For Illinois' Kasparas Jakučionis, his first — and perhaps only — NCAA Tournament is about ‘the beauty of basketball'
MILWAUKEE — Kasparas Jakučionis never watched NCAA basketball when he was growing up.
The time difference in his home country of Lithuania was inconvenient, and he usually focused on European basketball instead. But a few years ago, he latched onto March Madness and he understood its appeal.
'You can see how every win, every detail in the game matters,' Jakučionis said. 'Every possession matters, and you win or you go home. And that's the beauty of basketball.'
The Illinois freshman guard will get his first in-person taste of the NCAA Tournament on Friday when the No. 6 seed Illini face 11th-seeded Xavier at 8:45 p.m. at Fiserv Forum. Illinois' Tournament run, however long it lasts, also very well could be the last for Jakučionis, the team leader with 15 points, 5.6 rebounds and 4.6 assists per game.
The latest ESPN NBA mock draft ahead of the NCAA Tournament has the Brooklyn Nets taking the 6-foot-6 Jakučionis at No. 6 and the Miami Heat selecting Illinois freshman forward Will Riley at No. 22.
After their Big Ten Tournament quarterfinal loss to Maryland last week, the Illini talked about the need to understand the urgency of this time of year in college basketball. Junior guard Kylan Boswell said the potential near future without some of their best teammates 'definitely' increases the urgency even more.
'(Will) and KJ are gone, for sure. There's not even a question about that,' Boswell said. 'We know this could be the last time we play with each other. We've had a great year, but we don't want it to end this early.'
If his time at Illinois is just a blink in a long basketball career for Jakučionis, he is determined to savor the moment — and not focus on the NBA attention he's getting.
'I don't think about that now,' Jakučionis said from the Illinois locker room in Milwaukee before Thursday's practice. 'We're in March Madness now. The only focus is tomorrow's game against Xavier, and that's it.'
'I love how much he cares'
For a moment in the Big Ten Tournament second-round victory against Iowa, Boswell was going to take the four foul shots stemming from then-Hawkeyes coach Fran McCaffery's two technical fouls. But Boswell knew Jakučionis was struggling to get his offensive game going, so he offered the shots to the freshman, who made all four.
'He decided to trust me and give those free throws for me,' Jakučionis said. 'He said, 'Go make a few easy buckets, then you will feel the ball, and the game will be easier.' And it really did. I think it helped me a lot, and I really appreciate it. He's that kind of guy. He's that kind of leader, and that's what leaders do.'
Listen to coach Brad Underwood and his players talk about what has impressed them most over a season with Jakučionis, a third-team All-Big Ten and All-Freshman player, and they'll give you a number of qualities.
Underwood has talked multiple times about the maturity Jakučionis and the Illini's other international recruits have brought to his program, and he more than once has said the guard is 'one of the smartest people I've ever been around.'
Illinois will face Xavier in the NCAA Tournament. 5 takeaways on the Illini's 1st-round opponent after its win over Texas.
Riley pointed to how humble Jakučionis is, how he doesn't talk about himself and instead tries to lift others up. Guard Tre White said he admires how Jakučionis is fearless, relentless and committed to winning.
Boswell zeroed in on something else — how his friend has handled the good and the bad of this season.
'How his perseverance has been throughout the year,' Boswell said. 'He always takes things so hard on himself, and he always comes to me and leans on me. I love how much he cares about the game, he cares about what he does for his team in helping us win.
'The bad games, he's in the gym right after, 5 a.m. and stuff like that. So it's making sure he has the right mentality that it's not on any individual.'
Underwood on Thursday praised the relationship between Jakučionis and Boswell, saying the freshman has had a 'tremendous response' to Boswell's advice.
'KJ's respect for Kylan is tremendous, and vice versa,' he said. 'All KJ wants to do is be great, and Kylan knows how good a player he is.'
It hasn't all been easy in Jakučionis' first season playing outside Europe, and he had highs and lows over the last month.
In a loss at Wisconsin, he scored just six points and had seven turnovers. A couple of weeks after that, he had 17 points and four assists in an upset of Michigan and then hit the go-ahead 3-pointer in the final minute in the home finale against Purdue, a moment that prompted Underwood to say, 'He's not afraid of that moment. He's not afraid to fail.'
In two Big Ten Tournament games, Jakučionis totaled 25 points, 13 rebounds and four assists, but he also had 12 turnovers.
'I didn't do a very good job to be honest,' Jakučionis said when asked about his play over the last month. 'The shots maybe weren't falling. I still tried to execute on the defensive end, on offensive rebounds, and just help the team however I can help the team. My teammates did a very good job of just being themselves, playing like they can, to show who they are.'
