Civil Service workforce up 2,000 to almost 20-year high, figures suggest
A total of 550,000 people were employed in the Civil Service as of March 2025, according to new data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS).
This is up from 548,000 in December 2024 and a rise of 1% year-on-year from 544,000 in March 2024.
Headcount fell to 416,000 in June 2016, the month of the EU referendum.
Since that date, the total has risen steadily, driven chiefly by the impact of Brexit and the Covid-19 pandemic.
The Government announced in April this year that it planned to cut around 2,100 staff from the Cabinet Office, as part of a plan to shrink the Civil Service and reduce the cost of bureaucracy.
Some 1,200 roles will disappear through redundancies, while 900 will be transferred to other departments.
The latest Civil Service headcount of 550,000 is nearly a third higher (32%) than it was in 2016, or an increase of 134,000.
Of the 550,000, almost 443,000 are full-time roles and the remainder are part-time positions.
The last time the quarterly headcount was higher than the current figure was in June 2006, when it stood at 553,000.
The total was on a downwards path during the second half of the 2000s and this trend continued into the 2010s until the EU referendum in 2016, after which the headcount began to climb.
It grew by 40,000 in the years between 2016 and the start of the pandemic, as thousands of people were recruited to manage the complex and lengthy Brexit process.
There was then a further jump once the pandemic was under way, as the Government hired staff to oversee huge projects such as the furlough scheme, testing for Covid-19 and the rollout of the vaccination programme.
Headcount increased by 56,000 between March 2020, when the first lockdown began, and March 2022.
By June 2024, just ahead of the general election on July 4, the total had reached at 546,000, since when the figure has increased by a further 4,000.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves said in March that Civil Service running costs would be reduced by 15% by the end of the decade.
As well as abolishing quangos such as NHS England, ministers have committed to increasing the proportion of civil servants working in digital and data roles, creating a workforce 'fit for the future'.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
4 minutes ago
- Reuters
Bosnia partners with EU to strengthen border security
SARAJEVO, June 11 (Reuters) - Bosnia and Herzegovina on Wednesday signed an agreement with the European Union providing for technical assistance and deployment of EU guards on its borders to control and prevent illegal migration and cross-border crime. The agreement was signed in Brussels by Borjana Kristo, the chairwoman of Bosnia's Council of Ministers, and Magnus Brunner, the EU Commissioner for Internal Affairs and Migration, a statement from Kristo's office said. "The signing today ... is an important step forward on the European path of Bosnia-Herzegovina which has thus fulfilled an EU condition and become a credible partner in securing the external borders of the EU," the statement said. An EU candidate country which has yet to start negotiations on the membership of the 27-member bloc, Bosnia was the only Western Balkan country besides Kosovo that had not signed an arrangement with the EU's border agency Frontex. Thousands of people from the Middle East, Afghanistan, Pakistan and North Africa use the so-called Balkan route, which runs via Turkey, Bulgaria, North Macedonia and Serbia, to reach wealthy Western countries. Frontex can assist EU countries by exercising powers such as border checks and registrations. The EU has said its increased cooperation on border management with the Western Balkan countries has significantly decreased illegal border crossing, with a downward trend continuing in 2025. Bosnia borders EU member Croatia, as well as Serbia and Montenegro, the countries which along with Albania and North Macedonia have signed arrangements with Frontex.
