logo
Prince Harry and others criticised by charity watchdog for letting ‘damaging' Sentebale dispute play out in public

Prince Harry and others criticised by charity watchdog for letting ‘damaging' Sentebale dispute play out in public

Independenta day ago
A watchdog has cleared Prince Harry of 'over-reach' at the charity he co-founded – but says a string of failures amounted to mismanagement in its administration.
Regulator the Charity Commission, which investigated Sentebale for four months, has condemned 'all parties to the dispute for allowing it to play out publicly'.
The commission also says the then trustees' failure to resolve disputes internally severely affected the charity's reputation and risked undermining public trust in charities more generally.
Pointing to 'a lack of clarity around role descriptions and internal policies' as the key cause for weaknesses in the management, the watchdog says the confusion inflamed tensions, which culminated in a row and mass resignations of trustees and both founding patrons, the commission found.
In March, Prince Harry and Prince Seeiso of Lesotho, the co-founder, quit as patrons, saying the move was in support of the trustees – who also resigned – in a dispute with chairwoman Sophie Chandauka.
'It is devastating that the relationship between the charity's trustees and the chair of the board broke down beyond repair, creating an untenable situation,' the princes said at the time.
Dr Chandauka said she had reported Sentebale's trustees to the Charity Commission and had taken legal steps to prevent her removal. She also made claims of misconduct.
Prince Seeiso and Prince Harry founded the organisation in 2006 in honour of Harry's mother, Diana, to help young people and children in southern Africa, particularly those with HIV and Aids.
The watchdog said the row began after 2023, when Sentebale's then trustees tried to implement a new fundraising strategy in the United States.
A serious dispute then emerged between Dr Chandauka, some trustees and the Duke of Sussex.
Members of the regulator said that after conducting interviews and reviewing evidence, they found the delegation of certain powers to the chair, including consideration of an executive chair role, was a 'confusing, convoluted and poorly governed' process, with a lack of clearly defined delegations.
The watchdog said the then trustees failed to have proper processes and policies to investigate internal complaints.
'More generally, a lack of clear policies contributed to the failure to resolve disputes,' they concluded.
And the commission said public statements made to the media and criticism made in television interviews, did not serve the charity's best interests.
It found no evidence of widespread or systemic bullying or harassment, including misogyny or racism, but acknowledged 'the strong perception of ill treatment felt by a number of parties to the dispute and the impact this may have had on them personally'.
Nor was there evidence of 'over-reach' by either the chair or the Duke of Sussex, it said.
But the regulator concluded: 'The failure to clarify delegations within the charity to the chair, and the failure to have proper processes for internal complaints, both amount to mismanagement in the administration of the charity.'
The commission has issued Sentebale with a regulatory action plan, saying the charity should have a clearly defined patron role set out in writing.
The plan also includes improving complaints and whistleblowing procedures.
The watchdog said all the charity's then trustees contributed to a missed opportunity to resolve issues that led to the dispute.
Financial difficulties following the Covid-19 pandemic contributed to tensions, it added.
David Holdsworth, chief executive of the Charity Commission, said: 'Sentebale's problems played out in the public eye, enabling a damaging dispute to harm the charity's reputation, risk overshadowing its many achievements, and jeopardising the charity's ability to deliver for the very beneficiaries it was created to serve.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

I am injecting my 13-year-old daughter with fat jabs. This is why I did it, the incredible impact it's already had and why hundreds of parents will follow in my footsteps
I am injecting my 13-year-old daughter with fat jabs. This is why I did it, the incredible impact it's already had and why hundreds of parents will follow in my footsteps

Daily Mail​

time5 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

I am injecting my 13-year-old daughter with fat jabs. This is why I did it, the incredible impact it's already had and why hundreds of parents will follow in my footsteps

Tomorrow evening, just as she has done for the last eight months, Sarah Masterman* will take a small syringe into her 13-year-old daughter Bella's bedroom and swiftly inject medication into one of her thighs. The mother of three is happy to describe this weekly ritual as little short of a lifesaver, although it is not vital emergency medicine that Sarah is administering to her young daughter's body. It is the GLP-1 drug semaglutide, a weight-loss aid better known by brand names such as Ozempic and Wegovy. Teenage Bella is certainly a success story on that front: since Christmas, she has lost three stone, dropping from 11st 7lbs to just over 8st.

