'Paddington in Peru' teaches a timely lesson about immigration
Paddington Bear wasn't even supposed to be from Peru. When writing the first book in the popular British series in 1958, author Michael Bond wanted him to be from "darkest Africa" but was saved from his casual racism by a book agent who pointed out that the continent has no bears.
Not that it mattered. The point of the stories was that Paddington was from Somewhere Else, a fish out of water whose bumbling but good-hearted attempts to fit into British society were meant to be relatable to kids going through their own trials. Every child is an immigrant in the adult world, after all.
Now, in "Paddington in Peru," the third installment of a popular movie series based on the books, which hit theaters over the weekend, the titular bear's home country finally gets its due. And in keeping with the quiet humanism of these movies, it's with a thoughtful exploration of the lingering effects of colonialism and the push-and-pull that immigrants feel toward their homes.
The movie has lessons that Americans could stand to benefit from right now as our president targets immigrant communities with renewed threats of mass deportations, increasingly indiscriminate ICE raids and anti-immigrant rhetoric that fuels angry white nationalists trying to claim the country for their own.
That all sounds heavy, so let me reassure you: "Paddington in Peru" is a movie that an elementary schooler will enjoy, full of bright colors and singing nuns and adventures in the jungle.
But far more than the books ever did, this and the other "Paddington" movies take his experience as an immigrant seriously. The first, in 2014, featured a villain who refused to accept him as anything more than a bear and a crotchety neighbor who belatedly came to acknowledge his worth. The second, in 2017, hinged on police who were quick to arrest the immigrant bear for a crime he didn't commit.
In the third, Paddington has officially become a British citizen, as evidenced by his new passport and, more importantly perhaps, his proper London umbrella. But he's drawn back to Peru — and eventually into the Amazon — by a desire to help his elderly Aunt Lucy. He eventually gets caught up in a scheme to find the lost city of El Dorado, because, well, this is a children's movie.
As before, the villain is a treat. In this case, it's Antonio Banderas, who plays a grizzled riverboat captain as well as the multiple generations of his ancestors who haunt him with their desire to find the fabled city of gold. The most notable is a conquistador who appears to have stepped out of Werner Herzog's epic "Aguirre, the Wrath of God" and into this movie about a lovable CGI bear. (There are references to "The Sound of Music," Indiana Jones and Buster Keaton, too, for good measure. This is a movie made by people who love movies.)
A jokey montage of the captain's ancestors meeting their fates while searching for gold in the Amazon also doubles as a tidy history for kids of the various attempts to exploit South American resources. But while it critiques foreign adventurers treating the jungle as their playground, the movie doesn't do much better. Indigenous Peruvians are reduced to a literal snapshot and Incan culture gets boiled down to quipu knots and stone sculptures.
But I'm willing to overlook this fault because the movie already has about three more characters than it really needs for the plot, which is par for the course in the third outing of any series. The crew eventually finds El Dorado, and it turns out to be not what anyone expected. Paddington meets his long-lost family and shares with them his recipe for marmalade — a nod to the ways in which immigration is a two-way street, enriching both countries. And there's a brief but emotional moment when you are supposed to think that Paddington may decide to stay behind in the jungle.
It's no spoiler to say that he doesn't. Paddington is British not through some accident of birth, but because he chooses to be. The things that make him British are not blood and soil, but rather the customs that he has adopted: teatime and marmalade sandwiches, duffel coats and Weatherman umbrellas, the hard stare at someone who has forgotten their manners and the unfailing politeness when he's the one at fault and, most of all, a deep love of his new home. "Unmixed feelings," as he says at one point.
It is remarkable, really, that this foreign-born bear has come to be seen as so quintessentially British that an illustration of him and Queen Elizabeth II holding hands went viral after her death. An image of the CGI Paddington and the queen from a short made for her Platinum Jubilee even has a brief cameo in the movie. This is even more interesting because the royals have historically represented the opposing idea of Britishness and their current track record isn't great.
