Number of Texans receiving out-of-state abortions quadrupled between 2021 and 2023
Data from the Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) shows at least 7,844 Texas residents received an abortion in a different state in 2023, up from 4,718 in 2022 and 1,712 in 2021. Still the total number of abortions for Texas residents dropped by 85 percent compared to 2021.
In 2023, just 62 abortions were reported in Texas, all due to medical emergency and/or to preserve the health of the mother. In 2024, 76 abortions were performed in the state, according to the HHSC data.
Texas receives reports from other states through the State and Territorial Exchange of Vital Events, a public health reporting system maintained by the National Association for Public Health Statistics and Information Systems.
Reporting abortion data to the system is voluntary, and not all states participate, according to a HHSC spokesperson. That means the total number may be higher than the 7,844 reported in 2023.
In fact, the Guttmacher Institute, a non-profit that tracks access to abortion, estimates the number to be closer to 35,000. The organization estimates 14,230 Texas women traveled to New Mexico for an abortion in 2023, while 6,620 went to Kansas, 4,440 went to Colorado and 3,310 went to California. An estimated 6,300 Texas women went to other states.
In 2022, almost 3,000 Texans received an abortion in Kansas, according to official data from the Kansas Department of Health and Environment. That constituted a 1,178 percent increase from 2021, when just 233 abortions were performed on Texas residents. Kansas has yet to report data for 2023.
HHSC does not maintain data on people who travel internationally to receive an abortion.
The Supreme Court struck down Roe v. Wade in a 6-3 decision on June 24, 2022, eliminating the nearly 50-year-old constitutional right to abortion. The ruling gave states the authority to limit or ban the procedure.
A trigger law in Texas went into effect in August 2022, banning most abortions in the state. Abortion is also banned in neighboring Arkansas, Louisiana and Oklahoma, meaning Texas women who want the procedure must travel to states like Kansas, Colorado and New Mexico.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
14 hours ago
- Newsweek
VA Plans Major Change to Healthcare Benefits
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has announced it plans to scale back abortion access under its healthcare programs. Why It Matters The decision would reverse a policy put in place in September 2022, following the U.S. Supreme Court's June ruling that overturned Roe v. Wade, the 1973 ruling that protected a pregnant woman's right to choose to have an abortion. The 2022 policy allowed federal funds to be used to pay for abortion care for veterans and eligible dependents in cases of rape, incest, and danger to the life or health of the mother. Critics argue the VA move could leave veterans without reproductive care options, especially in states with strict abortion bans. What To Know In a notice published Monday in the Federal Register, the department said it would reinstate a pre-2022 rule that excludes abortion services from coverage except when a pregnancy poses a threat to the life of the mother. It would apply to medical benefits packages for veterans and their dependents. At the time of the 2022 change, then-VA Secretary Denis McDonough said the decision had been made to protect patient safety. The change also made it possible for abortion care to be provided in states which had limited access to reproductive care following the overturn. The change garnered scrutiny from conservative lawmakers, who argued it exceeded the limits set by the Hyde Amendment—a federal provision that restricts the use of government funds for abortions unless the life of the mother is in danger. Stock image/file photo: Signboard of United States Department of Veterans Affairs in Washington DC. Stock image/file photo: Signboard of United States Department of Veterans Affairs in Washington DC. GETTY The department said in its proposal that it wanted to ensure it "provides only needed medical services to our nation's heroes and their families." It will continue to provide coverage for Veterans experiencing miscarriages or ectopic pregnancies. Anti-abortion Republicans have praised the rollback as a victory for taxpayers and the sanctity of life, while abortion-rights advocates condemned it as a dangerous denial of care, arguing it strips veterans of bodily autonomy and puts their health and dignity at risk. What People Are Saying Republicans on the House Committee on Veterans' Affairs said in a statement: "It was wrong that the Biden administration violated settled law in 2022 and began offering abortion services through VA. We pushed back hard on this disastrous policy over the last two years to hold the Biden-Harris administration accountable and protect the lives of the unborn. It's simple–taxpayers do not want their hard-earned money spent on paying for abortions—and VA's sole focus should always be providing service-connected health care and benefits to the veterans they serve. House Republicans, alongside President Trump, will always stand up for the sanctity of life—today's decision by Secretary Collins makes that message perfectly clear." Alexis McGill Johnson, the president and CEO of Planned Parenthood Federation of America, said in a statement on Monday: "Those who fight for all our freedom must have the most basic freedom to control their own bodies and futures—and this rule robs them of it. Taking away access to heath care shows us that the Trump administration will always put politics and retribution over people's lives." Nancy Northup, president and CEO at the Center for Reproductive Rights, said in a statement: "After veterans put their lives on the line to protect our freedoms, the Trump administration is trying to rob them of their own freedoms and putting their health at risk. This administration is sending a clear message to veterans—that their health and dignity aren't worth defending. To devalue veterans in this way and take away life-changing health care would be unconscionable. This shows you just how extreme this administration's anti-abortion stance is—they would rather a veteran suffer severely than receive an abortion." What's Next The proposal will be open for a 30-day public comment period until September 3.
