Mehul Choksi takes ‘kidnapping' allegations against India to U.K. court
Mehul Choksi, the businessman wanted in India to face charges in the Punjab National Bank (PNB) fraud case, is suing the Indian government and five individuals in the High Court in London as conspirators for his alleged 'kidnap, torture and attempted rendition'.
The Indian authorities have denied the allegations and objected to the U.K. jurisdiction based on 'state immunity' and also sought permission for expert evidence on Indian law and the Indian Constitution to be taken into account.
During a case management hearing listed before Justice Freedman on Monday (June 16, 2025), the court was told that Choksi claims to have been tortured back in May 2021 as part of a kidnap attempt 'orchestrated by the government of India'.
'For the avoidance of doubt, nothing in these submissions is intended to waive or should be interpreted as waiving India's state immunity,' the court was told this week by the Indian side.
Choksi was accused of making 'extremely serious allegations against India, alleging it masterminded an international plot to kidnap and harm him'.
'It is India's position that the present claim is being pursued principally with the (misguided) intention of attempting to cause embarrassment to India and obtain leverage in the Claimant's international attempts to avoid extradition,' barrister Harish Salve argued on behalf of the Indian authorities.
Choksi's lawyers, led by barrister Edward Fitzgerald, allege that there was a collusion between five individuals in the attack on him in Antigua to be forcibly taken to Dominica in the Caribbean with the purpose of being 'rendered' to India.
'The Defendants thereby entered into an unlawful means conspiracy whereby the Defendants agreed to, and then did, inflict unlawful and injurious acts on the Claimant by means of assault, battery, false imprisonment, unlawful detention, and/or unlawful restriction of liberty,' Choksi's legal claim reads.
The businessman, meanwhile, remains in custody in Belgium, fighting against his extradition to India. He is wanted in India along with his nephew, Nirav Modi, who remains behind bars in London after repeated attempts at bail have been denied by the English courts.
There are three sets of criminal proceedings against Nirav in India – the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) case of fraud on PNB, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) case relating to the alleged laundering of the proceeds of that fraud and a third set of criminal proceedings involving alleged interference with evidence and witnesses in the CBI proceedings.
In April 2021, then U.K. home secretary Priti Patel had ordered his extradition to face these charges in the Indian courts after a prima facie case was established against him. But recent court hearings in London have alluded to a "confidential" impediment to his extradition, believed to be an asylum application.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
17 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Sign this and shut up!': Employee accuses HR of pressure tactics over suspicious exit papers. Netizens call out corporate gaslighting
In a viral Reddit post on r/developersIndia, a former employee has exposed what they describe as a "shady and coercive" exit process at their previous company. The post, titled 'HR Says 'You'll Get Paid, But Sign This and Shut Up!' Seriously?' , recounts how the individual was allegedly pushed into resigning under the threat of a termination mark on their record — and then strong-armed into signing questionable documents in exchange for their rightful dues. According to the user, they were asked to resign on April 1st after the company announced their termination, with HR reportedly saying a resignation would 'look better' on their career. Taking the suggestion at face value, the employee resigned the very next day and returned their work laptop as instructed. But they quickly realised they were entitled to a two-month notice period, and formally expressed their willingness to serve it. The twist? The company neither acknowledged their email nor permitted them to work during that notice period. A month later, they were informed that the compensation would be paid as part of the final settlement. By May 30th, they received their relieving letter—but it carried an unexpected surprise. The Date That Disappeared, and the Documents That Gagged The employee discovered that the relieving documents reflected April 2nd as their final working date—essentially nullifying the two-month notice period altogether. Even more baffling was the company's response. When asked to correct the date to June 2nd, in line with the stated notice period, management allegedly claimed they couldn't amend the document because it had been generated after the end of the financial year in March. As per the post, the HR team said, 'We understand, but it's a shame we can't do anything about it,' while still assuring payment—but only if the employee signed a release form stating they had 'no further claims against the company.' You Might Also Like: Can frequent job changes hurt your career growth? Employee shares his major career regrets on Reddit Also attached to the exit documents was a termination letter, a move that left the employee flabbergasted: 'There is also a termination letter attached to the relieving letter—like WHAT???' Netizens Call Out Corporate Gaslighting The Reddit post has since ignited widespread discussion and disbelief. One user bluntly advised, 'Don't sign it and threaten a legal case. They'll come back with both the updated relieving letter and the money within a day. That justification about the financial year is out of this world.' Another commented, 'What do companies get from doing something this bad to a random employee? They're giving him the pay, but not the paperwork—just because they don't want to redo a mistake?' You Might Also Like: 'Constant fear of...': Indian student in US warns others planning US education, shares struggles on Reddit A third offered a broader warning: 'Please don't resign if they are forcing you and saying termination looks bad. Companies use that to avoid paying rightful severance.' This case stands as a cautionary tale in the corporate landscape. As workplaces tighten belts and streamline headcounts, employees must remain vigilant—especially during exits. Experts recommend keeping written records of all communication, and not signing any document that contains language waiving future claims without thorough scrutiny. You Might Also Like: 'We are not robots': Techie's viral Reddit rant slams outsourcing pressure; netizens say it is Indians in the U.S., not the west, to blame