After Maryland blew out Illinois in the conference tournament, Underwood acknowledged the mixed results from his star.
'There's been some great moments. There's been some — I don't want to say bad play — but there have been some challenges,' Underwood said after the game. 'He's at the top of the scouting report. I know how good he is. We've all seen that. He's hit big shot after big shot all year long.
'I'm more about getting him dialed in defensively so he doesn't worry about offense. And tonight, defensively, he wasn't very good. The offense stuff will take care of itself when he starts worrying about the other end.'
Despite some of the struggles, Underwood also believes in Jakučionis' present and future.
The pressure of the end
Jakučionis was plenty familiar with playing in rowdy atmospheres before he arrived at Illinois. After beginning his career in Lithuania, he moved to play for FC Barcelona.
'In Barcelona, there were less fans, but they were very passionate,' Jakučionis said. 'The atmosphere is pretty similar to be honest. In Europe, it's like crazy fans too. Here, I expected less fans and less attention, but now I can see they're very passionate too.'
Illinois enters its game against a veteran Xavier group as a young team, with Dra Gibbs-Lawhorn as the only holdover from the group that advanced to the Elite Eight last season. But transfers Boswell and White bring some postseason experience.
No. 6 seed Illinois glad to be sent to 'Big Ten country' in Milwaukee for its NCAA Tournament opener
And the experience Jakučionis and 7-foot-1 Croatian center Tomislav Ivišić had playing in Europe gives Underwood the confidence they can rise to the occasion in the biggest games of their college careers.
'The good thing for those guys, they've been in a lot of big games,' Underwood said. 'They've got kind of a worldly knowledge and understanding.
'This stage is different. It's unmatched. There's nothing like the NCAA Tournament. But it's still basketball, and you've got to go out and play the game and you've got to compete.'
Underwood has preached the 'urgency of the end' to his players when it comes to this time of year, and he has publicly been transparent about what the end of the season might mean for Jakučionis. On the Jim Rome Show this week, he acknowledged the possibility of Jakučionis moving on from the Illini, saying that there's no question that Jakučionis has NBA lottery-pick potential.
'He's so instinctive. His feel is great. He's a great teammate,' Underwood said. 'At 6-5, 6-6, he's a guy that shoots it extremely well off the dribble, which you have to do in the NBA. But he has the ability and the physical size. He's 210-215 pounds already. And then he's just 18, so his best days won't be at the University of Illinois. They'll be at the Association.'
Still, the Illini hope there are some more good games for Jakučionis with them too.
Another big performance certainly would help their chances as they look to the Musketeers and beyond. Jakučionis was asked Thursday how he handles the responsibility of shouldering the Illini's Tournament hopes. He went back to the lesson Boswell tried to impart on him.
'To win and to win in especially these games, we need everybody,' Jakučionis said. 'We need everyone to be involved, every possession. Everyone needs to do their job on the defensive end and the offensive end. I think one player cannot do everything in this type of competition.'
And if everyone does their jobs, he said, his NCAA experience might go on a while longer.
'I think the ceiling is very high,' Jakučionis said. 'And if we just do our job, we are a very good team and we can go far.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
What is NIL Go, and why is it the latest subject of debate among college sports leaders?