The Hill
2 days ago
- The Hill
Proposed rule bans nearly all abortions at VA hospitals
The VA said in the proposal that it is reversing a 2022 rule that for the first time allowed the department to provide abortions in limited circumstances to pregnant veterans and their eligible family members, even in states that banned abortion after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. Between 1999 and 2022, the VA excluded almost all abortions and abortion counseling for veterans and their families from their medical benefits package. By reversing the rule, officials are seeking to ensure taxpayer dollars are not used to terminate pregnancies, according to a filing released Friday. They also called the Biden administration's decision to implement the interim rule 'inappropriate' and 'legally questionable.' A final rule could come as soon as the public comment period on the measure closes on Sept. 3. Reproductive rights groups said the move robbed service members of the ability to control their bodies and their futures. 'Since taking office, the Trump administration has repeatedly attacked service members, veterans, and their families' access to basic reproductive care, including gender-affirming care,' Alexis McGill Johnson, president and CEO of Planned Parenthood Federation of America, said, referring to the VA's decision in March to stop providing transgender veterans with hormone therapy. 'Taking away access to health care shows us that the Trump administration will always put politics and retribution over people's lives.' Anti-abortion groups, meanwhile, applauded the Trump administration's decision, calling it a 'major win' for the movement. 'Instead of prioritizing the real and urgent needs of our veterans, the Biden-Harris Administration turned VA hospitals into abortion centers – violating longstanding law and betraying the will of the American people who strongly oppose forced taxpayer-funded abortions,' the anti-abortion group Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America said in a statement. 'Thankfully, this injustice is now corrected.'
Cosmopolitan
3 days ago
- Cosmopolitan
60 Years of Covering Reproductive Rights
For decades, Cosmopolitan has provided young people with the information they need to protect their bodies and own their choices when it comes to topics like birth control, sexual health, fertility, and abortion. We were there, reporting and spreading awareness before abortion became legal nationally—and we were there after the Supreme Court recently overturned that fundamental right. Through it all, we've published in-depth guides and deeply personal accounts of how people in this country think about, promote, restrict, and access reproductive freedoms. Below, we take a look back at how our coverage has evolved—and how it's remained the same—over the years. One woman examines the emotional complexities of having an abortion and recounts how challenging it was before the U.S. Supreme Court legalized the procedure via Roe v. Wade. In 1960, the FDA approved the first birth control pill, but years later, people still had plenty of questions. This thorough, four-page guide answered everything from 'How does the pill work?' to 'Could it mask cancer symptoms?' A compassionate male gynecologist offers a simple and timeless truth: 'The only difference between making love and making a pregnancy is a contraceptive.' Before it was even available in the U.S., we educated readers on the then-new copper IUD. A first-person account from a woman who was lured into an anti-abortion 'clinic' where, instead of getting actual health care, she received one-on-one counseling from a series of anti-choice extremists. Their goal? To guilt her out of her decision to have an abortion. A writer's personal story finds a delicate balance between stark honesty about the emotional and psychological aftermath of having an abortion and the urgent insistence that no woman should feel shame for getting one. This deeply reported feature details the rise—and dangers—of the Christian anti-abortion movement. To 'put an end to contraception confusion,' this story meticulously explains every then-current option: how it works and how to get it. As politicians enacted new restrictions on later-term abortions, this 12-page story explained the laws while also detailing how to still access vital resources. Legislators in President Trump's first term went after accessible, affordable birth control. We examined exactly what was at stake in this comprehensive guide. When researchers started testing a male contraceptive gel, Cosmopolitan got special access to the early trials. We sat with participants and revealed how the potentially groundbreaking birth control method for men could change everything. After the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, our fervent response included an original survey, deep legal context, the debunking of misinformation, rallying calls from reproductive rights leaders, and current resources. Post-Roe, we kept our efforts up, publishing this compelling look inside a secret fleet of mobile abortion clinics. In a culture where any discussion about reproductive freedoms feels once again urgent, we broke down what might happen to people after quitting hormonal birth control.