Mental health waiting lists: Amy has complex PTSD but has seen a psychiatrist once in 10 years
Mental health waiting lists: Amy has complex PTSD but has seen a psychiatrist once in 10 years

BBC News

time8 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Mental health waiting lists: Amy has complex PTSD but has seen a psychiatrist once in 10 years

As a child, Amy was often violently attacked. At 15, she was threatened with a knife. Now diagnosed with complex PTSD, she's spent over a decade isolated at home with her mum, desperately seeking help. She has seen a psychiatrist only once."I was self harming and felt suicidal and didn't want to be alive anymore," says Amy, who's stuck on the long waiting list for NHS mental health has bounced up and down the list for years despite being known by crisis teams at her local hospital and GP is one of thousands of patients across England caught in the backlog of mental health analysis for the BBC by charity Rethink Mental Illness reveals a stark - and widening - inequality between mental and physical healthcare. There are 12 times more patients waiting longer than 18 months for treatment compared to those with physical four emergency ambulance callouts this year, Amy remains on an indefinite waiting list for severe mental health treatment - with no timeline and no clear path out of crisis."I just get told to wait and that services are struggling," she says. "Sometimes I feel really angry and like screaming and cry all day because I can't move on with my life."Amy finally got onto a college course last year but was asked to leave after a crisis."I feel like I'm going round and round in circles and end up in the same situation every single day," she says. Amy's mum no longer works, in order to care for story reflects the harsh reality behind the statistics: lives unravelling while help remains out of reach. Mental health gap widening While the physical health waiting list in England is declining rapidly, the mental health backlog is not coming down rapidly and remains stubbornly high - leaving vulnerable people like Amy stuck and unsupported."This is an urgent wake-up call," says Brian Dow, deputy chief executive of Rethink Mental Illness. "Long delays worsen outcomes. It becomes more expensive to treat them. They end up in secondary care, which is more complex - and they fall further from work and become more reliant on benefits."The analysis uses data from NHS England's monthly statistics. It includes only adults with severe mental illness that have waited more than 78 be included on the waiting list numbers they have to have been referred by community mental health services for further treatment or assessment. Those waiting for talking therapy for mild anxiety or depression are not included in these statistics.A list of organisations in the UK offering support and information with some of the issues in this story is available at BBC Action the month of May there were 14,586 patients waiting longer than 18 months (78 weeks) for mental health treatment compared to 1,237 people waiting for a physical health operation or Becks Fisher of the Nuffield Trust health think tank said the government had made progress on a pledge to recruit 8,500 more mental health workers but added that access for people referred to mental health services "had not been as prominent" in recent planning and guidance as reducing physical health said that the share of health spending going towards mental health was set to fall in the financial year ending in effect that means departmental funding had been favouring physical health services."Mental health problems disproportionately affect young people," adds Mr Dow. "It makes huge health sense and huge economic sense to prioritise mental health access." What 'good' care looks like A new mental health hub in East London is offering a radically different approach - described as an example of what "good" mental health care could look for walk-in patients without appointments, it provides early intervention in a well-staffed, welcoming space. The effects are already visible - Dr Sheraz Ahmad, a consultant psychiatrist at the centre, says waiting lists have already fallen hub has three consultant psychiatrists and a number of mental health specialists that can offer around-the-clock care. The team here is stable."We want to have conversations early on," explains Dr Ahmad. "Once we understand the problem, we can point people in the right direction - avoiding that vicious circle."Here, it's not just treatment. It's the continuity of care that helps most. "Having access to the same clinicians that know your story everyday makes a huge difference. It builds trust," he says."I come every day and play pool," says Moyna, who is living with schizophrenia."Sometimes I watch TV, listen to music - and feel better."He credits the hub with helping him avoid relapse, and reducing his need for hospital care. He doesn't need an appointment any more to get support and care in times of crisis, and it is all within his neighbourhood. The facility is the first of its kind, with short-stay beds. It is only one of six planned by NHS England from Birmingham to Sheffield, York to hubs, which are tricky to set up and so are unlikely to be able to be scaled up drastically, unite the voluntary sector and the are limited with psychiatrists and infrastructure being the main outlays. Most other staff are volunteers and the east London venue has been provided by a growing calls for more low-cost, high-impact hubs like these, access to this kind of care remains a distant hope for thousands like Amy. Shifting care from hospitals to the community Health Minister Stephen Kinnock acknowledges the reality of mental health care in England: "For far too long people have been let down by the mental health system and that has led to big backlogs."He says the government has a plan to tackle the problems."We're seeing more people present with challenges, and the way to deal with that is shifting support from hospitals into the community," he mental health care, "it's all about prevention" adds Mr Kinnock. That's how he thinks the government can help reduce waiting lists. The gap between mental and physical health waits has grown since Labour came into month, when Amy's mum was discharged after a short hospital stay, she was given a consultant appointment for her physical condition - an undiagnosed heart problem - just a few weeks later. By contrast, Amy continues to wait."We don't know how we're going to get out of this situation," she says. "I want to get a job and go to college and things like that. But we're both just stuck living this life."