ORLANDO, Fla. — The man steps onto a raised platform, walks behind a podium and leans toward the microphone. Before him, more than 200 college athletic administrators shift to the front of their seats. For months now, they've been waiting for this moment. Advertisement 'I'm Karl,' the man says, 'with Deloitte.' Karl Schaefer is a young man with perfectly cropped hair, a sharp grin and slender frame. He is here to lead a 40-minute presentation on the single most talked-about concept of college athletics' new revenue-sharing era: the Deloitte-run clearinghouse dubbed 'NIL Go.' Though it remains unsaid by those in power, the goal of NIL Go is quite clear: prevent booster payments to athletes that, for four years now, have been masquerading as commercial and endorsement deals. As Schaefer flips through slides of the NIL Go software system, for the first time revealed publicly, whispers within the room build to murmurs. Attendees capture slides with photos. Some video the entire event. Others scribble notes on a pad. How Deloitte and the new enforcement entity, the College Sports Commission, plan to prevent booster pay is the target of much criticism and fascination — plenty of it shrouded in secrecy for the last many months. Advertisement In central Florida, at an annual conference of administrators this week, the shroud was at least partially lifted. Not only was the platform's interface shown on a giant projection screen during Schaefer's presentation — including the six-step submission and approval process — but, in interviews with Yahoo Sports or during other public presentations, college sports executives who helped craft the system answered questions that, up to this point, had remained unanswered. While many doubt that the clearinghouse will withstand inevitable legal challenges, administrators here provided legitimate reasons for why they believe in its long-term survival. Most notable of those, says NCAA president Charlie Baker, is that the clearinghouse's appeals process — arbitration — is equipped with subpoena powers. 'They do have that power,' Baker told Yahoo Sports this week. 'Arbitration typically has subpoena power and I'm pretty sure since this one sits inside an injunction, they will have it.' Officials at the power conferences confirmed that 'significant subpoena powers' exist under the arbitration appeals process, but those powers are less expansive than subpoena authority within a courtroom. The decision to use subpoena powers and how exactly to use them — limited or broad — is expected to rest with the arbitrator presiding over the appeals process. Advertisement A subpoena compels individuals or entities to produce evidence under penalty of law, such as turning over text messages, emails and phone call logs as well as testifying before investigators. It is one of the more important tools for officers of the law, such as police investigators — and something that was never available to the NCAA enforcement staff. 'We won't have complete subpoena power, but if an athlete goes into arbitration … those records, you can get access to some of those records,' said Ohio State athletic director Ross Bjork, who is a member of a settlement implementation committee that helped construct the new enforcement entity. 'It's going to be a new day.' The algorithm Back in the Deloitte presentation room, Schaefer is explaining the submission process for NIL Go. Athletes are required to submit third-party NIL deals of $600 or more using a web-based submission system, not unlike an online registration system for, say, a passport. Advertisement Shaefer explains, gesturing toward a giant projection screen, that the clearinghouse makes three determinations once a deal is submitted: Is the third party an 'associated entity' with the university, such as a booster, or a business contracted with a school like a university sponsor or apparel brand? If so, more intense scrutiny is applied in the vetting process. Public companies can, and many of them will, be deemed as associated entities. Is the deal for a 'valid business purpose?" The third-party business, brand or individual must be receiving true value from the activities, such as an autograph session, television commercial or speaking engagement. Is the deal within Deloitte's 'range of compensation' paid to similarly situated individuals? This is perhaps the most criticized of the concepts. Deloitte created 'the range of compensation' through an algorithm using fair market value analysis, comparing similar types of NIL deals struck between an athlete and the third party. More is now known about that algorithm. Clemson athletic director Graham Neff, one of the implementation committee members, details the factors used to form a compensation range: 'Athletic performance is a big part of it. Your social media reach and following. Market — where schools are at. The reach of your school within said market.' This will vary by school. Neff offers an example. 'The reach of Georgia Tech in Atlanta is different than the reach of Georgia State,' he says. Advertisement Neff believes that a 'majority' of NIL deals will derive from 'associated companies,' as school sponsors, multi-media rights partners and individual alumni and boosters work to provide universities with additional compensation so they can exceed the $20.5 million revenue sharing cap that each school is afforded. Third-party NIL compensation that passes the clearinghouse does not count against the cap. Even those who helped craft the new enforcement entity acknowledge that the system is attempting to do a very difficult thing: bring regulation to an enterprise that has, for four years now, seen little to no regulation or enforcement of athlete compensation. 'There's some toothpaste back in the tube a little bit given the environment,' Neff said. For example, Deloitte officials claim that 70% of past deals from booster collectives would have been denied in their algorithm, while 90% of past deals from public companies would have been approved. Deloitte has also shared with officials that about 80% of NIL deals with public companies were valued at less than $10,000 and 99% of those deals were valued at less than $100,000. Advertisement These figures suggest that the clearinghouse threatens to significantly curtail the millions of dollars that school-affiliated, booster-backed collectives are distributing to athletes. 