
AA Assist let me down after a collision – and wanted nearly £1,000 to give my car back
When my rear bumper was torn off after a collision with a post, the AA directed me to its Accident Assist service. I was told my vehicle would be recovered immediately and assessed for repairs on the next working day, and that the service would liaise with my insurer. I was also promised a courtesy car.
My car was taken into storage over the weekend. Four days later, it had still not arrived at the nominated garage. It eventually arrived on day five, and I was informed it would take up to four days to assess. The courtesy car never happened, and I found my insurer had not been contacted.
I lost faith in the service and asked to take my car back and I was told it would cost £991.71 in cancellation fees, including £254.50 for storage over the weekend.
I arranged a repair myself which came to £1,200, only marginally more than Accident Assist's bill for messing me around.
RB, York
The Accident Assist leaflet is unambiguous. It promises a speedy repair, a courtesy car and hassle- and cost-free handling of insurance claims. You received none of these.
The storage charges you have been billed for are astronomical and inflated by the delay in removing your car to the garage on the Monday. An online search suggests average storage costs for a car are between £20 and £45 a week.
When I queried them, the AA decided it had made a mistake. The £254.50 storage fee, it now claims, is the cost of transferring your car to the garage, and that the cost of its weekend sojourn, also billed as storage, was only £76. It has agreed to refund you the larger sum and a £150 admin fee.
As for the delays, AA's argument is 'these things can happen'. The courtesy car, it says, is granted only when the insurer agrees to pay, and the insurer is contacted only when the car has arrived at the repair garage (four days later in your case). Neither of these caveats are mentioned in the terms and conditions.
The AA insists it does not take fees from repairers or storage providers, and that it is funded by 'combining a number of services together [for] our insurance customers and breakdown members'.
AA Accident Assist says: 'When the customer chose to withdraw from making a claim, we instigated the cancellation process, which the customer was advised of on the initial call.
'We acknowledge that the incorrectly itemised invoice caused confusion and, upon review, we have agreed to reimburse the customer for this error.'
You are now appealing to the Financial Ombudsman Service as you feel you are still out of pocket.
We welcome letters but cannot answer individually. Email us at consumer.champions@theguardian.com or write to Consumer Champions, Money, the Guardian, 90 York Way, London N1 9GU. Please include a daytime phone number. Submission and publication of all letters is subject to our terms and conditions.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Top Gear
17 minutes ago
- Top Gear
BMW has streamlined the XM lineup (but not the car itself)
BMW has streamlined the XM lineup (but not the car itself) It's now the 50e or the Label… or nothin' Skip 10 photos in the image carousel and continue reading Turn on Javascript to see all the available pictures. 1 / 10 BMW has reshuffled the XM pack slightly, with only two trim levels now available (down from three): the 50e and range-topping Label. The engines remain unchanged, with the 50e's turbocharged hybrid straight-six delivering 469bhp and around 50 miles of electric range. That's from a universal 25.8kWh battery. Advertisement - Page continues below Meanwhile, the Label's V8 ramps the output up to 738bhp, though zero emission driving is lowered slightly to 47 miles. Both cars will now also accept improved charging speeds of up to 11kW. Bimmer has also used the opportunity to broaden the Label's equipment list, adding a new Welcome Light Animation, bigger 22in alloys (with optional 23s) and a series of new colours for the seat upholstery accents. Those include 'Night Blue Merino' and 'Vintage Coffee Brown'. It builds on the various things you get with the 50e, such as a 3D prism graphic along the roof panel, a 14.9in infotainment and 12.3in instrument screen, and a Harmon Kardon surround sound system. Plus, it looks very easy on the eye in there… unlike out there. Pricing starts at £112,580 for the 50e and climbs to £154,470 for the Label. Which is a lot of money to scare children (and no doubt some adults) witless on the pavement. Advertisement - Page continues below Top Gear Newsletter Thank you for subscribing to our newsletter. Look out for your regular round-up of news, reviews and offers in your inbox. Get all the latest news, reviews and exclusives, direct to your inbox. Success Your Email*


The Independent
39 minutes ago
- The Independent
AA survey reveals ‘alarming' state of UK drivers and roads
The AA has called for improvements to 'alarming' driver behaviour, 'misleading' motorway signage and 'poor' UK road conditions following a member survey. According to the AA, more than eight in 10 drivers regularly witness dangerous driving, while a fifth claim that UK motorways are in poor condition. The roadside assistance service polled 14,076 AA members between 14 and 21 January. It found that drivers frequently encounter dangerous and illegal driving behaviour on the road. Up to 88 per cent of motorists said they had observed middle lane hogging and vehicles driving too close together. Drivers also reported undertaking, tailgating, lane changing without signalling, using mobile phones and not wearing a seatbelt among poor driving etiquette. Jack Cousens, head of roads policy at the AA, said: 'The prevalence of dangerous driving behaviours is alarming and highlights the need for stricter enforcement.' Inaccurate motorway signage was also found to be a frustration among drivers. The survey revealed that 75 per cent of respondents had encountered lane closure signs, but no incident had occurred when they passed the affected area. Similarly, two-thirds (66 per cent) of drivers spotted signs indicating congestion for no obvious reason. However, 54 per cent of AA members surveyed said they had encountered traffic congestion without any signal to warn them. Drivers also told the AA that they were dissatisfied with the state of UK motorways. A fifth (22 per cent) of motorists said conditions of roads were poor, 32 per cent rated congestion badly and almost a third of drivers indicated a need for better litter management. Cousens said: 'Statistics show that motorways are the safest type of road, there remain several reasons that need addressing to make them safer. 'The main focus should be on ourselves as drivers. Middle lane hogging and tailgating are everyday occurrences, while two-thirds are spotted using a hand-held mobile phone at speeds around 70mph.' He added: 'Additionally, the high incidence of misleading signage, particularly around breakdowns and potential obstacles in the lane, alongside poor road conditions is a major frustration for drivers.' According to Cousens, the AA is 'committed to working with the relevant authorities' to improve the reliability of motorway signage, safe driving practices and road conditions on UK motorways.


