logo
Light pollution is making it harder for astronomers to study the universe

Light pollution is making it harder for astronomers to study the universe

Fast Company01-08-2025
Outdoor lighting for buildings, roads and advertising can help people see in the dark of night, but many astronomers are growing increasingly concerned that these lights could be blinding us to the rest of the universe.
Hot science in the cold, dark night
While orbiting telescopes like the Hubble Space Telescope or the James Webb Space Telescope give researchers a unique view of the cosmos—particularly because they can see light blocked by the Earth's atmosphere—ground-based telescopes also continue to drive cutting-edge discovery.
Telescopes on the ground capture light with gigantic and precise focusing mirrors that can be 20 to 35 feet wide. Moving all astronomical observations to space to escape light pollution would not be possible, because space missions have a much greater cost and so many large ground-based telescopes are already in operation or under construction.
Around the world, there are 17 ground-based telescopes with primary mirrors as big or bigger than Webb's 20-foot mirror, and three more under construction with mirrors planned to span 80 to 130 feet.
The newest telescope starting its scientific mission right now, the Vera Rubin Observatory in Chile, has a mirror with a 28-foot diameter and a 3-gigapixel camera. One of its missions is to map the distribution of dark matter in the universe.
To do that, it will collect a sample of 2.6 billion galaxies. The typical galaxy in that sample is 100 times fainter than the natural glow in the nighttime air in the Earth's atmosphere, so this Rubin Observatory program depends on near-total natural darkness.
Any light scattered at night—road lighting, building illumination, billboards—would add glare and noise to the scene, greatly reducing the number of galaxies Rubin can reliably measure in the same time, or greatly increasing the total exposure time required to get the same result.
The LED revolution
Astronomers care specifically about artificial light in the blue-green range of the electromagnetic spectrum, as that used to be the darkest part of the night sky. A decade ago, the most common outdoor lighting was from sodium vapor discharge lamps. They produced an orange-pink glow, which meant that they put out very little blue and green light.
Even observatories relatively close to growing urban areas had skies that were naturally dark in the blue and green part of the spectrum, enabling all kinds of new observations.
Then came the solid-state LED lighting revolution. Those lights put out a broad rainbow of color with very high efficiency, meaning they produce lots of light per watt of electricity. The earliest versions of LEDs put out a large fraction of their energy in the blue and green, but advancing technology now gets the same efficiency with 'warmer' lights that have much less blue and green.
Nevertheless, the formerly pristine darkness of the night sky now has much more light, particularly in the blue and green, from LEDs in cities and towns, lighting roads, public spaces, and advertising.
The broad output of color from LEDs affects the whole spectrum, from ultraviolet through deep red.
The U.S. Department of Energy commissioned a study in 2019 which predicted that the higher energy efficiency of LEDs would mean that the amount of power used for lights at night would go down, with the amount of light emitted staying roughly the same.
But satellites looking down at the Earth reveal that just isn't the case. The amount of light is going steadily up, meaning that cities and businesses were willing to keep their electricity bills about the same as energy efficiency improved, and just get more light.
Natural darkness in retreat
As human activity spreads out over time, many of the remote areas that host observatories are becoming less remote. Light domes from large urban areas slightly brighten the dark sky at mountaintop observatories up to 200 miles away. When these urban areas are adjacent to an observatory, the addition to the skyglow is much stronger, making detection of the faintest galaxies and stars that much harder.
When the Mount Wilson Observatory was constructed in the Angeles National Forest near Pasadena, California, in the early 1900s, it was a very dark site, considerably far from the 500,000 people living in Greater Los Angeles. Today, 18.6 million people live in the L.A. area, and urban sprawl has brought civilization much closer to Mount Wilson.
When Kitt Peak National Observatory was first under construction in the late 1950s, it was far from metro Tucson, Arizona, with its population of 230,000. Today, that area houses 1 million people, and Kitt Peak faces much more light pollution.
Even telescopes in darker, more secluded regions—like northern Chile or western Texas—experience light pollution from industrial activities like open-pit mining or oil and gas facilities.
The case of the European Southern Observatory
An interesting modern challenge is facing the European Southern Observatory, which operates four of the world's largest optical telescopes. Their site in northern Chile is very remote, and it is nominally covered by strict national regulations protecting the dark sky.
AES Chile, an energy provider with strong U.S. investor backing, announced a plan in December 2024 for the development of a large industrial plant and transport hub close to the observatory. The plant would produce liquid hydrogen and ammonia for green energy.
Even though formally compliant with the national lighting norm, the fully built operation could scatter enough artificial light into the night sky to turn the current observatory's pristine darkness into a state similar to some of the legacy observatories now near large urban areas.
This light pollution could mean the facility won't have the same ability to detect and measure the faintest galaxies and stars.
Light pollution doesn't only affect observatories. Today, around 80% of the world's population cannot see the Milky Way at night. Some Asian cities are so bright that the eyes of people walking outdoors cannot become visually dark-adapted.
In 2009, the International Astronomical Union declared that there is a universal right to starlight. The dark night sky belongs to all people—its awe-inspiring beauty is something that you don't have to be an astronomer to appreciate.
Richard Green is an astronomer emeritus at Steward Observatory at the University of Arizona.
The early-rate deadline for Fast Company's Most Innovative Companies Awards is Friday, September 5, at 11:59 p.m. PT. Apply today.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Oldest black hole ever seen is 300 million times bigger than our sun
Oldest black hole ever seen is 300 million times bigger than our sun

