary. "A justice system's credibility rests not only in the fairness of its decisions but also in the timeliness with which those decisions are rendered. The issue is not merely administrative, it is constitutional". It stated that the right to access to justice is guaranteed by Articles 4, 9 and 10A of the Constitution and it encompasses within it the right to a fair and timely trial. Delay that renders a remedy ineffective or a right illusory amount to a denial of due process. Justice, to be real, must be both just and timely. The verdict said over 2.2 million cases are currently pending before courts across Pakistan, including approximately 55,941 cases before the SC alone despite enhancing the number of judges. These figures, he said, are not abstractthey represent disputes suspended in time. It said delay in adjudication is not merely a by-product of docket congestion or branch-level inefficiencies; it is a deeper, structural challenge of judicial governance.
Express Tribune
12 hours ago
- Express Tribune
SJC throws out complaints against CEC, ECP members
The Supreme Judicial Council (SJC) has dismissed the complaints filed against the chief election commissioner (CEC) and two members of the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP). A statement dated Aug 15 read that complaints against "CEC Mr Sikandar Sultan Raja and members of ECP, Mr Nisar Ahmed Durrani and Mr Shah Muhammad Jatoi, have been dismissed by the SJC in its meetings held on Nov 8, 2024 and Dec 13, 2024". The statement did not provide any details regarding the complaints. Although the five-year tenure of CEC Raja, Sindh Member Durrani, and Balochistan Member Jatoi ended on Jan 26, they will remain in office in line with the 26th Constitutional Amendment. The amendment permits the CEC and members to remain in office until their successors are appointed. Under Article 215(4) of the Constitution, these appointments are required to be made within 45 days. However, the deadline lapsed on March 12 without any tangible progress. Raja's tenure has been marred by controversies, with the opposition frequently criticising him over delays in holding general elections, the denial of PTI's "bat" symbol, and alleged manipulation of poll results. The PTI had filed a complaint before the SJC in July 2024 seeking the removal of Raja and four members of the ECP. The complaint alleged that the July 12 order of the apex court has held that the election supervisor used powers in violation of the Constitution with malice and made a skewed interpretation of Jan 13 judgement of denying election symbol of "bat" to the former ruling party.