When he was created, Paddington wasn't supposed to be such an important symbol of the value of immigration or more expansive ideas of nationality. But accidentally at first — and then with more forethought through these carefully constructed movies — he's grown into the role. It's a lesson we could use on this side of the Atlantic as well these days.
This article was originally published on MSNBC.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Billionaire friend of Prince of Wales dies after ‘swallowing a bee'
A billionaire friend of Prince William has died aged 53 after swallowing a bee, it has been claimed. Sunjay Kapur, an Indian businessman, reportedly collapsed while playing polo yesterday in England. Mr Kapur, who was chairman of global car parts giant Sona Comstar, had paid tribute to the victims of the Air India plane crash on Thursday hours before he died. He posted: 'Terrible news of the tragic Air India crash in Ahmedabad. My thoughts and prayers are with all the families affected. May they find strength in this difficult hour.'Reports have suggested he was stung by a bee in the mouth, potentially sparking an anaphylactic shock causing a heart attack. In a tribute posted on X, Mr Kapur's school said they were 'deeply saddened' by his death. The billionaire attended the Doon School in Uttarakhand, a 90-year-old boarding school in northern India, and later served on its board of governors. The school, which was modelled on the British public school and charges £13,406 per year for Indian students, described Mr Kapur as a 'passionate fitness and sport enthusiast and a learner for life'. They added: 'He worked to make polo more accessible beyond its traditional roots. 'Mr Kapur's enduring commitment to excellence, service, and community leaves a lasting legacy.' Mr Kapur was once married to Bollywood star Karisma Kapoor, 50, but the couple divorced. In an interview about her marriage in 2016, Ms Kapoor claimed Mr Kapur once left her to look after their child to play polo with William. Kapoor claimed: '[Sunjay] decided to carry on, leaving me behind to take care of our sick four-month-old son, just to play a Polo match with Prince William.' More to follow Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Miami Herald
17 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Americans have a ruff time watching animal violence on screen
"Not the dog!" Americans believe that it's harder to watch animals being killed on-screen than humans, according to new research. A poll of 1,512 U.S. adults sought to uncover their "gore line," or just how much blood and violence Americans can tolerate when it comes to TV and movies. If "I Am Legend" keeps your attention until "the dog scene" or you shy away from the first few minutes of the original "John Wick" movie, you may be part of the 51% who are more likely to turn away when something bad happens to an animal. Just 32% do the same with people. Animal abuse/killing even ranked as the No. 1 hardest scenes to watch (57%), followed closely by child abuse (56%) and domestic violence (43%). Dr. Chad Walding, Chief Culture Officer and Co-Founder of NativePath, weighs in on how psychological and cultural elements factor into these tendencies. "The emotional reaction of watching cruelty or abuse to an animal or living being in the media is interesting to explore from a psychological perspective and not so different from how we view the abuse of a human," said Walding. "Every weekend, the news reels share a shocking story of animal abuse or animal cruelty; however, our strong emotional response occurs specifically from watching something that is innocent being victimized. Viewers naturally see animals as innocent and/or weak, leading to some serious emotional engagement with the source of the abuse." Though both have tear-jerking sentiment, funerals or memorial services ranked below death beds and final "goodbyes" ranked above funerals and memorial services (27% vs 15%). And despite every early 2000s TV drama depicting at least one, only 14% believe that car accidents are the most gut-wrenching. Conducted by Talker Research, the results found that Americans have strong stomachs and have a high tolerance for gore. Slaps, punches and KOs are fair game for the majority of the panel, though 12% start to draw the line at someone being stabbed repeatedly, and 14% of baby boomers agree. One in 10 Americans call it quits if someone's head is being chopped off, whereas many (21%) will take it all the way to the end with someone being chopped into pieces. A little more than two in five (22%) can't even identify their gore line. In fact, 53% of respondents haven't encountered a movie or TV show in the last 12 months that they needed to turn off because it was too gory. "Media violence is growing and desensitization to violence is becoming more and more obvious," continued Walding. "Our cognitive tolerance for gore has begun to influence the media