'No one is trying to restrict someone's earning potential, but what we're trying to say is, 'What is the real market?'' Bjork says. 'Everybody you talk to about the pro market will tell you that NIL deals for pro athletes are really small. In the collective world, we created a false market.' Denial, approval and arbitration Displayed on the giant screen before hundreds of athletic administrators is the six-step clearinghouse submission and approval process. Advertisement Step 6 lays out the process for a player if his or her deal is denied by the clearinghouse because it either is not struck for a valid business purpose or it does not meet the compensation range. (1) Revise and resubmit the deal so that the compensation amount falls within the algorithm's range. For instance, if the clearinghouse deems that a submitted $1 million deal should be $500,000, the athlete can resubmit for $500,000 and the school, if it so chooses, can compensate the athlete for the other $500,000 through its revenue-share pool. (2) Cancel the deal completely. (3) Request arbitration as an appeals process. Advertisement (4) Accept the rejected deal as is. In this case, the athlete 'may face enforcement consequences (e.g., loss of eligibility),' the Deloitte presentation slide reads. According to settlement terms, attorneys for the plaintiffs (the suing athletes) and defendants (NCAA and power conferences) will work together to select a neutral arbitrator or arbitrators to preside over these cases. Individual arbitration processes are expected to last no more than 45 days. In an interview last fall, plaintiff lawyer Jeffrey Kessler described the arbitration as a trial-like set of hearings in front of an arbitrator — the new enforcement entity on one side (NCAA and power conferences) and the athlete on the other side. NCAA president Charlie Baker says the new NIL enforcement process will add accountability to the system, as long as athletes and schools follow the rules. (Photo by) (Kevin Dietsch via Getty Images) How an arbitrator rules may 'depend on what evidence' each side produces, Kessler said. As Baker and others have noted, that evidence may now be generated through limited subpoena power. Advertisement But one lingering question remains: Will an athlete's school fight alongside him or her in the case? 'I expect that if the athlete pursues it, the school will support the athlete and help provide the athlete with counsel to help represent them in that challenge,' Kessler said. Penalties for NIL violations Implementation committee members say they are finalizing a 'menu' of penalties for those found to commit violations within this new revenue-sharing era, most notably those found to have (1) circumvented the cap with old-fashioned cheating or intentional or accidental miscalculations; and (2) tampered with another college athlete or prospect who is under contract. Officials decided against using a set penalty matrix as the NCAA currently does (Level I, Level II, etc.). Instead, they are providing the new College Sports Commission CEO, Brian Seeley, with the flexibility to choose penalties from a wide range of options, depending on the individual circumstance. Advertisement 'Those penalties being worked through are going to be significant and are going to be different than any penalties we've had previously,' said new Michigan State athletic director J Batt, a member of the implementation committee. An example of a new kind of penalty is a reduction in transfers that a school can acquire from the portal, Bjork says. But there are others. A postseason ban remains among the penalties, said Desiree Reed-Francois, the Arizona athletic director and implementation committee member. There are also stiff fines — multi-million dollars in value — that may be levied against schools, administrators and coaches. Suspensions, for coaches and administrators, are on the penalty menu as well. 'The fines are substantive,' Reed-Francois says. Advertisement One penalty is off the table. Administrators say that reducing a school's revenue-share pool for subsequent years is not permitted. The settlement guarantees that schools are afforded the same revenue share pool. Pushback The clearinghouse has made its way to the U.S. Capitol. During a congressional hearing over college sports on Thursday, Rep. Lori Trahan, a Democrat from Massachusetts, chided college leaders for instituting a new enforcement process that 'guarantees people in power always win and the athletes who fuel this multi-billion dollar industry always lose.' One of the witnesses in that hearing, Ramogi Huma, the executive director of the National College Players Association, chimed in as well, accusing the NCAA and conference leadership as wanting to 'shut down boosters' ability to pay players just to monopolize it' themselves. Advertisement College executives reject these notions and consider all of these elements — even the new enforcement process — as protected by a legally binding settlement. The new enforcement entity was not created by committee members in some 'backroom,' Bjork says. The implementation committee only provided structure to an enforcement piece that is 'codified' within the settlement. 'There are processes here that have been approved by the court and the plaintiffs and the defendants that people are going to be expected to follow,' Baker told Yahoo Sports. 'Given so much of what's been going on in the third-party space hasn't been accountable or transparent, and has made a lot of people outside of college athletics a lot of money, I can understand why there might be some grumpiness about this.' Soon, power conference schools — and others opting into the settlement — are expected to sign an affiliation or membership agreement. With this binding document, schools waive their right to sue over enforcement decisions and commit to settlement terms, even if their state laws contradict them. The agreement — itself the subject of legal concerns, even from some schools — is an indictment on an industry of stakeholders that, for competitive reasons, are constantly scrambling to bend, break and shatter rules to gain even the slightest edge. Advertisement Earlier this week in Orlando, members of the implementation committee publicly implored schools to follow rules. 