Clinics to need licences for Botox fillers in cosmetics crackdown
Clinics to need licences for Botox fillers in cosmetics crackdown

BBC News

time38 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Clinics to need licences for Botox fillers in cosmetics crackdown

The government has announced plans to crack down on dodgy cosmetic practitioners who it says are exploiting people and causing the new proposals, only qualified health professionals will be able to carry out risky non-surgical Brazilian butt lifts (BBLs) and clinics will need to meet strict rules to obtain licences to offer fillers and will also be protected from potentially dangerous beauty trends on social media with age restrictions on certain industry has welcomed the plans, although the government says it now needs to consult further to figure out exactly how this will work in practice. There has been concern over the lack of rules in parts of the non-surgical cosmetic industry for some procedures, such as liquid BBLs, are marketed as non-surgical but are invasive and carry serious risks, experts BBLs are one of the most high-risk procedures which involve filler being injected into the buttocks to make them bigger, more rounded or lifted. Women have told the BBC of dangerous complications, pain and permanent scarring after treatment by rogue operators. In September 2024, Alice Webb is believed to have become the first person to die in the UK after receiving this unregulated government says it will bring in regulations for the most dangerous procedures first - such as breast fillers and BBLs - which means only some qualified health professionals will be able to perform on who can offer lower-risk treatments such as lip fillers, Botox and facial dermal fillers will also change. A licensing scheme run by local authorities will require practitioners to meet strict safety, training and insurance standards before they can it could still be several years before any of these measures comes into force. The plans will be subject to public consultation and must go through Parliament before they are introduced. 'Wild west' Health Minister Karin Smyth said the industry had been plagued by "a Wild West" of "cosmetic cowboys causing serious, catastrophic damage".She said the government was taking action to protect people, support honest practitioners and root out the unqualified, dangerous ones, while also reducing the costs to the NHS of fixing botched procedures."This isn't about stopping anyone from getting treatments. It's about preventing rogue operators from exploiting people at the expense of their safety." A public consultation in 2023 demonstrated widespread support for tighter regulation across the Collins, director of Save Face, a register of approved clinics and practitioners, said she had seen first hand "the devastating impact these procedures can have on the lives of victims and their families"."I am delighted that the government has recognised the significant and potentially fatal risks posed by highly dangerous procedures like liquid BBLs, and has made it a priority to implement restrictions to protect public safety."There are thought to be around 16,000 businesses involved in non-surgical cosmetic procedures, which have seen a huge boom in popularity in recent Joint Council for Cosmetic Practitioners (JCCP) said ensuring all cosmetic practitioners were regulated and licensed, appropriately insured and worked from safe premises had become "imperative"."These proposals have our full support and we welcome the opportunity to engage in further consultation," says JCCP executive chair Prof David Sines. Health officials are currently investigating 38 cases of poisoning following suspected fake Botox public is reminded to make sure they only use registered and qualified practitioners and use products licensed for use in Scottish government recently set out measures to improve the safety and standards of the non-surgical cosmetic procedures industry, following a consultation.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store