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Oldest black hole ever seen is 300 million times bigger than our sun

Astronomers have identified the most distant—and by extension earliest—black hole ever seen. Located in the galaxy CAPERS-LRD-z9, the supermassive black hole likely formed 13.3 billion years ago, barely 500 million years after the big bang. But recent discoveries by the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) mean we could find many similar black holes lurking inside so-called Little Red Dots, or LRDs. Experts started spotting the Little Red Dots about three years ago. In December 2022, data collected by the JWST indicated these numerous, never-before-seen pinpricks of light from extremely distant, ancient formations created at the dawn of the universe. Additional analysis showed that around 70 percent of these LRDs displayed evidence of gas swirling around 2 million miles per hour—solid indicators of accretion disks surrounding supermassive black holes. In many cases, similar accreting black holes are telltale signs of active galactic nuclei, but astronomers needed to examine the evidence more carefully. After years of follow-up study, an international research team led by the University of Texas at Austin's Cosmic Frontier Center say they can now confirm CAPERS-LRD-z9 contains the oldest supermassive black hole ever detected. 'When looking for black holes, this is about as far back as you can practically go. We're really pushing the boundaries of what current technology can detect,' Cosmic Frontier Center researcher and study lead author Anthony Taylor said in a statement. The evidence published on August 6 in the Astrophysical Journal came from JWST's CANDELS-Area Prism Epoch of Reionization Survey (CAPERS) project. Of all its technological arrays, CAPERS allows the telescope to observe the outermost edges of space currently possible. To determine CAPERS-LRD-z9's true identity, experts conducted a spectroscopic analysis of its light emissions in a bid to find fast-moving gas. As it falls into a black hole, gas moving away from Earth's perspective is stretched into redder wavelengths, while the gas moving towards the planet compresses into blue waves. 'There aren't many other things that create this signature. And this galaxy has it,' said Taylor. 'We've seen these clouds in other galaxies. When we compared this object to those other sources, it was a dead ringer.' Further examinations revealed that while a Little Red Dot may appear 'little' at this distance, the name is a bit misleading. The black hole at the center of CAPERS-LRD-z9 is believed to be as much as 300 million times larger than the sun, with a mass equivalent to half of its galaxy's stars. That makes it particularly supermassive even when compared to other supermassive black holes. The implications of its size are particularly striking to astronomers. While newer black holes have plenty of material to devour, that theoretically wouldn't be the case for one born within the universe's first 500 million years. 'This adds to growing evidence that early black holes grew much faster than we thought possible. Or they started out far more massive than our models predict,' said Steven Finkelstein, Cosmic Frontier Center director and study co-author. Moving forward, the team hopes to compile even higher resolution observations from JWST. 'The discovery of Little Red Dots was a major surprise from early JWST data, as they looked nothing like galaxies seen with the Hubble Space Telescope,' Finkelstein explained. 'Now, we're in the process of figuring out what they're like and how they came to be.' Solve the daily Crossword

Possible Planet Is Spotted Around Neighboring Sunlike Star
Possible Planet Is Spotted Around Neighboring Sunlike Star