'This has to be a mindset change,' Bjork told the audience. 'We see all the reports and naysayers, that 'we're going to go back to old-school cheating and all these things and that this is not going to work.' This has to work.' 'This will work if we make it work,' Reed-Francois said. 'We need to shift our mindset and make this work.' Can it be done? But what if athletes decide not to submit any of their third-party deals at all? 'People will be turning in people,' Reed-Francois said. 'There's a lot more `transparency now.' Advertisement Back in the convention hall, Schaefer, from Deloitte, is winding down his presentation. He thanks the crowd before beginning to walk off the stage. From among the crowd, a few raised hands emerge. Folks have questions. Others in the audience remind the hand-raisers of something announced before the presentation began: The Deloitte employees are not taking questions.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Germany's Woltemade happy about another hat-trick, at U21 Euros
Portugal's Ruben Dias and Germany's Nick Woltemade battle for the ball during the UEFA Nations League semi final soccer match between Germany and Portugal at Allianz Arena. Peter Kneffel/dpa Nick Woltemade has added to his scoring credentials with a second straight hat-trick to give Germany a winning start into the under-21 European championships and further make a name for himself. The 24-year-old from VfB Stuttgart scored all goals in Thursday's 3-0 over Slovenia, after also netting three times in a 3-1 over Spain in the team's previous match in March. He has 10 goals from 13 U21 matches overall. Advertisement Woltemade has enjoyed a meteoric rise this year, freely scoring for Stuttgart in the final weeks of the season which has generated interest from other clubs, with Chelsea and Bayern Munich reportedly monitoring his progress. Woltemade shrugged off this aspect, saying that "these are things I am honestly not dealing with. I am very happy to be here and to have scored three goals." "It was a very good start and I think it can continue like this. The three goals did me good. And I think they also did the team good." Germany have big ambitions at the tournament, and Woltemade found the net again after failing to score in his first two senior national team matches last week in the Nations League against Portugal and France. Advertisement Coach Antonio di Salvo hopes that Woltemade's run continues, saying: "The streak with us is scary, but it can go on like this." Germany next face the Czech Republic on Sunday and defending champion England on Wednesday. Victory against the Czechs could see Germany clinch a place in the quarter-finals.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Kingston Shaw shuts down recruitment after Illinois official visit
@KingstonShaw15 The New Year has brought positive change in for Kingston Shaw. The Orlando-area native made a verbal commitment to Illinois on January 1 and made the move to uber-talented The First Academy ahead of spring football, where his recruitment would continue. Advertisement Programs like Mississippi State and Michigan State worked to create a dent in the rising-senior's college decision, and each was under consideration for a visit, until Shaw returned to Champaign for his official visit last weekend. "This weekend, along with my family, confirmed I'm 100 percent locked in with Illinois," he said. "The whole family aspect is big, it's one team, one heartbeat, one voice. It's all the same standard. Throughout the recruiting process it's been constant communication, calls, letters, they have not skipped a beat -- they've been there. "They offered in July my sophomore year and they have been consistent ever since." The comfort at Illinois with Shaw and his camp starts at the very top with Bret Bielema. Advertisement "With Coach B, he's been amazing," he said. "Every time I've met with him, sat down and talked to him, me and my parents have had it great. He is definitely someone I see myself playing for in the future with all of his background, getting guys to the NFL, and the standards he has. "On top of that, he renewed his contract, so he'll be there the whole time I will be." CLASS OF 2026 RANKINGS: Rivals250 | Team | Position | State CLASS OF 2027 RANKINGS: Rivals250 | Team | Position | State TRANSFER PORTAL: Full coverage | Player ranking | Team ranking | Transfer search | Transfer Tracker RIVALS CAMP SERIES: Rivals Five-Star heading back to Indy | Rivals Five-Star roster | Schedule/info The early identification from the Illini staff and Shaw's commitment just as his profile was rising helped to build a lead the program would not relinquish for the Floridian. Advertisement The program's emphasis in the Sunshine State, where six commitments in the top-10 class reside, also created a layer of comfort and communication for the defender. "We're all super close, I talk to them on a daily basis," Shaw said. "Most of us were up there together for the visit and it was great camaraderie, brotherhood. Illinois recruits a specific type of kid and family, so it's a great locker room environment, like we've been together for years. "Nothing compares to Illinois. I didn't really want to put anything in jeopardy with what I have or with what we're building." From assistant coaches to the current roster, it seems like each aspect of the personnel in Champaign helped to check a box ahead of Shaw shutting it down. Advertisement "From the moment I stepped on campus, the players embraced me right off the bat," he said. "They love me. I stay in contact with the players, too. It's not like it is at some schools where players are already there and feel like they're above you and don't include you in things. With these guys, they act like you're one of the brothers and you're accepted into the environment." The First Academy just announced a national schedule, beginning with IMG Academy on August 14, and that is where the Illinois commitment will turn his attention the remainder of the offseason. "It's a relief," Shaw said. "It allows me to focus and lock in on my senior season and not have to worry about choosing between these different schools and staying up with all these coaches. "Now I can lock in and be the best me I can be until January, when I get up there."