The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Moment multiple cars & 30-tonne HGV collide in terrifying high-speed motorway pile-up… but is everything as it seems?
THIS is the moment a huge pile-up takes place on a motorway, involving multiple cars, a caravan and a huge 30-tonne heavy goods vehicle. But while the destruction and terror brought about by the incident are all very real, not all is as it seems. 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Indeed, the high-speed crash was all part of a carefully planned experiment conducted as part of a Channel 4 documentary titled Pile Up - The World's Biggest Crash Test. Carried out at a former RAF base in Scotland, the experiment involved recreating a high-speed motorway pile-up with eight vehicles and a 30-tonne lorry. The cars involved were a Toyota Prius, Porsche Boxster, Volkswagen Golf GTI, Ford F-150, Audi A8, Dodge Grand Caravan, Mercedes ML and a Vauxhall Vivaro van. The team used an almost 2-mile-long stretch of road, which was presumably an aircraft runway, and included white lines, a hard shoulder and motorway-grade varioguard barriers to make everything as realistic as possible. Professor James Brighton and his team from Cranfield University's Advanced Vehicle Engineering Centre led the study, which thankfully utilised cars that were remote-controlled from 'pods' but driven at motorway speeds. Four members of the public took part, each selected to represent a cross-section of road users. To make the pile-up as realistic as possible and to capture genuine reactions, the four selected drivers had no knowledge of the true nature of the experiment. They were revealed as 19-year-old Caitlyn, who represents inexperienced drivers aged 17 to 24; Luke, 26, a 'boy racer,' reflecting young male drivers who account for 65% of serious injuries or deaths; 66-year-old Lynn, representing older drivers aged 60+; and Tito, 57, a surfer and international driver familiar with UK and US road differences. All four believed they were taking part in an experiment to improve motorway safety and advance their driving skills and were unaware they would be involved in a high-speed multi-car pile-up. As they drove along at speed, a lorry swerved into their lanes to simulate a pile-up. Heart-stopping moment out-of-control driver speeds at woman on pavement missing her by inches before ploughing into shop Over 90 cameras, drones and black boxes were used to capture the moment of impact, recording crash dynamics, vehicle data and driver reactions. The experiment provides valuable insights into crash dynamics, safety systems and human behaviour during multi-vehicle accidents, while also highlighting areas for improvement in vehicle design and accident analysis. The aftermath of the crash replicated several intricate details, such as a car sliding under the lorry and also demonstrated crumple zones, which are effective at absorbing impacts and saving lives. For example, despite a massive rear shunt from a van, the Prius' electric battery remained intact. Afterwards, Marcus Rowe, a crash investigator, was sent to the scene of the accident - having not witnessed the crash - to figure out what happened using crash forensics. One concerning finding was that airbags might not always deploy and largely depend on where the vehicle is hit, showing that safety systems can struggle with multiple impacts. One thing that can't be determined is a driver's reaction in the heat of the moment, as one panicked motorist accelerated into the lorry, despite having come to a stop safely. Lastly, it found that the hard shoulder is a dangerous place to be, as any drivers or passengers in the cars on the mock-up hard shoulder would most likely have lost their lives. Speaking on the experiment, David Twohig, an Automotive Engineering Consultant, said: 'The beauty of a lab-based crash test is everything is controlled. "Everything is repeatable, but unfortunately, the real world is not a laboratory, and there are many, many variables. 'It might be the weather conditions, it might be the friction of the road surface, it might be temperature, humidity, the state of the driver, the mood of the driver - so I think that's the limitation of the lab, it's almost too good.'