New York Times

time2 hours ago

  • New York Times

Possible Planet Is Spotted Around Neighboring Sunlike Star

Alpha Centauri has gripped the imaginations of sci-fi aficionados for decades. Only four light-years from Earth, the three-star system inspires fictional alien worlds and journeys through interstellar space. Its proximity also makes it alluring for astronomers, including a team that, on Thursday, provided the strongest evidence yet that a planet circles one of Alpha Centauri's sunlike stars. The world is at the very edge of the region around the star where liquid water can exist, known as the habitable zone. Because it is made of gas, the planet itself would not support life as we know it. But the possible planet, discovered through observations from NASA's powerful James Webb Space Telescope, would be the closest ever found orbiting within a sunlike star's habitable zone. However, further observations are needed to confirm it is indeed a planet. The find was announced in two papers that have been accepted for publication in The Astrophysical Journal Letters. It is a potential preview of the types of discoveries that will be possible in the future as astronomers' tools for hunting exoplanets — particularly ones like our Earth — evolve. Three stars make up Alpha Centauri. But only two, Alpha Centauri A and Alpha Centauri B, are like our sun. They are locked in close orbit around each other. Circling this pair from farther away is a faint red dwarf known as Proxima Centauri. The stars themselves are 'pretty run-of-the mill,' said Charles Beichman, an astronomer at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory and the California Institute of Technology. But the system is a touchstone for investigations of stars like our sun, Dr. Beichman added, because cosmically speaking, 'it's right next door.' Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Astronomer Says Unidentified Object Could Be Alien Spacecraft: ‘We've Never Seen Such a Thing'
Astronomer Says Unidentified Object Could Be Alien Spacecraft: ‘We've Never Seen Such a Thing'

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Astronomer Says Unidentified Object Could Be Alien Spacecraft: ‘We've Never Seen Such a Thing'

The plot of the movie Independence Day could soon become reality—as early as this November. According to Harvard astronomer Avi Loeb, a 20-kilometer-wide unidentified space object exhibits some alien-like attributes. Even further, a paper co-authored by Loeb last month concluded that if the object were an alien vessel with 'malign' intentions, then the consequences could be 'dire for humanity.' Loeb and his colleagues at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics have written two papers about the object, which was first detected by a NASA-funded telescope in Chile on July 1. On Thursday morning, Loeb joined CNN This Morning to discuss what NASA has labelled 3I/ATLAS. The agency has identified the object as an 'interstellar comet' on its website and said that it 'poses no threat to Earth,' but Loeb cautioned against dismissing some of the object's extraordinary characteristics. 'The brightness of the object implies a diameter of 20 kilometers. There's not enough rocky material in interstellar space to deliver such a giant object,' Loeb said. 'It takes 10,000 years for that much mass to arrive to the inner part of the solar system.' Another factor that the scientist pointed to that distinguishes 3I/Atlas from other interstellar objects (of which only two others have ever been detected) is its trajectory through the solar system. 'The trajectory of this object is very finely tuned. It lies in the plane of the orbits of the planets around the sun, to within five degrees. The chances of that to happen is one in 500.' He went on to say that the chances of the object's path past Jupiter, Mars, and Venus being random were in the range of one in 20,000. Most remarkably, Loeb said that the glow emanating from the object is not befitting that of a comet. 'Usually, for comets you see a trailing tail behind the object. Here, the glow from behind the Hubble Space Telescope image is actually in front of the object.' 'We've never seen such a thing!' Loeb said. The Harvard astronomer isn't the only one who thinks the object is worth keeping an eye on. Last week, Republican Florida Rep. Anna Paulina Luna wrote NASA Administrator Sean Duffy to suggest that he investigate the nature of 3I/ATLAS using the agency's Juno spacecraft. Juno is currently orbiting Jupiter, the planet that 3I/ATLAS will come closest to. Loeb calculated in a paper published last week that adding extra fuel to the spacecraft would allow Juno to execute a 'fly-by' and study the nature of the object more closely than any Earth-bound telescope. It's unclear if Luna's request will go anywhere, but Loeb suggested on CNN that such a maneuver would help collect data that can help answer the million-dollar question: Are there other life forms out there? 'Why should we assume that we are the only one in our cosmic neighborhood?' he asked, as he advocated for further study of the object. 'We should just check by looking at data.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store