we use and the content of these media. A major factor is simply, the more violent media that is being consumed, and therefore normalized, it reduces the emotional impact of the consumer and becomes more normalized and it works for the media input." TOP 10HARDEST TYPES OF TV AND MOVIE SCENES TO WATCH Animal abuse/killing - 57%Child abuse - 56%Domestic violence/abuse - 43%Violence/murder - 30%Deathbed/final goodbyes - 27%Shootings - 18%Drug use - 16%Sex/intimacy - 14%Car accidents - 14%War/battles - 13% Survey methodology: Talker Research surveyed 1,512 general population Americans; the survey was administered and conducted online by Talker Research between Jan. 31 and Feb. 3, 2025. We are sourcing from a non-probability frame and the two main sources we use are: Traditional online access panels - where respondents opt-in to take part in online market research for an incentiveProgrammatic - where respondents are online and are given the option to take part in a survey to receive a virtual incentive usually related to the online activity they are engaging in Those who did not fit the specified sample were terminated from the survey. As the survey is fielded, dynamic online sampling is used, adjusting targeting to achieve the quotas specified as part of the sampling plan. Regardless of which sources a respondent came from, they were directed to an Online Survey, where the survey was conducted in English; a link to the questionnaire can be shared upon request. Respondents were awarded points for completing the survey. These points have a small cash-equivalent monetary value. Cells are only reported on for analysis if they have a minimum of 80 respondents, and statistical significance is calculated at the 95% level. Data is not weighted, but quotas and other parameters are put in place to reach the desired sample. Interviews are excluded from the final analysis if they failed quality-checking measures. This includes: Speeders: Respondents who complete the survey in a time that is quicker than one-third of the median length of interview are disqualified as speedersOpen ends: All verbatim responses (full open-ended questions as well as other please specify options) are checked for inappropriate or irrelevant textBots: Captcha is enabled on surveys, which allows the research team to identify and disqualify botsDuplicates: Survey software has "deduping" based on digital fingerprinting, which ensures nobody is allowed to take the survey more than once It is worth noting that this survey was only available to individuals with internet access, and the results may not be generalizable to those without internet access. The post Americans have a ruff time watching animal violence on screen appeared first on Talker. Copyright Talker News. All Rights Reserved.
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Indian billionaire dies during Queen's Cup polo
An Indian billionaire has died of a suspected heart attack after falling ill during a Queen's Cup polo match in Windsor. Sunjay Kapur, patron of the Aureus polo team and an established name in the English polo scene, was the ex-husband of Bollywood actress Karisma Kapoor. It was initially reported by witnesses that he was heard to have said 'I've swallowed something', prompting assumptions he may have swallowed a bee. However, other people with knowledge of the situation have dismissed this theory, saying instead that he lost consciousness after bending over on his horse during a break in play. The 53-year-old's team, which is captained by Mark Tomlinson, were playing Sujan Indian Tigers in the subsidiary final of the Queen's Cup when he fell ill. Kapur had been playing at the prestigious Guards Polo Club in Windsor. A friend of Kapur's told Telegraph Sport: 'He will be greatly lost not only by his family and friends but the local community around his club as he employed so many people and made so many friends – he was fun kind and generous. He didn't distinguish between his grooms or high net worth friends – when he had a party everyone was invited and everyone was equal.' Kapur was chairman of auto components maker Sona Comstar. 'A visionary leader, Kapur played a pivotal role in shaping Sona Comstar into a global mobility technology company built on innovation, sustainability, and purpose,' Sona Comstar said in a statement. The University of Buckingham graduate took over Sona Comstar in 2015 after the death of his father, Surinder Kapur, a pioneer in the Indian auto parts industry who founded the company in 1995. According to Forbes, Kapur, who was also a US citizen, had an estimated net worth of $1.2 billion. He had children with Kapoor prior to divorce in 2016. Kapur later married Priya Sachdev, a former model and entrepreneur, with whom he had a son. Just before his death, Kapur posted a condolence message on X about Thursday's fatal crash of an Air India flight in Ahmedabad. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.