Hindustan Times
22 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
CBI asks public sector banks to act timely on sanction requests in fraud cases
New Delhi: The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on Tuesday asked the public sector banks (PSBs) and ministry of finance officers to act timely on its requests for sanction under Section 17A (for conducting investigation) and Section 19 (for filing charge sheets) under the Prevention of Corruption Act, which are key to completing probes and trial in bank frauds, people familiar with the development said. The matter was discussed with the officers of department of financial services (DFS) and chief vigilance officers (CVOs) of public sector banks (PSBs) in a meeting in Bengaluru, in which other ways to expedite investigations in bank frauds being investigated by it. The meeting assumes significance in the wake of a Delhi court recently discharging all the accused persons in a high-profile bank fraud case because several public sector banks refused to grant sanction against their 40 officers. The federal anti-corruption agency is investigating hundreds of bank fraud cases involving amounts totalling in a few lakh crores, according to an official, the meeting was important to discuss hurdles in prosecution sanction requests, delay in filing complaints, involvement of bank officers etc. 'During the day-long meeting, all pending matters pertaining to ongoing investigation and prosecution of the bank fraud cases being handled by CBI were discussed and several issues sorted out,' a CBI spokesperson said in a statement. This, the spokesperson said, was a follow up meeting after a high-level meeting was held on January 30 this year. The agenda was to enhance the interdepartmental cooperation and expedite investigations pertaining to bank fraud cases. On Tuesday, 'detailed presentations were made by CBI and PSBs on relevant operational issues. Many aspects were discussed and resolved', the spokesperson said. 'A close coordination between the banks and CBI in terms of timely sharing of relied-upon documents was acknowledged. Further efforts to streamline procedures and ensure proactive cooperation in matters related to obtaining approvals/sanctions under Section 17A and Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act were also emphasised,' said the spokesperson. Apart from overall strategy to expedite bank fraud probes, CBI and PSBs also exchanged case-specific details and deliberated on the way forward to expedite pending investigations. 'The meeting concluded with a consensus to maintain the current momentum of cooperation between CBI and PSBs. Emphasis was laid on continuing structured engagement and institutional collaboration to overcome procedural bottlenecks, expedite investigations, resolve pending issues, and ensure timely completion of investigations,' the spokesperson said. Some of the important bank fraud cases being investigated by CBI are against - businessmen - Nirav Modi,Vijay Mallya, Mehul Choksi and Jatin Mehta, former ICICI Bank managing director Chanda Kochhar, Rishi Agrawal of ABG Shipyard Ltd, Kapil and Dheeraj Wadhawan of Dewan Housing and Finance Ltd (DHFL), Rana Kapoor (Yes Bank founder) and Sanjay Singal of Bhushan Power and Steel Ltd. Between 2018 and 2020 alone, CBI registered cases in bank frauds involving in excess of ₹1 lakh crore. In 2020, it filed over 200 cases, involving bank frauds of ₹70,000 crore, the highest ever in a year. In 2024, it registered 95 cases involving amounts worth over ₹8,000 crore.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Mehul Choksi takes ‘kidnapping' allegations against India to UK court; claims denied
Mehul Choksi, the businessman wanted in India to face charges in the Punjab National Bank (PNB) fraud case, is suing the Indian government and five individuals in the High Court in London as conspirators for his alleged 'kidnap, torture and attempted rendition'. The Indian authorities have denied the allegations and objected to the UK jurisdiction on the basis of 'state immunity' and also sought permission for expert evidence on Indian law and the Indian Constitution to be taken into account. During a case management hearing listed before Justice Freedman on Monday, the court was told that Choksi claims to have been tortured back in May 2021 as part of a kidnap attempt 'orchestrated by the government of India'. 'For the avoidance of doubt, nothing in these submissions is intended to waive or should be interpreted as waiving India's state immunity,' the court was told this week by the Indian side. Choksi was accused of making 'extremely serious allegations against India, alleging it masterminded an international plot to kidnap and harm him'. 'It is India's position that the present claim is being pursued principally with the (misguided) intention of attempting to cause embarrassment to India and obtain leverage in the Claimant's international attempts to avoid extradition,' barrister Harish Salve argued on behalf of the Indian authorities. Choksi's lawyers, led by barrister Edward Fitzgerald, allege that there was a collusion between five individuals in the attack on him in Antigua to be forcibly taken to Dominica in the Caribbean with the purpose of being 'rendered' to India. 'The Defendants thereby entered into an unlawful means conspiracy whereby the Defendants agreed to, and then did, inflict unlawful and injurious acts on the Claimant by means of assault, battery, false imprisonment, unlawful detention, and/or unlawful restriction of liberty,' Choksi's legal claim reads. The businessman, meanwhile, remains in custody in Belgium, fighting against his extradition to India. He is wanted in India along with his nephew, Nirav Modi, who remains behind bars in London after repeated attempts at bail have been denied by the English courts. There are three sets of criminal proceedings against Nirav in India – the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) case of fraud on PNB, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) case relating to the alleged laundering of the proceeds of that fraud and a third set of criminal proceedings involving alleged interference with evidence and witnesses in the CBI proceedings. In April 2021, then UK home secretary Priti Patel had ordered his extradition to face these charges in the Indian courts after a prima facie case was established against him. But recent court hearings in London have alluded to a "confidential" impediment to his extradition, believed to be an asylum application.