Telegraph
12 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Rayner rough sleeping plan ‘could lead to San Francisco-style tent cities'
Angela Rayner's plans to decriminalise rough sleeping could lead to San Francisco-style tent cities in Britain, the Tories have warned. The Deputy Prime Minister announced on Tuesday that the Vagrancy Act, introduced in 1824 to tackle a worsening homelessness crisis after the Industrial Revolution, will be repealed by next spring. However, the Tories claimed the plans would create a 'charter for chaos' if Labour failed to replace the repealed Act with new offences to tackle nuisance rough sleeping and begging. The Tories' proposals for repealing the Act when they were in government included two offences that would have given police powers to prosecute nuisance beggars and rough sleeping, which covered any damage they did to property and the environment including 'excessive' noise, litter and waste. Labour insists the police will be able to tackle nuisance begging and rough sleeping by using existing powers in the Crime and Policing Act of 2014, which were created to combat anti-social behaviour. Ms Rayner has also proposed new laws to target organised begging by gangs and trespassing with intention to commit a crime to replace powers in the Act which will be repealed. The row comes during a sharp rise in homelessness which has led to encampments sprouting up even in some of the most prosperous areas of cities. Last September, rough sleepers set up a camp of some 24 tents on Park Lane in central London. The number of people classed as living on the streets in London has risen by more than a third (38 per cent) year-on-year to 706 from 511, according to figures for April. The number recorded as sleeping rough in the capital has also increased by 8 per cent, to 4,427 in the three months to March this year, from 4,118 in the same quarter last year. 'Charter for chaos' Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, said: 'Ms Rayner's plans are a charter for chaos. The Government is repealing legislation without providing an adequate replacement. 'The police will not have the powers needed to ensure that high streets and town and city centres are kept clear of nuisance rough sleeping. 'Of course, people need to be helped and supported but the police also need the powers to take action when necessary to maintain order in city centres and maintain a pleasant environment for the majority. 'This move risks turning British cities into a version of San Francisco, which has become overrun by encampments of homeless people. 'We need to ensure support but there needs to be strong enforcement powers as well.' But in a letter to MPs Dame Diana Johnson, the policing minister, said the Government was 'satisfied that generally where nuisance begging meets the threshold of anti-social behaviour, it is open to the police and others to use the existing powers in the Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014'. She said the Home Office would issue statutory guidance to police to 'make this clear' so officers could tackle nuisance begging that caused distress to the public and residents. Two new offences will replace powers which were in the Vagrancy Act, she added. An offence of arranging or facilitating begging for gain would target people who organised begging gangs or drove people to places for them to beg. It would carry a maximum sentence of six months in jail. An offence of trespassing with intent to commit a criminal offence would replicate the one already in the 1824 act with a maximum penalty of three months in jail. Ms Rayner has also secured an extra £233 million this financial year to provide a total of nearly £1 billion for support services to divert homeless people away from the street and rough sleeping and into accommodation.
The National
12 minutes ago
- The National
Scottish Government rules out reopening national park process
With ministers having decided not to proceed with plans to establish a national park in Galloway, Rural Affairs Secretary Mairi Gougeon said she would not be 'reopening' the process. That was despite Galloway having been selected for consideration from a shortlist of five areas. As Gougeon appeared before Holyrood's Rural Affairs Committee, she was pressed on whether one of the other areas could now be considered for national park status. READ MORE: Secondary pupils to receive free school meals in eligibility expansion Noting that the plans for Galloway had been abandoned because of a lack of public support in the area, Green MSP Mark Ruskell said in one of the other shortlisted areas, Tay Forest, a consultation had found a 'large majority support for a national park in that area'. He told the Rural Affairs Secretary: 'You have one area which does have public support, does meet the criteria, what would be the future for a national park in Tay Forest at this point?' Gougeon told him: 'We set out a process to establish or to designate a new national park in Scotland, as far as I am concerned we have completed that process and we have come to a decision not to proceed with that designation. 'So, I wouldn't want you to now think we are going to reopen that or go back to consider other bids, because we have been through that process and that has been completed. 'So, I won't be going back to review those bids or to consider proceeding on that basis.' Gougeon added that ministers are 'open to considering establishing a national park, potentially in the future' but with the next Holyrood elections taking place in May 2026 she stressed that this would be for a future government to consider. Ruskell said: 'That sounds like no more national parks for the foreseeable future, at a time when there are lots of national park proposals being developed in England and elsewhere.' Scotland currently has two national parks, with one in the Cairngorms and one in Loch Lomond and the Trossachs. The Scottish Government's commitment to creating a new one came out of the powersharing agreement between the SNP and the Scottish Greens at Holyrood – a deal which came to an end last year when then first minister Humza Yousaf ejected the smaller party from his government. Gougeon appeared before Holyrood's Rural Affairs Committee some two weeks after she confirmed that the Government would not be proceeding with the proposed national park in Galloway. She told MSPs than that a consultation had found 54% of people were opposed to a national park in the area, with 42% in favour. Among local people, 57% were against the national park bid while 40% were supportive of it, Ms Gougeon added.
